Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be really worried about Reform?

1000 replies

FiveHorse · 29/04/2025 13:09

Just that really. They’re predicted to gain the most from the upcoming elections, if this carries on could we see a reform government at the next general elections? Or is it press scaremongering as usual?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
23
PandoraSocks · 01/05/2025 09:14

DuncinToffee · 01/05/2025 09:05

Where are you going to house them? Just answer that question.

Labour has a housing plan, very ambitious and difficult to fullfill and it won't be a quick solution.

What is Reform's housing policy?

Bit light on detail, but basically keep the foreigners and benefit claimants at the back of the queue.

To be really worried about Reform?
inkognitha · 01/05/2025 09:14

Alexandra2001 · 30/04/2025 21:16

ID cards haven't reduced immigration into mainland Europe has it?

We give a migrant £49 per week, it's just £9 if meals provided... how much would you reduce this by?
France gives a migrant 47 euros per migrant, about £40... that extra £9 worth risking being drowned for?

Rwanda, at best, would have taken 500 per year... how is that a deterrent? the chances of going there was tiny... Rwanda is also involved another countries war...

Australia had more "success" because everyone was deported to a deserted Island camp...

Ideally, I am in favour of a global handling of migration and asylum. It should be global organisations such as the UN or the EU coordinating this rather than nations.

Everyone should have the right up sticks and move if they don't like their country, if they are persecuted, there is a war or natural catastrophe, to improve their prospects etc.

The current system makes it so that who wants to apply for asylum somewhere need to "pick" a country in the world and stick to it. It is actually not fair because the rules and outcomes are so different country to country.

I think of another system where people who want to leave their country for whatever reason and cannot do so through other legal channels, can ask the help of an international institution to be resettled somewhere else, in a decent place where they can build a future. And they can apply from where they are, no need to cross countries illegally and dangerously to start the procedure.

And I am sorry to say, places like Rwanda have something the UK cannot offer anymore: a booming economy. Their growth rate was 8.9% last year, the UK 0.3%.

I have lived in such places, it's booming, it's easy to find work, start your thing, find investment, clients, there are opportunities. Everything needs to be done over there, basic education and hard work can suffice to really build a good life for oneself, there is really space for growth and prosperity for everyone.

The UK is much richer but it simply cannot offer the same opportunity anymore. It is a post-industrial economy that doesn't need low-skilled people, except for menial jobs, unstable poorly paid, no possibility of social progression, super high cost of living.

PandoraSocks · 01/05/2025 09:16

Fearfulsaints · 01/05/2025 09:11

I actually dont think it's fair to expect the average member of the public to have the solutions to issues. It's the job of the party to suggest them and other parties to question or debunk them if their suggestions aren't workable. Then we weigh up which we think sounds most likely /better in the debate.

Government is complex, most if us have no idea on national treaties, trade, even tax amounts or what's possible. I have a special interest in education but beyond that, I can't suggest workable solutions for nhs, emrvironment, housing, transport..I just know I want them..

I don't like reforms policies, I think they are unworkable. But I still need to listen that immigration is a huge issue for people and make sure the party I support has that on thier radar, has more workable solutions and is engaging in the debate etc.

But I still need to listen that immigration is a huge issue for people and make sure the party I support has that on thier radar

There is some research that reveals the people most concerned about immigration live in areas where there are few immigrants.

PandoraSocks · 01/05/2025 09:18

Dangermoo · 01/05/2025 07:58

So out of touch with the working class man and woman, it's untrue. It's always easy to throw lazy labels around rather than understand why people feel the way they do.

Edited

I'm working class.

DuncinToffee · 01/05/2025 09:21

Fearfulsaints · 01/05/2025 09:11

I actually dont think it's fair to expect the average member of the public to have the solutions to issues. It's the job of the party to suggest them and other parties to question or debunk them if their suggestions aren't workable. Then we weigh up which we think sounds most likely /better in the debate.

Government is complex, most if us have no idea on national treaties, trade, even tax amounts or what's possible. I have a special interest in education but beyond that, I can't suggest workable solutions for nhs, emrvironment, housing, transport..I just know I want them..

I don't like reforms policies, I think they are unworkable. But I still need to listen that immigration is a huge issue for people and make sure the party I support has that on thier radar, has more workable solutions and is engaging in the debate etc.

There is difference between being concerned about immigration (I think most people are in some way) and blaming immigration for everything.

Can't see a GP, immigrant's fault (Farage)
Can't get a council house, immigrants skipping queues (Anderson)

DuncinToffee · 01/05/2025 09:22

PandoraSocks · 01/05/2025 09:18

I'm working class.

