Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Starmer’s support for Palestine

794 replies

Steph888 · 21/09/2025 15:39

Am I alone in seeing this as one of the darkest days in UK history?

Never before did I think I’d end up living under a government who reward terrorism.

Starmer and Labour are grotesque. History will not be kind to them. They have now empowered all terrorists and their supporters.

We deserve such better than this reprehensible government. They disgust me.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
35
Honesting · 21/09/2025 21:45

ThatDreamyLemonBiscuit · 21/09/2025 21:41

Britain has more responsibility than most. It promised statehood to the Jewish and Arab occupants of the land. We are very much complicit (even before you get onto the issue of military support and arms sales).

(I agree with you condemning the "From the River to the Sea" slogan's use in here, though).

And what was wrong with that promise? They actually gave 77% of the promised land to Jordan, then (in the partition plan) a further 45% of the remainder was offered to the Arabs. They rejected it, as they have every single offer for statehood and attempt at peace ever since.

The Arabs were never interested in having a state, all they want is for Jews not to have any sovereignty in their ancestral homeland.

Upbraidy · 21/09/2025 21:46

ThatDreamyLemonBiscuit · 21/09/2025 21:41

Britain has more responsibility than most. It promised statehood to the Jewish and Arab occupants of the land. We are very much complicit (even before you get onto the issue of military support and arms sales).

(I agree with you condemning the "From the River to the Sea" slogan's use in here, though).

We’re no more complicit than all the other states that have had a hand in that part of the Middle East. I don’t see Turkey wringing their hands over it.

ThatDreamyLemonBiscuit · 21/09/2025 21:46

Upbraidy · 21/09/2025 21:44

Saying ‘the English/Israelis made them terrorists’ is pure emotional manipulation. ‘Look what you made me do’. Sometimes government action makes terrorism more likely but it never justifies it.

Presumably you'd then agree that there's no excuse for the multitude of Israeli warcrimes that have occurred since the Nova Festival massacre, then?

Livelovebehappy · 21/09/2025 21:54

Kpo58 · 21/09/2025 21:40

No it's not. You can recognise the right for a country to exist without recognising legitimacy of the leaders of said country.

If Palestine doesn't exist then Israel isn't stealing land or displacing/destroying the population of said land as they don't exist and have no rights.

But what happens when we have to sit round a table with these people? If we are recognising the existence of a Palestinian state, then surely with that comes the potential for having to sit and discuss issues of global importance with the terrorist leaders? On that basis alone, it was a stupid move by Starmer. Surely the best way would have been to ensure the elimination of Hamas and to move towards putting in a stable government before acknowledging existence.

EsmeSusanOgg · 21/09/2025 21:54

Livelovebehappy · 21/09/2025 21:38

Why do people keep comparing the Northern Ireland peace agreement with what’s happening in Gaza? Northern Ireland is part of the UK. We had to make unpalatable decisions to promote peace in our country. Gaza is somewhere in the Middle East which is nothing to do with us. Not our circus….

Because experts in international diplomacy have been comparing Sinn Fein/ IRA to Hamas (of different parts of Hamas. It's not 100% unified) for decades? Because diplomats have said at various points in time there has been scope for guided diplomatic talks between representatives from the Israeli government and Hamas over the years?

I would expect those would be the reasons.

No political situation is exactly the same as another. But we do have examples of how different attempts to heal divisions have/ have not worked. For example the positives and negatives about the truth and reconciliation process in post-apartheid South Africa (the successes attributed to the personality and unifying presence of Mandela, but the challenges being around successors/ lack of natural unifying figure post-Mandela). The challenges that came out of the Dayton Accords which has led to effectively three governments rotating in Bosnia-Herzegovina rather than a true post conflict solution. If you want to get a good grounding in the background there's an excellent book by the late Paddy Ashdown who was involved in both Northern Ireland and Bosnia.

But yes, there is a good reason people are comparing the two scenarios.

Mummy7777 · 21/09/2025 21:55

Whatado · 21/09/2025 15:45

Personally I would find that fact they have willing and quite publicly supported a modern day version of Hitler undertake a genocide in the world view more disgusting.

The Israeli government make me want to believe hell is an actual place.

What has been allowed to happen in Palestine will go down in History as one of the vilest episodes of modern day history.

Edited

This!

peasporrige · 21/09/2025 21:56

@SirHumphreyRocks "Actually it is the UN and every civilised nation in the world that insists that there is genocide"

So far, 14 countries have joined or signalled their intention to join South Africa’s genocide case against Israel in the World Court.
They include Belgium, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Egypt, Ireland, Spain, Libya, Maldives, Mexico, Nicaragua and Turkiye.

Out of those who has said they believe Israel is committing genocide are; Bolivia flagged up by Amnesty International for using child labour and Human Rights Abuses also Chile, Colombia, Egypt, Libya, lcw.ngo/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/HUMAN-RIGHTS-VIOLATIONS-IN-LIBYA-DURING-JULY-2025.pdf
Nicaragua and allegations against Cuba for on-line targeting of LGBT people.

People and glass houses come to mind...

ThatDreamyLemonBiscuit · 21/09/2025 21:56

Honesting · 21/09/2025 21:45

And what was wrong with that promise? They actually gave 77% of the promised land to Jordan, then (in the partition plan) a further 45% of the remainder was offered to the Arabs. They rejected it, as they have every single offer for statehood and attempt at peace ever since.

The Arabs were never interested in having a state, all they want is for Jews not to have any sovereignty in their ancestral homeland.

Although Britain's promises were a little vague, most historians and lawyers interpret them to include recognizing all of Palestine as an Arab state, and that's how Arab leaders (reasonably) understood it. Based on that promise, local Arab leaders supported Britain against the Ottoman Empire, at the cost of around 60,000 lives.

But Britain had lied or, to be very kind to it, had been reckless and loose in its promises.

I happen to support a Jewish state in the region, but Britain made conflicting promises to different groups, to advance its own ends.

As a result, I believe Britain has some level of duty to all of the current occupants of the region, and to do all it reasonably can to advance their mutual wellbeing.

Upbraidy · 21/09/2025 21:57

ThatDreamyLemonBiscuit · 21/09/2025 21:46

Presumably you'd then agree that there's no excuse for the multitude of Israeli warcrimes that have occurred since the Nova Festival massacre, then?

Is this a gotcha? Do you expect me to say it’s fine for the IDF to target civilians? I’ve clearly said that deliberately killing civilians is never justified. This is a boringly obvious point I shouldn’t have to make, but it seems I have to because some people on here literally support terrorism.

Livelovebehappy · 21/09/2025 21:58

BluntPlumHam · 21/09/2025 21:14

The recognition is a little too late and not enough. Sanctions, full arms embargo and Hotoveley needs to be expelled.

Well don’t worry. I expect that’s the next issue on Starmer’s ‘to do’ list….the puppet masters in government will make sure of that.

Whatado · 21/09/2025 21:59

Livelovebehappy · 21/09/2025 21:54

But what happens when we have to sit round a table with these people? If we are recognising the existence of a Palestinian state, then surely with that comes the potential for having to sit and discuss issues of global importance with the terrorist leaders? On that basis alone, it was a stupid move by Starmer. Surely the best way would have been to ensure the elimination of Hamas and to move towards putting in a stable government before acknowledging existence.

Well I suppose it depends on your views on a stable government doesn't it.

The Israeli government has been given a seat at the table, money, influence and power while committing war crimes on a world stage. They hold no more credibility than Hamas in my eyes.

anotherside · 21/09/2025 22:05

amylou8 · 21/09/2025 16:23

It's an appalling decision.
For those of you shouting genocide, if Israel wanted to commit genocide every Palestinian would have been dead months ago.
This terrible war rests squarely on the shoulders of Hamas, and Starmer has just handed them their reward.

