Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To leave DH if he loses his second job in three years?

795 replies

Joness2 · 11/08/2025 20:22

My DH got dismissed (walked before he was pushed) from his previous job 3 years ago. It was set to go to hearing but his Union representative advised him he was likely to be dismissed so he resigned in order to not have to declare a dismissal when applying for future roles.

I was furious, I was in the early stages of pregnancy and could not believe he would be so stupid. It was a very worrying time for a while with finances etc.

He found a new job about 2 months before our child was born so had minimal paternity leave (he would have had 4 weeks had he not left his job). It caused a lot of resentment and I struggled to get over it.

He has remained in that job without issue until now. He told me after work today that he has been informed of disciplinary action due to inappropriate comments towards (female) colleagues on a night out. This is the exact reason he had to leave his job before. He promised me then he would not go on nights out with work again, something he has mainly stuck to only waning if it’s something where there isn’t drink involved.

This time, he is convinced that he will get a warning and is not at risk of dismissal. This is his opinion rather than factual.

I am so bloody angry with him doing this again and told him that if he loses his job, we are over. Infact, I’m considering leaving regardless having been told the vile comments.

He says I should be supporting him and that we are a team and to threaten to leave is making it ‘about me’.

Do you think I should try to support him through this and how to handle any hearing or would you leave him to clean up his own mess?

OP posts:
CatMummyOf3 · 14/08/2025 17:44

Ex HR here, albeit some time ago (when 'banter / high jinx' were more likely to be tolerated).

The chances of him keeping his job are miniscule. Not only is his behaviour disgusting, the risk of the recipients of his vile comments leaving and filing for constructive dismissal are very high. I can't imagine the company will want to take that risk, or keep such a toxic employee. I suspect they are following their procedures, but he will soon be unemployable unemployed.

What I'm struggling with the most though, is his apparent nonchalance. He's not apologetic to OP, or presumably his co-workers. He's convinced himself that he'll just get a slap on the wrist or maybe a warning. He doesn't seem to realise how abhorrent his behaviour is.

Joness2 · 14/08/2025 17:45

Someone2025 · 14/08/2025 17:43

Agree, whether he is sacked or not doesn’t mean anything, it doesn’t change his character and the fact he did it

It seems the OP thinks that if he isn’t sacked then he must be innocent, he has already admitted he did it so keeping his job means nothing

Not at all, my immediate worry given the hearing is tomorrow is how we will keep paying the next bills if he loses his job. I know I’ve got bigger problems but I can’t resolve them all straight away

OP posts:
Joness2 · 14/08/2025 17:49

CatMummyOf3 · 14/08/2025 17:44

Ex HR here, albeit some time ago (when 'banter / high jinx' were more likely to be tolerated).

The chances of him keeping his job are miniscule. Not only is his behaviour disgusting, the risk of the recipients of his vile comments leaving and filing for constructive dismissal are very high. I can't imagine the company will want to take that risk, or keep such a toxic employee. I suspect they are following their procedures, but he will soon be unemployable unemployed.

What I'm struggling with the most though, is his apparent nonchalance. He's not apologetic to OP, or presumably his co-workers. He's convinced himself that he'll just get a slap on the wrist or maybe a warning. He doesn't seem to realise how abhorrent his behaviour is.

Yes, he is completely ‘shrugged shoulders’ about it all - ‘nothing you won’t hear down the pub on a Friday night’ sort of thing. It seems he has that attitude as only one of the comments was made to the colleague directly and he felt she was giving as good as she got with ‘banter’ (I HATE that word)

OP posts:
MissRaspberry · 14/08/2025 17:57

Joness2 · 14/08/2025 17:22

Oh yeah, another thing he had kept from me - it transpires that the hearing is tomorrow morning! This was only revealed when I saw the documents.

He initially made out he had only been told on Monday but he has known for weeks and the incident in question was back in May, it’s been playing through since then and has been moved once already.

So, I believe he told me on Monday because he spoke to the Union again that day and was sufficiently worried his job may be at risk.

What I would say though, is that I think he would quit if the union advised of the outcome being dismissal as he did that last time and is very aware of the implications of having to disclose he was sacked.

Yeah he'll definitely quit to not have to disclose a dismissal as he knows what he did is disgusting and wrong-problem is he's not bothered and he will continue to display his behaviour as he knows all he has to do is quit his jobs every time he's caught and pulled up on it. I'm surprised nobody's actually reported his pest behaviour yet. The behaviour he is displaying could wind him up on a sex offenders register and once that's public knowledge your family could end up targeted unfortunately as most gossips tend to put the opinion out there that the family know and condone the behaviour. He needs to realise that what he does affects his family too

StrikeForever · 14/08/2025 18:02

Joness2 · 14/08/2025 13:28

Apologies for the lack of updates.

