Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To absolutely not want closer ties to Europe

1000 replies

Viviennemary · 19/05/2025 14:07

What is the matter with Stammer toadying up to the EU. We voted Out. Has he forgotten. I switched the TV off when I heard the word contribution and free movement. Here we go again. Shafted and ripped off at every turn and following their dumb rules. It's groundhog day. I'm furious.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
LakieLady · 19/05/2025 19:41

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Ahem... I'm a boomer and so are most of my friends and colleagues. None of us voted to leave.

Please don't tar us all with the same brush.

DoraSpenlow · 19/05/2025 19:41

LegallyLoopy · 19/05/2025 16:51

I don’t think the OP meant any specific laws but rather the system whereby the EU passes a regulation, it must be implemented into members states legislation, even if those member states disagree with it.

Additionally, member states must interpret all domestic laws to be compatible with EU law and if that is not possible, a declaration of incompatibility must be made.

I am assuming that the OP meant the system but which laws are enacted and implemented into member states legislation.

This post reminds me of a rather boozy night in Austria a few years ago. Around the table were French, Germans, Dutch, Norwegians and us from the UK. The topic got round to the EU. After much discussion it was decided that the French make the rules but then ignore them: the Germans pick out the rules which are good for Germany and disregard the others but that the UK implements absolutely everything whether it is in our best interests or not. The Dutch were neutral and the Norwegians didn't understand why we needed an EU at all.

Much laughter and too much beer. A brilliant night that I will always remember.

Alexandra2001 · 19/05/2025 19:45

WillWeSeeAstilbe · 19/05/2025 19:40

Defence, fishing, Erasmus? youth mobility... all good! food standards too... means we wont get US rubbish now.

@Alexandra2001 We don’t have an agreed deal on Erasmus or youth mobility! 🤦‍♀️

We have secured a binding agreement on Defence and to allow EU fishermen continued access to UK waters until 2038.

Everything else will be discussed at some point in the future. There is no binding timeline and not even a binding agenda on what will be up for discussion!

I want us to rejoin the EU. I want us to have mutually beneficial binding agreements on movement and trade.

I don’t want us to pay the EU loads just to sit at table and have endless meetings with no guarantee of a deal ever being secured.

Thats why i put a ? after Erasmus....!! i know its an aim, not yet agreed, youth mobility is on a much firmer footing.

Why do you think we are paying the EU to take part in discussions? we are not!

Hwi · 19/05/2025 19:46

Oooohhh, you are on the wrong forum, I am afraid! People here bemoan the fact that their little ones won't be able to freeload on Erasmus programme, with the consensus being 'we should sacrifice our sovereign rights so little Timmy (aka Spoilt B**tard') can go on a year abroad to the Sorbonne. Aye.

Dymaxion · 19/05/2025 19:47

In order to get the EU to agree to consider (no binding requirement to implement - they could refuse to allow an agreement if they want) the UK has had to give a binding and non-reversible agreement that EU fishermen have access to UK waters and fish until 2038.

I don't think they are allowed to catch more fish than they already do ? We export 70% of the fish caught, so being able to sell it to people who actually eat the stuff without too much additional expense and paperwork is a good thing ?
Also most of the fishing quota's for England and Wales aren't in the hands of smaller family fishing ventures are they ?

Clavinova · 19/05/2025 19:48

Frenchbluesea · 19/05/2025 19:16

Freedom of movement is one of the four parts of the single market. It’s literally part of its definition

Yes, I know - my post only referred to goods. Also;

Any country can trade with the countries of the Single Market, on the terms established by the EU in its schedules at the WTO. Such ‘access’ to the Single Market is currently enjoyed by, for example, the US.

Countries that have concluded a free trade agreement (FTA) with the EU, such as the Republic of Korea, Mexico and Switzerland, also have ‘access’ to the Single Market, but on preferential terms.

By contrast, ‘membership’ of the Single Market involves all economic activity—whether or not engaged in cross border trade within the EU—being subject to the legislation established by the EU, and acceptance of the Four Freedoms.

Hwi · 19/05/2025 19:49

Viviennemary · 19/05/2025 14:13

I just object to being governed by EU laws and the fact they could overturn decisions made in our courts. I don't want that.

