Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Photo of husband posted on Facebook group with allegation - legalities?

622 replies

Hattie24 · 04/07/2025 23:35

Earlier I was alerted to a post by a woman on our town’s community Facebook page. It is a rant about a flat in her block being used by a group of prostitutes which is causing issues at unsociable hours and how the landlord isn’t doing anything about it. Under this there are photos of various men at the entrance of the block of flats and one of them is my husband. The insinuation is that these have all been visiting that flat.

I want to know the legalities of this woman posting such an allegation as she is outright refusing to remove the post. It is obviously extremely humiliating for me (friends and no doubt colleagues have seen it) and there’s so many comments underneath. We’ve been on a ‘break’ due to various issues but still living together and haven’t been intimate for nearly a year so I don’t need a lecture on how I shouldn’t have married such a man.

Is it me or is someone putting up a post like this without any thought for the consequences on various families etc utterly disgusting?

OP posts:
PinkSwatch · 05/07/2025 17:43

Hattie24 · 05/07/2025 10:59

We do still have love for each other, he’s a decent man deep down.

A man who pays money to rape women and doesn't care whether they've been trafficked is not a decent man! JFC!

PinkSwatch · 05/07/2025 17:47

Motherofacertainage · 05/07/2025 17:29

The fact that OP herself isn't convinced her STBX isn't visiting prostitutes tells us all we need to know. The FB 'busybody' may or may not be operating entirely inside the privacy laws but I can't understand why people have more sympathy with the STBX than with her. If this post was called " I suspect that someone is running a brothel in my building using sex trafficked women" then many would be advising getting photos of the Johns and naming and shaming.

Can you quote the posts that are showing more sympathy for the rapist than for the OP? Because all I can see is a bunch of women concerned about vulnerable women and girls being trafficked and assaulted.

2025ismybestyear · 05/07/2025 17:48

Hattie24 · 05/07/2025 11:18

He has also offered for me to review his bank account for any cash withdrawals which he tells me I won’t find - and he certainly isn’t financially savvy enough to have any hidden accounts.

I am starting to wonder if I should find the partner of the snooping cow who put the post up and photograph him somewhere ‘dodgy’ and post it on FB! See how she likes it.

Don't be an immature idiot.

By the way, wouldn't you rather have a man who is decent on the surface and throughout, than deep down?

arcticpandas · 05/07/2025 17:48

@Hattie24 You could say that about anyone "he's a decent man deep down". For me actions speak louder than words. But I think you don't want to believe it's true so whatever far fetched salad he's feeding you you'll buy it. Just like he buys prostitutes.

Nikki75 · 05/07/2025 17:53

I'd never let your husband back in your life after this .... I wouldn't waste money on solicitors getting someone prosecuted for posting a picture as awful as if is I'd pay out for a divorce though.
Your husbands at fault no one else.

madroid · 05/07/2025 18:03

"He says he was seeing a physio for treatment of a muscle injury linked to his rugby playing. I am struggling to believe this"

It is NOT defamation if it's true. I'd stay out of it OP. Hope your children don't find out about the post. But if they do you will just have to support them through it. Direct any questions to their father.

This is not your circus.

Inyournewdress · 05/07/2025 18:09

PeapodMcgee · 05/07/2025 11:45

You sound nice.

Doesn’t she? I’m starting to get a sense of how OP and hubby ended up together.

Angelbottom · 05/07/2025 18:09

As far as I understand it visiting a “escort “ is not illegal. Running a brothel is. Not sure how that factors in. I feel for you and your family, it is humiliating for you.
Pay no attention to “your husband is a demon posts.” That has no bearing on you. Enormous amounts of men use call girls.

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 05/07/2025 18:37

Are you saying it is OK to buy women’s bodies for sex, @Angelbottom? That it is fine to be the sort of man who doesn’t care if a woman has been trafficked and is being forced into prostitution, as long as he gets to fuck someone?

You are right that it is not illegal to buy sex with a prostitute, but I still think it is morally repugnant.

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 05/07/2025 18:39

Gloriia · 05/07/2025 17:07

According to a FB vigilante!

Facts, proof, evidence, landlords, the police. All better things for the avid Face booker to be concerning themselves with.

What other reason could there be for a flat full of women, that change on a regular and frequent basis, and have a stream of solely male visitors who only stay an hour or so, @Gloriia? I can’t think of any innocent explanations for all of that.

ShamrockShenanigans · 05/07/2025 18:41

Angelbottom · 05/07/2025 18:09

As far as I understand it visiting a “escort “ is not illegal. Running a brothel is. Not sure how that factors in. I feel for you and your family, it is humiliating for you.
Pay no attention to “your husband is a demon posts.” That has no bearing on you. Enormous amounts of men use call girls.

The word you're looking for is prostitute.

And since when does an enormous amount of men doing anything, make something ok?

PinkyFlamingo · 05/07/2025 18:41

Hattie24 · 05/07/2025 11:45

She is a snooping cow who posted images of men without any evidence to accuse them of wrong doing. Someone in the FB comments asked her if she was just jealous she isn’t getting any!

