Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To agree with increasing tax and more benefit cuts to pay for defence

303 replies

Viviennemary · 04/06/2025 09:37

I was surprised to hear that Labour is to spend more on defence. We really do need to with the threats from Russia and run down of weapon stocks because they have been given to Ukraine. All of Europe needs to wake up. But I think they realise this.

OP posts:
XDownwiththissortofthingX · 04/06/2025 23:11

caringcarer · 04/06/2025 21:34

The moment they are granted asylum they can claim UC. How else would £1 billion per month be spent on them.

They moment they are granted asylum, they are no longer "so called asylum seekers".

TatteredAndTorn · 05/06/2025 00:21

blueshoes · 04/06/2025 21:39

A rising tide lifts all boats.

You might argue that wealth distribution is unequal but that is why the government imposes taxes (and the tax take is more if income and wealth are being generated) and gives it back in terms of public services and benefits. A higher GDP results in more tax contributions and spending.

A stagnant economy (the current one) funds nothing, only rats fighting in a sack.

Is that not the Trickle Down economics theory that’s. been debunked? A stronger economy is good (obviously) but that alone doesn’t guarantee that everyone benefits if a tiny proportion of the population is taking all the wealth. You need to do both.

And the wealth gap is growing. That’s a fact and not just an “argument”:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-59565690

https://equalitytrust.org.uk/scale-economic-inequality-uk/#:~:text=The%2520UK's%2520wealth%2520inequality%2520is%2520much%2520more,according%2520to%2520the%2520Office%2520for%2520National%2520Statistics.&text=The%2520UK%2520has%2520a%2520wealth%2520GINI%2520coefficient%2520of%252074.6%25.

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/inequalities/2024/10/29/the-uks-wealth-gap-has-grown-by-50-in-eight-years/#:~:text=The%20value%20of%20assets%20has,already%20in%20the%20top%2010%25.

Some people (and not immigrants, benefit claimants or the sick and disabled) have been getting very very rich while the rest of us have been getting poorer. That’s not a coincidence.

People in Cambodia

Super-rich increase their share of world's income

A major report on wealth and inequality says 2020 saw the steepest rise in billionaires' wealth on record.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-59565690

DrPrunesqualer · 05/06/2025 00:44

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 04/06/2025 21:20

Big difference so called 'pensioners' have paid tax and NI into the UK system for often 40 years...

While benefiting from public service provision for the same length of time. They aren't owed anything.

So called 'Asylum seekers' have not paid a penny into the UK system so should not be prioritised to take money out in UC

Asylum Seekers don't qualify for UC, but you'd know that if you weren't totally ignorant and just fancied coming in here to blurt goady nonsense in a contentious thread.

Edited

Pensioners are paid in accordance with how long they have been paying in. There’s a clear correlation
Just the same principle with how much people pay in to a private pension

It is not the same as other taxes that pay for everything else.

Morningsleepin · 05/06/2025 02:03

caringcarer · 04/06/2025 22:26

Most of them are economic migrants. They justake up spurious reasons why they should be aloud to stay, they are gay, they are Christian their DC don't want to go back to country of origin because they can't get chicken nuggets there.

Do you know this for a fact? I wonder what happens to all the people escaping wars then

DrPrunesqualer · 05/06/2025 02:19

Morningsleepin · 05/06/2025 02:03

Do you know this for a fact? I wonder what happens to all the people escaping wars then

If I was escaping war I’d go to Ireland or France because they are the nearest safe spaces for me.
I wouldn’t go across Europe to Italy. What’s the point if all I want is a safe place to wait it out till I can return when my own country is safe.

People chose the UK however. Why?
We aren’t the first safe country as no country that borders us is at war.

xanthomelana · 05/06/2025 04:27

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 04/06/2025 16:57

How about they means test the State pensions of "so called" pensioners?

They’ve paid into the system through NI so why should they not get a state pension? Bizarre thing to suggest unless you start giving people the option to opt out of NI if they are not going to get anything at the end of it.

nearlylovemyusername · 05/06/2025 07:38

Willyoujustbequiet · 04/06/2025 21:47

No one wants to defend a way of life that entails abject poverty and endless suffering. Its no coincidence that suicide rates are at their highest in 30 years and that's before any cuts mooted.

yes, absolutely. Welfare state, workers rights, NHS, the entire package was so much more generous before WWII, that was the reason our grandparents went to fight with Nazis.

And now Russia and China have so much better social security and way of living, why to fight.
🙄

Willyoujustbequiet · 05/06/2025 07:59

nearlylovemyusername · 05/06/2025 07:38

yes, absolutely. Welfare state, workers rights, NHS, the entire package was so much more generous before WWII, that was the reason our grandparents went to fight with Nazis.

And now Russia and China have so much better social security and way of living, why to fight.
🙄

Edited

Bizarre that you think a war 80 years can accurately reflect what some people suffer today.

