Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Inheritance dilemma

487 replies

midlifesharp · 27/08/2025 18:15

Some context- my SIL (early 40s) is the most useless woman. She doesn’t work, doesn’t drive, is a SAHM who doesn’t do housework or look after children. She doesn’t read books or watch films or have any kind of hobby or inner life. Fortunately for her she was born extremely beautiful and has had people looking after and supporting her her whole life. I actually don’t dislike her (I realise I sound like I do!) because she’s not usually unkind or cruel- she’s just boring, a bit self centred, helpless and unable to do anything for herself.

The problem- MIL is dying. She has 3 children- my DH, SIL and my lovely BIL. MIL lives abroad with her sister as the temperature helped her degenerative condition, but recently things have got worse and she’s going into hospice care. She’s moving out of her house and sorting out all her possessions before she goes. She has a lot of lovely jewellery and paintings and arty things that she’s collected over the years and wanted to arrange everything before she goes into hospice so we’re not having to deal with the house and possessions as well as her dying when we fly out.

She asked me to set up a family call so they could discuss and agree in advance who gets what so she can have things boxed and parcelled up as appropriate. I set up a zoom call and sent the details to everyone. I even messaged SIL separately to check that she had the details and crucially knew how to join the call (either download the app or join in her browser.) Then, after worrying about it some more I sent her the link to the app in the App Store, some clear instructions and suggested she practice beforehand.

Obviously at the time of the call she wasn’t able to get it to work having not done anything before hand. My 80+ MIL and her sister managed just fine but apparently it was beyond SIL. MIL was extremely disappointed and just texted her that we’d go ahead without her and hope that she was able to join. She eventually got her 10 year old son to sort it and joined 35 mins late. She was utterly furious to find out that we’d started without her and that the jewellery had already been discussed. Just to be clear- she got most of the jewellery. MIL still gave her many items that she knew she liked but there were a couple of pieces that MIL gave to me and to BIL’s wife. SIL’s not totally crass so didn’t say anything to her mum, but she did call me up afterwards to say she was shocked that she wasn’t getting all the jewellery as the only daughter, that it wasn’t fair because she wasn’t on the call, and that she expected me and BILs wife to give her the pieces MIL had said were for us.

DH told her to do one (in a more polite way). It turned into a big row and he suggested that she call up mum if she didn’t like it. He also pointed out that she was the only child not to have visited MIL in FOUR years, despite having the most financial resources, support at home and free time. Both myself and BILs wife have visited 1-2 times a year as MIL is lovely and the grandchildren love her and I’m happy to have something to remember her by.

Was I unreasonable to set up the call the way I did? If I’m honest, deep down I knew she’d somehow not be able to manage it. I could have looked into other options. Also AIBU not to give her the items MIL gave me, bearing in mind if she’d managed to join the zoom call I’d be unlikely to have them?

(We’re talking about total value of jewellery gifts to me and BILs wife of around £5k, remaining £50k plus to SIL. Total remaining estate about £500k split evenly 3 ways.)

Finally, before people come on and say how awful everyone sounds, I’ve not touched upon how devastated everyone is and how sad and how miserable this all is. This is simply a post asking for feedback on one aspect.

OP posts:
Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 28/08/2025 17:07

ThatCyanCat · 28/08/2025 16:08

Honestly, just ignore him.

Wise words.

BoundaryGirl3939 · 28/08/2025 17:37

Gloriia · 28/08/2025 15:43

'I'm sorry but it seems as though Op has hijacked this weakness and fractured relationship, and enjoyed muscling in on position of the real daughter'

There does sadly seem to be that undertone. The list of criticisms of the sil, the admission that her relationship with her own dm was poor so she'd obviously enjoyed being close to the mil all seem to point to your assessment.

It is sad situation all round and I can only imagine how further things will deteriorate with the death and the funeral. Hopefully the sister who the mil lives with will have all the under control to prevent the need for big family chats including inlaws.

That undertone does exist, and also a deep, deep jealousy of her sister in law. Op must be very insecure underneath it all and is trying to find her place by trying to take someone else's.

I don't have as much issue with Mil leaving something to daughter in law but the way it was done was sneaky and brazen.

TammyJones · 28/08/2025 17:47

BoundaryGirl3939 · 28/08/2025 17:37

That undertone does exist, and also a deep, deep jealousy of her sister in law. Op must be very insecure underneath it all and is trying to find her place by trying to take someone else's.

I don't have as much issue with Mil leaving something to daughter in law but the way it was done was sneaky and brazen.

You have obvious never come across a gabby, entitled, totally unreasonable daughter. ( my sil is like this - victim, always someone else fault)
This 9
particular sil has had 90 % of her mums jewellery.
Op Isn’t jealous- probably fed up with sil’s attutude - as is probably the rest of the family.
I think even sil’s mum knows this and has made the will to reflect this , and to stop grabby sil taking the lot.
This does happen in real life…

TammyJones · 28/08/2025 17:49

MorrisZapp · 28/08/2025 16:52

Grabby bitch? It's her mother. Her own mum. OP obviously has a good relationship with her MIL but it simply isn't possible for someone's daughter to be 'grabby' over their daughter in law. They are not the same.

you should have been there when the siblings were clearing the house …. Sil was literally grabbing everything of value ( I , as the DIL was not there, as it was not my place )
My dh was very upset about it all…

ThatCyanCat · 28/08/2025 17:54

BoundaryGirl3939 · 28/08/2025 17:37

That undertone does exist, and also a deep, deep jealousy of her sister in law. Op must be very insecure underneath it all and is trying to find her place by trying to take someone else's.

I don't have as much issue with Mil leaving something to daughter in law but the way it was done was sneaky and brazen.

How was it sneaky? A meeting was arranged and SIL was given full details of when and how to join. And MIL made her own choices.

(Can something be both sneaky and brazen?)

godmum56 · 28/08/2025 17:58

MorrisZapp · 28/08/2025 16:52

Grabby bitch? It's her mother. Her own mum. OP obviously has a good relationship with her MIL but it simply isn't possible for someone's daughter to be 'grabby' over their daughter in law. They are not the same.

you are so wrong.

Bananaandmangosmoothie · 28/08/2025 17:59

God, what more could you have done, gone round to her house and set it up for her?

whistlesandbells · 28/08/2025 18:00

I don’t think you’re wrong OP, but personally I would have insisted my DH led setting up the call and communicating with his siblings, even if MIL had asked me to do it. I would have likely done the admin behind the scenes but stayed out of it, to support my DH only.

BoundaryGirl3939 · 28/08/2025 18:03

ThatCyanCat · 28/08/2025 17:54

How was it sneaky? A meeting was arranged and SIL was given full details of when and how to join. And MIL made her own choices.

(Can something be both sneaky and brazen?)

Yes. Sneaky because she knew SIL would have technical issues.

Brazen because she went ahead anyway.

According to Op, MIL also thought SIL would join at any minute. I'm sure she didn't realise that SIL would be shut out of the conversation for 35mins and perhaps MIL would have postponed the distribution should she have known it would take so long.

To be honest, I'm sure actual daughter doesn't care about the monetary value of the jewellery but if my sister in law were to orchestrate a meeting to distribute my mother's assets, and purposefully went ahead even though she knew I couldn't join, I would feel betrayed and angry. Op appears gleeful to have gotten the shitty piece of jewellery.

godmum56 · 28/08/2025 18:10

whistlesandbells · 28/08/2025 18:00

I don’t think you’re wrong OP, but personally I would have insisted my DH led setting up the call and communicating with his siblings, even if MIL had asked me to do it. I would have likely done the admin behind the scenes but stayed out of it, to support my DH only.

but that isn't what the Mil wanted. Why does she not get to do what she wants how she wants it?

godmum56 · 28/08/2025 18:13

BoundaryGirl3939 · 28/08/2025 18:03

Yes. Sneaky because she knew SIL would have technical issues.

Brazen because she went ahead anyway.

According to Op, MIL also thought SIL would join at any minute. I'm sure she didn't realise that SIL would be shut out of the conversation for 35mins and perhaps MIL would have postponed the distribution should she have known it would take so long.

To be honest, I'm sure actual daughter doesn't care about the monetary value of the jewellery but if my sister in law were to orchestrate a meeting to distribute my mother's assets, and purposefully went ahead even though she knew I couldn't join, I would feel betrayed and angry. Op appears gleeful to have gotten the shitty piece of jewellery.

Her Mil asked her to do precisely what she did. Her Mil also took the decision to go ahead without her daughter. I am sure she was aware of what her daughter might do. Why should the Mil not get to do things how she wants to?

Notonthestairs · 28/08/2025 18:47

It wasnt 'technical issues' and she wasn't 'shut out'. She had exactly the same opportunity to join the same phone call at the same time as everyone else.

Kulwinder54 · 28/08/2025 18:56

Inheritances are decided on by how efficient you are on turning up to a zoom call?! 😂

She's not au fait with technology, millions of people aren't. At least she managed in the end.

What makes you think you are in a position to judge who gets what?? I'd be more than annoyed if you were my SIL

ThatCyanCat · 28/08/2025 18:57

BoundaryGirl3939 · 28/08/2025 18:03

Yes. Sneaky because she knew SIL would have technical issues.

Brazen because she went ahead anyway.

According to Op, MIL also thought SIL would join at any minute. I'm sure she didn't realise that SIL would be shut out of the conversation for 35mins and perhaps MIL would have postponed the distribution should she have known it would take so long.

To be honest, I'm sure actual daughter doesn't care about the monetary value of the jewellery but if my sister in law were to orchestrate a meeting to distribute my mother's assets, and purposefully went ahead even though she knew I couldn't join, I would feel betrayed and angry. Op appears gleeful to have gotten the shitty piece of jewellery.

She didn't have technical issues. She just didn't do what she was told she needed to do beforehand to prepare. Didn't even offload it to her husband. Just ignored it. If MIL had wanted to postpone until she'd got through, she could have done. As for "orchestrating", this is what MIL asked her to do!

