Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that not speaking to your own son is not a good look for the King ?

536 replies

Marmaladelover · 02/05/2025 21:08

Don’t get me wrong I think Harry has been a bit of an entitled burk but even so I was shocked that there has not been a reconciliation between Harry and Megan and the King and Queen at least to be civil to each other .
Refusing to even speak just seems like sulking to me !
That said I don’t think Harry telling the world and washing yet more dirty laundry in public is going to help matters .

Maybe some folk will think this comment belongs in the Royal Family thread rather than AIBU but it’s more about mumsnet standards ( sulking is not good ) and whether they should apply to those in high office .

Even JFK and Krushev had a hotline after the Cuban Crisis !

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
SammyScrounge · 03/05/2025 01:51

None of the RF will risk talking to Harry or Meghan for fear of being recorded and appearing in the tabloids. It"s what H&M do.
You could never trust a family member who did that

notanothernamechange24 · 03/05/2025 01:57

I think H&M have been somewhat foolish and ill advised since leaving the UK. I don’t actually think what they wanted and advocated for in the first instance was that unreasonable.
I don’t think either of them where wrong to not be on board with the way the British media operate and I do think Meghan was treated badly (as have most women who marry into the royals). And I do think Meghan being American and not white brought out the worst of the press.
I also don’t think it’s hard to understand H&M position on the security. If there had been a plot to kidnap your young child would you not be fighting as hard as you could to get the information you needed to protect them. And if your father had the authority to provide a level of protection for your family but chooses not to - then equally would you really not resent that and be angry about it? Especially if your siblings family was provided with that security.

They are most certainly not perfect and have said and done some really ill advised things in recent years. But I’m not sure they bare sole responsibility for the situation as is now.

TheAutumnCrow · 03/05/2025 02:05

Velmy · 03/05/2025 01:47

I know he'd talked about doing coke when he was younger and that he smokes a bit of weed (legal where he lives)...that doesn't make him a drug addict.

And there’s the Gabor Maté interview which was pay per view, from memory.

’Ongoing drug use is a fundamental part of my life’.

Here’s a link to an Australian media source, if you didn’t pay to see it.

www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/prince-harry-reveals-ongoing-drug-use-fundamental-part-of-my-life/news-story/ab9bd142c14c77ee0320a168455fbaf4?amp

Blackkittenfluff · 03/05/2025 02:21

Is James Hewitt his biological father?

Onthemaintrunkline · 03/05/2025 02:21

H & M departing from being working senior members of the family, caused a ruckus I’ve no doubt…duty and all that. But if they’d quietly gone to live their lives in LA then hey good luck to them.

BUT they didn’t go quietly, they have moaned, criticised and made a good deal of money at every opportunity from their royal connection…and by the looks of it have no intention of ceasing.

Both of them need to just stop, stop the photo ops, stop advertising the galling references to so-called good works…just stop all of it!! - But will they, not a chance! What an embarrassment they have become.

LBFseBrom · 03/05/2025 02:35

Wowzel · 02/05/2025 21:11

Surely this constant moaning to the press is exactly why he isn't talking to him? (If it's true)

He doesn't appear to be moaning in this particular interview. He is asked questions and he answers factually. It's always been evident Harry would like to reconcile with the family but they have to meet him in the middle. The royal family takes a stance and does not budge. I bet they miss him though.

Notknots · 03/05/2025 02:54

A lot of assumptions op. Apart from what is actually true, you're assuming "sulking".
There's a lot of reasons why people don't talk to each other.

Vaxtable · 03/05/2025 02:56

HRTQueen · 02/05/2025 21:14

He allowed his sons to walk behind their mothers coffin at her funeral while the world watch all for the royal image

he packed them back off to boarding school when their were grieving

he had no intentions of ever being faithful and choose a bride that suited his needs and watched her mental health spiral and did nothing

what makes you think Charles is a nice guy he has never had a reputation of being nice

Let’s be fair here shall we

it was Philip that made the boys walk behind the coffin, Charles wouldntstand up to him to stop it though

They went back to boarding school because that was school, normal people wouldn’t send kids to boarding school but kids who lost parents would still go back to school at some point

I think he was prepared to try and make the marriage work, but Diana was, with doubt hard work, and as she got older got far more manipulative. She was also prepared to have affairs remember? Should he have married her, No but he did and both of them contributed to the end of the marriage

He did the best he could, remembering his own upbringing and expectations from his parents. Personally as a father he was not particularly good, but neither was he bad.

