Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Reform winning big

1000 replies

Keirawr · 02/05/2025 06:21

Reform had a good night, winning county councils, probably will win a mayoral seat and won the parliamentary by election also.

You don’t have to be a Reform voter to acknowledge that they are taking votes off Labour. Or that they are being electorally effective.

No doubt the ‘basket of deplorables’ crowd will be along in a min with their usual quips calling reform voters names, having learned absolutely 0 from Brexit. Insult the voters at your peril.

These same people also totally miss the point that winning is winning. Feeling all moral and superior about ‘oh well, what will they actually do’ changes nothing.

Perhaps those who label everyone that wants immigration limiting as ‘racist’ Will think again. But likely not.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Dangermoo · 02/05/2025 12:24

EasternStandard · 02/05/2025 11:16

Didn’t you just post that people were thick

Yes, not only incorrect grammar but a use of double negatives. Hardly a reflection of intelligence.

OldieButBaddie · 02/05/2025 12:24

thepariscrimefiles · 02/05/2025 12:18

If you are going to indulge in childish name calling, at least spell Starmer's name correctly.

Or just don't do it? Makes you sound like a primary school child!

OneAquaFatball · 02/05/2025 12:25

HappiestSleeping · 02/05/2025 06:43

The anarchist in me actually hopes reform could win a general election. Discounting the chaos it would cause, it would be hilarious to see Farage actually have to be accountable. Then again, he'd probably do a disappearing act like he did after the referendum.

I don't think he's been at a clinic in his constituency once since he was elected as an MP.

Edited

Surely the anarchist in you wouldn’t be engaging with any state systems which reinforce hierarchical power structures ;)

Kardamyli2 · 02/05/2025 12:27

OldieButBaddie · 02/05/2025 12:24

Or just don't do it? Makes you sound like a primary school child!

Oh dear, another disgruntled Labour supporter.

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 02/05/2025 12:27

Reform are doing well in many areas of Devon (still lots to be announced).

Starmer needs to go after this. Labour need to clamp down on immigration - the main issue driving people to Reform. He needs to do something to ensure that people coming to the UK (and already here) are integrating fully into UK culture.

OldieButBaddie · 02/05/2025 12:29

Kardamyli2 · 02/05/2025 12:27

Oh dear, another disgruntled Labour supporter.

Not at all! I don't vote Labour, I just don't like pathetic name calling

thepariscrimefiles · 02/05/2025 12:29

inkognitha · 02/05/2025 12:12

Mind-blowing sexist contempt for someone who really offered a nuanced and informed opinion.

Being progressive and antiracist, it’s not parroting slogans and theories in the comfort of your own home and attending marches and feeling all virtuous, it’s, when you are challenged or in a conflict, to resist the urge to resort to racist and sexist tropes to try to take the advantage or to make yourself feel better. Yours is really just a veneer. Lots of hatred in the Left, voters feel it.

It was a valid comparison of Reform's proposals to allow women/mothers to stay at home with policies of extreme right wing parties from the past.

Nazi Germany made women and mothers a priority in their political rhetoric. Many women supported the National Socialist Party because it urged returning to the family values of the past when women were encouraged to stay at home and concern themselves with taking care of the household.

MrsTWH · 02/05/2025 12:31

I think we need change desperately. People are angry and fed up.
But that still wouldn’t make me vote Reform, this will be a disaster - especially for climate change.

thepariscrimefiles · 02/05/2025 12:31

Kardamyli2 · 02/05/2025 12:24

lol. People spelling Stammers name correctly is the least of Labour's worries.

Oh it definitely is the least of Labour's worries, but making up ridiculous names and spelling them incorrectly isn't evidence of a constructive and rational rebuttal of Labour's policies.

ilovesooty · 02/05/2025 12:33

BallerinaRadio · 02/05/2025 06:58

Wait Andrea Jenkyns actually won something? Jesus wept I cannot think of a list of people's names and she is the one I would put my cross next to.

I'd be more compassionate to the opinions of the Reform voters if they weren't voting for such horrible people.

How can anyone look at a party with Rice, Farage and Jenkyns and go yep they're the people I want representing me.