I sensed my H was hiding something as he was reluctant to share the hearing pack with me. Eventually I was able to look at it and it’s grim reading and not entirely as he told me.

It has comments in quotation marks, there’s something about saying to a colleague that suffocating under her bum wouldn’t be a bad way to ‘go’ if he had to choose. The manager he said is strict is lesbian and there was a comment about her owning a lot of strap on toys to choose from to punish him.

There is one other comment that he didn’t touch upon at all with me originally which is about a third colleague and he basically says something about her dressing for their office as if she’s gagging for it. It wasn’t made to her directly but reported by another man.

He has now turned from ‘it’ll be a slap on the wrist’ to ‘maybe a verbal warning, but nothing more’.

I am disgusted by what I read, I’ve gone ballistic at him and he just keeps saying he won’t drink at work events any more, he hasn’t actually apologised to me!

I’m sorry you’re dealing with this. It must be awful. Alcohol isn’t any kind of excuse though is it. Very few men behave like this at work in a mixed sex workplace and few men would say these things to, or about colleagues at work socials even when drunk. I’m 66 and have been to lots of work socials where people are drunk and nothing like this has happened. This kind of misogyny is in him.

Laura95167 · 14/08/2025 18:13

So he was sacked quit for sexually inappropriate comments, got a new job, was moved for inappropriate behaviour, made comments to another man who reported him, publicly made graphic, suggestive comments 2 other colleagues. And hes successfully hid this since May?!?!

Each time he says these things he gets identified as a pig and reprimanded. And he still does it. Have you asked yourself what response hes hoping for? And how hed behave if (not that anyone would) someone responded well to that?

Im sorry OP but if he was getting a verbal warning there wouldn't be a pack or hearing. If he was getting a verbal warning hed have got it and youd be non the wiser. Id be surprised if he didnt get a warning when they moved him. And none of these near misses have had any effect, no responsibility, no accountability.

Daisyvodka · 14/08/2025 18:25

Im guessing when you say 'if you get sacked, how will we pay the bills' he just says 'i won't get sacked'
God, he's genuinely not very smart is he.

BuckChuckets · 14/08/2025 19:12

Joness2 · 14/08/2025 17:45

Not at all, my immediate worry given the hearing is tomorrow is how we will keep paying the next bills if he loses his job. I know I’ve got bigger problems but I can’t resolve them all straight away

I think your immediate worry should be how do you sort your finances, life etc alone. Because I don't know how you can bare to be under the same roof as this man, he's making my skin crawl and he's not even anything to do with me (thankfully!).

Joness2 · 14/08/2025 19:14

Daisyvodka · 14/08/2025 18:25

Im guessing when you say 'if you get sacked, how will we pay the bills' he just says 'i won't get sacked'
God, he's genuinely not very smart is he.

More or less - he seems convinced the union are adamant he won’t get dismissed and they’ve helped him with how to play it.

OP posts:
Cosyblankets · 14/08/2025 19:14

There are plenty of jobs where you'd be suspended before a disciplinary. Has he definitely been going to work?

OlderGlaswegianLivingInDevon · 14/08/2025 19:23

I am very very very surprised this happened in May

do you mean the 1st of these comments / incidents happened in May and he continued

as where I work he would have been sacked / dismissed / what ever you choose to call it, in May - June at the latest.
It is the middle of August now.

and he knows / realises it is serious

that is why he has informed you of a little of what is going on...

Crikeyalmighty · 14/08/2025 19:44

@LillyPJ yep not sure why I said that - clearly had a brain fart!!

Bathingforest · 14/08/2025 19:55

He's just grim as they say. Hasn't any grace, respect, value or tolerance to women. I wonder does he watch violent porn secretly

OriginalUsername2 · 14/08/2025 19:58

I’d get the divorce started now.

OlderGlaswegianLivingInDevon · 14/08/2025 19:58

You need to get onto the website ' Entitledto ' and see if you will be able to get any assistance re benefits

however

do bear in mind he will not be entitled to unemployment benefit if he is sacked / leaves of his own choice, for I believe it is up to 6 months

LillyPJ · 14/08/2025 20:05

Joness2 · 14/08/2025 19:14

More or less - he seems convinced the union are adamant he won’t get dismissed and they’ve helped him with how to play it.