However Harry has trashed his family openly, told a myriad of proven lies alongside his wife and is incapable of understanding he chose to leave the family, so he makes his own way in the world and that includes paying his way. He gets security when he returns. Funny though how he and Meghan are happy to go to dangerous countries with no security provided, but won’t come to UK.

He made his bed he can now lie on it

TheOriginalEmu · 03/05/2025 03:10

ThedaBara · 02/05/2025 22:55

I'm sure he does know his family better than I do, they're all awful as far as I'm concerned, but if his own family want him and his wife dead why on earth does he want to reconcile with them?? Why go on TV to stir the shit? He's inviting me to have an opinion by airing his dirty washing tbh

Because they’re his family I’d imagine. . Even people who suffer the worst abuse possible often still want to be loved by their family. He’s a human being with thoughts and feelings and emotions.
do I think he’s going about this the right way? No. But he’s been raised his whole life that everything he does is going to be public fodder, so it’s not hard to imagine that he knows no other way.
or I could be wrong as again, I don’t know them.

I just find it fascinating how people seem so interested in them. And that they think they know what they think and will do.

Keirawr · 03/05/2025 03:17

So the ginger whinger sells another interview for money and for column inches. And his family is supposed to cave into that.

With someone as toxic as Harry as a family member, the rest of family are well rid.

The guy doesn’t want to speak to his dad. He just wants to freeload of him and the rest of the British public. And when he gets told no, he throws his toys out of the pram and thinks we are all naive enough to fall for the ‘oh I want to come back for a reconciliation’ nonsense. No, you want to come back to revive your pathetic public image, because the dollars are drying up.

To be honest it’s good that Scotland Yard have refused him police protection. Anything that keeps him away from this country is a plus.

BruFord · 03/05/2025 03:23

bluesinthenight · 02/05/2025 22:21

Well, they obviously do want him dead because the risk to his and his family's safety is phenomenal. Just think how many crazies there are out there who want to take a pop at him, Meghan and the kids. I just hope that nothing happens to them. Given the way that the world of politics is shifting right now and feeding the crazy it's quite scary.

@bluesinthenight Do you think that H& M are still at risk nowadays?

They were at risk when they were first married, but now that they’ve been gone for over five years, are estranged from the RF, and not major celebs in the US (I live in the US, they get little attention here), would they still be targets?

doubleshotcappuccino · 03/05/2025 03:26

This man is still a boy full of hurt. All that moment and power and Charles couldn’t do the work or get the help to learn how to heal his family and the power of forgiveness . Not the role model we need

Notsosure1 · 03/05/2025 03:45

TulaOfDarkWater · 03/05/2025 00:25

What hypocrisy? How on earth do you know Charles hasn’t forgiven Harry? Has Charles come out and said so?

Forgiving someone does not mean forgetting what’s happened nor does it mean you’re obligated to carry on a relationship; especially if it leaves you open to continuing hurt and upset.

It’s entirely possible to forgive someone, wish them well but carry without them in your life - no one is entitled to be in anyone’s life. Forgiveness doesn’t mean being a doormat and it certainly doesn’t mean that just because you forgive, you’re not entitled to your own boundaries.

If you want to talk about hypocrisy and forgiveness though, look no further than Meghan’s Dad; funny how there’s no forgiveness for him, don’t you think?

Edited

If you want to talk about hypocrisy and forgiveness though, look no further than Meghan’s Dad; funny how there’s no forgiveness for him, don’t you think?

Thank you! It’s staggering they are pretending to feel so hard done by when they have done exactly the same to him.

Also how they hate/laugh at the monarchy and all the pageantry and tradition that goes with it and yet were enraged their kids weren’t involved in the coronation 🤷‍♀️ if it was and is such a damaging institution why would they want their kids to have any part of it and why fight for their rights to use royal monikers - just why?

silentpool · 03/05/2025 03:51

For a 40 year old man, Harry is a whiny brat. If he didn't insist on playing out family matters in public, he would get on better with them. Why would anyone want to talk to someone who would then go to the media?

If he doesn't want to be a working royal, that is fine. However, people who don't work, do not get the perks of the job or salary.

Keirawr · 03/05/2025 03:52

Notsosure1 · 03/05/2025 03:45

If you want to talk about hypocrisy and forgiveness though, look no further than Meghan’s Dad; funny how there’s no forgiveness for him, don’t you think?