I can't imagine why anyone would vote for Jenkyns.

I know of someone who didn't vote in the Runcorn by election because the Labour candidate was fat and her clothes looked cheap. 😡

Kardamyli2 · 02/05/2025 12:33

OldieButBaddie · 02/05/2025 12:29

Not at all! I don't vote Labour, I just don't like pathetic name calling

Don't like name calling but happy to indulge in name calling yourself. Okay then, good to know where you stand OldieButBaddie.

Tomatotater · 02/05/2025 12:34

thepariscrimefiles · 02/05/2025 11:55

What sort of policies to support SAHPs are you expecting? Are you expecting financial help to stay at home? If so, given the state of the public finances and the fact that Reform are in favour of reducing taxes, how would this be paid for?

Especially if you not only reduce the tax take from women not working but create enormous job vacancies in the care, retail and hospitality sector (where many low paid women are) not to mention the 50% of GP's who are women and over 70% of teachers and teaching staff who are women. Its all fine and dandy being a SAHM and voting for extra money so more people can do it, but who's going to be standing in front of a classroom to teach your kids or see them down the doctors surgery? The Menz? Why aren't they doing it now then, when there are huge labour shortages already? If you want to be a SAHM, budget for it out of your own family income. Its your decision.

Helloworlditsmeagain · 02/05/2025 12:35

Dangermoo · 02/05/2025 12:20

The correct grammar is "if you were to go on FB" not "if you was to go on FB". I'm not sure why you keep talking about restructuring the sentence. Incidentally, to the poster you are replying to, it's also rude and bad manners to call people thick. More ironic, when you apply incorrect grammar whilst calling people thick. I'm not emotive at all; I don't believe I'm triggered by election results.

You won't be satisfied until you fuck up the country. BREXIT was not enough you want to go deeper until there are no immigrants. Since Brexit more immigrants have come to this country not less. I had a random conversation with a woman and I was telling her we are selling up and moving she thought I was leaving the country. A lot of people have imigrated since Brexit to live a better life. People were happy before Brexit the country was stable. I can't tell you who you should or shouldn't vote for. There is an old saying "Who don't hear, must feel".

Todaywasbetter · 02/05/2025 12:35

All the man has to do is open mouth grin and hold a pint of beer and you're all wetting yourselves.
he has no policies.

Magic

Judiezones · 02/05/2025 12:35

Helloworlditsmeagain · 02/05/2025 12:08

Not even that poster was grammatically correct read her response. My whole post would need changing for it to make sense. I know some people struggle at least correct me properly. Her emotions got the better of her.

She was correcting the OP

Kardamyli2 · 02/05/2025 12:35

thepariscrimefiles · 02/05/2025 12:31

Oh it definitely is the least of Labour's worries, but making up ridiculous names and spelling them incorrectly isn't evidence of a constructive and rational rebuttal of Labour's policies.

Nor was it meant to be a rebuttal. I was simply saying that I don't understand how anyone can see what Two Tier Keir stands for (or doesn't stand for as the man has no principles) and still vote Labour.

Bluebellwood129 · 02/05/2025 12:36

SallyWD · 02/05/2025 11:56

I know there are many more votes to be counted, but interestingly it's the Conservatives who are being hit the hardest. Labour have so far only lost 15 seats whereas the Conservatives have lost 71!

It's only of interest for Labour supporters desperate to deflect. Today is yet another humiliation for Keir Starmer and one that will significantly increase the likelihood of a leadership challenge in the coming months.

safetyfreak · 02/05/2025 12:38

Helloworlditsmeagain · 02/05/2025 12:35

You won't be satisfied until you fuck up the country. BREXIT was not enough you want to go deeper until there are no immigrants. Since Brexit more immigrants have come to this country not less. I had a random conversation with a woman and I was telling her we are selling up and moving she thought I was leaving the country. A lot of people have imigrated since Brexit to live a better life. People were happy before Brexit the country was stable. I can't tell you who you should or shouldn't vote for. There is an old saying "Who don't hear, must feel".

