This whole thing is making me ponder the contemporary trend of personalising everything in order to sell it to the masses. It seems there has to be an "overcoming adversity" narrative arc in order to sell any unrelated content.
Has anyone seen Apple Cider Vinegar? In it you have Belle Gibson, aware she's been at least partially rumbled, trying to persuade her editor at Penguin to leave out the bits about overcoming cancer in her recipe book and just market it on the strength of the recipes, but the editor will have none of it, telling her "It's not the books we sell nowadays, it's the people" or similar. I don't know how far that's based on the truth though.
This also hit me while watching Race Across the World- everybody had to have a bloody back story, and screen time that could have been spent focusing on the participants exploring the fantastic countries they were travelling in was instead dedicated to tedious navel gazing about whether they'd "grown closer" 🙄 And then it turns out that the winner's back story had been heavily manipulated by the BBC to cast her as a "simple wife and mum finding herself again", rather than the successful eventer she actually was.
It's a tedious and infantalising fashion, and hopefully Saltgate will prod the culture industry to move on from it.
God, imagine if there was this tendency in publishing when Dervla Murphy was writing her books. "Less about the countries you're visiting Dervla, and more about you revisiting past trauma of having to nurse your sick mum, and ooh- why not a whole book about your decision to become a single mum by choice in the 1970s, with maybe the odd superficial pretty view chucked in? Then the whole Internet can join in with the fun of trying to identify your daughter's father!"