The Israeli government has dropped explosives equivalent to five Hiroshima bombs on an area not much bigger than Birmingham. Evil fuckers.

CanSeeClearlyNowTheRainHasGone · 21/09/2025 22:05

SirHumphreyRocks · 21/09/2025 21:22

Actually it is the UN and every civilised nation in the world that insists that there is genocide. Because in law Israel is committing genocide. It's not "an agenda". It is a fact. Israel is being held to account for that fact because it wishes to be part of an international community that sets standards of behaviour. It can stop being part of that international community any time it wants. With the consequences that entails.

On the other hand, if you want to hold Palestine to those standards- and I'm sure they'd be happy with that - then something needs to happen first. They need to be a state. And the sooner that happens, the sooner they can be held to the standards that Israel is ignoring.

Simples...

The simples part of it is that you still only care about one side.
You can only quibble about genocide.

You seem to lack the humanity to recognise there are other people who are suffering in this war.

Your "non-agenda" is partisan, not for the words you use, but for the scope you care aboit

Livelovebehappy · 21/09/2025 22:06

EsmeSusanOgg · 21/09/2025 21:54

Because experts in international diplomacy have been comparing Sinn Fein/ IRA to Hamas (of different parts of Hamas. It's not 100% unified) for decades? Because diplomats have said at various points in time there has been scope for guided diplomatic talks between representatives from the Israeli government and Hamas over the years?

I would expect those would be the reasons.

No political situation is exactly the same as another. But we do have examples of how different attempts to heal divisions have/ have not worked. For example the positives and negatives about the truth and reconciliation process in post-apartheid South Africa (the successes attributed to the personality and unifying presence of Mandela, but the challenges being around successors/ lack of natural unifying figure post-Mandela). The challenges that came out of the Dayton Accords which has led to effectively three governments rotating in Bosnia-Herzegovina rather than a true post conflict solution. If you want to get a good grounding in the background there's an excellent book by the late Paddy Ashdown who was involved in both Northern Ireland and Bosnia.

But yes, there is a good reason people are comparing the two scenarios.

But that’s not in context with the post I was referencing, where it was referenced that of course the UK should accept that unpalatable decisions sometimes have to be made to progress peace, as what was done with th3 Good Friday agreement. My point was that the Northern Ireland peace process was needed to protect our own people. Whether we declare we recognise Palestine as a state means nothing unless Israel and other major global leaders are also in agreement. It’s irrelevant and something we shouldn't interject ourselves into. Free the Israeli hostages - even if dead, so that their families can have closure.

anotherside · 21/09/2025 22:07

wrongthinker · 21/09/2025 18:41

There's no genocide in Gaza; you have it back to front. Hamas want to eradicate the Jews. The genocide is happening in the same direction it was always happening in.

There's plenty of aid getting into Gaza and if people are starving there, it's because Hamas is stealing aid from the people. They are utterly corrupt.

Do I think Israel is perfect? No, of course not. But I think they have the right to defend themselves and I hope to God they win this war.

They’ve dropped explosives equivalent to five Hiroshima nuclear bombs on Gaza so far, obliterating almost every school, hospital and landmark and killing tens of thousands of children in the process. People hate Netanyahu and his cronies because they’re fucking evil.

Livelovebehappy · 21/09/2025 22:14

Whatado · 21/09/2025 21:59

Well I suppose it depends on your views on a stable government doesn't it.

The Israeli government has been given a seat at the table, money, influence and power while committing war crimes on a world stage. They hold no more credibility than Hamas in my eyes.

Oh give over. Hamas are internationally recognised as a terrorist organisation. And the difference between how the leadership in Israel and in Palestine look after their own people is worlds apart. Hamas brought the hell upon their own people over the past 2 years, resulting in the deaths of thousands of Palestinians. They use the Palestinians as human shields. They intercept aid to sell on to line the pockets of their fat cat leaders, obviously stationed elsewhere in another country to protect their own skins. They’re a vile regime who don’t deserve to be given any credibility for what they’ve done, and continue to do.

anotherside · 21/09/2025 22:14

EatMoreChocolate44 · 21/09/2025 16:55

People predominantly vote Sinn Fein or Unionist parties (I'm from Northern Ireland) here however it doesn't necessarily mean they support terrorism, they are voting closest to their views and tactically voting even though they don't agree with certain stances. At one point I wanted a United Ireland but I didn't want anyone to die to achieve that or undergo any violence. Are you saying because they voted Hamas then their children deserve to be mutilated, starved, orphaned etc? If that's how people think then that is terrifying. 😔

Many people in Israel literally believe that Palestinian children are guilty and deserve everything they’ve suffered. For example :

And from politicians:
“The children in Gaza brought it upon themselves,' said Israeli Member of the Knesset Merav Ben-Ari during a debate about protecting civilians in the Gaza Strip.

And
“The enemy is not Hamas. Every child, every baby in Gaza is an enemy,” Former member of the Knesset Moshe Feiglin said during an interview.

peasporrige · 21/09/2025 22:15

@ThatDreamyLemonBiscuit "As a result, I believe Britain has some level of duty to all of the current occupants of the region, and to do all it reasonably can to advance their mutual wellbeing."

Well "Palestinians" didn't exist as a named people until they were given the title by Yasser Arafat. (who incidentally was Egyptian)Prior to that they were called "Arabs"

Even PLO leader Yasser Arafat admits as much in his authorized biography:
“If there is any such thing as a Palestinian people, it is I, Yasser Arafat, who created them.”

As Arab historian Abd Al-Ghani Salameh says, in 1917, “there was nothing called a Palestinian people.”

In 1937, a local Arab leader told the Palestine Royal Commission, “There is no such country [as Palestine]. Palestine is a term the Zionists invented! Our country for centuries was part of Syria.”

ThatDreamyLemonBiscuit · 21/09/2025 22:16

Upbraidy · 21/09/2025 21:57

Is this a gotcha? Do you expect me to say it’s fine for the IDF to target civilians? I’ve clearly said that deliberately killing civilians is never justified. This is a boringly obvious point I shouldn’t have to make, but it seems I have to because some people on here literally support terrorism.

I haven't personally noted all of your posts, but I'm glad to hear your being even-handed on that.

I do, though, think its understandable that living conditions in Gaza, in particular, drive people toward Hamas. I don't think Hamas's leadership is, by any means, comprised of righteous freedom fighters - their ideology (though they purport to have softened - which I don't believe) is genocidal. If, though, you were born and raised in Gaza, lost several family members to Israeli violence, and grew up without any true sense of freedom...yeah, I understand that is going to radicalize people.

That isn't to justify the actions of Hamas fighters, particularly against civilians, but I can understand and (to an extent, excuse) the radicalization itself. I can understand Israeli radicalization too. For it to cease self-perpetusting, someone needs to rise above it, and given the disparity in military resources, living conditions and freedoms, it has to be Israel.

If a young adult in Gaza, today, has lost their parents, partner, children and friends to Israel's actions over the last 2 years, I'd find it hard to judge their becoming radicalized, even if I'd condem their resulting actions. I don't think it's half as simple as just choosing to embrace evil.

anotherside · 21/09/2025 22:16

Livelovebehappy · 21/09/2025 22:14

Oh give over. Hamas are internationally recognised as a terrorist organisation. And the difference between how the leadership in Israel and in Palestine look after their own people is worlds apart. Hamas brought the hell upon their own people over the past 2 years, resulting in the deaths of thousands of Palestinians. They use the Palestinians as human shields. They intercept aid to sell on to line the pockets of their fat cat leaders, obviously stationed elsewhere in another country to protect their own skins. They’re a vile regime who don’t deserve to be given any credibility for what they’ve done, and continue to do.

Quit the nonsense about human shields - it doesn’t fly. Israel has flattened the majority of Gaza. Five Hiroshimas worth of explosives. Drone videos on YouTube show the incredible, sickening extent of the devastation. Many in Israel care exactly as much about the lives of innocent Palestinian children as they do about Hamas fighters - ie zero. It will take many decades of even centuries for Gaza to be rebuilt.

ThatDreamyLemonBiscuit · 21/09/2025 22:19

peasporrige · 21/09/2025 22:15

@ThatDreamyLemonBiscuit "As a result, I believe Britain has some level of duty to all of the current occupants of the region, and to do all it reasonably can to advance their mutual wellbeing."

Well "Palestinians" didn't exist as a named people until they were given the title by Yasser Arafat. (who incidentally was Egyptian)Prior to that they were called "Arabs"

Even PLO leader Yasser Arafat admits as much in his authorized biography:
“If there is any such thing as a Palestinian people, it is I, Yasser Arafat, who created them.”

As Arab historian Abd Al-Ghani Salameh says, in 1917, “there was nothing called a Palestinian people.”

In 1937, a local Arab leader told the Palestine Royal Commission, “There is no such country [as Palestine]. Palestine is a term the Zionists invented! Our country for centuries was part of Syria.”

All irrelevant.

If you promise certain land to certain people, and they expend lives based on that, is does not matter whether they had a specific national identity tied to a certain portion of the lands promised to them.

Again - that doesnt mean I think the promise should now be honored - more that it shouldn't have been made.

Roseanna5 · 21/09/2025 22:20

Livelovebehappy · 21/09/2025 21:54

But what happens when we have to sit round a table with these people? If we are recognising the existence of a Palestinian state, then surely with that comes the potential for having to sit and discuss issues of global importance with the terrorist leaders? On that basis alone, it was a stupid move by Starmer. Surely the best way would have been to ensure the elimination of Hamas and to move towards putting in a stable government before acknowledging existence.

So what? The Israeli government are just as much terrorists as Hamas are and our government happily meet with them

anotherside · 21/09/2025 22:22

CanSeeClearlyNowTheRainHasGone · 21/09/2025 22:05

The simples part of it is that you still only care about one side.
You can only quibble about genocide.

You seem to lack the humanity to recognise there are other people who are suffering in this war.

Your "non-agenda" is partisan, not for the words you use, but for the scope you care aboit

Netanyahu has betrayed the hostages by devastating the entirety of Gaza, murdering thousands upon thousands of innocent, including many of the Israeli hostages as collateral damage (to use the horrid political term).

Whatado · 21/09/2025 22:22

Livelovebehappy · 21/09/2025 22:14

Oh give over. Hamas are internationally recognised as a terrorist organisation. And the difference between how the leadership in Israel and in Palestine look after their own people is worlds apart. Hamas brought the hell upon their own people over the past 2 years, resulting in the deaths of thousands of Palestinians. They use the Palestinians as human shields. They intercept aid to sell on to line the pockets of their fat cat leaders, obviously stationed elsewhere in another country to protect their own skins. They’re a vile regime who don’t deserve to be given any credibility for what they’ve done, and continue to do.

As are the Israeli government.

Vile, war criminals responsible for an internationally recognised genocide and responsible for the murder and starvation of innocent men, women and children.

Of course that would only matter to a person if they believed that the the life of Palestines actually mattered.

cupfinalchaos · 21/09/2025 22:27

wrongthinker · 21/09/2025 16:14

No, you're not alone.

You'll get a load of crap from posters on here, though, who have fallen hook, line and sinker for the pro-Palestine propaganda, not to mention the anti-semitism.

The truth is Hamas do not want a two-state solution. They have been offered this many times. What they actually want is to murder every Jew and eradicate them from the face of the earth. They have been completely explicit about this.

How anyone can support Hamas is beyond me. Why the hell would you want racist, misogynist, homophobic, violent religious ideologues to have more land and more international support? Fucking stupid, apart from anything else. But they have been really, really good at propagandising and lying.

Unfortunately exactly this.. and only this.