Well that's horrible then. The reality of living next to prostitutes will be grim. And she is not a ",snooping cow", funny how all your fury is directed at her and not your lying cheating DH. You deserve each other

2024onwardsandup · 05/07/2025 18:41

ShamrockShenanigans · 05/07/2025 18:41

The word you're looking for is prostitute.

And since when does an enormous amount of men doing anything, make something ok?

I suspect the word is actually trafficked women

SnoopyPajamas · 05/07/2025 18:42

The "physio" just so happens to operate out of a flat, and just so happens to be a mate.

This is obviously just a friend providing a cover story.

The husband has offered to let OP go through his bank statements.

And this is laughable. It's a brothel operating out of someone's flat. He'll have paid in cash, which will have gone straight to the pimp of these sex-trafficked women with no English.

OP obviously doesn't care either way, but if this convoluted yarn about the "physio" is designed to convince friends and family of her husband's innocence, I wouldn't bother. No-one with half a brain cell would buy it.

Angelbottom · 05/07/2025 19:26

ShamrockShenanigans · 05/07/2025 18:41

The word you're looking for is prostitute.

And since when does an enormous amount of men doing anything, make something ok?

I believe the preferred term is sex worker. And it is a legitimate, legal and taxable profession. HMRC makes a large amount of revenue from this industry (see only fans) notwithstanding your moral outrage.
The point of the post is what is excepted in the parameters of the law; not the fact MN’s don’t like the idea of their husbands/partners/brothers paying for sex—which many are.

Angelbottom · 05/07/2025 19:28

2024onwardsandup · 05/07/2025 18:41

I suspect the word is actually trafficked women

Sex trafficking is a tragedy, but not all sex workers are trafficked.

Foolsgold74 · 05/07/2025 19:29

Angelbottom · 05/07/2025 19:26

I believe the preferred term is sex worker. And it is a legitimate, legal and taxable profession. HMRC makes a large amount of revenue from this industry (see only fans) notwithstanding your moral outrage.
The point of the post is what is excepted in the parameters of the law; not the fact MN’s don’t like the idea of their husbands/partners/brothers paying for sex—which many are.

Worker suggests that they are subject to employment law, legal rights, health and safety etc and this quite clearly isn't the case. Prostitute is far more accurate.

Foolsgold74 · 05/07/2025 19:30

Angelbottom · 05/07/2025 19:28

Sex trafficking is a tragedy, but not all sex workers are trafficked.

Tens of thousands will be though and the remainder are likely to have abuse and trauma in their background.

2024onwardsandup · 05/07/2025 19:33

Angelbottom · 05/07/2025 19:26

I believe the preferred term is sex worker. And it is a legitimate, legal and taxable profession. HMRC makes a large amount of revenue from this industry (see only fans) notwithstanding your moral outrage.
The point of the post is what is excepted in the parameters of the law; not the fact MN’s don’t like the idea of their husbands/partners/brothers paying for sex—which many are.

Yes I am morally outraged by men abusing women

Foolsgold74 · 05/07/2025 19:33

Angelbottom · 05/07/2025 18:09

As far as I understand it visiting a “escort “ is not illegal. Running a brothel is. Not sure how that factors in. I feel for you and your family, it is humiliating for you.
Pay no attention to “your husband is a demon posts.” That has no bearing on you. Enormous amounts of men use call girls.

Enormous amounts of men are low life scum who hate women and have zero regard for their health and well being and are happy to pay for access to their bodies.

AyeDeadOn · 05/07/2025 19:38

Hattie24 · 05/07/2025 09:45

The post is still there this morning but comments have been disabled, so hopefully it will fall down the page quickly (not that it makes much difference as the damage is done).

I do have sympathy for the residents, but don’t agree how they’ve gone about it. People in the comments asked why they haven’t addressed it with the women working there directly, and apparently there is a group of 3/4 which changes every fortnight and they all claim to have limited English.

My husband says the physio session was with a teammate who does this on the side as a favour for the team manager so there is no evidence in terms of a booking. However he says this team mate will vouch for him.

It has made me realise that the length of our break has been stupid and we either need to end it once and for all, or give it one last go.

Fgs the women are clearly trafficked! You expect the residents to take it up with trafficked women? Or their organised crime gang pimps?

lyinginthebathpondering · 05/07/2025 19:40

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ah that old chestnut…generally used when people who lack critical thinking skills aren’t winning an argument

PurpleRobe · 05/07/2025 19:45

Hattie24 · 04/07/2025 23:45

He says he was seeing a physio for treatment of a muscle injury linked to his rugby playing.

Lol

PurpleRobe · 05/07/2025 19:53

Forget about the FB woman. Sort out your marriage/ divorce. I'd not have anything to do with that man.

It won't reflect badly on you if people see the post .he is his own person.

Get the divorce is motion fgs

Disturbia81 · 05/07/2025 20:00

You should be focusing on his dirty fucking habit and thinking how to make it so you never need to see his face again.
He deserves to be shamed