How about we dust off our redcoats and muskets to deal with Trump lol

nearlylovemyusername · 05/06/2025 08:00

TatteredAndTorn · 05/06/2025 00:21

Is that not the Trickle Down economics theory that’s. been debunked? A stronger economy is good (obviously) but that alone doesn’t guarantee that everyone benefits if a tiny proportion of the population is taking all the wealth. You need to do both.

And the wealth gap is growing. That’s a fact and not just an “argument”:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-59565690

https://equalitytrust.org.uk/scale-economic-inequality-uk/#:~:text=The%2520UK's%2520wealth%2520inequality%2520is%2520much%2520more,according%2520to%2520the%2520Office%2520for%2520National%2520Statistics.&text=The%2520UK%2520has%2520a%2520wealth%2520GINI%2520coefficient%2520of%252074.6%25.

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/inequalities/2024/10/29/the-uks-wealth-gap-has-grown-by-50-in-eight-years/#:~:text=The%20value%20of%20assets%20has,already%20in%20the%20top%2010%25.

Some people (and not immigrants, benefit claimants or the sick and disabled) have been getting very very rich while the rest of us have been getting poorer. That’s not a coincidence.

That is correct. But we're talking here about a very small group of a highly mobile people, not even those with 10m worth of assets, but handful of truly wealthy ones. You simply can't tax them at a country level, it has to be a global system which will never be implemented.

If you step back and look at the last 10-15 years - SM ruling every aspect of our lives, selling lifestyle which has never been achievable for majority and thus making it expected rather than a rare exception. People are generally getting dumber (https://archive.ph/C8rFg) .

The frustration is turning onto neighbours who are just a bit wealthier / doing better, not true global wealth elite. All these talks about tax rises are to tax people who are on what? 100k, 150k? have state pension? people who mostly worked really smart or hard and had some inspiration to achieve. They are taxed to the bone and push them more they'll just drop out of this all together so no more left in the pot to pay for the likes of Weyland.

People who work must be substantially, by very large margin, better off than those out of work. Benefits should be very time limited, to allow to retrain and find another job, but not last for years. Only truly disabled should be supported, but supported generously.

And yes, I do think there is a reasonably sized group in our society, and youth in particular, who'd benefit a lot from being taken from the streets and put in armed service.

MyLimeGuide · 05/06/2025 08:04

Viviennemary · 04/06/2025 14:36

If we were under even the threat of attack folk would have a lot more to worry about than an increase in their taxes or a reduction in their benefits. It's head in the sand.

Yes. This is 100% correct.

MyLimeGuide · 05/06/2025 08:11

WeylandYutani · 04/06/2025 21:45

I am on benefits. All this talk of cuts to benefits to fund defence - to me just says that I will be plunged into absolute poverty so the rich can be protected.

Odd way of thinking?!😂

PaulKnickerless · 05/06/2025 08:16

We absolutely can and should tax assets of the 1% more to pay for defence rather than pushing it onto people who have poor health or disabilities. Tax assets like land and close the loopholes like they do in other countries. And no, that does not mean taxing Mary on £150K more.

Alexandra2001 · 05/06/2025 08:26

PaulKnickerless · 04/06/2025 22:22

Asylum seekers cannot claim UC. They get £49.18 per week, or £9.95 per week if their accommodation provides meals.

https://www.gov.uk/asylum-support/what-youll-get

Which is why i specifically said "if given asylum, they can claim UC..."

No need to post links i already know about if my post is actually read....

bombastix · 05/06/2025 08:27

PaulKnickerless · 05/06/2025 08:16

We absolutely can and should tax assets of the 1% more to pay for defence rather than pushing it onto people who have poor health or disabilities. Tax assets like land and close the loopholes like they do in other countries. And no, that does not mean taxing Mary on £150K more.

Well I think it’s going to be both, but cuts before tax increases.

Let’s read the tea leaves; the Americans are pulling out eventually. They are focussing on China.

It’s also sensible for us because Russia has now completely retooled to be a war economy. Even if there were peace Ukraine next week, they would be better armed and resourced for conflict than for 40 years. I don’t think that if that war ends, it’s goes back to how it was.

EasternStandard · 05/06/2025 08:29

Which tax increases will Labour do next? They’ve already taxed and borrowed more.

And pledged not to do more. They will have to deal with the finances they created and have.

ETA the love for the war talk is a cover for that incompetence.

Tiredofwhataboutery · 05/06/2025 08:34

PaulKnickerless · 05/06/2025 08:16

We absolutely can and should tax assets of the 1% more to pay for defence rather than pushing it onto people who have poor health or disabilities. Tax assets like land and close the loopholes like they do in other countries. And no, that does not mean taxing Mary on £150K more.

In Scotland land ownership is concentrated so 432 that’s less than 0.001% of the population own more than half the country.

Are they paying much tax? Probably not, if they introduce a land tax do I think they will be coughing up, probably not. There will be loopholes and business exemptions.

As a person who owns a house worth about 300k, will I get shafted? Probably. I think our elected officials invariably get there with a bit of help along the way, funding, a chat with the right people. Promises are made and they are beholden so the really rich are fine and everyone else is fucked.

Alexandra2001 · 05/06/2025 08:40

EasternStandard · 05/06/2025 08:29

Which tax increases will Labour do next? They’ve already taxed and borrowed more.

And pledged not to do more. They will have to deal with the finances they created and have.

ETA the love for the war talk is a cover for that incompetence.

Edited

You re rowing against the tide there, any views on what Russia is doing or Trump and his very luke warm support of NATO?

The Tories slashed defence, even went into last years election, promising to cut infantry even further.

btw Economy doing ok, growth up, wages up, OECD forecasts upgraded & the promised devastation of UK business hasn't happened, in fact the opposite, business confidence up, still room for improvement but its heading upwards....

PaulKnickerless · 05/06/2025 08:42

Tiredofwhataboutery · 05/06/2025 08:34

In Scotland land ownership is concentrated so 432 that’s less than 0.001% of the population own more than half the country.

Are they paying much tax? Probably not, if they introduce a land tax do I think they will be coughing up, probably not. There will be loopholes and business exemptions.

As a person who owns a house worth about 300k, will I get shafted? Probably. I think our elected officials invariably get there with a bit of help along the way, funding, a chat with the right people. Promises are made and they are beholden so the really rich are fine and everyone else is fucked.

So close the loopholes. I am tired of hearing these excuses when other countries manage things much better for their citizens. It is almost as though UK citizens have been gaslit into feeling that they don’t deserve the basics and can’t be bothered to fight. Maybe it is suffering decades of useless politicians…

bombastix · 05/06/2025 08:46

Alexandra2001 · 05/06/2025 08:40

You re rowing against the tide there, any views on what Russia is doing or Trump and his very luke warm support of NATO?

The Tories slashed defence, even went into last years election, promising to cut infantry even further.

btw Economy doing ok, growth up, wages up, OECD forecasts upgraded & the promised devastation of UK business hasn't happened, in fact the opposite, business confidence up, still room for improvement but its heading upwards....

Let’s hope it keeps going that way. A lot of assumptions that UK policy has relied on for the last 50 years are shifting like sand.

Even if Trump goes, it’s foolish to imagine that the Americans will suddenly re prioritize Europe. There is a school of thought that Trump really not that different to a lot of American thought about Europe, thought his expression is extreme. This you see in his trade policy too.

Noodlewave · 05/06/2025 09:05

Russia have taken 3 years to occupy ~20% of Ukraine with enormous losses of men and equipment. That doesn't scream to me that we need to ramp up defence spending. Why should we be so scared of them?

EasternStandard · 05/06/2025 09:05

Alexandra2001 · 05/06/2025 08:40

You re rowing against the tide there, any views on what Russia is doing or Trump and his very luke warm support of NATO?

The Tories slashed defence, even went into last years election, promising to cut infantry even further.

btw Economy doing ok, growth up, wages up, OECD forecasts upgraded & the promised devastation of UK business hasn't happened, in fact the opposite, business confidence up, still room for improvement but its heading upwards....

If it’s as good as you and Labour go on about great no tax rises necessary.

bombastix · 05/06/2025 09:19

Noodlewave · 05/06/2025 09:05

Russia have taken 3 years to occupy ~20% of Ukraine with enormous losses of men and equipment. That doesn't scream to me that we need to ramp up defence spending. Why should we be so scared of them?

I would suggest it’s their total disregard for their own people and pursuit of this goal that should worry us. A rational leader would not have done this, would they?

caringcarer · 05/06/2025 09:28

Morningsleepin · 05/06/2025 02:03

Do you know this for a fact? I wonder what happens to all the people escaping wars then

There are not wars in many countries illegal immigrants come from. They just want a chance to earn more money. Many pretend they are gay or Christian to avoid being sent back to their country not at war.

tamade · 05/06/2025 09:28

SummerEve · 04/06/2025 15:57

They certainly have not “stirred shit” in Ukraine.

Are you serious? It is widely accepted that Bojo was involved in the withdrawal of Ukraine from peace negotiations in 2022. And he is still appearing over there from time to time quite literally shit stirring, though I admit that cannot say whether he has any official capacity.

That is just the most obvious and egregious example, plenty more for those who want to look

EasternStandard · 05/06/2025 09:43

tamade · 05/06/2025 09:28

Are you serious? It is widely accepted that Bojo was involved in the withdrawal of Ukraine from peace negotiations in 2022. And he is still appearing over there from time to time quite literally shit stirring, though I admit that cannot say whether he has any official capacity.

That is just the most obvious and egregious example, plenty more for those who want to look

Were the peace negotiation terms the same from Russia as they are now? Have you read them recently?

Swipe left for the next trending thread