But then you are not a sell-out. We are lukewarm traitors to our ancestors, who measure everything in money terms.

Crikeyalmighty · 19/05/2025 19:49

@Horserider5678 tend to split into two - those who like Farage and his ilk because they too are barstool bigoted bullshitters who hate non whites ( unless of course they are rich ones who can use their services or fund them - then they tolerate them) or it’s well off people who rather like the fact they can hide their assets or buy up cheap assets when the country struggles or act like Trump destabilising economies and then buy low , sell high etc - The party are a bunch of absolute weirdos who would be happy with a dog eat dog system like the USA but because they play on people’s prejudices, many are ok with that - the media love it because they sell clicks, they are great audience drivers/ clickbait and in a declining physical marketplace, they are where the money is - in a way I would love Farage to be in power - because you know what they say ‘sunlight is the best disinfectant ‘ and there would be nowhere for him to hide - no refusing to do interviews with certain people who are negative to him etc, etc - no policies on the back of a fag packet , he’s an old school corrupt cad - dressed up to sound serious and playing on the fact that it’s turbulent times - he caused Brexit but now of course rarely mentions it unless promoted like today , because he knows full well it isn’t a success and he was full of shit

MH0084 · 19/05/2025 19:52

Good for you. But I want young people to have the opportunity to travel and experience life abroad and not get stuck in a tiny island. I’m very happy about this (even though I don’t have high regards for the PM)

GuevarasBeret · 19/05/2025 19:53

Look at yourself at the ridiculous language you use -escaping their clutches.

The problem is you cannot accept the logic of the EU’s position- (a) Brexit means Brexit (b) Other people have sovereignty too. (c) No cherry picking. Why would you presume that they ought to allow you destroy their organization, after you failed to implode it on the inside?

Regardless of anything you (or N. Farage ) think, any UK deal will be somewhere on the chart. Fine- have No Deal if you think it’s so great. But whining when other sovereign nations choose to pool their sovereignty and not do your bidding- pathetic. When will you get that they owe you zilch?

To absolutely not want closer ties to Europe
housethatbuiltme · 19/05/2025 19:53

Viviennemary · 19/05/2025 14:19

You can ask as often as you like. I do not want to live under EU law.

Your free to move then.

Thing is its not all about you and what you want, many are suffering horrifically since the shit show of brexit and whats best for fixing that comes above your 'feelings' (which you seemingly can't even explain as anything other than nonsense).

bombastix · 19/05/2025 19:53

I’m okay with it. Labour were elected on that manifesto and won. You may think the referendum is forever; the truth is so long as we have a democracy the thoughts of your fellows may wax and wane @Viviennemary and you will have to accept it

OneAmusedShark · 19/05/2025 19:54

Theroadt · 19/05/2025 18:47

Closer ties to EU in a world where USA gone rogue, China, Russia all threats….we are isolated on our own CLOSER TO EUROPE IS THE SANE SENSIBLE APPROACH!

Totally agree.

And invite Canada to join the EU too!

They have far more in common with Europe than they do with Trump’s USA!

WillWeSeeAstilbe · 19/05/2025 19:55

Alexandra2001 · 19/05/2025 19:45

Thats why i put a ? after Erasmus....!! i know its an aim, not yet agreed, youth mobility is on a much firmer footing.

Why do you think we are paying the EU to take part in discussions? we are not!

In order to get the EU to agree to come to the table and open discussions on trade agreements the UK had to make a binding agreement to:

  1. enter into a defence agreement with the EU
  2. allow EU fishermen to have access to UK waters until 2038

The defence agreement is expected to require the UK to pay into a fund in order to secure access to any of the deals.

In some parts of the fishing agreement the EU has a quota of 80% of the fish stock in UK waters.

In effect both of those things represent a cost to the UK, either directly, or indirectly by limiting the amount of fish UK fishermen can land, and so by extension limiting the size of the UK fishing industry.

In return the EU agrees only to consider opening negotiations on other matters.

