3 It’s an actual photo. What can be positively spun about the actual photo? Would a different caption have helped, or do you just think that the proles shouldn’t see actual footage of issues?
The ‘Breaking Point’ poster (16 June 2016) uses a photo taken in Slovenia in October 2015 of refugees with brown skin being escorted to the Brežice refugee camp. Most were Syrians fleeing the brutal civil war, Russian air strikes; Iranian-backed militias and human rights abuses by the Syrian government.
The photo was used in the poster with the slogan: ‘The EU has failed us all’. Suggesting the ‘failure’ was EU countries giving refuge to people with brown skin. The one white-skinned person in the original photo is covered by text in the poster. How this failed voters in the UK was unclear. Most refugees remain in the first safe country they reach. Plus, the UK has obligations under international law to grant asylum to refugees: 1951 UN Convention on Refugees, co-created and signed by Britain. Brexit didn’t change those obligations.
The poster implied most immigrants to the UK were refugees with brown skin.
Blatantly incorrect.
In the year ending June 2016, the UK's net migration was 311,000. Total immigration was 650,000. In the year ending June 2016, there were 36,465 applications for asylum and 2,563 (7%) of these were from Syrians. Between October 2015 (when it began) and June 2016, a further 2,646 people were resettled in the UK under the Syrian Vulnerable Persons Resettlement (VPRS) scheme.
That means in the year ending June 2016, only 6% of total immigrants (and only 12% of net immigrants) were people seeking asylum. 0.8% of total immigrants (and 1.7% of net immigrants) were Syrian refugees/asylum seekers. Instead, most immigrants to the UK (303,000 arrivals) came on work visas. And most of these (93,935) were skilled (Tier 2) work visas, which required a UK employer as sponsor, e.g. international company transfers.
Given this, could you explain why the poster wasn’t racist propaganda?