I see nothing wrong with wanting to retain British culture or the innate culture of any country and see nothing wrong with a country being proud of its flag..as many are-Spain, Usa, Portugal etc etc
You see nothing wrong with it inherently, or you don't see how a drive to "save British culture" is being weaponised by regressive elements and chaos-seekers? I wouldn't say the laws for preserving the French language, for example, or the EU "Domain of Origin" laws are "far right" and haven't heard them called so. But using the alleged dilution of culture as an excuse to promote nativist and ethnic nationalist legislation and national policy might suggest some far-right sympathies.
Whilst I have no issue with anyone being transgender, I do not believe transgender males should play in female sports, be in female toilets, prisons etc and I don’t believe children should be given drugs to alter their gender.
This sounds like a defence of women's and children's rights. A far right position would wish to eliminate or suppress transgender people, rather than looking for ways to discuss and balance any potential or actual conflict of rights among multiple marginalised groups. I'd look at why you associate this stance with rightism; that might be a sign of internalised misogyny.
I think immigration in Europe needs to be controlled.,and quickly
So does EUropean arch liberal Donald Tusk, and he's taking steps to do so; is he "far right" now? This is the prevailing view, post-Merkel (who was herself a conservative) and is pretty openly voiced at least throughout the EU. The differences along the political spectrum here are mainly in (1) what are considered proportionate measures to deter immigration, (2) whether and when it's OK to abandon international agreements, and for what goals, and (3) the rhetoric around the whole discussion. Nativist and ethnonationalist motivations for closing borders and ceasing to take asylum applications may (appear to) be "far right" but they are pretty easy to spot.
I would be put off a man and likely wouldn’t see him again if he asked to split the bill on a first date. I can pay the bill four times over, but that’s not the point. I am educated to post degree status and worked full time in my career for many years until I had my dc, I then wanted to and was thankfully able to stay at home. I see nothing wrong with the man going out to work, the mum staying home, taking care of the kids and the house-if that suits everyone and they’re happy doing that.
This sounds like you are conflating personal social choices with legal and policy decisions. You and your partner made a choice that worked for your family; if you're insisting that yours is the only "right" way or you aren't as open to a family where the dad "stays at home" - or, much more practically in most cases, both parents divide childcare and other shared responsibilities equally - there could be some essentialism and misogyny going on. Those aren't inherently far right, but are typically regressive.
I am not anti abortion completely but my stance leans more towards this angle
This sounds potentially authoritarian and inegalitarian, and could be a symptom of righter-than-centre fundamental views UNLESS there is some context like you are actively promoting and where possible working toward reducing the demand for abortion by introducing and normalising better methods of prevention, which necessarily include enabling women to resist sexual force and coercion. The idea that abortion is unacceptable except under very specific, government-mandated conditions is an authoritarian and misogynist position; advocates withhold abortion as a punishment rather than making a principled stand that it is inherently wrong and finding a viable (no pun intended) alternative.
I regularly watched Charlie kirk, whilst I didn’t agree with everything and i’m not hugely religious, I agreed with a lot of his points and found he made his points respectfully. I also regularly watch Piers morgan uncensored
You can watch/read what you like and it's best to observe a spectrum, while also checking against primary sources where possible. However, Charlie Kirk was hyper-capitalist performance art and relied on misrepresenting his opponents and exploiting misinformation and prejudice in his audiences, so the view that "he made his points respectfully" could be confirmation bias of an inegalitarian perspective.
I didn’t agree with the almost forcing of people to have the covid injection
Neither do many liberals or leftists; look at criticism and opposition from across the political spectrum in places like Austria that effectively DID make it the law. In less restrictive regimes like the UK, you have to weigh the perceived public good against the impingement upon individual freedoms. It's mainly the insistence that no one needs the vaccine and it's all a big conspiracy theory (see the USA, where even people fully insured privately or via their jobs were being jerked around for weeks with the possibility that COVID vaccines would not be available this year) that's been perceived as extreme.
I quite like Trump
Again, personal, and it depends on how well you understand what he is CURRENTLY doing. It's one thing to admire isolated actions or pieces of policy - e.g., to like how he imposed effective sanctions against lower-level genocidaires in Myanmar during his first term, or having a knee-jerk positive response to his threat to impose economic measures like tariffs on Russia's trading partners to put pressure on Russia over Ukraine (which is a dangerous precedent and part of an overall damaging and elitist strategy, but has broad superficial appeal). But if you are widely aligning yourself with the project of immediately and hastily dismantling US (and to an extent international) democratic institutions, however flawed, and simply not replacing them with anything except grift and personal gain then yes, that could be something in common with the radical right.
I feel embarrassed writing all this down as I feel I can’t really say this in real life
Do you think that this extreme self-censorship may be contributing to the problem? If you with your long history of liberalism and leftism are not speaking up about these individual concerns and discussing them, can you be surprised if harder-line voices seem to have a monopoly on these views? I'm not advocating putting yourself in danger, but a victim mentality isn't helping anyone.