WitchesCauldron · 19/05/2025 19:55

Viviennemary · 19/05/2025 14:07

What is the matter with Stammer toadying up to the EU. We voted Out. Has he forgotten. I switched the TV off when I heard the word contribution and free movement. Here we go again. Shafted and ripped off at every turn and following their dumb rules. It's groundhog day. I'm furious.

Can you detail the benefits of voting out that you have noticed ?

Crikeyalmighty · 19/05/2025 19:56

@housethatbuiltme or rather her choices are more restricted if without an EU passport - never mind as Brexitersare find of saying, ‘lots of other places’ all of course are a doddle to get into to live and work .

MissAmbrosia · 19/05/2025 19:57

I am really happy living in the EU, under EU law, and with my freedom of movement, and that of my dd, fully intact and I am still clueless as to what some people in the UK think they actually gained from Brexit. Maybe someone can do a list? <<I know this was asked a million times>>

ExercicenformedeZ · 19/05/2025 20:00

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Theroadt · 19/05/2025 20:02

Shuttered · 19/05/2025 14:10

The consequences of Brexit have been predictably damaging, and significant numbers of those who voted for it did so on poor or misleading information, and have realised that a UK nirvana hasn’t ensued. The same referendum today would get a different result.

This.

Theroadt · 19/05/2025 20:04

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

CalleOcho · 19/05/2025 20:04

Viviennemary · 19/05/2025 17:22

Yes Reform will be cheering at today's news. I will vote Reform if only to keep us out of Europe's clutches. They bullied us long enough.

How have Europe bullied us @Viviennemary ?

I’m genuinely curious.

Please could you explain and point out the EU laws were damaging for the UK?

Also, curious to know which of the Reform policies entices you to support and vote for them?

WillWeSeeAstilbe · 19/05/2025 20:04

Dymaxion · 19/05/2025 19:47

In order to get the EU to agree to consider (no binding requirement to implement - they could refuse to allow an agreement if they want) the UK has had to give a binding and non-reversible agreement that EU fishermen have access to UK waters and fish until 2038.

I don't think they are allowed to catch more fish than they already do ? We export 70% of the fish caught, so being able to sell it to people who actually eat the stuff without too much additional expense and paperwork is a good thing ?
Also most of the fishing quota's for England and Wales aren't in the hands of smaller family fishing ventures are they ?

For some areas of fishing the EU has the rights to 80% of the fish stock in UK waters.

If UK fishermen sell 70% of their share to the EU this represents 14% of the total stock - the EU already catches 80% themselves. If the number of fish going to the EU remained the same but the UK had retained the fishing rights for UK fishermen, then rather than selling 14% of stock to the EU we would be selling 94%.

That would be a massive boost for both UK fishermen and the UK economy and would allow the UK fishing fleet to expand, in turn bringing a boost for local employment and economy. Areas which often have high unemployment and levels of deprivation.

As the current fishing quotas are now to remain in place until 2038 (at least) it is unlikely that there will be any expansion or investment into the UK fishing industry before then.

bombastix · 19/05/2025 20:05

Vote Reform. Vote for the abyss

vintagedove · 19/05/2025 20:06

I’m not in the UK but I am in Europe. As are the UK. What do you mean by not wanting to be closer to Europe? I think you must be a bit confused.

Theroadt · 19/05/2025 20:07

WillWeSeeAstilbe · 19/05/2025 19:55

In order to get the EU to agree to come to the table and open discussions on trade agreements the UK had to make a binding agreement to:

  1. enter into a defence agreement with the EU
  2. allow EU fishermen to have access to UK waters until 2038

The defence agreement is expected to require the UK to pay into a fund in order to secure access to any of the deals.

In some parts of the fishing agreement the EU has a quota of 80% of the fish stock in UK waters.

In effect both of those things represent a cost to the UK, either directly, or indirectly by limiting the amount of fish UK fishermen can land, and so by extension limiting the size of the UK fishing industry.

In return the EU agrees only to consider opening negotiations on other matters.

And fishing is such a vital part of our economy isn’t it. 0.03% last time I checked. For heaven’s sake GET INFORMED don’t just blindly reiterate arguments thaf frankly were tired even in the 1970s.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread