Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Starmer is utterly reprehensible

1000 replies

Thegreyhound · 12/05/2025 20:31

I know everyone will disagree, that’s ok- But I just have to say that Starmer today seems to have sunk lower than I ever believed he would with his incendiary ‘island of strangers’ and ‘incalculable damage’ rhetoric.
I find it particularly shocking because he has calculated this and decided it’s worth it to throw immigrants under the bus and essentially give all the ground in the debate to Farage, Tommy Robinson and Enoch Powell types.
Policy can be altered without making statements that are designed to impact race relations and make life even more difficult for people who are just trying to get along and make a living here.
Starmer is vile. This country does indeed feel like an island of strangers these days but the strangers are not the immigrants :(

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Dangermoo · 13/05/2025 06:22

SamPM · 13/05/2025 05:56

They don't. They tend to live in beautiful untouched parts of the country , like the Cotswolds, in cutesy cottages and never have to deal with the effects of all unfettered immigration.

Yes, Birmingham and Bradford being presented as wonderful places to live. Horse shit.

QueenQueef25 · 13/05/2025 06:24

Upandaneigh · 13/05/2025 06:21

You made those choices though.

Exactly

QueenQueef25 · 13/05/2025 06:25

Ritasueandbobtoo9 · 13/05/2025 05:51

Is that you Harry?

Lol

OneLemonGuide · 13/05/2025 06:31

To say we have a “handful of immigrants” is completely blind to the facts. Net migration since Covid has been 3 million! That’s the equivalent of the entire population of Wales arriving in 4 years.

Managed immigration can enrich and improve a country, and I’m proud of how tolerant we’ve been as a country in accepting and assimilating those from overseas, but limitless millions will destroy us a country, particularly when they are from very different cultures and there is no effort to assimilate, creating ghettos.

Swimmingpoolgirl · 13/05/2025 06:35

caringcarer · 12/05/2025 22:19

In 2022-23 the NHS alone paid out £113 million in translators and translating services for patients. Councils spend millions more for same services. If people want to live in the UK they should speak decent English as a minimum entry requirement or pay for their own translation services. Having skilled immigrants coming to UK to work and contribute to UK economy is quite different than allowing in people with a criminal record, people with low skills who won't earn enough to live so will just need to claim benefits and people coming in to the UK illegally, throwing their passports into the sea and claiming they are either a child, gay or Christian so can't go home and need to be put up in 4* hotels at £145 per night per person. Plus food money and phone plus credit.

Spot on! This is the kind of strain on services that we don’t need.

Come here as a skilled worker by all means but don’t bring a large extended family who refuse to learn any English and basically live in their own little enclave and not integrate into British society.

HellsBalls · 13/05/2025 06:37

I’m beginning to wonder if Labour talk the talk but have no intention of walking the walk.
Why didn’t they put caps of visa numbers? Just say it’s max 300k per year.

Ritasueandbobtoo9 · 13/05/2025 06:40

I think it is illegal immigration they need to focus on. It is easy to get into this country and not return. It is easy to work in the black market, there isn’t enough enforcement.

Araminta1003 · 13/05/2025 06:41

He has no choice but to do this or he will lose the next election. Do you want Reform to win?

Barney16 · 13/05/2025 06:41

I don't think Labour will see off Reform by trying to be more Reform. They need to point out the flaws in Reform and be more Labour. Labour, if they aren't careful will have two barriers to votes or support, they aren't going to lure away potential Reform voters by being Reform lite and they risk alienating Labour voters who perceive them as doing quite a lot of things that aren't "labourey", winter fuel, PIP, immigration. I dont think KS is reprehensible, I think he's trying to widen the appeal of Labour but going about it the wrong way.

Vesuvio · 13/05/2025 06:43

It’s the first sensible thing Starmer has said since he came into power.

At my granddaughters school, over half of the kids in her class can’t speak english - how much of the schools resources go on these kids?

Our A&E is constantly full of people who can’t speak English

but let’s not forget this isn’t Starmer speaking - it’s Farage. Starmer is simply parroting him.

Araminta1003 · 13/05/2025 06:44

We need ID cards and checks on cash businesses.
We need immigration of highly qualified and educated net young contributors and we need temporary construction workers. The Government know exactly what we need. How it is phrased and then misrepresented in the press is a separate matter.

BrightonEarlyOneSummerMorning · 13/05/2025 06:45

The people of this country don't want anymore immigration.

We don't have to give a reasoning or argument for that either.

We just don't want it anymore.

Thegreyhound · 13/05/2025 06:46

Neededa · 13/05/2025 01:12

Please, please, please. One more time, I just want OP to tell me why Starmer is reprehensible?
i absolutely have my opinions about Starmer, but I just want to understand the reprehensible bit???

As I said in the OP I think the language he used was reprehensible. ‘Island of strangers’ is a direct echo of Enoch Powell and will embolden racists.

I think he is reprehensible to give ground to reform and amplify their views by giving them credence.

I don’t think the collapse in infrastructure and the cost of living crisis is caused by migration.

I think Starmer could have led his government to tackle migration WITHOUT using dog whistle terms. He absolutely did use the phrase island of strangers, it has been all over the news and is in the transcript of his speech. It was deliberate and therefore reprehensible.

OP posts:
Araminta1003 · 13/05/2025 06:47

@Barney16 - no they are taking the centre right ground as that is where the next election will be won. The establishment won’t vote Reform. They need to get the Centre Tories and Lib Dem voters primarily. No sane person will vote Reform with their lack of track record when push comes to shove. They need to do this now before a whole lot of establishment join Reform and give them more credibility. It’s absolutely the right thing to do.

Thegreyhound · 13/05/2025 06:47

Araminta1003 · 13/05/2025 06:41

He has no choice but to do this or he will lose the next election. Do you want Reform to win?

Reform have already won

OP posts:
babyproblems · 13/05/2025 06:47

I mean I think he is attempting to address these things to avoid us being governed (or not) by a party like Reform. Which I personally absolutely do not want! The future will be very bleak for everyone should that happen. It’s already dire for most people with unprecedented levels of inequality and no clear way back from that; and definitely no way back from that with a right wing nutter at the helm doing nothing but lining their own pockets and spouting outrageous soundbites. I think you sound ignorant tbh.

TheFastTraybake · 13/05/2025 06:48

Barbadossunset · 13/05/2025 03:46

Of course London is seemingly unsafe; it's grossly unequal.

@TheFastTraybake
There are other cities in the world which are unequal - Seoul, Busan, Tokyo for example - so why are they safe?

Well I said London is "seemingly" unsafe. There's no evidence to suggest that it's less safe than it previously was. In fact you're more likely to be the victim of a crime in the rest of England and Wales than in London.

lllllllllll · 13/05/2025 06:48

To say we have a “handful of immigrants” is completely blind to the facts. Net migration since Covid has been 3 million! That’s the equivalent of the entire population of Wales arriving in 4 years.

Goodness - that is shockingly high. I understand why people want to come here and give their families a better life, but at the same time, I simply don’t believe we as a country have the resources to cope with that number of people coming to live here in such a short space of time, and quality of life therefore declines for everyone. Services are stretched to the limit as it is and no wonder.

I’m a Londoner and whilst I love my diverse city, I do worry about the impact of recent immigration on housing. There are just too many people to accommodate without building millions more homes - and I don’t want to see tons more houses built on London’s green belt, as Sadiq Khan announced this week. It’s impossible to take the government’s climate goals seriously when at the same time, they want to destroy hundreds of thousands of acres of nature for building roads and houses.

The flipside is that where I am, we have an influx of unscrupulous landlords vying to buy homes on local streets (thereby pushing up property prices), then immediately converting them into HMOs and packing poorer people into tiny rooms.

Both scenarios are unacceptable IMO - but both issues could also be resolved (or at least, greatly eased) by reducing immigration.

Dangermoo · 13/05/2025 06:48

Thegreyhound · 13/05/2025 06:46

As I said in the OP I think the language he used was reprehensible. ‘Island of strangers’ is a direct echo of Enoch Powell and will embolden racists.

I think he is reprehensible to give ground to reform and amplify their views by giving them credence.

I don’t think the collapse in infrastructure and the cost of living crisis is caused by migration.

I think Starmer could have led his government to tackle migration WITHOUT using dog whistle terms. He absolutely did use the phrase island of strangers, it has been all over the news and is in the transcript of his speech. It was deliberate and therefore reprehensible.

Interesting that his language was perfectly fine when he was colourful about white people heated up about the Southport scumbag killer's cultural heritage.

TheaBrandt1 · 13/05/2025 06:49

Am baffled by the huge translator costs. If I chose to live in a non English speaking country I wouldn’t expect the state there to fund a translator for me?! Blows my mind.

FiveWhatByFiveWhat · 13/05/2025 06:50

Notsosure1 · 13/05/2025 03:55

without the language chosen and the big fanfare would have been better.

Labour need the language chosen and the big fanfare so they are publicly seen to be doing what a lot of their voters (who are threatening or have already voted Reform) want them to. Reform are gaining a lot of support. Labour probably view this approach as the ends justifying the means.

From what I've seen though, it's the Conservatives who have mostly lost ground to Reform, not Labour? And Labour are losing their voters because they're being too Tory/following Reform rhetoric?

Also, I'm sorry but WHY are people acting like Reform won a general election or something? They still have less seats/MPs than the greens/lib Dems and yet the amount of coverage they get is making them out to have all the power? They did better than they should in some local elections, but have 4 years before a GE and we all know how much in fighting goes on within the party and what a shambles they are. They've lost 9 councillors already for various reasons.

I'm baffled as to why Labour are trying to copy their narrative to be honest because from what I can see all they're doing is pissing off their own voters. People who would vote Reform almost certainly wouldn't vote Labour anyway.

lllllllllll · 13/05/2025 06:50

TheFastTraybake · 13/05/2025 06:48

Well I said London is "seemingly" unsafe. There's no evidence to suggest that it's less safe than it previously was. In fact you're more likely to be the victim of a crime in the rest of England and Wales than in London.

I do feel unsafe in my part of London late at night, if I’m walking home by myself. But I don’t think that’s anything to do with immigration. More that the Tories closed our local police station and we no longer have a visible policing presence.

EasternStandard · 13/05/2025 06:51

daisychain01 · 13/05/2025 05:47

But he just says what he thinks he has to. They all do it but with him he’s just a vacuous mouthpiece.

Politics isn't always about saying what you personally think. Politicians don't have the luxury of fighting for only those causes they hold dear, they also have to sort out problems in the country which may go against their own personal convictions.

it's ridiculous to call Starmer vacuous, that isn't a term compatible with a KC whatever you think of him. I'm no apologist or cheerleader for Labour, but if it was a simple thing to sort out, someone would have, by now.

he's backed into a corner on immigration. Tories did precisely zero towards solving illegal immigration - they weren't a stranger to rhetoric, all about "the boats, stop the boats!!" and remember the £mm spent on Rwanda. Reform aren't in power, they are a one issue party and heaven forbid if they were to be opted into power. They wouldn't have a clue. They'd absolutely trash the economy.

no political party has the silver bullet to resolve illegal immigration.

Edited

Now he’s got a lot of people to talk about cities being overrun etc and dropped it’s a ‘dog whistle’ / ‘culture war’ not ending the crossings may well bite him.

Vacuous probably isn’t the right term. More empty vessel and hypocritical.

Thegreyhound · 13/05/2025 06:52

Araminta1003 · 13/05/2025 06:47

@Barney16 - no they are taking the centre right ground as that is where the next election will be won. The establishment won’t vote Reform. They need to get the Centre Tories and Lib Dem voters primarily. No sane person will vote Reform with their lack of track record when push comes to shove. They need to do this now before a whole lot of establishment join Reform and give them more credibility. It’s absolutely the right thing to do.

Have you not been looking at the polls and the results of the last election? Voters are deserting Labour to the left and the right. They won’t gain back Bristol by mimicking reform and they won’t win back Gt Yarmouth because why would you vote Labour (reform lite) when you could vote actual reform?
if all that Starmer is doing is banging on negatively about immigration and using dodgy language then he will hand reform the election on a plate.

OP posts:
Dangermoo · 13/05/2025 06:54

You can see why Reform are doing so well. I really do think some live in a bubble about Reform's popularity. The biggest laugh is that Reform are seen as the biggest threat to this country.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.