I expected her to resign once it was clear she’d claimed she’d acted in good faith, on advice.
It’s obvious no reputable Stamp Duty tax adviser would get it wrong. They’d always err on the side of caution, especially when advising the Deputy PM.
So, clearly she either:
(a) had deliberately evaded
(b) it was an innocent mistake, and (when questioned about it) she either didn’t bother to check if she was advised to take tax advice, or knew full well, and fibbed about taking advice.
She might possibly have survived if she’d come clean straight away and said how sorry she was: she didn’t take the advice; a silly mistake at a v busy time, arguing to the wire for investment in homes ahead of the Spending Review.
It was the fact she tried to brash it out and fib. I don’t see what the court order to protect her family has to do with it. The higher stamp duty was owed on the Hove flat, regardless of extenuating circumstances. There may be legitimate arguments to review the ‘second home’ definition to take account of ‘nesting’ co-parenting or trusteeships for minors etc. But (correct me if I’m wrong) as things stood the SDLT was owed. End of.
The only option was to say: “Sorry. My mistake. I feel terrible. I dropped a ball. Certainly didn’t intend to evade. Have immediately paid it. Plus extra, to acknowledge and recompense my wrongdoing.”