No women and children coming? Are you in denial as well, or are you not referring to the illegal boat migrants, among whom are some women and children. How do you know those women and children are not coerced into crossing the channel as insurance? Perhaps they are slaves, used by the slave traffickers?
I don't know if Afghan women are coming by boat, but if they are, they are coming by an illegal route. I applaud their efforts to escape the Taliban, but they can ask for asylum in many countries between UK and Afghanistan, as can anyone, and a genuine refugee from Afghanistan would do that, rather than make a perilous journey to the coast of France. It makes no sense, and neither do the other migrants. Those who can prove they are in danger can come by other routes.
All the claptrap about 'poor things they are persecuted and desperate' is so much who shot John, because if they were genuine asylum seekers they would apply in the first safe country that they reach.
We should all be asking why they are crossing the channel when there are alternatives, not arguing the toss about whether they are entitled.
THINK FOR A MOMENT: work out how many hours you have to work to supply aid to these unknown men who cross illegally. Perhaps if we looked at it that way, we might band together and make the government do more about stopping them. Mothers have their own children to work for, not fit and able men who want to slum off taxpayers because they think Britain is wealthy.
It is YOUR PURSE STRINGS they are loosening. How many hours do you have to work to pay school dinners? How many hours to get the kids ready for going back to school? How many hours to pay for school fares? How many hours you earn to pay for the weekly shopping?