Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think most men wouldn’t survive a year living the life of an average woman?

932 replies

ThatRealLimeBee · 01/08/2025 20:12

The daily grind of sexism, safety worries, juggling expectations, emotional labour… Most men have no idea. AIBU to think they’d crumble under the load if they had to swap lives with us for a year?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
ThankYouNigel · 06/08/2025 10:13

SugarSoiree · 06/08/2025 09:27

Yes, you're right. By her logic @ThankYouNigels husband is not raising his own kids. But it's all double standards with her isn't it?

She calls post partum women pathetic for needing help with their toddlers, she says it's disgusting that women are swanning off to gasp the gym! And beauty appointments! While grandparents look after their children! You know she wouldn't bat an eyelid at fathers going to the barbers or the gym and she actually calls nurseries immoral.

It's all so clear that it's all about expecting women to be subservient once they become mothers, all a man has to do is work while a woman shouldn't even expect to get her hair cut until her baby goes to school four years later. It's misogynistic and totally absurd.

Although she calls women weak for needing a break from their own kids which she finds appalling, she overlooks the fact that she gets 30 hours a week break from hers, whilst having no pressure to work so can do as she pleases in that time and says that if she had to work and then do housework on top or god forbid, ask her husband to share the house work with her, it would put strain on her marriage. So she hardly sounds resilient herself. She just thinks it's wrong for women to not be everyone's maid and actually want things for themselves.

Just garden variety internalised misogyny.

And yes, @ThankYouNigel you are dependant on your husband, you only have the cushty life where you come and go as you please and have all the time in the world to ferry kids around because he bank rolls you. Nothing in life is free, you have to pay for it, and if he wasn't paying, you would have to actually work for a living. Working parents pay through the nose for their kids childcare when they aren't available to pick up at certain times or anything else, we certainly aren't relying on any free labour. We aren't dependent on grandparents and most working parents aren't, you just have a very narrow, negative view of them because you want them to be less than you to feel superior.

Oh and I bet you are also financially dependent on your DH- if he left tomorrow, I’d bet my house that you couldn’t survive on your own without him on your own earnings as an individual. Most can’t, but like to feel superior for working any token amount of hours. Most of the hours my friends who do work covers a few holidays etc and is a drop in the ocean compared to what their DH’s cover- still financially dependent factually 😂

ThankYouNigel · 06/08/2025 10:17

HowardTJMoon · 06/08/2025 10:02

You choosing to be a housewife is cool. You describing yourself as a "Professional Housewife" is a fascinating mix of comical and cringeworthy.

Do your red clown nose and big shoes get in the way when you're rearranging your children's wall art?

Shows how little people understand the role these days. My children are being brought up to understand and respect what housewives do.

SleeplessInWherever · 06/08/2025 10:17

ThankYouNigel · 06/08/2025 10:13

Oh and I bet you are also financially dependent on your DH- if he left tomorrow, I’d bet my house that you couldn’t survive on your own without him on your own earnings as an individual. Most can’t, but like to feel superior for working any token amount of hours. Most of the hours my friends who do work covers a few holidays etc and is a drop in the ocean compared to what their DH’s cover- still financially dependent factually 😂

Again with the assumptions.

I left my ex husband and found myself somewhere else to live, paid for all the furniture in that place, and covered the bills and all costs for 3 years until I met my partner.

I absolutely can survive financially by myself, as can many others. I know because I have.

ThankYouNigel · 06/08/2025 10:20

HighLadyofTheNightCourt · 06/08/2025 10:07

Nobody is trying to stop you living your life the way you want to. Stop being so dramatic. The problem is YOU trying to stop other women making a different choice to you. I hate to break it to you but nurseries aren’t going anywhere so you need to just accept that.

Just own your choice instead of trying to justify it by putting other people down. It just makes you sound like a complete dick tbh.
It is possible to have different views and still be respectful.

Do you say these out loud to people in real life? If so I can’t imagine you have many friends.

The problem is people judging me who downright lie about their own level of financial independence.

I would like to know out of all the posters who have been ganging up on me who truthfully could, if their DH left tomorrow and refused to contribute financially, still (without upping their hours) cover everything themselves that is currently needed to maintain their current lifestyle exactly as it is? If you cant, then you are also financially dependent on your DH.

Stop lying and own it!

SleeplessInWherever · 06/08/2025 10:22

ThankYouNigel · 06/08/2025 10:20

The problem is people judging me who downright lie about their own level of financial independence.

I would like to know out of all the posters who have been ganging up on me who truthfully could, if their DH left tomorrow and refused to contribute financially, still (without upping their hours) cover everything themselves that is currently needed to maintain their current lifestyle exactly as it is? If you cant, then you are also financially dependent on your DH.

Stop lying and own it!

Me. 👋🏻

HighLadyofTheNightCourt · 06/08/2025 10:26

ThankYouNigel · 06/08/2025 10:20

The problem is people judging me who downright lie about their own level of financial independence.

I would like to know out of all the posters who have been ganging up on me who truthfully could, if their DH left tomorrow and refused to contribute financially, still (without upping their hours) cover everything themselves that is currently needed to maintain their current lifestyle exactly as it is? If you cant, then you are also financially dependent on your DH.

Stop lying and own it!

Yes I could.

I have zero issue with how you’ve chosen to live your life. I couldn’t do it and I wouldn’t want to. I do think it makes you financially vulnerable but that’s your choice. I don’t agree with the term professional housewife, it doesn’t exist as profession. I think if you’ve chosen not to participate in the labour market, pay taxes etc then you own that and don’t make up jobs. You’re a housewife. That’s your choice and you don’t need to dress it up.

My issue your vitriol towards working mothers. It’s unnecessary and downright nasty.

HighLadyofTheNightCourt · 06/08/2025 10:27

ThankYouNigel · 06/08/2025 10:17

Shows how little people understand the role these days. My children are being brought up to understand and respect what housewives do.

Will they be brought up to respect those who choose to work too?

Agix · 06/08/2025 10:38

The pressure for women to work after they have children is capitalist bullshit. Women fought for the right to work so they could choose to fund themselves instead of being forced into relying on a man, and now it's been twisted into someone that just benefits capitalist fat cats - you're now useless if you don't work, and if (gasp) you choose to be a SAHM.

And half of mumsnet is doing the dirty work for them, scratching anyone who is a SAHM and financially dependant on their husband.

You should be able to depend on the partner you married to bring home the bacon whilst you look after home and family. If he earns enough, and is happy with the arrangement , why shouldn't mum stay home with the kids.

It is better for the kids. Of course it is.

"Ewww you're financially dependent on a man! You're so financially vulnerable!"... So? No problem with that if it works for the family. You should be able to trust him. You should be able to be vulnerable. If you can't trust your husband, then maybe you should have chosen a better husband. Utterly weird that you married someone you can't trust, better to have not married at all.

If their DHs left, and that mother was left with barely anything from the divorce (unlikely but let's pretend), we all know she'd still be able to find her way and support herself. Of course she would. Not like she's gonna lie down in a gutter and die is it? Being a SAHM gives a lot of transferable skills if nothing else.

Truly think people who fearmonger at SAHMs are jealous because they can't do it and feel secure, and would actually love it if they could.

No issue with working mums. They have to do that, either for their current financial health or emotional health or because they can't trust their husbands or because their husbands won't allow it or whatever. Any reason they have for continuing work is valid as far as I care, and I have no reason to believe they're not doing their best. But damn, they do seem to get overly angry at SAHMs and delight in putting them down.

I'm planning to quit work and be a housewife at this rate as my health sucks (did have career aspirations about going to Uni and try to restart my career in a more sustainable way , but mumsnet shat on my confidence about that saying I couldn't do it as I'm disabled lol) and I don't even have kids. I'd be entirely dependant on DH and vulnerable. I'm cool with that. I'll frolic in the fields and bake him cookies and take him lunch whilst you're having yet another wanky meeting about KPIs or some shit and worrying about whether to spend your super high wage in a beach holiday or loft conversion. If he leaves me, worst that will happen is homelessness really. And I'm sure it wouldn't.

Anyway,

I think men would cope fine as women. As well as we cope, anyway hahaha.

HighLadyofTheNightCourt · 06/08/2025 10:52

Agix · 06/08/2025 10:38

The pressure for women to work after they have children is capitalist bullshit. Women fought for the right to work so they could choose to fund themselves instead of being forced into relying on a man, and now it's been twisted into someone that just benefits capitalist fat cats - you're now useless if you don't work, and if (gasp) you choose to be a SAHM.

And half of mumsnet is doing the dirty work for them, scratching anyone who is a SAHM and financially dependant on their husband.

You should be able to depend on the partner you married to bring home the bacon whilst you look after home and family. If he earns enough, and is happy with the arrangement , why shouldn't mum stay home with the kids.

It is better for the kids. Of course it is.

"Ewww you're financially dependent on a man! You're so financially vulnerable!"... So? No problem with that if it works for the family. You should be able to trust him. You should be able to be vulnerable. If you can't trust your husband, then maybe you should have chosen a better husband. Utterly weird that you married someone you can't trust, better to have not married at all.

If their DHs left, and that mother was left with barely anything from the divorce (unlikely but let's pretend), we all know she'd still be able to find her way and support herself. Of course she would. Not like she's gonna lie down in a gutter and die is it? Being a SAHM gives a lot of transferable skills if nothing else.

Truly think people who fearmonger at SAHMs are jealous because they can't do it and feel secure, and would actually love it if they could.

No issue with working mums. They have to do that, either for their current financial health or emotional health or because they can't trust their husbands or because their husbands won't allow it or whatever. Any reason they have for continuing work is valid as far as I care, and I have no reason to believe they're not doing their best. But damn, they do seem to get overly angry at SAHMs and delight in putting them down.

I'm planning to quit work and be a housewife at this rate as my health sucks (did have career aspirations about going to Uni and try to restart my career in a more sustainable way , but mumsnet shat on my confidence about that saying I couldn't do it as I'm disabled lol) and I don't even have kids. I'd be entirely dependant on DH and vulnerable. I'm cool with that. I'll frolic in the fields and bake him cookies and take him lunch whilst you're having yet another wanky meeting about KPIs or some shit and worrying about whether to spend your super high wage in a beach holiday or loft conversion. If he leaves me, worst that will happen is homelessness really. And I'm sure it wouldn't.

Anyway,

I think men would cope fine as women. As well as we cope, anyway hahaha.

I have zero issue with women choosing to be a SAHP. If it works for your family then go for it!

I have issues with people suggesting I’m neglecting my child by going out to work. Or that I’m working for luxuries rather than providing for my family.

I’m not jealous either, I have never wanted to be a SAHP and while it’s partly because financial independence is important to me it’s also because I wouldn’t enjoy it. We’re all different.

Glowingup · 06/08/2025 10:54

Agix · 06/08/2025 10:38

The pressure for women to work after they have children is capitalist bullshit. Women fought for the right to work so they could choose to fund themselves instead of being forced into relying on a man, and now it's been twisted into someone that just benefits capitalist fat cats - you're now useless if you don't work, and if (gasp) you choose to be a SAHM.

And half of mumsnet is doing the dirty work for them, scratching anyone who is a SAHM and financially dependant on their husband.

You should be able to depend on the partner you married to bring home the bacon whilst you look after home and family. If he earns enough, and is happy with the arrangement , why shouldn't mum stay home with the kids.

It is better for the kids. Of course it is.

"Ewww you're financially dependent on a man! You're so financially vulnerable!"... So? No problem with that if it works for the family. You should be able to trust him. You should be able to be vulnerable. If you can't trust your husband, then maybe you should have chosen a better husband. Utterly weird that you married someone you can't trust, better to have not married at all.

If their DHs left, and that mother was left with barely anything from the divorce (unlikely but let's pretend), we all know she'd still be able to find her way and support herself. Of course she would. Not like she's gonna lie down in a gutter and die is it? Being a SAHM gives a lot of transferable skills if nothing else.

Truly think people who fearmonger at SAHMs are jealous because they can't do it and feel secure, and would actually love it if they could.

No issue with working mums. They have to do that, either for their current financial health or emotional health or because they can't trust their husbands or because their husbands won't allow it or whatever. Any reason they have for continuing work is valid as far as I care, and I have no reason to believe they're not doing their best. But damn, they do seem to get overly angry at SAHMs and delight in putting them down.

I'm planning to quit work and be a housewife at this rate as my health sucks (did have career aspirations about going to Uni and try to restart my career in a more sustainable way , but mumsnet shat on my confidence about that saying I couldn't do it as I'm disabled lol) and I don't even have kids. I'd be entirely dependant on DH and vulnerable. I'm cool with that. I'll frolic in the fields and bake him cookies and take him lunch whilst you're having yet another wanky meeting about KPIs or some shit and worrying about whether to spend your super high wage in a beach holiday or loft conversion. If he leaves me, worst that will happen is homelessness really. And I'm sure it wouldn't.

Anyway,

I think men would cope fine as women. As well as we cope, anyway hahaha.

Maybe do some research about post-divorce poverty before you spout off eh? Theres a reason for the warnings.

HowardTJMoon · 06/08/2025 11:01

ThankYouNigel · 06/08/2025 10:17

Shows how little people understand the role these days. My children are being brought up to understand and respect what housewives do.

I understand perfectly that being a housewife is in no way a profession and anyone claiming otherwise is delusional.

Backtoreality1 · 06/08/2025 11:25

Have to ask - whats an 'average' woman? I don't know any tow women that lead even similar lives.

SugarSoiree · 06/08/2025 12:08

ThankYouNigel · 06/08/2025 10:13

Oh and I bet you are also financially dependent on your DH- if he left tomorrow, I’d bet my house that you couldn’t survive on your own without him on your own earnings as an individual. Most can’t, but like to feel superior for working any token amount of hours. Most of the hours my friends who do work covers a few holidays etc and is a drop in the ocean compared to what their DH’s cover- still financially dependent factually 😂

Can't address any of the points raised there then?

You're embarrassing yourself.

I can and have run a household on my own for years after divorcing my ex husband and buying him out of the house to get rid of him because he was lazy and useless at home, thought all he had to do was work and complain he was tired from work. I won't be anyone's maid. I don't depend on my husband for his money. I would expect him to continue to pay 50% of my daughters costs if we ever divorce because he is her father but I don't need his money for me or my lifestyle.

SugarSoiree · 06/08/2025 12:13

ThankYouNigel · 06/08/2025 09:40

I’ve got two full time jobs already thanks- Full Time Mother and Professional Housewife. You know, the ones that actually matter.

No. You do not have two full time jobs.

Being a mother is not a job, it is a role. A personal responsibility. One that you don't do full time because your children are at school.

Professional Housewife 😂 like I said you're embarrassing yourself.

You don't have any full time jobs. You are unemployed.

ThankYouNigel · 06/08/2025 12:24

SugarSoiree · 06/08/2025 12:13

No. You do not have two full time jobs.

Being a mother is not a job, it is a role. A personal responsibility. One that you don't do full time because your children are at school.

Professional Housewife 😂 like I said you're embarrassing yourself.

You don't have any full time jobs. You are unemployed.

You’re embarrassing yourself being so rude to me.

A society that disrespects full time motherhood is utterly corrupt and materialistic. Abusive actually to both women and children. That’s embarrassing.

ThankYouNigel · 06/08/2025 12:26

SugarSoiree · 06/08/2025 12:08

Can't address any of the points raised there then?

You're embarrassing yourself.

I can and have run a household on my own for years after divorcing my ex husband and buying him out of the house to get rid of him because he was lazy and useless at home, thought all he had to do was work and complain he was tired from work. I won't be anyone's maid. I don't depend on my husband for his money. I would expect him to continue to pay 50% of my daughters costs if we ever divorce because he is her father but I don't need his money for me or my lifestyle.

Edited

Oh and it sounds like your ex-DH would be much better suited to a housewife, a proper team player who respects his contribution instead of running him into the ground and trying to palm their half onto him. Hope he found one- plenty out there who respect a good man!

ThankYouNigel · 06/08/2025 12:28

Agix · 06/08/2025 10:38

The pressure for women to work after they have children is capitalist bullshit. Women fought for the right to work so they could choose to fund themselves instead of being forced into relying on a man, and now it's been twisted into someone that just benefits capitalist fat cats - you're now useless if you don't work, and if (gasp) you choose to be a SAHM.

And half of mumsnet is doing the dirty work for them, scratching anyone who is a SAHM and financially dependant on their husband.

You should be able to depend on the partner you married to bring home the bacon whilst you look after home and family. If he earns enough, and is happy with the arrangement , why shouldn't mum stay home with the kids.

It is better for the kids. Of course it is.

"Ewww you're financially dependent on a man! You're so financially vulnerable!"... So? No problem with that if it works for the family. You should be able to trust him. You should be able to be vulnerable. If you can't trust your husband, then maybe you should have chosen a better husband. Utterly weird that you married someone you can't trust, better to have not married at all.

If their DHs left, and that mother was left with barely anything from the divorce (unlikely but let's pretend), we all know she'd still be able to find her way and support herself. Of course she would. Not like she's gonna lie down in a gutter and die is it? Being a SAHM gives a lot of transferable skills if nothing else.

Truly think people who fearmonger at SAHMs are jealous because they can't do it and feel secure, and would actually love it if they could.

No issue with working mums. They have to do that, either for their current financial health or emotional health or because they can't trust their husbands or because their husbands won't allow it or whatever. Any reason they have for continuing work is valid as far as I care, and I have no reason to believe they're not doing their best. But damn, they do seem to get overly angry at SAHMs and delight in putting them down.

