I was surprised at the line "it was a pressurised time for me. It was also a time mistakes were made in the business" very telling when she was talking about the embezzlement. Also why point out the financial crunch occurred after she was working there?
To me she's saying she didn't do anything wrong and that the business wasn't well run. Even if that were the case, she was bookkeeper, why didn't she tell Hemmings of the errors? Why was it pressurised?
The 2008 crunch was swift. There was an impact on the housing market...but no one saw it coming at their level. So why mention it? To obscure the facts? to push the ideal the business was struggling? Which given it was pre 2008 no it wouldn't have been.
Also if there was no evidence to prove Her innocence, clearly there was to proof that something was admiss, otherwise, why would the police have talked to Her and why would she have paid him money. Clearly Mrs Hennings has proof of Her payments.
Her statement looks like it's been written by a very good pr. Company or even ai, using emotive language from the start, not addressing the details of how she lost her house, making statements that are clearly not true as there is no way post the hacking scandal would a newspaper like the Observer print if they had been approached by lawyers/Winn.