I’m not sure how it’s diagnosed.
My confusion was more about the fact that I don’t understand why others have received a definite diagnosis of CBD and Moth still hasn’t.
Everything points to the fact that Moth’s diagnosis is atypical (it’s slow-developing etc). However, he still hasn’t received a definite diagnosis.
Considering that RW and Moth started investigating his symptoms in 2015 (if we just go by the medical letters released by RW), you would expect more concrete evidence by now (10 years later) of the condition.
I’m confused at the discrepancy between the released medical letters and RW’s representation of his diagnosis. It’s very, very bold to definitively say he has CBD when the letters don’t offer any concrete evidence for that.
I doubt that the Observer will be able to get to the bottom of this, as medical records are private, but it just doesn’t add up.
I know I’m not saying anything new, as this has been a big question for most of us since the Observer’s initial investigation came out, but it’s been on my mind, as I’ve been wondering why the diagnosis process for others would be so different to Moth’s and why he still has no clear answers about his condition.