Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Starmer’s support for Palestine

794 replies

Steph888 · 21/09/2025 15:39

Am I alone in seeing this as one of the darkest days in UK history?

Never before did I think I’d end up living under a government who reward terrorism.

Starmer and Labour are grotesque. History will not be kind to them. They have now empowered all terrorists and their supporters.

We deserve such better than this reprehensible government. They disgust me.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
35
KhakiTiger · 22/09/2025 10:40

SirHumphreyRocks · 22/09/2025 07:45

😂😂😂

Starmer is about as Marxist or far left as Hitler was a real humanitarian.

What is most hysterical about this is that many of Marxisms greatest figures were Jewish, and one of the greatest anti-semitic lies is the Jewish Bolshevism conspiracy theory which was used by Hitler to justify his final solution. Marxists are bothered about Gaza because of the genocide, and that includes Jewish Marxists. None of which are likely to be members of the Labour Party.

Marxists are not bothered about much. Bothering takes brain power.

peasporrige · 22/09/2025 10:46

anotherside · 21/09/2025 22:07

They’ve dropped explosives equivalent to five Hiroshima nuclear bombs on Gaza so far, obliterating almost every school, hospital and landmark and killing tens of thousands of children in the process. People hate Netanyahu and his cronies because they’re fucking evil.

And Hamas aren't fucking evil?

Really?

KimberleyClark · 22/09/2025 10:47

Livelovebehappy · 22/09/2025 09:49

The difference bring herzog are not a recognised terrorist regime. Hamas are internationally recognised as terrorists.

The Irgun were a recognised terrorist organisation, they used bombs and targeted innocent people, and their actions led to the establishment of Israel. Their leader Menachem Begin eventually became prime minister.

TempestTost · 22/09/2025 10:52

I understand why governments are doing this but I think it is unlikely to work.

Most of this situation has been very deliberately manufactured by Hamas, they are making decisions, including deliberate war crimes against their own people, that are intended to manufacture a mass killing of their own people.

Hiding munitions in hospitals, hiding soldiers with civilians, these are war crimes - and I don't mean metaphorically, I mean according to international law - because they inevitably mean it becomes impossible to differentiate military from civilian targets and will result in the exact kinds of horrors laws of war were written to prevent.

So that has now been successful, there is no reason for Hamas to change their tactics and it will solidify their hold on the Palestinian people, who they are entirely willing to sacrifice as martyrs for their cause.

peasporrige · 22/09/2025 10:55

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

peasporrige · 22/09/2025 11:00

Spiritofeden87 · 21/09/2025 18:35

God - some of the pro - Israel propaganda in here is scary.

It’s like that thread that got deleted on Mumsnet talking about how what starving looks like and how the people of Gaza couldn’t be starving as they weren’t thin enough.

Absolutely devoid of any compassion.

I would also dispute that they are starving.

All the footage I have seen from Gaza shows well-fed people going about their business using donkey carts pulled by well-fed donkeys.

If they were starving, those donkeys would have been killed and eaten.

JodieTatum · 22/09/2025 11:02

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

EasternStandard · 22/09/2025 11:10

TempestTost · 22/09/2025 10:52

I understand why governments are doing this but I think it is unlikely to work.

Most of this situation has been very deliberately manufactured by Hamas, they are making decisions, including deliberate war crimes against their own people, that are intended to manufacture a mass killing of their own people.

Hiding munitions in hospitals, hiding soldiers with civilians, these are war crimes - and I don't mean metaphorically, I mean according to international law - because they inevitably mean it becomes impossible to differentiate military from civilian targets and will result in the exact kinds of horrors laws of war were written to prevent.

So that has now been successful, there is no reason for Hamas to change their tactics and it will solidify their hold on the Palestinian people, who they are entirely willing to sacrifice as martyrs for their cause.

I’m not sure how it goes from this to peace. Hamas feel they have victory but then what happens

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 22/09/2025 12:04

On top of everything else, how could Palestinians hold an election and elect a new govt whilst this conflict is still going on?

I know Hamas aren’t a legitimate govt but they can’t get a legitimate govt under this all ends.

We need to end the conflict before they can do that.

So in order to end the conflict we have to recognise that Palestine is a state - even with the illegitimate govt they have. Lots of countries have terrible govts and we don’t say they don’t exist.

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 22/09/2025 12:09

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Sorry but this is horrifying. You wanted Irish people in NI to wait generations to be treated with basic dignity in their own country? Until they could “lie down and breed” enough people to have a majority?

The NI people who became terrorists didn’t just do so because they wanted a united Ireland, with everything else having been rosy. They were being subjected to systematic discrimination in a multitude of ways ever since Ireland was petitioned. It took a very long time before they went from that to terrorism (those who did, which was by no means everyone or even a majority).

I’m not saying terrorism is ever justified, but your post is incredibly offensive.

KimberleyClark · 22/09/2025 12:11

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 22/09/2025 12:09

Sorry but this is horrifying. You wanted Irish people in NI to wait generations to be treated with basic dignity in their own country? Until they could “lie down and breed” enough people to have a majority?

The NI people who became terrorists didn’t just do so because they wanted a united Ireland, with everything else having been rosy. They were being subjected to systematic discrimination in a multitude of ways ever since Ireland was petitioned. It took a very long time before they went from that to terrorism (those who did, which was by no means everyone or even a majority).

I’m not saying terrorism is ever justified, but your post is incredibly offensive.

This.

Kpo58 · 22/09/2025 13:07

Namelessnelly · 22/09/2025 08:22

So where are the marches demanding the hostages are freed. Where are the placards condemning Hamas? How will recognising Hamas as a legitimate government help anyone? Surely demanding the hostages are freed and demanding Hamas apologise and face sanctions will de escalate things? Taking away Israel’s justification for the war may help. Hamas are claiming this as a victory. So the terrorists get rewarded.

If Israel hadn't been killing a disproportionate amount of people per hostage held, then people would be marching for the hostages to be released.

It's like when you have 2 kids. One has wound up the other and wound up one hits the other in the face with a frying pan. The one with the frying pan is the one that gets told off. If they hadn't of done that, the one winding up the other would have been told off.

peasporrige · 22/09/2025 13:33

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 22/09/2025 12:09

Sorry but this is horrifying. You wanted Irish people in NI to wait generations to be treated with basic dignity in their own country? Until they could “lie down and breed” enough people to have a majority?

The NI people who became terrorists didn’t just do so because they wanted a united Ireland, with everything else having been rosy. They were being subjected to systematic discrimination in a multitude of ways ever since Ireland was petitioned. It took a very long time before they went from that to terrorism (those who did, which was by no means everyone or even a majority).

I’m not saying terrorism is ever justified, but your post is incredibly offensive.

My suggestion is a lot less offensive than the fighting that killed 3,600 and wounded 30,000 people.

Even their own countrymen/women in Ireland didn't support them.

Barrister and media personality Joe Brolly recently set social media alight with some comments taken from a longer interview. Brolly asserted that the Northern Ireland Troubles saw the emergence of a southern orthodoxy whereby "nationalists in the north were to blame".

He was then joined by one-time MP and long-time rights activist Bernadette McAliskey, who argued that "the northern Catholic was and still is looked on by the southern state as not worth the trouble". The words aroused a strong sense of approval among a considerable demographic within the north; many of whom feel that southern Irish society did indeed 'fail' them.

Nonetheless, it is clear that a considerable majority of southerners were critical of the PIRA and wider republican violence and it is this, rather than blanket rejection, which forms the feeling of historical alienation among a certain northern cohort. As with most northern Catholics, the southern Irish could see the logic of the civil rights movement as a response to the situation faced by the minority there. But they could not see the proportion or moral justification in endlessly bombing and shooting British soldiers, and more especially policemen, civil servants, and members of the public.

Going even further back in history an often forgotten fact about the Battle of the Boyne in 1690 was that the Pope of the day supported the Protestant King William of Orange against the supporters of the deposed Catholic King James II of England.
This unusual alliance came about because the Papacy, then a world power, was at odds with King Louis XIV of France, who was an ally of King James.
It is said that a Mass of deliverance was celebrated in Rome after King William's victory.

Echobelly · 22/09/2025 15:47

Kpo58 · 22/09/2025 13:07

If Israel hadn't been killing a disproportionate amount of people per hostage held, then people would be marching for the hostages to be released.

It's like when you have 2 kids. One has wound up the other and wound up one hits the other in the face with a frying pan. The one with the frying pan is the one that gets told off. If they hadn't of done that, the one winding up the other would have been told off.

Yes, I think you have to imagine this scenario without the identities of the people involved. If Israel were 'People A' and Palestine were 'People B', who would most people feel most sympathetic with?

Yes, representatives of B did something appaling to A and a handful of hostages from A remain in terrible peril and conditions, if they are alive at all. But A's cities are still standing, they have schools, hospitals, running water, universities, cultural institutions. No one there is dying of starvation. A has one of the most advanced and best funded armies in the world. B isn't even allowed an army, though a milirary they are armed by some rich and powerful countries.

Is it surprising if people are thinking primarily of the status of country B?

ThatCyanCat · 22/09/2025 15:50

Kpo58 · 22/09/2025 13:07

If Israel hadn't been killing a disproportionate amount of people per hostage held, then people would be marching for the hostages to be released.

It's like when you have 2 kids. One has wound up the other and wound up one hits the other in the face with a frying pan. The one with the frying pan is the one that gets told off. If they hadn't of done that, the one winding up the other would have been told off.

If Israel hadn't been killing a disproportionate amount of people per hostage held, then people would be marching for the hostages to be released.

Hey. Pssst. Wanna buy a bridge?

PotholesAnonymous · 22/09/2025 15:59

In case it's useful to anyone - here is a proforma email to send to your MP to request them to clarify their stance now that the UK formerly recognises the state of Palestine:

Dear . . . . .

In light of the action by the Labour Government to state that the UK now formerly recognise the state of Palestine, and as a member of your constituency, I am writing to you, as my MP, to request that you:

  1. disavow your recent vote to ban Palestine Action and to nullify all actions against people peacefully protesting in solidarity with Palestinians
  2. acknowledge that Israeli actions clearly fit the legal definition of genocide
  3. join other Labour MPs in signing Early Day Motion 1310 calling for the immediate suspension of all UK arms sales to Israel.

Can you please update me on your stance and intentions on each of these 3 requests along with your justification for each?

Thank you

SirHumphreyRocks · 22/09/2025 16:33

peasporrige · 22/09/2025 13:33

My suggestion is a lot less offensive than the fighting that killed 3,600 and wounded 30,000 people.

Even their own countrymen/women in Ireland didn't support them.

Barrister and media personality Joe Brolly recently set social media alight with some comments taken from a longer interview. Brolly asserted that the Northern Ireland Troubles saw the emergence of a southern orthodoxy whereby "nationalists in the north were to blame".

He was then joined by one-time MP and long-time rights activist Bernadette McAliskey, who argued that "the northern Catholic was and still is looked on by the southern state as not worth the trouble". The words aroused a strong sense of approval among a considerable demographic within the north; many of whom feel that southern Irish society did indeed 'fail' them.

Nonetheless, it is clear that a considerable majority of southerners were critical of the PIRA and wider republican violence and it is this, rather than blanket rejection, which forms the feeling of historical alienation among a certain northern cohort. As with most northern Catholics, the southern Irish could see the logic of the civil rights movement as a response to the situation faced by the minority there. But they could not see the proportion or moral justification in endlessly bombing and shooting British soldiers, and more especially policemen, civil servants, and members of the public.

Going even further back in history an often forgotten fact about the Battle of the Boyne in 1690 was that the Pope of the day supported the Protestant King William of Orange against the supporters of the deposed Catholic King James II of England.
This unusual alliance came about because the Papacy, then a world power, was at odds with King Louis XIV of France, who was an ally of King James.
It is said that a Mass of deliverance was celebrated in Rome after King William's victory.

Your view of Ireland is as limited as your view of Palestine.

LaLaflower · 22/09/2025 17:52

PotholesAnonymous · 22/09/2025 15:59

In case it's useful to anyone - here is a proforma email to send to your MP to request them to clarify their stance now that the UK formerly recognises the state of Palestine:

Dear . . . . .

In light of the action by the Labour Government to state that the UK now formerly recognise the state of Palestine, and as a member of your constituency, I am writing to you, as my MP, to request that you:

  1. disavow your recent vote to ban Palestine Action and to nullify all actions against people peacefully protesting in solidarity with Palestinians
  2. acknowledge that Israeli actions clearly fit the legal definition of genocide
  3. join other Labour MPs in signing Early Day Motion 1310 calling for the immediate suspension of all UK arms sales to Israel.

Can you please update me on your stance and intentions on each of these 3 requests along with your justification for each?

Thank you

Thank you for this. I will email my local MP and get their opinion.

PotholesAnonymous · 22/09/2025 19:04

LaLaflower · 22/09/2025 17:52

Thank you for this. I will email my local MP and get their opinion.

Make sure you correct my misspelling of 'formerly' to 'formally' 😉

EatMoreChocolate44 · 22/09/2025 19:13

anotherside · 21/09/2025 22:14

Many people in Israel literally believe that Palestinian children are guilty and deserve everything they’ve suffered. For example :

And from politicians:
“The children in Gaza brought it upon themselves,' said Israeli Member of the Knesset Merav Ben-Ari during a debate about protecting civilians in the Gaza Strip.

And
“The enemy is not Hamas. Every child, every baby in Gaza is an enemy,” Former member of the Knesset Moshe Feiglin said during an interview.

That's horrendous. It's frightening and disgusting that some posters on here seem to think the same. I despair of humanity sometimes.

gingerelephant · 22/09/2025 20:33

So now the U.K. has recognised Palestine it needs to ensure it upholds the law ie the authorities within the state work to free the hostages, to condemn the terror in the newly recognised state

Beachtastic · 22/09/2025 21:24

I've given up on these threads, it's just too depressing.

Each side thinks "You either get it or you don't" and no one will budge, ever, so what's the point?

The same old arguments round and round in circles, but I get particularly fed up with "ah but the 40 beheaded babies was debunked, ya" and "How dare the Jews of all people repeat the Holocaust in Gaza and then pretend to be human."

Conflicts, maybe especially Middle Eastern conflicts, are hard to make sense of at the best of times, but the way some people make sense of this one takes my breath away at times.

PotholesAnonymous · 22/09/2025 21:27

and now Macron!!

People are waking up at last

Lollypop267 · 22/09/2025 21:36

ButtCheek · 21/09/2025 16:34

Fucking this a million times. People just hate Jews though.

Oh do be quiet 😴

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 22/09/2025 22:03

peasporrige · 22/09/2025 13:33

My suggestion is a lot less offensive than the fighting that killed 3,600 and wounded 30,000 people.

Even their own countrymen/women in Ireland didn't support them.

Barrister and media personality Joe Brolly recently set social media alight with some comments taken from a longer interview. Brolly asserted that the Northern Ireland Troubles saw the emergence of a southern orthodoxy whereby "nationalists in the north were to blame".

He was then joined by one-time MP and long-time rights activist Bernadette McAliskey, who argued that "the northern Catholic was and still is looked on by the southern state as not worth the trouble". The words aroused a strong sense of approval among a considerable demographic within the north; many of whom feel that southern Irish society did indeed 'fail' them.

Nonetheless, it is clear that a considerable majority of southerners were critical of the PIRA and wider republican violence and it is this, rather than blanket rejection, which forms the feeling of historical alienation among a certain northern cohort. As with most northern Catholics, the southern Irish could see the logic of the civil rights movement as a response to the situation faced by the minority there. But they could not see the proportion or moral justification in endlessly bombing and shooting British soldiers, and more especially policemen, civil servants, and members of the public.

Going even further back in history an often forgotten fact about the Battle of the Boyne in 1690 was that the Pope of the day supported the Protestant King William of Orange against the supporters of the deposed Catholic King James II of England.
This unusual alliance came about because the Papacy, then a world power, was at odds with King Louis XIV of France, who was an ally of King James.
It is said that a Mass of deliverance was celebrated in Rome after King William's victory.

This is just a load of random facts you know, it’s not addressing what I said or the point you were previously making at all.