Immigration went UP after Brexit as have the number of 'aslyum seekers' (most are not geniune aslyum seekers)

If Labour sort mass immigration, then Reform would quickly lost votes.

Please Labour, sort it out.

EasternStandard · 02/05/2025 12:40

Bluebellwood129 · 02/05/2025 12:36

It's only of interest for Labour supporters desperate to deflect. Today is yet another humiliation for Keir Starmer and one that will significantly increase the likelihood of a leadership challenge in the coming months.

I agree although I’m not sure on leadership. He and Reeves both seem stuck on using excuses and deflecting. I guess we’ll see.

StandFirm · 02/05/2025 12:40

Kardamyli2 · 02/05/2025 12:35

Nor was it meant to be a rebuttal. I was simply saying that I don't understand how anyone can see what Two Tier Keir stands for (or doesn't stand for as the man has no principles) and still vote Labour.

Yeah well I don't think that a man who pocketed a salary and pension for a job he barely ever showed up for is a paragon of principles either... but hey, looks like a mate from down the pub so must be a good'un.
And what was that about sovereignty again? Defined by the highest bidder I suppose...

PhilippaGeorgiou · 02/05/2025 12:40

Tomatotater · 02/05/2025 12:22

I do wonder whether Reform seem, in some ways similar to the 'old' Labour Party of the 1960's, 70's and 80's. They were very old school traditionalists then, anti Europe, anti immigration ( based on European Union being a capitalist construct) anti immigration being something that takes away British jobs, they were against equal pay for women or any equality for women at all, because of the impact on the working man again, fighting for the retention of fossil fuels and against shutting down of coal mines etc. This 'new' middle class Labour Party is a pretty new construct. Reform are even talking about Leftist ideas like Nationalisation of industry. I know they are run by Millionaires for Millionaires, but the way they talk appeals to the type of people who would be in the traditionally Labour areas who would have voted in the past for the Labour of the 60's and 70's.

As a voter from the mid-70's, I suspect that you aren't, because you don't understand the basis of "old Labour". I would by no means support all (or even most) of their views even back then (and pretty much none of them now). But, for example
(a) they were definitely not against equal pay - it was in their manifesto from the mid-1960's and the Equak Pay Act was passed under a Labour government
and
(b) They were not against shutting down the mines - in fact their deafening silence under Thatcher demonstrated their position succintly - but the opposition against pit closures had absolutely nothing to do with fighting to retain fossil fuels. Find me an ex-miner who themselves thought fossil fuels were a good thing or had a long term future and I'll find you 500 to match them with the opposite views. I live in a former mining village. What they were opposed to was transferring Britains reliance on British coal to relying on imported coal; the destruction of jobs and communities with no alternatives; and the attack on the working class / unions.

mummymeister · 02/05/2025 12:41

BalladOfBarryAndFreda · 02/05/2025 12:09

The concept of farmers voting for Reform aka Farage is an interesting one, given how he fucked them over with Brexit. Loss of £3.5bn annually in EU farming subsidies (CAP) which have never been replaced with any post-Brexit funding initiatives.

Turkeys voting for Christmas.

Ok so what are you going to do to change the narrative then? Farmers have just seen the inheiritance attack on their properties by Labour and hear that Reform will remove it and support them.? dismissing them all as turkeys voting for christmas changes absolutely nothing.

Kardamyli2 · 02/05/2025 12:43

StandFirm · 02/05/2025 12:40

Yeah well I don't think that a man who pocketed a salary and pension for a job he barely ever showed up for is a paragon of principles either... but hey, looks like a mate from down the pub so must be a good'un.
And what was that about sovereignty again? Defined by the highest bidder I suppose...

And that's fine by me. We're all entitled to an opinion.

YourAmplePlumPoster · 02/05/2025 12:43

Cyclebabble · 02/05/2025 11:28

As a brown person I feel slightly nauseas this morning. What I see is politics moving to the right, with race based politics at the centre of this move. I am fearful that we could see Reform in power or as part of a coalition government. In my view this would be disastrous for our economy and for civil liberties.

"As a brown person I feel slightly nauseous this morning."
The Reform Chairman is a brown person.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.