Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Dog lovers aren’t animal lovers

387 replies

Namechanger1993 · 11/06/2025 08:31

I’ve been lurking in various dog related threads recently and it’s become abundantly clear how few dog owners on MN actually love animals. Not all. But lots.

Posters not caring about health tests on parents, or the breeders experience or ability or what happens to the bitch (mother of the pups) after as their desire for expensive mix outweighs their ethics about puppy farming or dogs being born in pain with chronic health issues as a result of bad breeding. Posters admitting their dogs have soiled themselves for a year before they put their dog to sleep. No matter which way you look at it (and believe me, I understand how hard it is to say goodbye), people who love their dogs don’t let them sleep in their shit for a year. Posters not exercising their dog sufficiently or not giving it mental stimulation and then wondering why its badly behaved.

Time and time again I’ve seen posters put their desire for a dog above any morals they might have about animal welfare (including their own dogs). welfare. Honestly, it’s quite shocking how little so many posters care about their dogs, or indeed the dogs use to produce their cute puppy.

OP posts:
ChiliFiend · 11/06/2025 20:50

Of course dog lovers aren't animal lovers. The vast majority of them eat them. Call yourself a dog lover or a cat lover, but you're not an animal lover if you eat them...

redboxer321 · 11/06/2025 20:51

I think animal lover is the wrong term. Animal respecter might be better.

WhereIsMyJumper · 11/06/2025 20:52

SharpestBulb · 11/06/2025 19:00

I don't think we should breed any animals. I think we should let nature take care of itself. Dogs are an unnatural species, created by humans, and I believe we should absolutely stop breeding them. Technology is here and will take over for the drug-sniffers, the seeing-eye dogs etc. For the dogs that re already here, I don't see the difference in feeding them to obligate carnivores like lions, who are going to be eating other poor animals like goats and sheep - why not dogs?! Food for thought, eh!

Humans created dogs 😂😂😂😂😂

Twiglets1 · 11/06/2025 20:57

Stellaris22 · 11/06/2025 08:43

I agree. I was in the vets the other day and there was a French Bulldog, it’s inability to breathe was distressing to hear.

I have a colleague who recently bought a cockapoo and talks about it constantly. Real dog lovers wouldn’t go anywhere near these breeds.

I always feel sorry for indoor cats as well, what a dull life they have.

I always feel sorry for indoor cats too.

At the very least people shouldn’t get a cat unless they are willing to pay for a Catio or other outside enclosure if they feel their road is too busy to be safe (but also, don’t get a cat if you live on a busy road).

WhereIsMyJumper · 11/06/2025 21:12

EdithStourton · 11/06/2025 19:46

To drag this thread away from the vegans...

I have mixed feelings about the Kennel Club (and Crufts).

When you judge a dog in the show ring, aside from it being temperamentally stable enough to cope being in the ring, not bite the judge etc, you're not seeing anything about its mind. You're not seeing its working ability. You're not seeing how drivey it is, how good it is at working the wind, or working stock, whether it really would bring down a wolf, whether it's hardy enough to handle the weather that would be thrown at it, whether its coat would shrug off the rain, whether its conformation is robust enough to do a day's work. Nothing about trainable it is.

I don't know when there was last a dual champion cocker or Labrador: springer, cocker and labs have split into very different show and working types. I own a hunt-point-retrieve breed, and I know several dogs who both work and do well in shows, but even in those breeds a split is developing - some lines are losing their working ability, because if you don't breed for the working traits you will slowly lose them, and if you select against them (because a less driven dog is much easier to keep and handle) you will lose them even faster.

So, to that extent, the KC and Crufts destroy working breeds. And they also encourage - via what is rewarded in the show ring - the deformity of some breeds: the too-long dachshunds prone to back issues, the saggy-eyed bloodhounds that wouldn't last 5 minutes in the field, the brachy dogs that can barely breathe.

