Yes that's very true that people all have their own perceptions of risk, which can get skewed.
But I think the issue for me is that in a similar way people get their own ideas of "normality" and they are just as prone to skewed perceptions.
This is an issue that comes up quite a bit in the wake of the lockdowns and some of the more vigorous attitudes are clearly fuelled by resentment over the curtailing of liberty during that time.
Which I totally get.
But equally, I do know people who - without suffering any particular social issues - have opted to revert to a quieter lifestyle going forward, and to me the same rationale - personal liberty to live one's own life to one's OWN taste - ought to apply.
Of course at the extreme end there are people who are suffering very much and DO need help. But there are also people being bullied (even shamed really) by the fact they don't want to live the same way as the man on the next seat of the Clapham omnibus.
I think its very important we don't become narrow-minded about what is a life "worth" living. Provided people have human interaction of some sort, why do they have to be out and about? I, for one, like physical shopping and restaurants. But I don't flatter myself that that makes my life somehow more "worthwhile" than another person's.
Adrenaline junkies are an extreme example of the "must be out and doing something" variety, and I personally can't think of a more "wasted" existence from my perspective. But each to his own. And why not?
The issue in this case is that the lady is clearly frustrating her spouse, which is something she does need to take into consideration.