Farage and Tice aren't

PandoraSocks · 01/05/2025 09:28

I don't want to get my hopes up, but this is slightly encouraging:

www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/apr/30/tactical-voting-to-stop-reform-may-hamper-farage-in-local-elections

EasternStandard · 01/05/2025 09:29

Labour won’t be able to tackle the issue with current policies so it’s preferable to either get it off the topic list, which is increasingly impossible, or accuse / demonise those who do want to talk about it.

It just skews politics more. In the U.K. and EU there’s the requirement to do something bigger than a country with its own court system, laws and policies.

That’s why Aus and now US made changes earlier, but it’ll take outlier parties in EU and U.K.

TheNuthatch · 01/05/2025 09:32

PandoraSocks · 01/05/2025 09:14

Bit light on detail, but basically keep the foreigners and benefit claimants at the back of the queue.

So Reform want to prioritise people already here, and working.

DuncinToffee · 01/05/2025 09:39

TheNuthatch · 01/05/2025 09:32

So Reform want to prioritise people already here, and working.

Just British ones

They lie about Foreign Nationals jumping queue

Maitri108 · 01/05/2025 09:43

TheNuthatch · 01/05/2025 09:32

So Reform want to prioritise people already here, and working.

Many benefit claimants are working or cannot work due to disability. Why do you want a two tier society?

TheNuthatch · 01/05/2025 09:43

DuncinToffee · 01/05/2025 09:39

Just British ones

They lie about Foreign Nationals jumping queue

What's wrong with prioritising people already here and working?

DuncinToffee · 01/05/2025 09:47

TheNuthatch · 01/05/2025 09:43

What's wrong with prioritising people already here and working?

Many foreign nationals are already here, working and paying into the system and how will you define 'British' workers?

PandoraSocks · 01/05/2025 09:48

TheNuthatch · 01/05/2025 09:32

So Reform want to prioritise people already here, and working.

Even If you don't care about housing "foreigners" and refugees and the feckless unemployed, where will unemployed disabled people be housed?

Also Reform gives little detail on how it will build all this new social housing for local working people. Oh, that is because it has no plans to do so.

Illjusthavethebreadsticks · 01/05/2025 09:48

TheNuthatch · 01/05/2025 09:32

So Reform want to prioritise people already here, and working.

The sheer audacity !!

boys3 · 01/05/2025 09:48

The majority of the elections today are about electing local councillors.

No doubt there will be lots of excitement tomorrow as Reform candidates will get elected. Whether in sufficient number to run any of these Councils - either with an absolute majority or as largest party supported by others - remains to be seen.

however harsh reality is going to hit home pretty quickly.

if they are in charge - SEND deficit to deal with. The government has allowed Councils to keep these off balance sheets, but that override is currently due to end in March 2026. Adding to balancing budget - a legal requirement for Council - challenges.

they’ll suddenly discover that whilst they’d like to fix all the potholes there is no money to do that - with all the statutory demands.

Disillusionment will soon set in. I predict a raft of resignations and ward by-elections over the next 12-24 months.

and probably even quicker for those who find themselves in opposition at their Council. Slog of being a ward cllr will soon lose its lustre.

BIossomtoes · 01/05/2025 09:51

I really hope Reform takes over an entire council. Let them put their money where their mouths are. It will be very entertaining for everyone other than the people living there.

PandoraSocks · 01/05/2025 09:53

Illjusthavethebreadsticks · 01/05/2025 09:48

The sheer audacity !!

Lots of the people "here and working" will be "foreigners". But they will be at the back of the queue.

What do you think Reform means by "foreigners"? It is a bit of a wooly term.

cardibach · 01/05/2025 10:25

Dangermoo · 01/05/2025 07:55

The difference is that Reform voters don't start pearl clutching threads about being worried at other people's concerns which has led to the rise of Reform. Call the party and its voters what you want but they have gained traction. A PP talked about them having 4 seats too many. What arrogance and intolerance and no matter how much you dislike it, the party -not a business, a party - is going nowhere.

This is a thread about being worried about Reform, not ‘other people’s concerns’. Loads of threads are started worrying about things other parties do or say, but when someone questions Reform at all there’s a whole load of outrage from some posters about being silenced or people questioning their right to vote or nonsense about open borders.

cardibach · 01/05/2025 10:28

EasternStandard · 01/05/2025 08:39

Immigration as a political topic is normal. Maybe that’s why politics is going as it is, the language required to talk about policies and border control is too difficult and end up in accusations.

Immigration as a political topic, yes. Immigration as the only topic, not so much. It’s all that’s been said by Reform supporters on here, and then no practical solutions. Plus these are local elections - immigration isn’t likely to be something local councillors can do anything about whatever their party.