Thank you! It’s staggering they are pretending to feel so hard done by when they have done exactly the same to him.

Also how they hate/laugh at the monarchy and all the pageantry and tradition that goes with it and yet were enraged their kids weren’t involved in the coronation 🤷‍♀️ if it was and is such a damaging institution why would they want their kids to have any part of it and why fight for their rights to use royal monikers - just why?

Why? Hmmmm

let me think.

DrummingMousWife · 03/05/2025 03:54

If he was my son I would never speak to him again.
he sold out his brother, the brother who stood beside him throughout their grief and pain. That’s unforgivable by anyone’s standards.

HeySugarSugar · 03/05/2025 03:59

Theunamedcat · 02/05/2025 22:01

The government of the day demanded the children be trotted out

Charles and Diana's marriage was a mess but they were visibly getting along before her death

Harry was given mental health support as a child as an adult as well as more support than any of us would be given on the NHS

Charles tried he wasn't given a very supportive upbringing wrote a book about it he is a very emotional man his father was critical of him because of this it's not a secret

Charles has been open publicly to reconciliation with his son and Harry has denied him now the tables have turned Harry wants his dad back and his dad is saying no

Remember his dash to London when it was announced the king had cancer? The following day Harry is on good morning America (I think) nattering about what was said how is that building trust?

Harry isnt used to being told no it shows

Where’s the evidence that it was the government that “demanded the children be trotted out”? Have never seen that anywhere 🙄

Velmy · 03/05/2025 04:05

TheAutumnCrow · 03/05/2025 02:05

And there’s the Gabor Maté interview which was pay per view, from memory.

’Ongoing drug use is a fundamental part of my life’.

Here’s a link to an Australian media source, if you didn’t pay to see it.

www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/prince-harry-reveals-ongoing-drug-use-fundamental-part-of-my-life/news-story/ab9bd142c14c77ee0320a168455fbaf4?amp

He's talking about weed and Ayahuasca. Bit of a stretch to call him a drug addict.

Jcak · 03/05/2025 04:42

People have short memories. Charles himself has wrote a book criticising the queen and Philip as parents, saying Philip was a domineering bully and he was emotionally neglected by the queen who was distant and detached and it was Nannie’s that did all the parenting. So that’s okay for him to do it but not Harry? And do you not remember the tell all interviews Charles gave?

Mothership4two · 03/05/2025 04:48

He knows that the RF can't comment which must be incredibly annoying for them. I would be surprised if he told outright lies (but who knows?) but he could put a significant spin on things and they have no redress (other than leaking to the press).

I'm not a Royalist and haven't seen this interview, but his airing of his family's dirty laundry in public (and airing it for profit) is pretty distasteful (to me) and the fact that they are gagged by protocol isn't a good look (for him).

TheCourseOfTheRiverChanged · 03/05/2025 05:15

Lesina · 02/05/2025 21:21

This 100%. What ‘ the firm’ did to those children to satisfy the ghoulish demands of ‘the people’ was barbaric. He was 13 years old and expected to display his grief like an entertainment show. Horrific

Huh?
I thought this is what happened:
The Queen took the boys straight up to Balmoral on receipt of news of Lady Diana's death. People went absolutely bonkers and Tony Blair suggested to the Queen that she give the baying mob the flesh they were after and put the boys on display in London or there might be a constitutional crisis.
Have I just made up that version of events? I've never seen any of the fictionalisations of that time, neither The Crown or The Queen, nor the Lady Di film. That's my memory - the tabloids were crazy with demands the boys be brought back down to London.
Maybe it's like the Berentsein Bears thing and I've just reinvented the past.

Canopies · 03/05/2025 05:25

At this point it seems like Harry is using every tactic in the book to try to destroy his father.

Harry is a nasty piece of work, who lies for a living, it would be hard for anyone to maintain a relationship with him.

whitewineandsun · 03/05/2025 05:29

I wouldn't trust him or talk to him, either. He could be wearing a microphone for Netflix or taking notes for his next book.

Harry did this to himself.

Sporadica · 03/05/2025 05:45

Khrushchev and Kennedy had a functional and professional reason to keep an open line of communication. Does it really matter to anyone outside the RF whether Charles and Harry WhatsApp each other or not? To paraphrase Trump (sorry), Harry doesn't have any cards.

Swipe left for the next trending thread