Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think voting for assisted dying legalisation could be a huge mistake???

1000 replies

MyLimeGuide · 14/05/2025 07:41

In Scotland they are voting to legalise assisted dying. Looking likely to pass. I am worried this will come to England now. Kier is already proving he doesn't care about old and disabled people so this scares me.
Obviously there are 2 sides but how can people be so ignorant? If passed this could be one of the biggest opportunity for corrupt evil behaviour of saving money on the NHS, care, people literally getting away murder, playing god! No not good. It's so scary.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Tarrybankheidi · 17/05/2025 21:06

You do it yourself. It's not euthanasia its assisted dying.

Tarrybankheidi · 17/05/2025 21:10

MiloMinderbinder925 · 17/05/2025 21:03

You're consenting to the state taking your life.

You are taking your own life. It's not euthanasia its assisted dying.

MiloMinderbinder925 · 17/05/2025 21:13

Tarrybankheidi · 17/05/2025 21:10

You are taking your own life. It's not euthanasia its assisted dying.

Suicide is where you take your life without assistance. The state assists you to take your life with this bill.

DrPrunesqualer · 17/05/2025 21:15

WhereIsMyJumper · 17/05/2025 21:01

I didn’t realise that’s how the assisted dying bill would work. Surely there is no need to pose it as an option to a dying patient if they already know is is an option.
But I disagree that the instances are completely unrelated

Exactly
It really shouldn’t be a consideration unless the patient asks for it themselves

Tarrybankheidi · 17/05/2025 21:17

MiloMinderbinder925 · 17/05/2025 21:13

Suicide is where you take your life without assistance. The state assists you to take your life with this bill.

Yes of course but its your choice, your decision and you administer the drug.

Tarrybankheidi · 17/05/2025 21:27

Puzzledandpissedoff · 17/05/2025 18:43

They have less than 6 months to live they wont be blocking the beds for that long!

Yes, @tarrybankheidi, and I'd bracket that with the assurance about judicial hearings that was made so much of at the time but has now been scrapped ( and which noticeably you didn't comment on)

Ironically perhaps I'm in favour of a choice to die as long as it really is a choice ... I just don't trust the system to work properly and not be thoroughly abused

Yes I'm glad that's been scrapped. The person would probably have died in agony by the time the judicial hearing process completed. It's all part of the process in putting together the best bill possible, things will get altered and looked at again and amended until they come up with the best plan.

MiloMinderbinder925 · 17/05/2025 21:31

Tarrybankheidi · 17/05/2025 21:17

Yes of course but its your choice, your decision and you administer the drug.

That's what we're discussing. Consent.

Tarrybankheidi · 17/05/2025 21:34

MiloMinderbinder925 · 17/05/2025 21:31

That's what we're discussing. Consent.

Yes!

TooBigForMyBoots · 18/05/2025 00:06

AzureOtter · 17/05/2025 16:47

That was said about organ donation and the fact that everyone in England is upon their death, assumed to be willing to donate their organs unless they have been registered on an opt-out list or are excluded from the list for medical reasons.

There was a paranoid idea that the authorities would be letting people die to harvest their organs.

It hasn't happened. Families are always asked about organ donation and even if a family member explicitly stated they wanted their organs to be donated and were on the donor lists, their family members can still challenge that.

Ya'll need to stop with the paranoia that the authorities want you to die.

It's not paranoia. It's deliberate scaremongering.Angry

TooBigForMyBoots · 18/05/2025 00:17

MiloMinderbinder925 · 17/05/2025 21:03

You're consenting to the state taking your life.

You're either misunderstanding or deliberately misrepresenting this Bill @MiloMinderbinder925.

Which one is it?

MiloMinderbinder925 · 18/05/2025 00:36

TooBigForMyBoots · 18/05/2025 00:17

You're either misunderstanding or deliberately misrepresenting this Bill @MiloMinderbinder925.

Which one is it?

Neither. The NHS is funding AD, there are stipulations that state funded Drs, social workers and psychiatrists approve the death and it's being paid for by the tax payer.

Therefore the patient is being assisted to die by the state.

TooBigForMyBoots · 18/05/2025 01:18

This Bill does not allow the state to take your or anyone else's life. So are you're either misunderstanding or misrepresenting it.

Which one is it @MiloMinderbinder925?

MiloMinderbinder925 · 18/05/2025 01:31

TooBigForMyBoots · 18/05/2025 01:18

This Bill does not allow the state to take your or anyone else's life. So are you're either misunderstanding or misrepresenting it.

Which one is it @MiloMinderbinder925?

The bill allows the state to help you commit suicide. It's not me who doesn't understand how it works.

MrsSunshine2b · 18/05/2025 01:41

AzureOtter · 17/05/2025 16:47

That was said about organ donation and the fact that everyone in England is upon their death, assumed to be willing to donate their organs unless they have been registered on an opt-out list or are excluded from the list for medical reasons.

There was a paranoid idea that the authorities would be letting people die to harvest their organs.

It hasn't happened. Families are always asked about organ donation and even if a family member explicitly stated they wanted their organs to be donated and were on the donor lists, their family members can still challenge that.

Ya'll need to stop with the paranoia that the authorities want you to die.

Especially when a long drawn out death leads to elderly people often sacrificing their entire life's savings into end of life care. That's a win for the state.

DrPrunesqualer · 18/05/2025 02:10

MrsSunshine2b · 18/05/2025 01:41

Especially when a long drawn out death leads to elderly people often sacrificing their entire life's savings into end of life care. That's a win for the state.

The NHS fully fund end of life care

MiloMinderbinder925 · 18/05/2025 02:18

DrPrunesqualer · 18/05/2025 02:10

The NHS fully fund end of life care

Therefore AS is a win for the state.

DrPrunesqualer · 18/05/2025 02:28

MiloMinderbinder925 · 18/05/2025 02:18

Therefore AS is a win for the state.

Exactly !

and surprisingly popular don’t you think given the current number of elderly people and the ever increasing rise in the adult social care bill. What a surprise!

Tarrybankheidi · 18/05/2025 06:58

DrPrunesqualer · 18/05/2025 02:28

Exactly !

and surprisingly popular don’t you think given the current number of elderly people and the ever increasing rise in the adult social care bill. What a surprise!

Edited

You sound more and more like a conspiracy theorist. Large numbers of elderly? Large adult care bill? OMG they are trying to kill them all off!

Puzzledandpissedoff · 18/05/2025 08:16

DrPrunesqualer · 18/05/2025 02:10

The NHS fully fund end of life care

They do at the moment, even if the provision's inadequate, but what an opportunity to save money if patient s could be subtly moved towards "choosing" AD instead

Interesting, too, to see that while we'll all have our own views, the more considered posts are from those opposed, whereas those in favour seem to be relying on emotional, often insulting one liners - which are less than I believe such a grave subject deserves

Tarrybankheidi · 18/05/2025 08:26

Puzzledandpissedoff · 18/05/2025 08:16

They do at the moment, even if the provision's inadequate, but what an opportunity to save money if patient s could be subtly moved towards "choosing" AD instead

Interesting, too, to see that while we'll all have our own views, the more considered posts are from those opposed, whereas those in favour seem to be relying on emotional, often insulting one liners - which are less than I believe such a grave subject deserves

Your looking at the wrong posts if you think the more considered posts are from those opposed to it. The opposed are more paranoid and grab hold of scare stories. Some emotional posts are from those opposed- I dont care how many people will benefit, what about the one hypothetical potential person who might not, kind of posts.

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/05/2025 09:24

grapesandmelon · 16/05/2025 01:05

Which is why the very strict criteria, with lessons learnt from other countries who have already been through this, are being debated and written into the bill.

If you read the bill, the criteria and procedure almost entirely matches those in countries that have suffered the slippery slope and had abuses of assisted dying. There is nothing in the bill that addresses the lessons learned.

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/05/2025 09:29

Tarrybankheidi · 17/05/2025 20:35

You were trying to say people could abuse the system and use it to kill off their relatives because they wanted them dead. So how would they be able to do that if their relative didnt fit the requirements?? A medical professional will know the health of the person better than an abusive relative who doesnt care about them.

Except the bill requires the doctor signing off on the patient as terminal must NOT be a doctor that has ever treated them before. It’s not hard to fake a diagnosis letter and then fool a vulnerable relative into thinking they are dying.

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/05/2025 09:34

Tarrybankheidi · 17/05/2025 21:10

You are taking your own life. It's not euthanasia its assisted dying.

The bill allows for euthanasia if you need an extra bit of lethal drugs to finish the job. The cocktail of drugs you take orally are not 100% effective. Patients have vomited the medication up, had a gag reflex and can’t continue swallowing, others have fallen unconscious before they could get to the full lethal dose. In these cases of failed assisted suicide, which are more frequent than you may think, the healthcare professional (who by the bill doesn’t have to be a doctor or even a nurse) is to step in and inject or IV a boost to finish killing you which is euthanasia. The bill is called assisted dying because it is known up front that some amount of euthanasia will be needed even from the start.

Tarrybankheidi · 18/05/2025 09:35

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/05/2025 09:29

Except the bill requires the doctor signing off on the patient as terminal must NOT be a doctor that has ever treated them before. It’s not hard to fake a diagnosis letter and then fool a vulnerable relative into thinking they are dying.

Paranoia. If someone is going to such great lengths to murder someone then that's a whole other issue as they would be killing them off one way or another anyway.

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 18/05/2025 09:36

Tarrybankheidi · 18/05/2025 06:58

You sound more and more like a conspiracy theorist. Large numbers of elderly? Large adult care bill? OMG they are trying to kill them all off!

They did it during Covid to the elderly and disabled. That’s historical fact.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.