I'm entirely in favour of unions, but wish they weren't trying to help this man. Shouldn't the union be more concerned about the people who have to put up with him at work?

Someone2025 · 14/08/2025 20:13

LillyPJ · 14/08/2025 20:05

I'm entirely in favour of unions, but wish they weren't trying to help this man. Shouldn't the union be more concerned about the people who have to put up with him at work?

Agree!

MissRaspberry · 14/08/2025 20:16

LillyPJ · 14/08/2025 20:05

I'm entirely in favour of unions, but wish they weren't trying to help this man. Shouldn't the union be more concerned about the people who have to put up with him at work?

I agree. Unions are there to help people who have genuinely been treated unfairly at work. They should be supporting that vile man's victims of his sexual harassment rather than trying to help him keep his job. He doesn't deserve their help at all

BreadInCaptivity · 14/08/2025 20:20

Joness2 · 14/08/2025 19:14

More or less - he seems convinced the union are adamant he won’t get dismissed and they’ve helped him with how to play it.

I suspect he may be in denial about this.

I’m not in HR but have been (at a senior mgt level) involved in many disciplinary proceedings.

Go back 5/6 years and yes, maybe the “banter/out of office/drinking” defence would have worked but times have moved on.

Even the fact he didn’t say some comments to the persons face isn’t a pass.

Exposing your colleagues to vile comments about someone else in the workplace is still bullying and harassment, not just because it’s targeting that person (especially if they have a protected characteristic) but also because the people who heard it shouldn’t have to be exposed to that kind of awfulness.

Additionally as a pp described the implications of people impacted if no action is taken will be a factor.

Slap on the wrist and all goes back to normal? No - unless you are expecting a raft of grievances and potentially escalation to tribunal levels.

He’s working for a business and within the law they will take the path of least risk and expense.

Right now I’d bet good money that’s your H being subject to at minimum a final written warning with a strict personal improvement plan (thats basically designed to manage him out of the business) but more likely being dismissed for gross misconduct.

This was not one comment that was in poor taste. It was many highly inappropriate and graphic descriptions of how he wanted to behave towards (even in his head) other employees.

If I was involved as a manager at his meeting tomorrow, based on what’s been posted he’d be fired.

MrsSunshine2b · 14/08/2025 20:35

MissRaspberry · 14/08/2025 20:16

I agree. Unions are there to help people who have genuinely been treated unfairly at work. They should be supporting that vile man's victims of his sexual harassment rather than trying to help him keep his job. He doesn't deserve their help at all

They have presumably told him he needs to show remorse, but it will count for nothing at all if they can tell it's not genuine. Or if he continues to demonstrate the attitude you've described here when they scratch the surface.

My husband had a disciplinary once, for a genuine (but quite bad) mistake, nothing like this, and he was extremely remorseful and upset it had happened. It was only that that helped him keep his job- if he hadn't been really, really sorry, he'd never have kept his job. They grill you backwards and forwards, pull out every email, every phone record and every even vaguely similar situation, get statements from colleagues, in his case to find out whether his mistake was carelessness and irresponsibility, or just human error. If you're lying or faking it, they will suss you out.

As @BreadInCaptivity so insightfully explains, the next step was that his manager implemented a plan for extreme scrutiny and "support" in order to squeeze him out of the role anyway, so he wasn't saved in the end. His card was marked as soon as he made that mistake.

Is he very, very good at his job and in a very specialised role which very few people can do?

Tofudinosaur · 14/08/2025 21:00

Op I apologise if I was not understanding. I do see now how this leaves you financially vulnerable and stressing. I’m sorry.

Frostywinterwoods · 14/08/2025 21:07

FFS ,a marriage is for life, through better or worse. Today's generation, all hard done by and spoilt. Grow up!

OlderGlaswegianLivingInDevon · 14/08/2025 21:10

You only have your word that the union rep is representing him, they may just be giving him advice.

As you know you are married to a liar.

CauliflowerCheese00 · 14/08/2025 21:10

Frostywinterwoods · 14/08/2025 21:07

FFS ,a marriage is for life, through better or worse. Today's generation, all hard done by and spoilt. Grow up!

Today’s generation, learning from
yesterdays generation, where women had to stay with abusive men because they had no agency. Good for us demanding better for ourselves and our children.

DodoTired · 14/08/2025 21:11

Sorry OP I know it’s not helpful but the comments are quite disgusting and what’s most worrying that he has zero remorse OR at least enough self awareness to not say these things despite his first incident and its consequences