That's a lot of words to tell us you just took her word for it/made a vague guess because it suits your quasi religious belief about free choice.
Really, friend or not, you can't possibly say whether someone made a decision totally in a vacuum. The odds of you even being able to do that for yourself are remote.
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 18:44
You cant be real. This is reminding me of the young men who spend too much time looking at negative influences online with no guidance and their minds get warped.
Quoting Eagle2025
PutThe ·
08/07/2025 18:15
Yes I'm sure you do know her. That doesn't tell us how you've managed to work out whether she's correct about what has and hasn't influenced her. It's actually a pretty radical proposition to say you know someone hasn't been subjected to any wider societal influence at all on a particular point, especially as people often won't know this themselves, so it's a claim that requires actual evidence.
Quoting PutThe
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 16:47
What 😆 one of the women I'm referring to has been a very close friend for around 25 years, I know her, I know her life and how her mind works.
Quoting Eagle2025
PutThe ·
08/07/2025 16:34
How did you go about assessing this? Presumably there's some methodology, since you've said you know.
Quoting PutThe
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 16:29
Well I know some women make their own choice free of any influence. I've spoken to some of those women. So yes I can say that some women make their own choice.
Quoting Eagle2025
PutThe ·
08/07/2025 16:22
If that's the case, you can't say sometimes it's a choice entirely free of any wider influence. If we don't know how it's made up, that means we can't be sure that any cases where women made their decision in a vacuum exist at all.
Quoting MissScarletInTheBallroom
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 16:20
As I said before we dont know how it's made up. What percentage free thinking, what percentage dont care, what percentage practical reasons, what percentage other personal reasons and what percentage were forced or felt they had to for tradition.
Quoting Eagle2025
MissScarletInTheBallroom ·
08/07/2025 16:18
So odd that over 90% of women are making the same entirely free choice.
Quoting CurlewKate
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 16:08
Who knows actual the numbers but yes not everyone feels they should or shouldnt change their name based on what others may or may not think. Sometimes it can simply be the woman's own personal choice can you believe it!
Quoting Eagle2025
CurlewKate ·
08/07/2025 15:58
So you are saying that everybody makes decisions completely in a vacuum. No societal or familial pressures or social influences? Just absolute personal preference.
Quoting CurlewKate
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 15:11
Explanation in what way? Google it if you want- is a woman wishing to take her husband's surname sexist. Big long explanation will come up for you, for both sides of the argument. Its opinions and views not facts.
Quoting Eagle2025
CurlewKate ·
08/07/2025 15:04
Quoting CurlewKate
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 14:09
Well I haven't made any comments re children but I along with many others dont view a woman choosing to change her name on marriage as sexist. As long as it's her choice to do so.
Quoting Eagle2025
CurlewKate ·
08/07/2025 14:06
Have I missed you explaining why the practice of of women taking men’s names on marriage and children taking their father’s name is not patriarchal? I apologise if I have-it’s a fast moving thread…
Quoting MageQueen
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 13:57
Well this all comes back to whether you believe its sexist or not. I dont. You do.
Quoting SerafinasGoose
MageQueen ·
08/07/2025 13:26
@Eagle2025 doesn't believe or understand the difference between not being forced by law to do something vs going along with something because it's the done thing. she also doesn't seem to have any understanding whatsoever that just because a choice exists, that doesn't mean the option that is selected isn't intrinsically sexist. She thinks that the fact that there is no legal obligation removes the intrinsic sexism of a woman taking a man's name.
I have met many women like this. None of us want to be part of perpetuating sexism. so sometimes it's easier to present our choices as purely that - choices. And pretend that the underlying assumptions, stereotypes, social conditioning don't exist because there is a "choice".
Quoting Eagle2025
SerafinasGoose ·
08/07/2025 13:22
It's worth noting that this post doesn't address the point it was replying to in the post quoted above.
It takes up an entirely different point which the previous poster never made in the first place.
Quoting PutThe
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 12:35
But as grown women surely we can decide for ourselves what we want. I
If you had a female friend or relative getting married and she wanted to keep her name, what would your advice to her be? You must take your husbands name! I dont think so.
Quoting Eagle2025
PutThe ·
08/07/2025 12:30
There are absolutely people who expect women to do just that. It's a fact. There are examples of women who've experienced this on this very thread. Sometimes it's the response to finding out you haven't, sometimes it's having your details changed without your request or permission, sometimes it's people incorrectly telling you that it's your legal name.
I can't say whether these people expect women to do it without thinking, not least because some of them don't appear to have applied any thought themselves. But there are absolutely expectations that women will automatically change their names on marriage and those of us who've experienced this are the best qualified to comment on the issue.
If you just mean you don't expect it, that's laudable but unfortunately not everyone follows your good example.
Quoting MiloMinderbinder925
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 12:21
Ok yes. But it's not expected anymore for women to just automatically and without thinking take a new surname.
Quoting Eagle2025
MiloMinderbinder925 ·
08/07/2025 12:17
It's a social norm, something women do because it's expected.
Quoting MiloMinderbinder925
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 12:15
I would argue leg shaving is not traditional 😆
But anyway I dont think that's comparable.
Quoting Eagle2025
MiloMinderbinder925 ·
08/07/2025 12:11
So you can see why people do things that are considered 'traditional' without thinking.
Quoting MiloMinderbinder925
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 12:00
Would I go to the beach without shaving, my legs I presume you mean, no probably not.
Quoting Eagle2025
MiloMinderbinder925 ·
08/07/2025 11:57
The principle is the same. A woman's identity subsumed within her husband's. People tend to capitulate to the norms of society. For example, would you go to the beach without shaving?
Quoting MageQueen
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 11:53
Good that you view them all the same and also appreciate times have changed. A woman choosing to take her partner's surname is completely different to days gone by when it wasnt a choice.
Quoting Eagle2025
MageQueen ·
08/07/2025 11:49
They're ALL sexist. These traditions are ALL bsaed in misogyny. But I personally believe that if I choose to stick with one or some or all of these traditions, that's my right. I'd just be a fool if I don't understand that they are intrinsically based on a deeply flawed system.
And I'm thrilled that being married genuinely DOES do more to protect women today than it did in the past. Previously it was just taking everything away - rights, property, bodily autonomy. So YAY that it's changing and that as an institution or social and legal contract it's becoming BETTER. I don't think being married is intrinsically sexist or misogynist anymore, but the bits that go with it are still often based on those sexist or misogynist "norms" of the past.
Quoting MageQueen
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 11:46
I guess I dont understand the picking and choosing what you deem sexist given they both seem to have been very sexist traditions in the past.
Quoting Eagle2025
MageQueen ·
08/07/2025 11:43
I don't really understand this. @MiloMinderbinder925 is simply pointing out that there are loads of very sexist things associated with marriage and weddings in particular. And we'd be fools if we didn't acknowledge it. Doesn't mean we can't still wear white/get our dads to walk us down the aisle etc etc, but it would be ridiculous not to ackowledge how silly and misogynist these traditions are, or where they came from?
I just remembered another one from my "surprising push back when I didn't change my name". I had to make a very firm statement to the DJ or whoever it was at our reception - we were NOT coming in as "Ladies and Gentlement, I present - Mr and Mrs DH Name".
Quoting MiloMinderbinder925
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 11:38
So what's the reason behind posting things that are bad about marriage? Or that used to be bad but dont exist anymore
Quoting Eagle2025
MiloMinderbinder925 ·
08/07/2025 11:36
I've already said that marriage is a legal contract that protects women, I'm of course in favour of women being financially protected.
Quoting MiloMinderbinder925
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 11:29
So are you for or against marriage? I'm not sure if it's you or another poster that keeps mentioning bad things associated with marriage.
Quoting Eagle2025
MiloMinderbinder925 ·
08/07/2025 11:22
I've given you three wedding traditions that are still in use: 'Giving away the bride', promising to obey and taking her husband's name. They still apply.
It's delightful that you think we live in a feminist utopia, completely cut off from the past. Long may it continue💜
Quoting MiloMinderbinder925
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 11:15
Again doesnt apply anymore. But by the sounds of it its marriage thats connecting all this.
Quoting Eagle2025
MiloMinderbinder925 ·
08/07/2025 11:05
Legacy traditions are traditions carried over from the Law of Coverture which are still used now. It wasn't so long ago that women couldn't get a mortgage without a husband.
Quoting MiloMinderbinder925
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 10:41
Well thankfully that's in the past
Quoting Eagle2025
MiloMinderbinder925 ·
08/07/2025 10:29
I asked if you had heard of the Law of Coverture. For centuries, when a woman married, she lost all agency and her rights were subsumed. Part of this was being called by her husband's name, eg Mrs Barry Green.
Marriage is a legal contract which protects women, therefore it's not sexist. However legacy traditions of the Law of Coverture such as a father handing his property to her new owner, promises to 'love, honour and obey' and taking your husband's name, are deeply misogynist.
Quoting MiloMinderbinder925
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 10:19
You've just described marriage itself as a deeply misogynistic tradition. So a married woman has already taken part in a sexist tradition by getting married (in your opinion).
Quoting Eagle2025
MiloMinderbinder925 ·
08/07/2025 10:15
Taking a man's name upon marriage - the subject of the thread.
Quoting MiloMinderbinder925
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 10:09
You mean marriage is a deeply misogynistic tradition
Quoting Eagle2025
MiloMinderbinder925 ·
08/07/2025 10:06
Of course it doesn't but a woman being subsumed into a man's identity is a tradition from the Law. Upon marriage, a woman lost all agency and became her husband. Therefore it's a deeply misogynist tradition.
Quoting MiloMinderbinder925
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 10:00
Just googled it and it doesnt seem to exist anymore is that correct?
Quoting Eagle2025
MiloMinderbinder925 ·
08/07/2025 09:52
Do you know about the Law of Coverture?
Quoting Ddakji
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 08:08
My stance is I dont view a woman wishing to take her partner's surname as sexist.
Quoting Eagle2025
Ddakji ·
08/07/2025 07:52
Great - so you understand that not all women are feminists, and not all choices women make are feminist/non-sexist choices (even if they are feminists).
You seem to have been labouring under a misapprehension that we are telling women what they can and can’t do.
Quoting Ddakji
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 07:46
Correct we are all individuals. No two exactly the same.
Quoting Eagle2025
Ddakji ·
08/07/2025 07:42
Of course she can. That doesn’t make her choices automatically feminist choices. Not all women are feminists, for a start!
Quoting Ddakji
Eagle2025 ·
08/07/2025 07:08
A woman can make whatever choices she wishes.
Quoting Eagle2025
Ddakji ·
08/07/2025 06:55
Yes? No one is disagreeing with that. Simply making the point that not every choice a woman makes is a feminist choice.
Quoting Ddakji
Eagle2025 ·
07/07/2025 22:10
I see women as strong and confident with their own minds and a voice. Times have changed. I dont see women as victims. I'm confident that women can make their own choices in life in the majority of cases.
Quoting Eagle2025
Ddakji ·
07/07/2025 22:05
But it’s still not a free and equal choice, in that the expectation is still for women to take their husband’s name, or for women to decide to keep their name (but almost certainly her children will have his name).
Men are not making these decisions. Men just keep their name. Men are never the only person in the family with a different name to everyone else.
Quoting Ddakji
Eagle2025 ·
07/07/2025 21:54
Oh come on, we all know why throughout history men were dominant. But hey be happy we have choice now! Dont marry a man if his values dont align with yours. Or dont get married full stop if you dont agree with it.
Quoting Eagle2025
Ddakji ·
07/07/2025 21:42
Funny how blokes never seem to have this.
Where did the tradition come from, do you think?
Quoting Tandora
Eagle2025 ·
07/07/2025 21:40
No the reason is tradition. But if a woman wants her partner's surname then it's not sexism as she is getting what she wants.
And as others have mentioned sometimes there are other reasons they wished their husband's surname such as being bullied for their surname and not wishing their kids to experience the same.
Quoting Eagle2025
Tandora ·
07/07/2025 21:35
The issue is that the majority of women take their husbands names, whereas it’s virtually unheard of for men to take their wives names. The reason for this is sexism.
Quoting SouthLondonMum22
Eagle2025 ·
07/07/2025 21:14
Right so it's a non issue then if we all know fine well people can choose whatever surname option they want.
Quoting Eagle2025
SouthLondonMum22 ·
07/07/2025 21:09
No one is saying otherwise.
Quoting speroku
Eagle2025 ·
07/07/2025 21:07
It's up to the individual couples to decide what they want to do. If a woman doesnt want to change her surname and a man doesnt want to either then they can both just keep their own surnames. If one wishes to change then they can go with that.
speroku ·
07/07/2025 21:03
I'm curious, at what point would it become just a choice, rather than a sexist choice in your view?
I think there's a Caitlin Moran quote that goes something along the lines of "if you're not sure if something is sexist, ask yourself if the men are doing it. If the answer is no then it probably is"
Of course this is a massive oversimplification (and obviously shouldn't include biological things like giving birth) but it's broadly true. If even Mr Dick and Mr Fartly won't change their names on marriage then it might be worth asking why it's the default "choice" for women.