Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Flags..

541 replies

Elephant9 · 28/08/2025 13:46

Just a chat to understand what’s going on with the influx of England and UJ flags all over the streets?

thoughts?
where did it stem from?
is it making you uncomfortable? (It is, me, but not entirely sure why)

OP posts:
Thread gallery
32
PeanutCup · 01/09/2025 13:55

HangryLikeTheHulk · 01/09/2025 13:38

Maybe the left are doing the same - pushing back against right wing people living in their own bubbles, who label them “woke” (in the new derogatory sense), “snowflakes”, “blue haired”, “hysterical”, “don’t know what a woman is”, “alphabet people”, “terrorist apologists”, “virtue signalling”, “antisemitic”, “tree huggers”, “naive”, “anti-white”, “unpatriotic”, “anti-British” and “traitorous” - among others.

Is name calling really the reason the far-right are illegally co-opting public infrastructure for their flag displays, vandalising roads, homes & businesses, yelling at hotels and planning to vote for ultra-capitalist oligarch billionaires who plan to exploit them and make their lives even worse ?

Edited

See, there you go. You're a prime example of the problem. Rather than think ' let's take a look at what people in these communities are objecting about and critically analyse it to see what could be done,', you've gone straight on the blame train. I'm not talking about the far right antics, no ones excusing violence or hate speech, but rather the silent, peaceful majority who live in these areas who have justifiable concerns but are not allowed a say without a label attached to them.

SleeplessInWherever · 01/09/2025 13:59

PeanutCup · 01/09/2025 13:55

See, there you go. You're a prime example of the problem. Rather than think ' let's take a look at what people in these communities are objecting about and critically analyse it to see what could be done,', you've gone straight on the blame train. I'm not talking about the far right antics, no ones excusing violence or hate speech, but rather the silent, peaceful majority who live in these areas who have justifiable concerns but are not allowed a say without a label attached to them.

Edited

Well no because that’s imaginary. Working class people are allowed a say they’re not allowed to paint abuse on Chinese takeaways, shout at immigrants and demolish our local areas.

They can say all they like. Loudly if they want. But violence and or aggression isn’t going to be listened to.

PeanutCup · 01/09/2025 14:01

SleeplessInWherever · 01/09/2025 13:59

Well no because that’s imaginary. Working class people are allowed a say they’re not allowed to paint abuse on Chinese takeaways, shout at immigrants and demolish our local areas.

They can say all they like. Loudly if they want. But violence and or aggression isn’t going to be listened to.

Edited

So, you view all working class people as violent, abusive, vandals and aggressive? Great. Noted.

HangryLikeTheHulk · 01/09/2025 14:01

PeanutCup · 01/09/2025 13:55

See, there you go. You're a prime example of the problem. Rather than think ' let's take a look at what people in these communities are objecting about and critically analyse it to see what could be done,', you've gone straight on the blame train. I'm not talking about the far right antics, no ones excusing violence or hate speech, but rather the silent, peaceful majority who live in these areas who have justifiable concerns but are not allowed a say without a label attached to them.

Edited

They’re objecting about the very existence of other races, ethnicities, nationalities, non-binary genders, homosexuals, and supranational organisations as far as I can tell.

PeanutCup · 01/09/2025 14:04

HangryLikeTheHulk · 01/09/2025 14:01

They’re objecting about the very existence of other races, ethnicities, nationalities, non-binary genders, homosexuals, and supranational organisations as far as I can tell.

Are " they"? In your head and on the headlines of your preferred newspaper, they may be.

MumOfManyAliases · 01/09/2025 14:05

HangryLikeTheHulk · 01/09/2025 14:01

They’re objecting about the very existence of other races, ethnicities, nationalities, non-binary genders, homosexuals, and supranational organisations as far as I can tell.

And you can tell all that from a flag can you? Righto 🙄

SleeplessInWherever · 01/09/2025 14:07

PeanutCup · 01/09/2025 14:01

So, you view all working class people as violent, abusive, vandals and aggressive? Great. Noted.

Obviously not. That would make myself violent abusive etc etc.

The ones who paint flags all over shops and tell people to “go home” will end up either vilified or ignored. It’s a bit like throwing your toys out the pram, I’m not picking them up for you.

As in them.. not “you” personally.

HRTQueen · 01/09/2025 14:13

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 01/09/2025 10:34

And this is based on what precisely? Maybe if you actually stopped writing people off and started listening you might learn something, people would feel listened to and they would be less likely to seek out extreme views.

Your kind of rhetoric is an integral part of the problem.

I am willing to listen and to engage because I do think there are genuine concerns around immigration and how immigration has been managed I do not label everyone who has concerns as racist

but these people putting up flags shouting you are not welcome here etc are not wanting to engage they feel they have a right to now loudly spout their racism and it’s hidden behind being patriotic

same as the NF thugs in the 70’s that my family had to deal with

SleeplessInWherever · 01/09/2025 14:17

HRTQueen · 01/09/2025 14:13

I am willing to listen and to engage because I do think there are genuine concerns around immigration and how immigration has been managed I do not label everyone who has concerns as racist

but these people putting up flags shouting you are not welcome here etc are not wanting to engage they feel they have a right to now loudly spout their racism and it’s hidden behind being patriotic

same as the NF thugs in the 70’s that my family had to deal with

This is my take too.

I’ll have a sensible discussion about immigration, of all types and not just asylum seekers, all day long with whoever.

But if you’re spending your Saturdays shouting at hotels, or your answers are “I just don’t want to live near brown people” or “sometimes they stand on my local high street” or “well Islam doesn’t respect women so we’re all gonna die” … I probably don’t want to hear it.

If your opinion is a list of sound bites about how immigrants get phones from the government, when they don’t, or get loads of money, that they don’t… I don’t want to hear it.

Happy to discuss actual facts and actual situations, but nonsense lies and people who advocate pushing Filipinos over in parks need not apply.

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 01/09/2025 14:29

HRTQueen · 01/09/2025 14:13

I am willing to listen and to engage because I do think there are genuine concerns around immigration and how immigration has been managed I do not label everyone who has concerns as racist

but these people putting up flags shouting you are not welcome here etc are not wanting to engage they feel they have a right to now loudly spout their racism and it’s hidden behind being patriotic

same as the NF thugs in the 70’s that my family had to deal with

But with respect, you are not listening to them, you are drawing your own lines about who is worthy of being listened to. The group of individuals you are not willing to engage with are the ones who are frustrated about not being listened to. Then someone like Tommy Robinson comes along and listens to them, makes them feel heard. The issue will never be solved if you are only willing to listen to a select group

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 01/09/2025 14:31

SleeplessInWherever · 01/09/2025 14:17

This is my take too.

I’ll have a sensible discussion about immigration, of all types and not just asylum seekers, all day long with whoever.

But if you’re spending your Saturdays shouting at hotels, or your answers are “I just don’t want to live near brown people” or “sometimes they stand on my local high street” or “well Islam doesn’t respect women so we’re all gonna die” … I probably don’t want to hear it.

If your opinion is a list of sound bites about how immigrants get phones from the government, when they don’t, or get loads of money, that they don’t… I don’t want to hear it.

Happy to discuss actual facts and actual situations, but nonsense lies and people who advocate pushing Filipinos over in parks need not apply.

But there are many people on the Left who have arguments consisting solely of social media soundbites.

we need to get beyond the superficial nature of this and talk about and hear the underlying issues

PeanutCup · 01/09/2025 14:45

HRTQueen · 01/09/2025 14:13

I am willing to listen and to engage because I do think there are genuine concerns around immigration and how immigration has been managed I do not label everyone who has concerns as racist

but these people putting up flags shouting you are not welcome here etc are not wanting to engage they feel they have a right to now loudly spout their racism and it’s hidden behind being patriotic

same as the NF thugs in the 70’s that my family had to deal with

. Can we all agree that people shouting hate speech and using violence are absolutely wrong and move the conversation along then in that case?. What are some of your concerns about immigration?

PeanutCup · 01/09/2025 15:03

Interesting that starmer has finally had his say on the flags today. He approves and believes them to be an expression of patriotism.

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 01/09/2025 15:35

PeanutCup · 01/09/2025 14:45

. Can we all agree that people shouting hate speech and using violence are absolutely wrong and move the conversation along then in that case?. What are some of your concerns about immigration?

The trouble is, what actually counts as “hate speech”? I think some of the words used against protestors on here are extremely hateful. Do you accept that “hate speech” can occur on both sides?

Violence is not the right answer, but the frustration people feel at not being listened to was likely to overspill into violence.

Do you accept people have the right to protest if they feel frightened that large numbers of people are freely entering this country, where we have no idea who they are, what threats they represent? People who are using our resources? Perceived (rightly or wrongly) to being treated better than British citizens? To be coming from cultures with different beliefs and practices to those in Britain?

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 01/09/2025 15:40

PeanutCup · 01/09/2025 15:03

Interesting that starmer has finally had his say on the flags today. He approves and believes them to be an expression of patriotism.

Well he apparently has one up in his own flat. Are the Left now accusing him of being a “flag shagger” and “thick” like they accuse others of.

HRTQueen · 01/09/2025 15:41

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 01/09/2025 14:29

But with respect, you are not listening to them, you are drawing your own lines about who is worthy of being listened to. The group of individuals you are not willing to engage with are the ones who are frustrated about not being listened to. Then someone like Tommy Robinson comes along and listens to them, makes them feel heard. The issue will never be solved if you are only willing to listen to a select group

There are people on both sides of the political spectrum (and at times it’s not even about being more on the left or right) who have no interest in discussion

there are certainly those on the liberal side who are like this as there is on the right side

it’s those who are open to discussions and to listen who meed
to come together to move forward

this is nothing new just social media plays right into this

HRTQueen · 01/09/2025 15:44

PeanutCup · 01/09/2025 14:45

. Can we all agree that people shouting hate speech and using violence are absolutely wrong and move the conversation along then in that case?. What are some of your concerns about immigration?

But not everyone does agree that hate language is wrong they feel it’s justified

as for your other question I will answer on threads about immigration and the impact of immigration

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 01/09/2025 15:48

HRTQueen · 01/09/2025 15:41

There are people on both sides of the political spectrum (and at times it’s not even about being more on the left or right) who have no interest in discussion

there are certainly those on the liberal side who are like this as there is on the right side

it’s those who are open to discussions and to listen who meed
to come together to move forward

this is nothing new just social media plays right into this

Oh I 100% agree that there is fault on both sides here, Those on the middle willing to talk are not the issue, Those in the middle need to work together to make sure that those on all sides need to be engaged. We need to ensure those typically on the Left acknowledge there is a problem and that people have valid concerns about immigration which need to be addressed. Some of the language they are touching around is just as derogatory and offensive as that on the right. This needs to be treated similarly under the law. Those on the right need listening to and to feel understood and where appropriate action taken to address their valid concerns

those whipping up the left and right need to be dealt with equally under the law

PeanutCup · 01/09/2025 16:28

HRTQueen · 01/09/2025 15:44

But not everyone does agree that hate language is wrong they feel it’s justified

as for your other question I will answer on threads about immigration and the impact of immigration

Hmmmm, so you don't want to engage in discussion then? We could keep on posting the same things over and over on here about hate speech, but to what end? I do believe the " middle " is the voice of reason and from this position, debate can only be positive.

PeanutCup · 01/09/2025 16:40

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 01/09/2025 15:35

The trouble is, what actually counts as “hate speech”? I think some of the words used against protestors on here are extremely hateful. Do you accept that “hate speech” can occur on both sides?

Violence is not the right answer, but the frustration people feel at not being listened to was likely to overspill into violence.

Do you accept people have the right to protest if they feel frightened that large numbers of people are freely entering this country, where we have no idea who they are, what threats they represent? People who are using our resources? Perceived (rightly or wrongly) to being treated better than British citizens? To be coming from cultures with different beliefs and practices to those in Britain?

! Yes, I believe absolutely hate speech / slurs/insults derogatory language IS wrong - whether it comes from the left or right. My issue is the hypocrisy of the left who think nothing of dropping in ' gammon ' etc to their everyday language which in my mind, can be nothing less than a racist slur. But they don't see it at all. Alongside the well worn stereotypes of " fat, bald, toothless, beer swilling, thicko " who apparently, has no right to breathe the same air. Every time I see the coverage of the protests in the guardian or on the BBC, I'm presented with the same stereotypical images - it's clear as day to see, they'll never use images of middle aged woman who are also protesting. It's utter propaganda and the narrative of " fascist Britain " continues to be fed.

HRTQueen · 01/09/2025 16:41

PeanutCup · 01/09/2025 16:28

Hmmmm, so you don't want to engage in discussion then? We could keep on posting the same things over and over on here about hate speech, but to what end? I do believe the " middle " is the voice of reason and from this position, debate can only be positive.

I have engaged in discussions about the issues around the flags suddenly being put up all around the country and my thoughts about those who are behind this

that’s what the thread is about

PeanutCup · 01/09/2025 16:46

Ok, yes I see that. Sorry

PeanutCup · 01/09/2025 16:51

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 01/09/2025 15:40

Well he apparently has one up in his own flat. Are the Left now accusing him of being a “flag shagger” and “thick” like they accuse others of.

If you read the guardian comments, you'll see that he's being labelled as exactly that! Interesting times.

HangryLikeTheHulk · 01/09/2025 16:57

PeanutCup · 01/09/2025 16:40

! Yes, I believe absolutely hate speech / slurs/insults derogatory language IS wrong - whether it comes from the left or right. My issue is the hypocrisy of the left who think nothing of dropping in ' gammon ' etc to their everyday language which in my mind, can be nothing less than a racist slur. But they don't see it at all. Alongside the well worn stereotypes of " fat, bald, toothless, beer swilling, thicko " who apparently, has no right to breathe the same air. Every time I see the coverage of the protests in the guardian or on the BBC, I'm presented with the same stereotypical images - it's clear as day to see, they'll never use images of middle aged woman who are also protesting. It's utter propaganda and the narrative of " fascist Britain " continues to be fed.

They show the middle aged women too

Flags..
Flags..
Flags..
Flags..
PeanutCup · 01/09/2025 17:00

HangryLikeTheHulk · 01/09/2025 16:57

They show the middle aged women too

Funny how they're all so unflattering. Think the photographer needs a new vocation? Or could it be deliberate.... Pray tell, where did you source these from?

Swipe left for the next trending thread