GasPanic · 01/05/2025 10:29

Rosie8880 · 01/05/2025 05:50

in the part of London I work in - in one London borough - every week there are 120-130 new cases / requests for housing. We have a backlog that spans 10 years. People who are seeking homes via council support have a 10 year + wait.

the housing crisis has been created by the following - not immigration.

  • in the 1980s thatchers government banned local authorities from using any of the monies captured via rent from social housing to be reused to continue to build new council homes
  • at the same time, her government introduced a new scheme called right yo buy - where council tenants or others could buy for knock down prices a council home. This was a vote pleaser but effectively took council homes out of social rent into the private hands and massively reduced council homes stock.
  • until the 1980s approximately 1/3 of all homes were rented from the council. The original idea/ point of council homes were that they were for all kinds of tenants providing affordable homes for all. Not just the cheapest homes for those most vulnerable.
  • after thatchers government made those changes, council stock massively reduced - they were sold off and councils were banned from using monies to build more homes. This meant that former council homes were now being rented out for loads more and previous council tenants were pushed into the private housing market. Housing benefit that used to be paid to the council for thr rent of councils own properties - a nice virtuous circle - was now being paid to private landlords - another loss of income for councils.
  • so, for the past 40 years councils have been banned from using monies captured as outlined above to build new homes. Our current government reversed that ban.
  • over the last 40 years we have seen a reduction in actually affordable homes, a reduction in the number of homes aciabke that are affordable for a third of the population and the cost of housing as a result (limited stock vs increased demand) soar.
  • the situation with housing has nothing to do with immigration - it has everything to do with previous housing policy and an adherence to free market economic principles.
  • labour are not pushing to come for your homes to house immigrants ok - that is not a policy. if reform are pedaling this they are lying and also stoking dangerous messaging that is divisive.
Edited

Tony Blair actually built fewer council houses during his entire tenure than Fatcher did in one year.

So it's not just the Tories to blame for our current housing predicament.

Successive governments have failed to build enough houses for the population, or make housing affordable for everyone. I'm not expecting the current government to do any different, but the jury is of course out on this.

If there was/is something that people should be really worried about then it should be stuff like this.

PandoraSocks · 01/05/2025 10:53

GasPanic · 01/05/2025 10:29

Tony Blair actually built fewer council houses during his entire tenure than Fatcher did in one year.

So it's not just the Tories to blame for our current housing predicament.

Successive governments have failed to build enough houses for the population, or make housing affordable for everyone. I'm not expecting the current government to do any different, but the jury is of course out on this.

If there was/is something that people should be really worried about then it should be stuff like this.

Absolutely.

Yet here on this thread you have people welcoming the rhetoric from Farage about "foreigners" being put at the back of the queue for social housing, the inference being that they are the cause of the shortage of social holding. They also wilfully ignore the fact that Reform has no other policies on social housing.

EasternStandard · 01/05/2025 12:15

cardibach · 01/05/2025 10:28

Immigration as a political topic, yes. Immigration as the only topic, not so much. It’s all that’s been said by Reform supporters on here, and then no practical solutions. Plus these are local elections - immigration isn’t likely to be something local councillors can do anything about whatever their party.

I’m sure people are aware it’s local elections. And some mayoral too. If they do well it will still influence politics generally, even more than they have done so far.

Worriedsickmostofthetime · 01/05/2025 12:16

I don’t know much about UK politics so probably shouldn’t be commenting but it appears to me that underneath the veil of the anti-immigrant voting public is a sense of identity and nationalism and a dilution of that by ‘foreigners’ which people find upsetting. Instead of just owning up to this (like a child who doesn’t want to live in a blended family with other kids and adults thrown together) and saying it like it is they need to pin their concerns on ‘facts’ like housing and NHS queues and assign blame.
I live in a country where identity, race and culture are a political commodity and there are no bones about the hatred they have for each other based on these differences. The Brit’s just seem too polite and politically correct to admit it. Call it racism, call it right wing but people have a deep seated sense of nationalism and find integrating a bitter pill to swallow. I myself come from a mixed nationality (not race) family and we often come to blows with my mother who was born in one country, birth registered in another to foreign parents and UK nationalised citizen by virtue of marriage to my father about how she views herself as she can be so anti-immigrant when she is a migrant in more than one way.
it’s a very complex issue and there is so much emotive political narrative around it that it becomes hard to sift fact from fiction.

MerlinsBeard1 · 01/05/2025 12:25

Maitri108 · 30/04/2025 15:58

Is admiration for Putin unpleasant and divisive? Have you read about the civilians being tortured in prison camps? Russia isn't in the ECHR.

Plenty of other civilised countries cope without being in the ECHR. I'd say being unable to deport criminals because their kid only likes a specific type of chicken nugget or, the latest travesty, is 'afraid to catch Covid' is deeply unpleasant and divisive.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread