Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Unpleasant altercation - who was the most unreasonable?

1000 replies

zerofeeling · 02/07/2025 17:10

Took my dogs out today and was trying to park in a small space between two cars on a country lane. As I was inching back to fit into the space I heard a loud crunch 😖

The two men from the car behind had just set off on their walk, as I got out of my car one of them was heading back towards me shouting why did I try to park in such a small space. I said sorry and inspected the front of his car - couldn't see any damage at all, and apart from a tiny paint scuff nothing on my car. I said to him 'i can't see any damage, it doesn't look like I hit you'
Man just glanced over at his car then asked me for my details, I asked is that necessary and said again there's no damage. He said that's not the point you have to give your details if you've been in a collision. He was much taller than me and sort of fronting up to me repeating that he wanted my details and me refusing, saying I don't think it was a collision, I think I might have hit something underneath my car. (For info my Mum and a friend have both been scammed on their insurance by people who claimed all kinds of things after very minor prangs)

Then he took an ID wallet out of his pocket and flipped it open to show a photo and badge and said he's Police. I couldn't tell if it was genuine or not. He held his phone up and said he's filming me refusing to comply with the law.
By this time the other man had come back and also filming me and I started to worry - I'm in a secluded area, with two men who are much bigger than me. I told them I felt intimidated and are they trying to scam me?

I got in my car and tried to shut the door but 1st man held onto it to prevent me. I asked if he's trying to detain me and he said no but I will if you don't give me your details, I've identified myself to you as a police officer. I said you've got no right to detain me. Eventually he let go of the door and I had to turn the car round as the lane is a dead end. Once I turned round he said again that I'm breaking the law by refusing to give my details after a collision and he started to recite the Caution they give when you're arrested! I drove away very shaken up, no idea what consequences to expect.

OP posts:
Poppins21 · 05/07/2025 09:00

zerofeeling · 05/07/2025 08:57

Not one person - including me - has said this is 'the same' as what happened to Sarah. Obviously it isn't but neither does it minimise it at all - after what happened to her (and other terrible incidents) the Police were show to be institutionally misogynist and promises were made that they would address this.

When someone with this officer's potential power and influence, knowing he's got his mate to back him up, is dealing with a lone civilian woman in a secluded area there's no excuse for him to not be aware of the power imbalance. There's no excuse for a man who's professionally trained to deal with the public in difficult situations, to react by shouting and trying to stop the woman getting to safety in her car after she's told him she doesn't feel safe with his behaviour. No excuse for pretending to arrest her. Plus his subsequent action which I can't detail at the moment.
It's obvious to me and the rational posters on here that his behaviour was completely out of line to the extent that he could be a serious liability in his professional role.

If you can't see how that ties in with what happened to Sarah and many other women, that's definitely your problem not mine.

But you did hit is car through your own carelessness the whole situation was your doing though? They would not have come near you otherwise and he showed his warrant card and you then proceeded to commit an offence by leaving the accident that was committed on a public highway. It seems like you are saying it’s because you were a lone woman rather than you hit his car.

Shade17 · 05/07/2025 09:09

Codlingmoths · 05/07/2025 01:50

Read the gov website. It is legal to call e police after and report if you haven’t exchange details. Unbelievable that you can in the same short post both minimise the police culpability in the murder if Sarah everard and tell the op lies that she’s committed a crime.

She left it far too long to report to the police so she technically has committed a crime. The time to have called the police was 10 minutes later when she’d driven somewhere she felt safe.

Hummusandcrisps · 05/07/2025 09:12

So many holes in OPs story. OP seems to seek validation for her behaviour by spinning this lone woman retreating to her car for safety narrative ti disguise the fact that she hit someone's car, refused to give her details and then drove off. From a police officers perspective here's a woman who's clearly had a collision with a car, refused to provide her details as she's obligated to do so and driven off from the scene which she shouldn't have done.
She knew she hit the car but decided there was no damage and she didn't want to give her details. She's said she heard a loud crunch & immediately got out to apologise. She knew she had hit it. She then decides that it's a scam or 2 police officers pretending to police officers who are filming her and intimidating her so she drives off. Now she says they shouted at her. What she doesn't say is what she said to them, or what her tone was. Judging by OPs responses she sounds like a total nightmare. I think there will be so much more to this.

Utterlyconfusednow · 05/07/2025 09:16

Hummusandcrisps · 05/07/2025 09:12

So many holes in OPs story. OP seems to seek validation for her behaviour by spinning this lone woman retreating to her car for safety narrative ti disguise the fact that she hit someone's car, refused to give her details and then drove off. From a police officers perspective here's a woman who's clearly had a collision with a car, refused to provide her details as she's obligated to do so and driven off from the scene which she shouldn't have done.
She knew she hit the car but decided there was no damage and she didn't want to give her details. She's said she heard a loud crunch & immediately got out to apologise. She knew she had hit it. She then decides that it's a scam or 2 police officers pretending to police officers who are filming her and intimidating her so she drives off. Now she says they shouted at her. What she doesn't say is what she said to them, or what her tone was. Judging by OPs responses she sounds like a total nightmare. I think there will be so much more to this.

Agreed.

zerofeeling · 05/07/2025 09:18

Poppins21 · 05/07/2025 09:00

But you did hit is car through your own carelessness the whole situation was your doing though? They would not have come near you otherwise and he showed his warrant card and you then proceeded to commit an offence by leaving the accident that was committed on a public highway. It seems like you are saying it’s because you were a lone woman rather than you hit his car.

No idea what this contributes. You think it's worse that I possibly hit his car and didn't feel safe to give him identifying information than it is for him to abuse his position and the imbalance between men and women to intimidate me. I don't.

OP posts:
zerofeeling · 05/07/2025 09:19

Shade17 · 05/07/2025 09:09

She left it far too long to report to the police so she technically has committed a crime. The time to have called the police was 10 minutes later when she’d driven somewhere she felt safe.

Wrong.

OP posts:
Hummusandcrisps · 05/07/2025 09:23

I'm even wondering now if the police officers filmed her because they recognised that she was being difficult and wasn't going to give her details. It could have been to protect themselves. Like I said before, OP doesn't say what she said to them or how she behaved. But we know that she refused to provide her details and drove off. If it happened the way she described I am surprised she didn't ring the police immediately or visit a police station to verify the police officers details.

Walkden · 05/07/2025 09:28

"You think it's worse that I possibly hit his car and didn't feel safe to give him identifying information"

So had he not been there to "intimidate you" and make you feel unsafe no doubt he would have returned from his walk to find a note on his windscreen with your identifying information on, then you would have reported the accident regardless?

I don't get the impression this is how it would have turned out ...

Zonder · 05/07/2025 09:38

zerofeeling · 05/07/2025 09:19

Wrong.

Of course. There's always a longer leeway in these things than 10 minutes!

Teenybub · 05/07/2025 09:47

Hummusandcrisps · 05/07/2025 09:12

So many holes in OPs story. OP seems to seek validation for her behaviour by spinning this lone woman retreating to her car for safety narrative ti disguise the fact that she hit someone's car, refused to give her details and then drove off. From a police officers perspective here's a woman who's clearly had a collision with a car, refused to provide her details as she's obligated to do so and driven off from the scene which she shouldn't have done.
She knew she hit the car but decided there was no damage and she didn't want to give her details. She's said she heard a loud crunch & immediately got out to apologise. She knew she had hit it. She then decides that it's a scam or 2 police officers pretending to police officers who are filming her and intimidating her so she drives off. Now she says they shouted at her. What she doesn't say is what she said to them, or what her tone was. Judging by OPs responses she sounds like a total nightmare. I think there will be so much more to this.

And if the crunch was her driving over something… why didn’t it crunch again when she drove off? Suggests it wasn’t something underneath to me

Shade17 · 05/07/2025 09:52

zerofeeling · 05/07/2025 09:19

Wrong.

Absolutely not wrong. The law states that you must report it as soon as practicably possible and you clearly did not. I suggest it would be quite petty to prosecute you, but never underestimate the pettiness of police officers with an axe to grind.

legolegoeverywhereandnotadroptodrink · 05/07/2025 09:55

They were most definitely unreasonable

I dont care if he’s police. He was acting inappropriately

Didnhe get your number plate? If there’s any come back, complain formally

in the wake of Sarah Everard, lone females have every right to fear policemen

Shade17 · 05/07/2025 09:56

Zonder · 05/07/2025 09:38

Of course. There's always a longer leeway in these things than 10 minutes!

Yes of course, but that doesn’t amount to many hours later, after you’ve been going about your day and posting about it online. The 10 minutes was just an example of when it might have been a safe opportunity.

zerofeeling · 05/07/2025 10:04

Shade17 · 05/07/2025 09:52

Absolutely not wrong. The law states that you must report it as soon as practicably possible and you clearly did not. I suggest it would be quite petty to prosecute you, but never underestimate the pettiness of police officers with an axe to grind.

Given that there's no evidence a collision even occurred it certainly would be petty to penalise someone for reporting within the required 24 hours.

OP posts:
ButteredRadish · 05/07/2025 10:05

@zerofeelingHow on earth would any update be ‘outing’ unless it was headline news?!

Utterlyconfusednow · 05/07/2025 10:06

ButteredRadish · 05/07/2025 10:05

@zerofeelingHow on earth would any update be ‘outing’ unless it was headline news?!

I’m scanning the red tops as we type.

I think the fame/attention has gone to the OP’s head.

Hummusandcrisps · 05/07/2025 10:08

@zerofeeling still spinning the "no collision" narrative. You clearly hit the car. You know you hit the car. You said you were parking in a tight spot and whilst reversing you heard a loud crunch and got out of your car and immediately apologised. It was loud enough for the owner of the other car to turn around.

Walkden · 05/07/2025 10:10

"Given that there's no evidence a collision even occurred"

Apart from the crunching noise, 2 witnesses who would testify otherwise, and the scuff on your car.

I expect you haven't had the car inspected for possible damage to the underbody or subframe?

Have you notified your insurers....

Hummusandcrisps · 05/07/2025 10:10

I mean we are 22 pages in and OP still hasn't told us what she said to them or how she behaved.

yakkity · 05/07/2025 10:14

Ponoka7 · 02/07/2025 17:23

I'd contact the Police. State that you didn't hit the other car and left for your own safety. You didn't need to give him your details and his behaviour was intimidating.

But she can’t know if she hit their car or not. She was driving and trying to park in a tight spot and hit something. Most likely their car

Utterlyconfusednow · 05/07/2025 10:14

Hummusandcrisps · 05/07/2025 10:10

I mean we are 22 pages in and OP still hasn't told us what she said to them or how she behaved.

It’s now a high level investigation, I’m guessing at freemasonry level. We can only pick over the bare bones of this thread.

yakkity · 05/07/2025 10:17

zerofeeling · 02/07/2025 17:24

It's a fair point but I couldn't understand his belligerence in demanding them when there was no sign I'd actually hit him - like I say I know ppl who've been scammed. Seemed like he was out to cause trouble and intimidate.

You Hit something he was minding his own business walking. From an outside perspective YOU are the one who appears to be trying to get out of something. Not him.
Not all collisions cause visible damage at first look.

do you honestly think he was planning a scam by wandering about waiting for someone to hit something so he could claim it was his car?

Chiseltip · 05/07/2025 10:17

Walkden · 05/07/2025 04:56

"No. The police usually try to arrest drivers who make off after an accident. That's literally part of their job"

Critical thinking skills absent here I see.

Either

A) These police were undercover walking in the woods perhaps conducting a sting

Or

B ) they were off duty and not "doing their job" at the time......

Which do you think it is here?

Police officers are never off duty. They are Crown Servants, their authority comes from the Oath they swear, not their uniform or working hours. They are expected to act on their Oath at all times, even when technically "off duty".

To answer your question.

I think two Police Officers witnessed a crime, attempted to deal with it, the suspect driver made off from the scene, and is now pulling the complaints card in order to try to get away with the numerous offences she committed.

You clearly have no clue about the Police Service in the UK, or the Powers and responsibilities of Police Officers.

yakkity · 05/07/2025 10:20

MeringueOutang · 02/07/2025 17:29

Sounds like the bloke is one of those twats who purposely parks so no one can park next to him and is annoyed that you managed it anyway. The space can't have been that small though if you were able to get out of your car from it. Surely you'd be able to see in your mirrors if you were at an angle to hit anyone. I agree with PP that ringing the police and telling them about the incident (and that you're sure you didn't hit anything) is the best course of action.

Edited

MASSIVE leap. The spaces were tight. OP tried to squeeze into a small space and hit SOMETHING. Somehow you find a way to still make this someone else’s fault.

Chiseltip · 05/07/2025 10:20

zerofeeling · 05/07/2025 08:57

Not one person - including me - has said this is 'the same' as what happened to Sarah. Obviously it isn't but neither does it minimise it at all - after what happened to her (and other terrible incidents) the Police were show to be institutionally misogynist and promises were made that they would address this.

When someone with this officer's potential power and influence, knowing he's got his mate to back him up, is dealing with a lone civilian woman in a secluded area there's no excuse for him to not be aware of the power imbalance. There's no excuse for a man who's professionally trained to deal with the public in difficult situations, to react by shouting and trying to stop the woman getting to safety in her car after she's told him she doesn't feel safe with his behaviour. No excuse for pretending to arrest her. Plus his subsequent action which I can't detail at the moment.
It's obvious to me and the rational posters on here that his behaviour was completely out of line to the extent that he could be a serious liability in his professional role.

If you can't see how that ties in with what happened to Sarah and many other women, that's definitely your problem not mine.

Yeah, all female criminals should be let go, because ya know, misogyny and all that!

Male Police officers should just bow down to the great and mighty throne of "yeah, well I am a woman so you can't do anything".

🙄

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread