@Humankindness Any comment on the Times, Telegraph, Mail, Spectator, Sun, BBC etc who have all reported extensively on the matter? Are their pieces equally full of holes? Should they also be focused on more important matters?
In what way is interviewing Consultant Neurologists about the progress of rare neurodegenerative disorders and reporting their perspective making "insinuations"?
Having read both Sally Walker's "rebuttal" and listened to Mrs Hemmings and her daughter account of events - I'm confident that there was embezzlement.
Probably best to reserve the hyperbole for a piece of fiction, should you ever chose to write one. Asking an author about large holes in their high-profile "completely factual" piece of work isn't hanging, drawing and quartering.
Widespread press attention for some people must be deeply uncomfortably, I agree. It's slightly harder to argue that case when the subject in this instance has spoken to print and broadcast outlets on numerous occasions over the past few years.