I quite like people obeying the law. I believe that the law was put in place following discussion
This law has stood in its current form since 1870, when the law also considered women to be barely people in their own right, but mere chattels.
I believe that new ideas which are to become law should be properly debated.
There has been a campaign asking people to contact their MP about this amendment and it was debated in Parliament; it will continue to be open to scrutiny as this bill makes its way through parliament to become law. Doesn’t this process- our democratic process- count as being properly debated? Did you watch the debate on the amendment and find it wanting?
I believe that there is a good reason for a 24 week limit
and that limit remains unchanged.
ordering pills from India and taking them at 39 weeks, no, I dont think that should be given a bye.
ok really, how often do you imagine this will happen? It’s the most ridiculously unlikely scenario that you are using in order to object to the whole decriminalisation (which, by the way, is not the same as legalising. The process you describe would still be illegal, and people could still be prosecuted for it).
I am suspicious of the organisations that want this because I believe they have not considered all the issues.
Wow, all those experts in this area, professional bodies, people who spent their whole career working with women who go through the vast array of different situations around maternal and gynaecological health, different areas of women’s health, and you don’t think they have considered all the issues. Either you are incredibly arrogant to say this, or incredibly deluded.
They are 100% on the side of women having all the rights and the foetus having none
I don’t actually think you know what the legal position was, or what it will be after this change. I also don’t see you showing much interest in finding out, you just stick to your misinformed position.