On the other hand, the KC maintains a registry, so you can know, if you're looking to breed a litter, that this stud dog is too closely related for comfort and that stud dog is far enough away. You can look at generations of health test results. All of that is valuable.

I'd love the registry system with the health test information without a show ring rewarding only looks.

This is really interesting.
Please correct me if I am wrong, I don’t know too much about the KC but when I was googling my pup’s ancestors from his KC certificate, many of them are working labs and several had ‘FT CH’ before their name (which I had to google) so am I right in thinking the KC also has field trials for working dogs too?

fiveIsNewOne · 11/06/2025 21:19

Many dog owners don't like animals in general. They just like their dog as a part of themselves.

How many of them let them chase or scare wildlife, annoy other dogs or cats, all those interactions when their dog them is the only animal which matters.

vodkaredbullgirl · 11/06/2025 21:26

SharpestBulb · 11/06/2025 19:23

The farmed animals we have today are not a natural species. They have been interfered with to the Nth degree so they plump up fast, and die young. I am sure they'd rather not be bred only to be slaughtered. They'd have no consciousness about preserving their family lineage, would they. So what's the big deal if the cows and sheep who are bred to be slaughtered die out as a species? I'd happily save some safe areas for cows and sheep and pigs to have freedom, sure.

We can indeed all be vegan in this country, if we wanted to. Stop being so defeatist. We can build walled greenhouses and gardens, it's totally possible. We can encourage those with gardens and allotments to grow more vegetables, we can create community gardens to grow vegetables, this is happening in certain areas, and can be expanded upon.

I have been vegan for a very long time, and the change in the last 25 years has been amazing. I have no doubt it will continue along this trajectory, just wish some people weren't so stubborn about the change.

That figures, should have know you were a vegan.

SharpestBulb · 11/06/2025 21:33

WhereIsMyJumper · 11/06/2025 20:52

Humans created dogs 😂😂😂😂😂

You know what I meant. Dogs as they are now. The weird over-bred inbred manipulated for specific traits dogs.

CoubousAndTourmalet · 11/06/2025 21:37

SharpestBulb · 11/06/2025 21:33

You know what I meant. Dogs as they are now. The weird over-bred inbred manipulated for specific traits dogs.

I don't really think you know anything about dogs at all.

EdithStourton · 11/06/2025 22:57

WhereIsMyJumper · 11/06/2025 21:12

This is really interesting.
Please correct me if I am wrong, I don’t know too much about the KC but when I was googling my pup’s ancestors from his KC certificate, many of them are working labs and several had ‘FT CH’ before their name (which I had to google) so am I right in thinking the KC also has field trials for working dogs too?

Yes, they do. But you can only run a KC registered pedigree dog in a KC trial - there is no crossbreed registry for that.

If a dog becomes a FTCh and also a ShCh, it's what's called a dual champion. Very few of those crop up these days, and never in the spaniels and retrievers as the field lines do not win in the show ring.

hididdlyho · 11/06/2025 22:57

Dogs and cats cause significantly less harm to the ecosystem and planet than humans! I would never have kids and would never breed animals for pets or money, but don't see an issue with looking after an animal someone has dumped in a shelter and giving it the best life I can. If everyone stopped taking animals from shelters tomorrow, all that would happen is those animals would die.

If we dissect every environmentally damaging/selfish thing a human does in their daily life, there wouldn't be anything 'fun' left. Also who gets to be the final moral arbiter of what is acceptable and what isn't? If someone eats meat and has a pet dog, but doesn't have children and never travels abroad, is that worse for the environment than a vegan with a couple of kids who goes on holiday every year? How do people quantify these things in their mind to get worked up over people making different life choices to them? Are vets allowed to eat meat or does that go against the work they do to help animals?

The impact of our existence is so insignificant in the grand scheme of time and space that arguing that over whether someone didn't do life as well as you because they ate meat or had a pet dog is a bit silly really.

tumblingdowntherabbithole · 11/06/2025 23:02

hididdlyho · 11/06/2025 22:57

Dogs and cats cause significantly less harm to the ecosystem and planet than humans! I would never have kids and would never breed animals for pets or money, but don't see an issue with looking after an animal someone has dumped in a shelter and giving it the best life I can. If everyone stopped taking animals from shelters tomorrow, all that would happen is those animals would die.

If we dissect every environmentally damaging/selfish thing a human does in their daily life, there wouldn't be anything 'fun' left. Also who gets to be the final moral arbiter of what is acceptable and what isn't? If someone eats meat and has a pet dog, but doesn't have children and never travels abroad, is that worse for the environment than a vegan with a couple of kids who goes on holiday every year? How do people quantify these things in their mind to get worked up over people making different life choices to them? Are vets allowed to eat meat or does that go against the work they do to help animals?

The impact of our existence is so insignificant in the grand scheme of time and space that arguing that over whether someone didn't do life as well as you because they ate meat or had a pet dog is a bit silly really.

Very well said.

Having children is one of the worst things we can do environmentally yet we have posters here with multiple kids berating anyone who owns a dog 🙈

SquashedSquid · 12/06/2025 01:59

"We can indeed all be vegan in this country, if we wanted to. Stop being so defeatist."

No we can't, and it is ableist to suggest so.

WitchesCauldron · 12/06/2025 06:27

EdithStourton · 11/06/2025 14:20

Nah.
I know how much I love animals. I also understand the trophic cascade and accept that I am a member of an omnivorous species.

It is entirely normal to love and enjoy animals and still eat meat.

Keep telling yourself that dearie. While you're convincing yourself take at look at some abattoir footage & then say you're an animal lover.

WitchesCauldron · 12/06/2025 06:34

Whippetlovely · 11/06/2025 15:59

I love my dog and my cat. I don't love other people's animals. The same way I love my children, I don't love other people's children. Perhaps your right people shouldn't use the term animal lover when really they mean they like animals. You can't really love anything unless you have a personal relationship with it. This is why we can quite happily eat a KFC burger with no guilt. If it was my chicken of course I wouldn't chop it up and eat it as I'd have a relationship with it. One that's been in a farm I've never met I have no connection with I can eat guilt free. It's not hard to understand. Humans are meant to eat animals weather you like it or not. You don't have to if you so choose but the rest of us really aren't interested in your opinions on our diets. Go off and enjoy some spinach.

What a nasty post. Enjoy eating that KFC after the chicken sat in its own poo and then was gassed ( all the time probably posting about your fur baby on Instagram)

EdithStourton · 12/06/2025 08:39

WitchesCauldron · 12/06/2025 06:27

Keep telling yourself that dearie. While you're convincing yourself take at look at some abattoir footage & then say you're an animal lover.

Everything that lives, dies.
There are far worse ways to go than pre-stunned slaughter.

NB Patronising people is not a good way to get them onside.

tumblingdowntherabbithole · 12/06/2025 08:51

EdithStourton · 12/06/2025 08:39

Everything that lives, dies.
There are far worse ways to go than pre-stunned slaughter.

NB Patronising people is not a good way to get them onside.

Exactly, it’s not like animals die a lovely, peaceful death in the natural world.

LadyTangerine · 12/06/2025 09:10

EdithStourton · 12/06/2025 08:39

Everything that lives, dies.
There are far worse ways to go than pre-stunned slaughter.

NB Patronising people is not a good way to get them onside.

They get carted onto a lorry, packed in like sardines. Often travelling great distances to then queue up with the smell of blood and the sounds of other animals in great distress.

It is a horrible distressing procedure. Lucky if they are stunned first what with all the halal that has seeped in to our supermarket shelves most aren't stunned they are hung upside down and bleed to death.

You make out the bacon fairy sneaks in in the middle of the night and puts them to sleep without any suffering.

Eat meat if you must but do watch clips of slaughterhouse procedure just so you're fully informed of what suffering goes into your greasy burgers and bacon butties.

redboxer321 · 12/06/2025 09:25

I have to say if you have kids, I don't see how you can really claim to care about other animals or the environment. The main challenge many animals face is lack of living space because so much of it has been taken over by humans. Adding to that number isn't going to help. Also most humans go on to have children and no one know how those children or their children's children are going to turn out: they could be massive carnivores.

I was feeling bad about having a dog but what would be the option for her? I do think about feeding her a vegan diet but I'm not convinced and vegan food is not cruelty free anyway. So my only option would be to put her to sleep. And I'm not going to do that. She does eat other animals but I am unconvinced that animals are being killed for pet food. There must be so much of the carcass left after humans have taken what they want. Which brings me back to kids. That's what we need to stop. Humans breeding or breeding in the numbers that they do at least.

CoubousAndTourmalet · 12/06/2025 09:40

Oh, are we having a competition for who has less impact on the planet? Jolly good!

Here's my entry.
No kids
No car (though partner has an old Skoda estate)
No tv or smartphone.
I've never once been on a plane in my entire life!
But I've lived with dogs for 50 years.
I'm vegetarian but my dog is not.

Am I really harming the ecosystem more than a vegan with two kids and a car, just because I buy local cheese and local milk and feed my dog a bit of kibble?

EdithStourton · 12/06/2025 09:43

LadyTangerine · 12/06/2025 09:10

They get carted onto a lorry, packed in like sardines. Often travelling great distances to then queue up with the smell of blood and the sounds of other animals in great distress.

It is a horrible distressing procedure. Lucky if they are stunned first what with all the halal that has seeped in to our supermarket shelves most aren't stunned they are hung upside down and bleed to death.

You make out the bacon fairy sneaks in in the middle of the night and puts them to sleep without any suffering.

Eat meat if you must but do watch clips of slaughterhouse procedure just so you're fully informed of what suffering goes into your greasy burgers and bacon butties.

You make out the bacon fairy sneaks in in the middle of the night and puts them to sleep without any suffering.
I did nothing of the sort.

Putting words into the mouths of other people doesn't help your case at all.

tumblingdowntherabbithole · 12/06/2025 09:43

Yep, I do think anyone who has children or goes abroad and is also banging on about how we need to eat a vegan diet to save the planet is being massively hypocritical.

Go vegan by all means, but don’t act like you’re doing it to save the planet when you made the decision to reproduce 🫣

WhereIsMyJumper · 12/06/2025 09:43

CoubousAndTourmalet · 12/06/2025 09:40

Oh, are we having a competition for who has less impact on the planet? Jolly good!

Here's my entry.
No kids
No car (though partner has an old Skoda estate)
No tv or smartphone.
I've never once been on a plane in my entire life!
But I've lived with dogs for 50 years.
I'm vegetarian but my dog is not.

Am I really harming the ecosystem more than a vegan with two kids and a car, just because I buy local cheese and local milk and feed my dog a bit of kibble?

Depends. Does the Vegan regularly consume imported avocados and products containing palm oil? Wink

KimberleyClark · 12/06/2025 09:43

fiveIsNewOne · 11/06/2025 21:19

Many dog owners don't like animals in general. They just like their dog as a part of themselves.

How many of them let them chase or scare wildlife, annoy other dogs or cats, all those interactions when their dog them is the only animal which matters.

Just like many parents don’t like children in general, only their own as part of themselves, and often let them run riot in restaurants and other inappropriate places.

tumblingdowntherabbithole · 12/06/2025 09:46

You make out the bacon fairy sneaks in in the middle of the night and puts them to sleep without any suffering.

Absolutely nobody has said anything of the sort.

There’s also rarely ever such a thing as death without suffering - unfortunately that’s part of life. FWIW I’ve seen videos of slaughterhouses and live surrounded by farms - it doesn’t put me off eating meat in the slightest 🤷‍♀️

Swipe left for the next trending thread