Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Farage promises to deport people with ILR

1000 replies

Acidburn · 22/09/2025 12:21

Posting in AIBU for traffic.
Nigel Farage stated he would deport anyone with existing indefinite leave to remain. We are talking about millions of people.
This terrifying. If people live here, work here, have kids and mortgages - where are they supposed to go?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
CoreyFlood · 23/09/2025 08:56

ByQuaintAzureWasp · 23/09/2025 08:34

Needs to give his head a wobble. Why does he think.oeople are bothered about legal immigration ... we desperately need it, our NHS won't survive without it, that's just for starters.

The thing is, I DO have concerns about legal immigration, despite being married to a long term immigrant. It’s been handled very badly, and Brexit caused a massive population shift which was filled in a rush. The policies and processing have been badly thought out and managed.
I can see why people are worried and why it’s become an issue.
So I can have a nuanced discussion , I’m not a “all immigrant lion is great, all the time, diversity, NHS , yay!” head in sand person.
But tackling it by deporting people already settled, often for years, is not the answer.
The current shit show is due to successive government policy. The solution is NOT to demonise and punish innocent British residents.
Farage doesn’t give a shit about this country. He’s the global elite. He only cares about carving up the assets, making a fortune ( all this will make a few people very rich) and probably plans to fuck off to some tax haven leaving us in smoking ruins. He is NOT a patriot he is a traitor in my eyes.
My family is made up of people who have been immigrants here from a couple of generations ago to the last 25 years. I grew up feeling proud to be British, my grandparents who were 1st Gen were proud to be British. Partly because Britain is a country that never succumbed to fascism.
I can’t believe what is happening now.

MalinandGo · 23/09/2025 08:56

Farage and his mates have very successfully harnessed Europe and now immigration as a focus for the legitimate unhappiness of many people at the sustained lack of political engagement in improving the lives of people in post-industrial Britain, which worsened as public services were slashed by the bullshit austerity policy. Their efforts so far have made a lot of them much richer and made the lives of most of us much worse. But they continue to promise to make everything better and in a political vacuum exacerbated by COVID and Brexit they sound deeply appealing. Don’t we all want things to be better?

The aim of the Reform leaders is to get as much money through political levers as they can. That’s all it’s ever been. And most of them hold racist/sexist/homophobic views.

Digdongdoo · 23/09/2025 08:56

NautilusLionfish · 23/09/2025 07:56

Did he have to do any tests again like you do when getting ilr? I just find the processes tedious but I need to. Especially as it makes my travels to Europe easier

He'd done everything for ILR already, so it was very simple. It is tedious, but it was by far the simplest part of the whole process for us. Only waited about 6 weeks for an answer too (though I expect waiting times will shoot up in light of this).

Twiglets1 · 23/09/2025 08:58

Onegingerhead · 23/09/2025 08:52

Not “some” — most. Let’s be honest: £60k is a lot of money. I know Mumsnet likes to pretend a “moderate” salary starts at £100k, but even in professional fields, with the highest possible qualifications, the £60k threshold is out of reach for the majority.

And as for the comforting idea that settled status holders will somehow be spared — I don’t buy it. Not for a second. Farage and his crowd will keep stirring shit up, because that’s what the want

Ok we can agree on "most" which isn't everyone which is the misinformation I was trying to correct.

I do think EU nationals are different because of the Brexit agreement. Farage will do his best to chip away at that if he gets into power (unlikely) but Brussels would have to agree.

If I was an EU national I wouldn't be overly worried about this but I would try to get dual citizenship if my home country allowed it, to be on the safe side.

RasaSayangEh · 23/09/2025 08:58

IceLollyMolly · 23/09/2025 08:50

So basically you are saying ILRs need to build plans, get their kids into schools, buy houses on the basis of a fragile renewable visa? Oh and earn above £ 60 k, and often pay 40% tax.
The UK is not the UAE with 0 tax to make this kind of temporary integration attractive.

I think what Nige's supporters are saying is that people of non-100%-British extraction are either not-quite-human service units, or parasites.

If said people have correctly gone through all the steps to be legally resident and now hold documentation stating "indefinite" Nige's supporters want to retrospectively move the goalposts so that this is now irrelevant. If said people have made their lives here for decades, raised families, built careers, made friends, paid into pensions, bought homes, they should not have done so because only humans do that.

Oh, but they're also not to worry because they'll be grateful to keep proving their usefulness as service units every few years, until it's deemed (probably by more moving of goalposts) that they now fall into the category of parasites.

But with naice wording.

MalinandGo · 23/09/2025 08:58

IceLollyMolly · 23/09/2025 08:53

I passed the test in July on my first try, as did my family. Get the book and practice online.
It's easy enough if you study for about 3 weeks. Though a couple of my British friends flunked.

Edited

I’m sure it’s easy to pass if you put the work in. Assuming of course no issues taking tests in general, which some will have (while still being able to contribute to our country). It’s bullshit right though? Given how much of it is utterly irrelevant to anyone’s life.

Toastandbutterand · 23/09/2025 09:00

Twiglets1 · 23/09/2025 08:38

See above - not "everyone will be deported" because it will be replaced by a work visa scheme.

Edited

I find the fact you don't care about people who have lived here their entire lives, who have made their home here, who have raised children, who have contributed not just financially, but also socially to the UK, absolutely staggering.

These people were promised indefinite leave to remain. This is revoking something that is currently their legal right.

and you're just ok with that?

Onegingerhead · 23/09/2025 09:01

MalinandGo · 23/09/2025 08:47

DH has just told me that two of his senior staff are now going to go for citizenship as a result of yesterday and questions on the test are flying around his team to see who can answer them. Most people have no idea. (I assume though that this would be remedied by sitting with the book and revising it - although the Wars of the Roses presumably remains a challenge!)

ETA both are professionals in an internationally recognised field. Many people in these roles do not earn over 60k.

Edited

No, you really do need to study for the test! There was quite a bit of new information for me — some of it not exactly useful in day-to-day life (the Wars of the Roses, for instance). I doubt I’d have passed without doing some proper revision.

A friend just told me there’s an app now with practice questions and mock tests, which sounds handy.

Twiglets1 · 23/09/2025 09:01

IceLollyMolly · 23/09/2025 08:50

So basically you are saying ILRs need to build plans, get their kids into schools, buy houses on the basis of a fragile renewable visa? Oh and earn above £ 60 k, and often pay 40% tax.
The UK is not the UAE with 0 tax to make this kind of temporary integration attractive.

I'm not saying that at all. I'm reporting factually about what Farage said at the press conference.

Agree it would make the UK very unattractive to non EU nationals.

And for existing non EU nationals, it would be unethical to deport people already settled in the UK.

Allisnotlost1 · 23/09/2025 09:03

Abhannmor · 23/09/2025 08:51

This is the problem when you are a single issue party and you need to replace that issue. Reform are not allowed to talk about B*** any more as Farage finds it a bit awks.

But they haven't got a scooby what to do about the economy so that leaves picking on minorities. This works as a displacement activity for their supporters who know B*** is a shit show and need to deflect their bitterness and rage onto someone or something else.

Like their hero Trump, they have learned how to generate headlines on a daily basis. But not how to govern a nation of seventy million people.

See the mess of their health policy and connection with a vaccine conspiracist.

Twiglets1 · 23/09/2025 09:04

Toastandbutterand · 23/09/2025 09:00

I find the fact you don't care about people who have lived here their entire lives, who have made their home here, who have raised children, who have contributed not just financially, but also socially to the UK, absolutely staggering.

These people were promised indefinite leave to remain. This is revoking something that is currently their legal right.

and you're just ok with that?

No I'm not "ok with that" and have said so already on this thread.

I think it would be an unethical thing to do.

Nevertheless, facts matter and it is not the case that "everyone with ILR would be deported" that is misinformation.

CoreyFlood · 23/09/2025 09:09

Toastandbutterand · 23/09/2025 09:00

I find the fact you don't care about people who have lived here their entire lives, who have made their home here, who have raised children, who have contributed not just financially, but also socially to the UK, absolutely staggering.

These people were promised indefinite leave to remain. This is revoking something that is currently their legal right.

and you're just ok with that?

This is it- and what about pensions?? In about 10 years my husband will have his 35 years NI contributions, so will have been supporting the pensions of current British elderly. When it’s his turn, will the government says, cheers, now fuck of “home”??
And it’s not as simple as “ just apply for Citizenship”
I have said this before but why would you become a citizen of a country you increasingly feel doesn’t want you? What if then they go after naturalised Brits? And your country of origin didn’t allow dual citizenship anyway, so where do you go then??

BloominNora · 23/09/2025 09:09

BundleBoogie · 22/09/2025 22:00

Aah, so now, because certain aspects of the service level offered by a hotel that has been advertised as 4 up until its closure for use by asylum seekers are no longer available, you are claiming that asylum seekers are not being put into 4 hotels??

A bit of a desperate reach, no?

As you can see, the standard of amenities are quite important in the rating:

From the London Hotel website.

A 4 star hotel is defined as a hotel that provides above-average, deluxe service and experience for the guest. A 4 star hotel has a larger range of facilities available and the design is high quality. All service standards are aimed towards pleasing the guest. A 4 star hotel may have some of the following features:

  • A clearly designated reception area, open 24 hours a day
  • A restaurant or dining area that serves breakfast and dinner throughout the week
  • A liquor license and an area where beverages can be served
  • Room service available 24/7, with a cooked breakfast and full dinner option
  • A phone and WiFi service in every room
  • A fitness centre, a spa, or a swimming pool on-site or nearby
  • A concierge service, luggage assistance, and laundry service
  • Spacious and well-furnished rooms, with a minibar, a safe, a work desk, and a flat-screen TV
  • High-quality bed linen, towels, and bath products
  • Extra services, such as afternoon tea, welcome drinks, or turndown service

I don't understand this post - have you intentionally disproved your own point in an attempt to be ironic and show the ridiculousness of the argument?

Of all of those things you have listed as needing to be provided by a four star hotel - which ones do you think are actually being provided to asylum seekers housed there?

You could argue that they have wifi and access to dinner and breakfast, but the food won't be of the same standard you would expect of a 4* hotel and it certainly won't be waiter service.

They won't be getting anything else on that list. You said in another post "Why wouldn't they open the door to the pool and sauna?" Quite simply because of cost - costs to keep a pool and sauna heated, clean and hygienic are.astronomical!

You also talked about 1000 men arriving each day - again, that is just not true. 1000 people arrived in one day once, but it is not every day. The average is around 100 per day and that includes women and children, not just men.

That average is likely to reduce before the end of the year because higher numbers over the summer due to good weather have bolstered it, but those numbers will reduce as we head into autumn and winter, lowering the average.

You're hearing hooves....stop thinking Zebras and think horses instead!

BundleBoogie · 23/09/2025 09:10

BadgesforBadgers · 23/09/2025 08:08

I have no words to describe how angry I am that people are trying to justify or defend this ridiculous, unworkable stream of nonsense from that fascist grifter.

I don't believe people are stupid enough to genuinely think asylum seekers and migrants are receiving a 4 star service in our hotels. That has to be weaponised ignorance.

Now to go after people that are quietly going about their lives , contributing to the economy, is disgusting. To defend this is just as bad.

Can I respectfully suggest you take a break and calm down and read what people actually said. No one said they are getting 4* service in hotels.

Some are being accommodated in 4 hotels where accommodation and facilities are part of the rating. The hotels were advertised and sold as 4 tight up until their closure. PPs suggesting that is not the case because due to planning laws the hotels are now known as asylum seeker accommodation is mindblowingly dishonest.

I am also confused as to why you think these hotels are not staffed or provide clean bedding as that would have meant mass redundancies of hotel staff which I would hope we would have heard about from the media (but can’t trust them either these days).

Seriously, stop being ‘disgusted’ at people telling you facts.

IceLollyMolly · 23/09/2025 09:12

I guess the UK is moving towards the UAE model. Where foreigners are just service units to work and pay taxes, and useless if they don't pay enough or get sick. Except the UAE has zero tax, so that makes it attractive for people to come in for a few years, then leave.

Many will like the simple and brutal UAE model. It doesn't make for a very cohesive society though.

Toastandbutterand · 23/09/2025 09:12

Twiglets1 · 23/09/2025 09:04

No I'm not "ok with that" and have said so already on this thread.

I think it would be an unethical thing to do.

Nevertheless, facts matter and it is not the case that "everyone with ILR would be deported" that is misinformation.

He said everyone.

He has now backtracked. Added in little provisos. But he said everyone.

Falseknock · 23/09/2025 09:13

BundleBoogie · 23/09/2025 08:12

It’s quite mind blowing that you’re doubling down on this bizarre claim but ok.

The government and media reports on this refer to them as hotels.

The buildings haven’t changed.

The facilities haven’t changed.

The bedding (mentioned upthread) hasn’t changed (unless they’ve bought in brand new for the asylum seekers - there are reports of new beds and tv equipment so maybe?)

The staffing hasn’t changed (unless you’re suggesting there has been mass redundancies of hotel staff which is entirely possible as the media often refuse to report these stories)

You have made some extremely big assumptions based on zero information (pesky media again) but think about it. Why wouldn’t they open the pool for the men to have something to do? Why wouldn’t they let them in the sauna?

The staff in these hotels are looking after large numbers of single bored men. One has already paid with her life, and several rapes have occurred (one in Hyde Park by a known terrorist from Egypt in an asylum seekers hotel) it wouldn’t be a surprise if they tried to occupy them to reduce the time they are on the streets harassing schoolgirls.

I think you need to read up a bit and understand what you are actually talking about.

Define what a hotel is? You have bought into fear what is being told to you by the media.
I fear for my children if that's the ignorance they have to put up with.

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://youtu.be/SP8fgPs4N7M?si=d6aTtlSZRQKT7LvP

Smilingintherain · 23/09/2025 09:16

RasaSayangEh · 23/09/2025 08:58

I think what Nige's supporters are saying is that people of non-100%-British extraction are either not-quite-human service units, or parasites.

If said people have correctly gone through all the steps to be legally resident and now hold documentation stating "indefinite" Nige's supporters want to retrospectively move the goalposts so that this is now irrelevant. If said people have made their lives here for decades, raised families, built careers, made friends, paid into pensions, bought homes, they should not have done so because only humans do that.

Oh, but they're also not to worry because they'll be grateful to keep proving their usefulness as service units every few years, until it's deemed (probably by more moving of goalposts) that they now fall into the category of parasites.

But with naice wording.

I understood the policy is aimed at new arrivals who are low skilled and will claim benefits.

It is NOT aimed at people who have been here decades, have settled families, good jobs, own homes, private pensions, and not benefit claimants.

The first description costs the UK much more than the second. The point of the policy is to reduce spending.

EasternStandard · 23/09/2025 09:17

IceLollyMolly · 23/09/2025 08:50

So basically you are saying ILRs need to build plans, get their kids into schools, buy houses on the basis of a fragile renewable visa? Oh and earn above £ 60 k, and often pay 40% tax.
The UK is not the UAE with 0 tax to make this kind of temporary integration attractive.

If people are buying houses and feeling like they want to be here long term why at that stage wouldn’t a move to citizenship be a good idea?

Toastandbutterand · 23/09/2025 09:19

Smilingintherain · 23/09/2025 09:16

I understood the policy is aimed at new arrivals who are low skilled and will claim benefits.

It is NOT aimed at people who have been here decades, have settled families, good jobs, own homes, private pensions, and not benefit claimants.

The first description costs the UK much more than the second. The point of the policy is to reduce spending.

He literally said yesterday it does apply to those people.

There are literal newspaper articles with the headline that he will REVOKE ILR.

It is right there. Why are you not believing what he is telling you?

DuncinToffee · 23/09/2025 09:20

Smilingintherain · 23/09/2025 09:16

I understood the policy is aimed at new arrivals who are low skilled and will claim benefits.

It is NOT aimed at people who have been here decades, have settled families, good jobs, own homes, private pensions, and not benefit claimants.

The first description costs the UK much more than the second. The point of the policy is to reduce spending.

Newly arrived immigrants can't claim benefits

You do know the UK has a point based immigration system?

Notonthestairs · 23/09/2025 09:21

Smilingintherain · 23/09/2025 09:16

I understood the policy is aimed at new arrivals who are low skilled and will claim benefits.

It is NOT aimed at people who have been here decades, have settled families, good jobs, own homes, private pensions, and not benefit claimants.

The first description costs the UK much more than the second. The point of the policy is to reduce spending.

It’s retrospective. So it will cover people who have lived here for years.

IceLollyMolly · 23/09/2025 09:22

EasternStandard · 23/09/2025 09:17

If people are buying houses and feeling like they want to be here long term why at that stage wouldn’t a move to citizenship be a good idea?

Because (1) Many countries don't allow dual citizenship. Mine doesn't. If Reform comes in and decides to remove citizenship, I will be stateless. I have zero faith in the British government now.

(2) I am eligible for citizenship next year. By then, Labour may extend it to 10 years for citizenship. And if Reform comes in, that will be a pointless wait as they will take it away again.

(3) It's very expensive.

Toastandbutterand · 23/09/2025 09:22

EasternStandard · 23/09/2025 09:17

If people are buying houses and feeling like they want to be here long term why at that stage wouldn’t a move to citizenship be a good idea?

Perhaps because it's not legally necessary.

Perhaps they'd like to keep a bit of protection in case fascists are elected.
I mean, it's ok for farage to have an EU passport too isn't it?

Twiglets1 · 23/09/2025 09:25

Toastandbutterand · 23/09/2025 09:12

He said everyone.

He has now backtracked. Added in little provisos. But he said everyone.

EU nationals are not “little provisos” and he clearly said a work visa would replace ILR which at least some non EU migrants would qualify for.

The Reform proposal is bad enough it doesn’t need exaggerating.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.