Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Tax increases imminent

1000 replies

Iwishicouldflyhigh · 04/07/2025 11:28

Heavy hints that taxes will rise in the next Budget after the recent climb down (as the ‘taxes won’t rise again’ was based on a 5 billion saving in benefits).

I can’t lie, I’m so pissed off about this. I don’t think anyone wants to see someone who is genuinely unable to work to be further penalised, but we all know there are thousands of people who could work but don’t.

this country is going to absolute shit . We pay more and more for less and less.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Alexandra2001 · 05/07/2025 11:01

Araminta1003 · 05/07/2025 10:57

My guess is they will stick 1 per cent on VAT so everyone ends up paying.

VAT is a regressive tax and curtails growth.

Hits the poorest hardest...

Won't happen, is totally against Starmers "Broadest shoulders" promise.

taxguru · 05/07/2025 11:01

Alexandra2001 · 05/07/2025 09:08

But nothing on higher band council tax ? VAT on more luxury goods..... land taxes?

I'm also not quite sure of the motivation of some posters who are constantly pushing the narrative that any, not yet even announced, tax rises will be on income tax rates and VAT ....

Scaremongering at best.......

Edited

It's reality of the numbers. Increasing taxes by small amounts on huge numbers of people brings in more than massive tax hikes on a tiny number of "rich" people.

bookdook · 05/07/2025 11:03

We still have, overall, lower taxes than many countries in Europe.

We have more inequality than other European countries. Higher earners are taxed in line with Europe it's lower & middle that pay more elsewhere.

There isn't the tax base to raise all the money we would need.

Alexandra2001 · 05/07/2025 11:04

taxguru · 05/07/2025 11:01

It's reality of the numbers. Increasing taxes by small amounts on huge numbers of people brings in more than massive tax hikes on a tiny number of "rich" people.

Not when it hits consumer confidence it doesn't.

Small amounts are relative, to you or i, they may well be, for millions on or just above NMW, they are unaffordable and may well mean higher in work benefits.

bookdook · 05/07/2025 11:04

We need tax rises just to stand still....

taxguru · 05/07/2025 11:05

Livelovebehappy · 05/07/2025 09:46

Why do people always try to bring pensions into this? People these days are encouraged to pay into private pensions, and I expect that will eventually become compulsory and the state pension will decrease/pension age will rise. But a few decades ago, paying into private pensions wasn't a thing. So despite people seemingly wanting state pension to be reviewed, nothing can be done to fix that at this moment in time unless you propose sending out today’s 80 year olds to work. It will take time and a few years before there can be reforms brought in for future pensioners. And I’d rather my taxes went on paying pensioners than subsidising people who are fighting tooth and nail not to get help in getting back into work. The decreasing number of people actually working will come back to bite today’s future pensioners on the arse.

It was the mid 80s when private pensions were encouraged and SERPS was introduced. That's 40 years ago. So people retiring today have had most of their working life to make their own arrangements. You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.

Alexandra2001 · 05/07/2025 11:06

bookdook · 05/07/2025 11:03

We still have, overall, lower taxes than many countries in Europe.

We have more inequality than other European countries. Higher earners are taxed in line with Europe it's lower & middle that pay more elsewhere.

There isn't the tax base to raise all the money we would need.

No there isn't, which is why tax increases cannot be allowed to hit growth, which things like VAT increases will do.

A 1% hike in VAT, at most raises 6/7 billion, less if people cut spending.

taxguru · 05/07/2025 11:07

bookdook · 05/07/2025 11:04

We need tax rises just to stand still....

Not if we had economic growth but you need a government that doesnt hate business to achieve that!

taxguru · 05/07/2025 11:09

bookdook · 05/07/2025 09:34

Many people have paid into it for 50 years via national insurance contributions

The majority won't have paid enough if you actually calculate it but that's not the issue. It's the changing demographics

And let's not forget, some of them will have paid little or nothing if they've "earned" credits by virtue of being on certain benefits, a carer/parent or working part time just above the threshold to qualify but below the threshold to actually pay NIC.

bookdook · 05/07/2025 11:11

Not if we had economic growth but you need a government that doesnt hate business to achieve that!

@taxguru does any government know how to achieve this? What would you suggest? I'm stumped.

Araminta1003 · 05/07/2025 11:11

They cannot go for workers and reassessing top band houses is both expensive, takes time and there is already a semi crash happening at the top level of housing due to interest rates, non doms/rich leaving. You can’t have a housing crash when you have promised to build and also it can trigger a financial crash too. They also can’t mess with the volatility on the gilts- although there is stuff they could do there to decrease volatility which is rather urgent.
A penny on VAT is the simplest fix - that is why my bets are on that.
The tax the wealthy ideas have actually cost us billions. And lack of investment.

Alexandra2001 · 05/07/2025 11:12

taxguru · 05/07/2025 11:07

Not if we had economic growth but you need a government that doesnt hate business to achieve that!

So why didn't we get growth under the Tories? Wasn't Sunak pro growth? Hunt the entrepreneur chancellor!!

Growth has actually, marginally, increased under Labour, only US and Canada is higher - G7.

Anyway, Labour had no choice but to raise taxes, if not NI on business, which ones would you have increased?

Dufff23 · 05/07/2025 11:14

paul Johnson from IFS is clear that for scale of funds needed they have to go for VAT, income tax or worker NI…all else is a fiddle.

Araminta1003 · 05/07/2025 11:15

The voters seem to care more about immigration than anything else. According to the ipapet the French have started slashing small boats in shallow waters and the Home Office will crack down on UberEats etc. paperwork issues for recently arrived illegal immigrants. If they can get some grip on the black economy that would save billions!

Alexandra2001 · 05/07/2025 11:15

Araminta1003 · 05/07/2025 11:11

They cannot go for workers and reassessing top band houses is both expensive, takes time and there is already a semi crash happening at the top level of housing due to interest rates, non doms/rich leaving. You can’t have a housing crash when you have promised to build and also it can trigger a financial crash too. They also can’t mess with the volatility on the gilts- although there is stuff they could do there to decrease volatility which is rather urgent.
A penny on VAT is the simplest fix - that is why my bets are on that.
The tax the wealthy ideas have actually cost us billions. And lack of investment.

1% on VAT doesn't raise anything like enough, we need around 30 billion, that would raise 6/7 billion or less, should spending drop, which it would do & hit growth.

One could argue that lowering VAT would increase tax take and boost consumer confidence, increasing growth....

Araminta1003 · 05/07/2025 11:16

They already froze tax bands and went for NI which also hurts workers. So VAT it is.

taxguru · 05/07/2025 11:16

Alexandra2001 · 05/07/2025 11:12

So why didn't we get growth under the Tories? Wasn't Sunak pro growth? Hunt the entrepreneur chancellor!!

Growth has actually, marginally, increased under Labour, only US and Canada is higher - G7.

Anyway, Labour had no choice but to raise taxes, if not NI on business, which ones would you have increased?

Sunak hated small businesses. He was only interested in huge multinationals. That's part of why 3 million freelancers/small businesses were excluded from the covid support schemes.

Alexandra2001 · 05/07/2025 11:19

taxguru · 05/07/2025 11:16

Sunak hated small businesses. He was only interested in huge multinationals. That's part of why 3 million freelancers/small businesses were excluded from the covid support schemes.

Err? all the sole traders i knew got £10k lump sum..... only those who didn't have the book work got nothing...

Even though in all cases, they carried on working, after the initial ban but many ignored that.

As a friend, carpenter said "Money for nothing"

hamstersarse · 05/07/2025 11:19

people seem to casually dismiss the fact that Labour ran, very very clearly, on no tax rises.

It is not nothing that this turns out to be a lie. What is the value of democracy if when in power, politicians go back on what they said in their manifesto? Democracy is nothing, worthless, if the politicians are not representing what people voted for.

There should be no question of them raising taxes, that is not what they were democratically elected to do. If there is no
money, then they literally have to do spending cuts, that is their option, that’s it. Anything else is an insult to democracy.

Alexandra2001 · 05/07/2025 11:20

IF.... IF growth is down graded....

bookdook · 05/07/2025 11:20

They already froze tax bands and went for NI which also hurts workers

The Tories froze bands, labour kept it.

taxguru · 05/07/2025 11:21

Alexandra2001 · 05/07/2025 11:15

1% on VAT doesn't raise anything like enough, we need around 30 billion, that would raise 6/7 billion or less, should spending drop, which it would do & hit growth.

One could argue that lowering VAT would increase tax take and boost consumer confidence, increasing growth....

We need lots of small changes.

1% on income tax
1% on VAT
Remove pensioners exemption for NIC if they're still working
Change free prescriptions from 60 years to state retirement age
A new higher band for council tax
Scrap the state pension triple lock

The way the media pick up and blow up every small thing means it's impossible for any political party to make big changes anymore.

We need to move to lots of small, incremental changes. Chip away around the edges for year after year. It's what the Tories have done over their 14 years - lots of things that barely made the front pages but brought in increased tax revenue.

bookdook · 05/07/2025 11:22

people seem to casually dismiss the fact that Labour ran, very very clearly, on no tax rises.

True but they will argue they had no idea re the scale of the problem and their proposed cuts have been rejected.

Poynsettia · 05/07/2025 11:22

HPFA · 05/07/2025 10:21

You want Trump?

Massive tax cuts but only for the wealthy at the cost of millions losing health care?

Even many conservatives are opposed to the massive rises in the deficit.

No I don't want a Trump but I want someone a bit ruthless.
Everyone can't have everything - which is the present mindset. So nothing can be cut, taxes can't be raised, immigrants are coming across the channel in their thousands - we must be the laughing stock of the world with that. Other countries, Australia, Netherlands, US seem able to sort it but not us.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread