Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Tax increases imminent

1000 replies

Iwishicouldflyhigh · 04/07/2025 11:28

Heavy hints that taxes will rise in the next Budget after the recent climb down (as the ‘taxes won’t rise again’ was based on a 5 billion saving in benefits).

I can’t lie, I’m so pissed off about this. I don’t think anyone wants to see someone who is genuinely unable to work to be further penalised, but we all know there are thousands of people who could work but don’t.

this country is going to absolute shit . We pay more and more for less and less.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Poynsettia · 05/07/2025 11:41

There'll be an outcry about anything any party does, but the main thing is that the protesters will struggle to get widespread support if the change is considered "fair" by the majority.

This was proved by the inheritance tax increase on the poor old farmers - I'm not against it but there was 0 warning.

bookdook · 05/07/2025 11:41

It’s not so music the tax rises it’s the lack of real reform of any of the problems of the overly complex tax and pensions systems that bothers me.

they should just scrap NI

taxguru · 05/07/2025 11:42

Poynsettia · 05/07/2025 11:37

Everyone having an id card would help to sort the black economy.

Worth the money in the long run.

I agree. Such a shame that Blair/Prescott/Brown shied away from it a couple of decades ago. We desperately need it, but it's another political hot potato because no one trusts the politicians and senior civil servants to get it right!

harpytohelp · 05/07/2025 11:43

I’ll have a go at how to save money. It won’t be means testing pensions that’s for sure.

Government had it right the first time then backtracked.

Winter fuel allowance threshold is £35k? WTF, more than I earn and I get nothing and I’m paying for everyone else! Wipe it out for all of them. Sick of propping them up.

The PIP and welfare cuts are needed. So many people could work but have no incentive to if they are being given £800pcm for ‘anxiety’. This needs to protect those that really need it. DLA for kids with mild autism etc - no!

Stop people working just 16 hours and getting topped up. Come and see me when working full time and still need topping up. Why should the rest of us fund your lifestyle choice?

More money into social care to unblock the NHS which will ultimately save money as people get worse while on waiting lists. Invest more in prevention. Stop giving free health care to anyone who rocks up - people should have to prove they are UK taxpayers.

Stop funding social care for anyone who has lived abroad for years then comes home when they need care. We get loads of this in our LA.

Close loopholes on things like discretionary property disregards on people going into care homes. Stop allowing families to put homes into trust to avoid care fees.

Sort out the asylum processing times to reduce the hotel costs to the tax payer - no recourse to public funds should also mean just that. We should not fund people to stay in hotels when they have come over illegally.

Do something about the costs of home to school transport and put more responsibility on parents. Moved to a rural area nowhere near a school then expect the state to fund them getting there? No. LAs to work out better systems for the SEN school transport, paying £60 per day for a taxi to school for one child etc. Better SEN school provision.

Julen7 · 05/07/2025 11:43

hamstersarse · 05/07/2025 11:19

people seem to casually dismiss the fact that Labour ran, very very clearly, on no tax rises.

It is not nothing that this turns out to be a lie. What is the value of democracy if when in power, politicians go back on what they said in their manifesto? Democracy is nothing, worthless, if the politicians are not representing what people voted for.

There should be no question of them raising taxes, that is not what they were democratically elected to do. If there is no
money, then they literally have to do spending cuts, that is their option, that’s it. Anything else is an insult to democracy.

Will probably come October budget still be blaming the Tory black hole

Emotionalsupporthamster · 05/07/2025 11:44

I’m not super well off, but our household could afford to pay slightly more in taxes and given the state of public services I really do think those of us that can should be paying more. Schools and hospitals and all the rest don’t pay for themselves.

EasternStandard · 05/07/2025 11:49

hamstersarse · 05/07/2025 11:19

people seem to casually dismiss the fact that Labour ran, very very clearly, on no tax rises.

It is not nothing that this turns out to be a lie. What is the value of democracy if when in power, politicians go back on what they said in their manifesto? Democracy is nothing, worthless, if the politicians are not representing what people voted for.

There should be no question of them raising taxes, that is not what they were democratically elected to do. If there is no
money, then they literally have to do spending cuts, that is their option, that’s it. Anything else is an insult to democracy.

Of course but this is mn, the same were probably posting any mention of tax rises pre GE were a lie.

I doubt the general public will be as pro Labour. If they have lied it’ll come back. Already sentiment year in is low.

Nickisli1 · 05/07/2025 12:01

PandoraSocks · 05/07/2025 09:55

Bumping this excellent post.