I'm planning to quit work and be a housewife at this rate as my health sucks (did have career aspirations about going to Uni and try to restart my career in a more sustainable way , but mumsnet shat on my confidence about that saying I couldn't do it as I'm disabled lol) and I don't even have kids. I'd be entirely dependant on DH and vulnerable. I'm cool with that. I'll frolic in the fields and bake him cookies and take him lunch whilst you're having yet another wanky meeting about KPIs or some shit and worrying about whether to spend your super high wage in a beach holiday or loft conversion. If he leaves me, worst that will happen is homelessness really. And I'm sure it wouldn't.

Anyway,

I think men would cope fine as women. As well as we cope, anyway hahaha.

Well done for ignoring people who have been hateful towards you, and for prioritising your own health. It’s your life, wishing you well ☺️

SleeplessInWherever · 06/08/2025 12:28

ThankYouNigel · 06/08/2025 12:26

Oh and it sounds like your ex-DH would be much better suited to a housewife, a proper team player who respects his contribution instead of running him into the ground and trying to palm their half onto him. Hope he found one- plenty out there who respect a good man!

That’s a little below the belt.

I don’t think we need to be a) accusing posters of abusing women and children or b) commenting on their ended marriages, that we know very little about.

ThankYouNigel · 06/08/2025 12:29

SleeplessInWherever · 06/08/2025 12:28

That’s a little below the belt.

I don’t think we need to be a) accusing posters of abusing women and children or b) commenting on their ended marriages, that we know very little about.

You are joking, after the sheer amount of negative, angry, ranting posts I’ve had from that poster?! Mocking me, laughing at me?

My advice- stop dishing it out if you can’t take it. I will absolutely retaliate.

Pougr · 06/08/2025 12:29

ThankYouNigel · 06/08/2025 12:26

Oh and it sounds like your ex-DH would be much better suited to a housewife, a proper team player who respects his contribution instead of running him into the ground and trying to palm their half onto him. Hope he found one- plenty out there who respect a good man!

lol you’re jumping the shark.

a lazy man doing nothing at home, isn’t a team player or a good man.

HighLadyofTheNightCourt · 06/08/2025 12:32

ThankYouNigel · 06/08/2025 12:26

Oh and it sounds like your ex-DH would be much better suited to a housewife, a proper team player who respects his contribution instead of running him into the ground and trying to palm their half onto him. Hope he found one- plenty out there who respect a good man!

What a shitty comment. Low even for you @ThankYouNigel

You might be happy to be married to a man who thinks his only contribution to family life is financial, but many of us view those men as poor husbands and poor fathers. Especially when we’re just as capable of providing financially for our family.

SleeplessInWherever · 06/08/2025 12:35

ThankYouNigel · 06/08/2025 12:29

You are joking, after the sheer amount of negative, angry, ranting posts I’ve had from that poster?! Mocking me, laughing at me?

My advice- stop dishing it out if you can’t take it. I will absolutely retaliate.

I’m not joking, no.

Accusing a PP of child abuse, essentially, is out of line.

And if someone says why their previous relationship ended, it’s not up to you to say he’s a “good man.” That’s for her to decide, he’s her ex husband.

Retaliating and getting personal, are different.

HighLadyofTheNightCourt · 06/08/2025 12:37

ThankYouNigel · 06/08/2025 12:24

You’re embarrassing yourself being so rude to me.

A society that disrespects full time motherhood is utterly corrupt and materialistic. Abusive actually to both women and children. That’s embarrassing.

Are you actually accusing working mothers of abusing their children? You need help.

ThankYouNigel · 06/08/2025 12:37

SleeplessInWherever · 06/08/2025 12:35

I’m not joking, no.

Accusing a PP of child abuse, essentially, is out of line.

And if someone says why their previous relationship ended, it’s not up to you to say he’s a “good man.” That’s for her to decide, he’s her ex husband.

Retaliating and getting personal, are different.

Society is absolutely abusive to hound and badger mothers not to be with their own babies before either party is ready. To pester them, to question them, to shame them. Animals in the wild know better than that!

SleeplessInWherever · 06/08/2025 12:41

ThankYouNigel · 06/08/2025 12:37

Society is absolutely abusive to hound and badger mothers not to be with their own babies before either party is ready. To pester them, to question them, to shame them. Animals in the wild know better than that!

Some of them also eat their own young, I’d say that’s fairly abusive.

You’re honestly another level.