It was a multi person call. What other platform was there that wouldn't require an app or browser?

If she doesn't care about the monetary value of the jewellery, she's not missing anything. If it's "shitty", she's REALLY not missing anything. If she thinks her mother doesn't love her, she's got issues that a necklace won't resolve.

At any rate, none of it matters anyway. It's MIL's decision so if SIL doesn't like it, I'm sure she knows how to contact her mother.

Notonthestairs · 28/08/2025 19:15

Kulwinder54 · 28/08/2025 18:56

Inheritances are decided on by how efficient you are on turning up to a zoom call?! 😂

She's not au fait with technology, millions of people aren't. At least she managed in the end.

What makes you think you are in a position to judge who gets what?? I'd be more than annoyed if you were my SIL

No.
Gifts are decided by the giver.

Chinsupmeloves · 28/08/2025 19:42

My goodness, you did everything you possibly could and still she was hopeless!

That kind of person wants everything done for them and is not willing to learn or go out of their comfort zone to do things like visiting her own Mum.

You can't reason with her, she will always claim to be the victim as clearly has no responsibility for her own life.

Suck it up buttercup and get a grip for her. Xx

Chinsupmeloves · 28/08/2025 19:52

ThatCyanCat · 28/08/2025 17:54

How was it sneaky? A meeting was arranged and SIL was given full details of when and how to join. And MIL made her own choices.

(Can something be both sneaky and brazen?)

I never for a moment thought you were being sneaky. My only thought was the wondering how your SIL could be so inept and unreliable.

Chinsupmeloves · 28/08/2025 19:54

BoundaryGirl3939 · 28/08/2025 18:03

Yes. Sneaky because she knew SIL would have technical issues.

Brazen because she went ahead anyway.

According to Op, MIL also thought SIL would join at any minute. I'm sure she didn't realise that SIL would be shut out of the conversation for 35mins and perhaps MIL would have postponed the distribution should she have known it would take so long.

To be honest, I'm sure actual daughter doesn't care about the monetary value of the jewellery but if my sister in law were to orchestrate a meeting to distribute my mother's assets, and purposefully went ahead even though she knew I couldn't join, I would feel betrayed and angry. Op appears gleeful to have gotten the shitty piece of jewellery.

SIL had plenty of time to prepare and could've actually called anyone at the time.

Crunchymum · 28/08/2025 20:02

Also AIBU not to give her the items MIL gave me, bearing in mind if she’d managed to join the zoom call I’d be unlikely to have them?

Can you expand on this comment @midlifesharp ?

Are you saying your SIL would have kicked off on the call and your MIL would have changed her mind? Or do you mean your MIL may have made her decision differently if her DD was on the call and not offered the jewellery to you and your SIL at all?

daleylama · 28/08/2025 20:15

Charlize43 · 27/08/2025 20:14

All this bitterness could have been avoided and it would have been much better for everyone if she's bequeathed the lot to The Cats Protection.

Yes, you're so right ! Because Charities are famously grateful for being bequeathed 'things' that they have to then turn into cash via collection, storage, valuations , auctions etc.

Gloriia · 28/08/2025 20:18

'SIL had plenty of time to prepare and could've actually called anyone at the time'

The daughter maybe wanted to discuss things privately with her dm and brothers. Imo there's no place for the inlaws to be directly involved in these very emotional situations and the dm should have recognised this.

lljkk · 28/08/2025 20:22

Nothing about OP's story suggests OP was unreasonable.
Time for a thick skin, I suggest.

My grandmother's jewellery was parcelled out a little bit to all daughters (she had 3) and all granddaughters (maybe... 7? of us). I don't understand why the SIL thought she'd get all jewellery. anyway, whatever MIL wanted is what happens.

HonoriaBulstrode · 28/08/2025 20:27

The daughter maybe wanted to discuss things privately with her dm and brothers.

Then she could have arranged to do so at any time, couldn't she?

thepariscrimefiles · 28/08/2025 20:44

Gloriia · 28/08/2025 20:18

'SIL had plenty of time to prepare and could've actually called anyone at the time'

The daughter maybe wanted to discuss things privately with her dm and brothers. Imo there's no place for the inlaws to be directly involved in these very emotional situations and the dm should have recognised this.

Criticising a dying woman isn't a great look. OP's MIL has every right to include her two DILs, who she is very close to, in the online call.

If OP's SIL had wanted to discuss things privately with her mother and brothers, she should have set up her own online call.

OP was just following her MIL's wishes. It isn't her fault that her SIL can't use the simplest technology and couldn't be bothered to learn how to do so before the call, despite all the instructions she was given.

Ski37 · 28/08/2025 20:44

@midlifesharp I apologise that I haven’t read the full thread but have seen all of your updates.
It’s an extremely sad time for everyone involved and emotions will be running high but inheritance really brings out the worst in some people. It’s clear that you love your MIL and she has meant a lot to you in your life. I’d accept the jewellery she has offered to you and be honoured that wants to do that. The fact she remembered you admiring it says a lot about how she feels about you and likely wants to leave you an item that means something to you for you to remember her by.