Also bumping this excellent post! Focusing on disabled and IC is the wrong thing. Take the billions spent on bailing out banks (ie more money given to super wealthy). Also why does people keep saying the wealthy will just move out of the UK. Of the wealthy I know, most hage families and connections to the UK so will just pay more. Only the very very top / ultra wealthy will move away if they have to pay more

EasternStandard · 05/07/2025 12:06

Nickisli1 · 05/07/2025 12:01

Also bumping this excellent post! Focusing on disabled and IC is the wrong thing. Take the billions spent on bailing out banks (ie more money given to super wealthy). Also why does people keep saying the wealthy will just move out of the UK. Of the wealthy I know, most hage families and connections to the UK so will just pay more. Only the very very top / ultra wealthy will move away if they have to pay more

When people post they want others to pay more tax what income levels or taxes are you thinking of?

WestwardHo1 · 05/07/2025 12:06

MyDadWasAnArse · 05/07/2025 09:33

You cannot means test the state pension. It's not a benefit. Many people have paid into it for 50 years via national insurance contributions.

That's why I said it's a tricky one.

However you're not "paying into it". Your taxes are being used for the existing cohort's pensions.

taxguru · 05/07/2025 12:07

WestwardHo1 · 05/07/2025 12:06

That's why I said it's a tricky one.

However you're not "paying into it". Your taxes are being used for the existing cohort's pensions.

We really should have changed the name from "insurance" when it just morphed into yet another tax! It just gives people the wrong idea as to why it's paid and what it's used for!

WestwardHo1 · 05/07/2025 12:09

Emotionalsupporthamster · 05/07/2025 11:44

I’m not super well off, but our household could afford to pay slightly more in taxes and given the state of public services I really do think those of us that can should be paying more. Schools and hospitals and all the rest don’t pay for themselves.

The problem is we won't be getting better schools/hospitals etc. More money is needed to pay for poorer services.

It's really simple. There was an outcry about cutting benefits. To maintain these benefits (and extend them as more and more people claiming them), tax payers are going to have to pay more. It won't be going to schools and hospitals. It'll be going on welfare and debt interest.

Jellycatspyjamas · 05/07/2025 12:17

WestwardHo1 · 05/07/2025 12:09

The problem is we won't be getting better schools/hospitals etc. More money is needed to pay for poorer services.

It's really simple. There was an outcry about cutting benefits. To maintain these benefits (and extend them as more and more people claiming them), tax payers are going to have to pay more. It won't be going to schools and hospitals. It'll be going on welfare and debt interest.

I think people really need to understand this, more tax isn’t going to pay for improvements for a very long time. More investment is needed just to stand still. Services have been cut so deeply and for so long, leaving a trail of destruction in their wake it will take years and billions of investment to get to a point where we see anything additional or improved.

It’s like a house that’s been left to ruin, any money initially needs to go into the foundations, the walls, the roof making what’s there sound again. It’s a long time before you see paint on the walls.

Folk think their additional tax will buy a fresh coat of paint, when actually the roofs falling in.

bookdook · 05/07/2025 12:19

more tax isn’t going to pay for improvements for a very long time. More investment is needed just to stand still. Services have been cut so deeply and for so long, leaving a trail of destruction in their wake it will take years and billions of investment to get to a point where we see anything additional or improved.

Yep

Havanananana · 05/07/2025 12:27

Poynsettia · 05/07/2025 11:35

I agree - what has changed is the length of time people are living - all those retiring doctors, nurses, civil servants going to get a pension for decades longer than was expected when they started in their jobs. Then there's state pension - people living to 100 that's a lot of dole outs.

Governments have had decades in which to plan for people living longer - they've had since 1955 to work out a reasonable estimate of how many people over 70 would be alive today, and what housing, healthcare and support etc. they would need. People living longer is also the result of improved living and working conditions, better housing and better healthcare than was available decades ago - which is surely something to be celebrated rather than something that a few people seem to consider is a negative development.

People "getting pensions for decades longer than was expected" is incorrect - yes, many people are living longer than was expected at the time they were born, but not decades longer, and this could have been predicted and monitored over time and appropriate action taken.

Some people are living to 100, but life expectancy for many in the UK is falling, particularly in the poorer areas of the country, where life expectancy is almost 9 years less than in more affluent areas. UK life expectancy is also lower than in most Western European countries. Someone born in 1960 could expect to live on average until they were 71-72; now the average expectency is 82, but for someone born in Glasgow, life expectancy is still under 76, while for someone in Hart in South East England, the expectancy is 84.7.

messybutfun · 05/07/2025 12:28

deedooHaHa · 05/07/2025 08:18

But if you means test the pension, who, out of the UK tax payer, will stay?

To have a 12k pension you need about 300k saved.

If I save my socks off to have 300k in my personal pension, and then the government takes away my state pension, I'll be off.

And if you have any other assets worth more than £25k and you happen to die from April 2027, they will take at least 40% tax on that as well, potentially a whole lot more.

WideawakeinSanDiego · 05/07/2025 12:33

Miley23 · 05/07/2025 11:30

How could they possibly remove pension credit ? I have a client currently who came from India and has never worked here. She lived off her husband's state pension until recently when the husband went into a Nursing home. Now she has to claim pension credit, housing benefit etc or would starve and lose her home. She has no state pension at all. I see this regularly in my job. There are lots of ( usually older women) who have very very low state pensions due to barely working and need Pension creidt to survive, then you have British citizens who have worked abroad most of their lives but then decide to come back to the UK ( often with no means of supporting themselves ). In future years we will obviously see less people reliant on pension credit as many more will have occupational pensions.

If UK citizens spent their life in other countries or people from abroad arrive here in the later stage of life they should not expect a pension.

They should consider this before making such decisions and unless they have private financial provision they should return to where they spent the majority of their life. The onus should be on them and also the pension rules in the country they resided in.

Havanananana · 05/07/2025 12:39

People arriving from abroad in the later stage of life don't automatically get a UK pension - the State pension is dependent on the contributons paid.

The exception is people returning from countries with which the UK has a reciprocal deal, so for example, if someone works for 10 years somewhere in the EU, these years (in which they paid pension contributions in that country) can count towards their pension in the UK.

WideawakeinSanDiego · 05/07/2025 12:42

Havanananana · 05/07/2025 12:39

People arriving from abroad in the later stage of life don't automatically get a UK pension - the State pension is dependent on the contributons paid.

The exception is people returning from countries with which the UK has a reciprocal deal, so for example, if someone works for 10 years somewhere in the EU, these years (in which they paid pension contributions in that country) can count towards their pension in the UK.

What about pension credit?

HPFA · 05/07/2025 12:45

Poynsettia · 05/07/2025 11:22

No I don't want a Trump but I want someone a bit ruthless.
Everyone can't have everything - which is the present mindset. So nothing can be cut, taxes can't be raised, immigrants are coming across the channel in their thousands - we must be the laughing stock of the world with that. Other countries, Australia, Netherlands, US seem able to sort it but not us.

The US is establishing concentration camps and abandoning any pretence of due process and respecting the law.

Trump is establishing an armed force which will be accountable to no one.

It's also going to allow large employers to "exempt" their own workers - a move that amounts to a form of indentured labour and no doubt poor and unsafe working conditions

I'd sooner have double the number of immigrants than see my country descend to this level.

PandoraSocks · 05/07/2025 12:46

messybutfun · 05/07/2025 12:28

And if you have any other assets worth more than £25k and you happen to die from April 2027, they will take at least 40% tax on that as well, potentially a whole lot more.

Which tax are you talking about?

yellowspanner · 05/07/2025 12:58

There is no concentration camp in America. How ridiculous . You may not like Trump, I don't But he was elected by the American people rather like the shower we also elected.
I don't want tax rises I want welfare cut backs but some stupid short sighted people believed labour's lies and voted for them. Just like in America

EasternStandard · 05/07/2025 13:08

WestwardHo1 · 05/07/2025 12:09

The problem is we won't be getting better schools/hospitals etc. More money is needed to pay for poorer services.

It's really simple. There was an outcry about cutting benefits. To maintain these benefits (and extend them as more and more people claiming them), tax payers are going to have to pay more. It won't be going to schools and hospitals. It'll be going on welfare and debt interest.

Plus tax changes behaviour. If people opt out or leave then it’s a shrinking pool paying for an increasing one.

Lifeofthepartay · 05/07/2025 13:09

Spartahori · 04/07/2025 20:59

What makes you think tacking the wealthy and corporations will raise tax. Evasion from these two areas is miniscule these days. It’s small businesses that are responsible for the vast majority of evasion. You can tackle this yourself by never dealing with any cash business.

I am talking specifically about tax avoidance no tax evasion, better legislation is needed but government won't throw their pals under the bus by making the pay taxes. Not sure how prevalent is tax evasion in small businesses, tbh I think I less and less businesses take cash these days. Tax avoidance is definitely higher...

Havanananana · 05/07/2025 13:12

yellowspanner · 05/07/2025 12:58

There is no concentration camp in America. How ridiculous . You may not like Trump, I don't But he was elected by the American people rather like the shower we also elected.
I don't want tax rises I want welfare cut backs but some stupid short sighted people believed labour's lies and voted for them. Just like in America

Why do you want welfare cuts? Why do you support making life worse for those already struggling? Why do you think it is acceptable that in one of the richest countries on the planet, people cannot access healthcare or dental care, public services are on the point of collapse and millions are living below the poverty line, often in unsuitable housing?

As for politicians telling lies - where are the 40 hospitals? What happened to the Brexit benefits (all I can see is the £100bn a year hit to the economy)? When does the UK start to become the envy of the world? When are the free unicorns arriving?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.