Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

You are given the power to make three things illegal. What would you choose?

705 replies

SpringSunshineanddaffodils · 27/04/2025 08:40

I know people will post silly things that irritate them but think seriously. What three things would you make completely illegal right now?
Here's mine:

  1. The right to buy your council house
  2. Owning more than one property.
  3. Not keeping your cat contained in your own home. With hefty fines if it is caught killing any wildlife.
OP posts:
SpringSunshineanddaffodils · 27/04/2025 16:30

SoOxon · 27/04/2025 09:52

and impossible

It's not impossible. I'd enforce it in the exact same way we enforced roaming dogs. It would soon become a thing of the past, just the same way dogs no longer roam.

People only think it's ridiculous because they are not used to it. And they only don't want it because they don't want to have to take responsibility for their pet.

OP posts:
Anjo2011 · 27/04/2025 16:30
  • Having your phone on loudspeaker in a public area
  • Vaping
  • Dynamic pricing on tickets
Thedogscollar · 27/04/2025 16:35

Morningup · 27/04/2025 16:17

Like hankies!

Yup😉

user1497787065 · 27/04/2025 16:42

Swearing

JenniferBooth · 27/04/2025 16:46

SpringSunshineanddaffodils · 27/04/2025 08:40

I know people will post silly things that irritate them but think seriously. What three things would you make completely illegal right now?
Here's mine:

  1. The right to buy your council house
  2. Owning more than one property.
  3. Not keeping your cat contained in your own home. With hefty fines if it is caught killing any wildlife.

If a social housing tenant loses their job due to the incompetence of the HA. Constant no shows from contractors, Or endless visits the tenant has to take time off for (on one of my threads an MNer was on the 7th visit and repair STILL wasnt done) it should be law that the HA should NOT be allowed to evict when they have caused you to lose your job.

Ddakji · 27/04/2025 16:48

Oh, and given that my nostrils have just detected this -

bonfires during daylight hours, and outside of Oct - March.

SpringSunshineanddaffodils · 27/04/2025 16:56

MaRhodes · 27/04/2025 10:10

What's wrong with buying your council house?

Say you're given a council house in the 1990s or 2000s because you need one. Your children are young, you're struggling to afford to live etc etc. During this time, there's plenty of council houses to go round. You're given this house at a very low rent, subsidised by the tax payer. Fair enough.
Fast forward to the 2020s. There's a housing crisis, families are living in bedsits or cramped into one bedroom flats. You're all good though. Your children have left home by now, you're sitting pretty in a nice 3 bedroom council house, with two empty rooms and a nice big garden, just you and hubby. You could even rent some rooms out if you wanted and make money. You've had time to save up, work your way up in your job so you're financially comfortable. You are paying a tiny amount of rent, say 150pw which you can more than afford, while the family down the road are paying private rent of £1200pcm for a two bedroom flat.
You decide to buy this house you have paid very little for over the years, and the council sell it to you at a very low price, say £89k. Houses of this size in your area are easily going for £300k+
After five years, you can now legally sell this house, for market rate. You sell the house you were given at a very low price because you were hard-up, to help you out, built with taxpayers money, and you pocket a huge profit of over £200k, for simply being helped out one day 20 years ago.
Meanwhile, that house has GONE from the social housing market now. It can never be used to help another family in need, like you were helped. And it's very possibly been bought up by a landlord who will rent it out for extortionate private rent (in my area, 3 bed houses re going for £1850pcm) to families in the same position you were once in.
Is this a fair use of houses built with taxpayers money to help people in need?
They should be there for people who NEED them. Under-occupancy is bad enough but they should absolutely not be for sale.

OP posts:
polarsystem · 27/04/2025 17:00

Redhairandhottubs · 27/04/2025 09:01

  1. Cycling on main roads
  2. Being allowed to park multiple work vans and caravans in residential parking areas (this is very much an issue where I live!)
  3. Bonfires in back gardens

i second all of this!!

Kardamyli2 · 27/04/2025 17:09

sleepwouldbenice · 27/04/2025 15:53

Oh dear. Proved my point. Not really looked at this properly have you.

Go on then, explain to everyone why you think the earth's climate hasn't always changed.

Morningup · 27/04/2025 17:11

Kardamyli2 · 27/04/2025 17:09

Go on then, explain to everyone why you think the earth's climate hasn't always changed.

I misread ignore

Bringmeahigherlove · 27/04/2025 17:12
  1. Chewing with your mouth open or smacking your lips
  2. Whistling
  3. Smart phones/tablets for under 16s
QueefQueen80s · 27/04/2025 17:19

SpringSunshineanddaffodils · 27/04/2025 15:48

I will keep being bothered about it, and I will keep speaking out about it, because I give a shit about the damage they do.
I'm not some crazy minority either, lots of experts agree with me, including David Attenborough.
Maybe it will never change, human nature does tend to be selfish and self serving after all, so most people will, like you, continue to not give a shit because it suits them but that won't stop me from speaking against something that's not right.

My cats are indoor so it doesn’t apply to me.

comeandhaveteawithme · 27/04/2025 17:27

viques · 27/04/2025 11:40

Fireworks

littering

17 year olds being given a full driving licence with no restrictions (speed, curfew, passengers)

To be fair, our requirements for getting a licence are much stricter than other countries, where they give them to younger kids. America, for example, where they are handed out to kids as a given, after they've driven round some cones in a carpark for a few minutes.

With you on the fireworks though. Organised displays by licenced professionals only. It's actually madness that we sell literal explosives in Tesco to anyone over 18. Littering is my pet hate.

SmugglersHaunt · 27/04/2025 17:41
  1. Homemade food that’s been brought to a second location
  2. Yawning and/or coughing without covering the mouth
  3. Playing anything out loud on public transport = instant death penalty
JenniferBooth · 27/04/2025 17:48

SpringSunshineanddaffodils · 27/04/2025 16:56

Say you're given a council house in the 1990s or 2000s because you need one. Your children are young, you're struggling to afford to live etc etc. During this time, there's plenty of council houses to go round. You're given this house at a very low rent, subsidised by the tax payer. Fair enough.
Fast forward to the 2020s. There's a housing crisis, families are living in bedsits or cramped into one bedroom flats. You're all good though. Your children have left home by now, you're sitting pretty in a nice 3 bedroom council house, with two empty rooms and a nice big garden, just you and hubby. You could even rent some rooms out if you wanted and make money. You've had time to save up, work your way up in your job so you're financially comfortable. You are paying a tiny amount of rent, say 150pw which you can more than afford, while the family down the road are paying private rent of £1200pcm for a two bedroom flat.
You decide to buy this house you have paid very little for over the years, and the council sell it to you at a very low price, say £89k. Houses of this size in your area are easily going for £300k+
After five years, you can now legally sell this house, for market rate. You sell the house you were given at a very low price because you were hard-up, to help you out, built with taxpayers money, and you pocket a huge profit of over £200k, for simply being helped out one day 20 years ago.
Meanwhile, that house has GONE from the social housing market now. It can never be used to help another family in need, like you were helped. And it's very possibly been bought up by a landlord who will rent it out for extortionate private rent (in my area, 3 bed houses re going for £1850pcm) to families in the same position you were once in.
Is this a fair use of houses built with taxpayers money to help people in need?
They should be there for people who NEED them. Under-occupancy is bad enough but they should absolutely not be for sale.

IME on here a lot of posters only care about poor families in temp accomodation when they can use them as a tool to bash those already living in social housing. The rest of the time the same posters are saying these families shouldnt have had kids that they cant afford.
Tactics like this have been much easier to spot since Covid The same thing was done back then. Disabled and ill people were used as a tool to emotionally blackmail others into following Covid restrictions Now they want to cut their disability benefits. Im sick of people USING people (they usually like to feel superior too) as a tool to win their side of the debate when they couldnt give a fuck about them the rest of the time!!!!!!!!!!!

Judgejudysno1fan · 27/04/2025 17:49

RemusLupinsBiggestGroupie · 27/04/2025 08:42

1: standing like a twat at the top or bottom of a staircase or escalator
2: wearing leggings in public without a bum covering top
3: chewing gum

The newest one are bum scrunch leggings, where they dip in to the bum crack.and show pretty much everything, including what they ate for lunch!

NoBots · 27/04/2025 17:49

SpringSunshineanddaffodils · 27/04/2025 16:56

Say you're given a council house in the 1990s or 2000s because you need one. Your children are young, you're struggling to afford to live etc etc. During this time, there's plenty of council houses to go round. You're given this house at a very low rent, subsidised by the tax payer. Fair enough.
Fast forward to the 2020s. There's a housing crisis, families are living in bedsits or cramped into one bedroom flats. You're all good though. Your children have left home by now, you're sitting pretty in a nice 3 bedroom council house, with two empty rooms and a nice big garden, just you and hubby. You could even rent some rooms out if you wanted and make money. You've had time to save up, work your way up in your job so you're financially comfortable. You are paying a tiny amount of rent, say 150pw which you can more than afford, while the family down the road are paying private rent of £1200pcm for a two bedroom flat.
You decide to buy this house you have paid very little for over the years, and the council sell it to you at a very low price, say £89k. Houses of this size in your area are easily going for £300k+
After five years, you can now legally sell this house, for market rate. You sell the house you were given at a very low price because you were hard-up, to help you out, built with taxpayers money, and you pocket a huge profit of over £200k, for simply being helped out one day 20 years ago.
Meanwhile, that house has GONE from the social housing market now. It can never be used to help another family in need, like you were helped. And it's very possibly been bought up by a landlord who will rent it out for extortionate private rent (in my area, 3 bed houses re going for £1850pcm) to families in the same position you were once in.
Is this a fair use of houses built with taxpayers money to help people in need?
They should be there for people who NEED them. Under-occupancy is bad enough but they should absolutely not be for sale.

I think it is a good idea. It may solve the problem of people keep refusing the assigned housing too. Social care should be there only for safety net, not for life style support.

sleepwouldbenice · 27/04/2025 17:49

Kardamyli2 · 27/04/2025 17:09

Go on then, explain to everyone why you think the earth's climate hasn't always changed.

Your statements are irrelevant that's why

yes climate has always changed, claim a tiny gold star...
But over the past 2000 years, only in the last 150 years has the climate all around the world changed at the same time, and in the same direction, with warming of over 98% of the surface of the planet. But don't let critical thinking get in the way of your sound bites

MyUmberSeal · 27/04/2025 17:51

1..Parking on the road outside someone’s house (yes I know it’s allowed but I’m playing the game)

2..Taking children to supermarkets.

3..Cheap see through leggings.

MonteStory · 27/04/2025 17:51

SpringSunshineanddaffodils · 27/04/2025 15:23

  1. Because it takes it off the social housing market forever and its not fair. We need social housing to be there for people that need it, as a safety net, not for people to buy and even make a profit from. Several people I know have sold theirs for market value when they bought it for a ridiculously cheap price, downsized and pocketed the huge profit. Why should people be allowed to walk away with £100-200k while there are homeless families who need that house? A house given to them when they needed it?
I also have strong opinions about people staying in homes they no longer need. Once you're earning above a certain threshold, you should be expected to move out. Empty besters living in 3 bed homes needed by families should be offered smaller houses and kicked to the curb if they refuse them.
  1. Yes.
  2. No, not necessarily, just keep them contained in your own land. I don't have any suggestions, I don't have a cat. That's the responsibility of cat owners to figure out. Just as I have to with my dog.

You’ve been prosecuted because your dog killed a sparrow? Or a wild rabbit?

No, of course you haven’t.

JenniferBooth · 27/04/2025 17:52

NoBots · 27/04/2025 17:49

I think it is a good idea. It may solve the problem of people keep refusing the assigned housing too. Social care should be there only for safety net, not for life style support.

We are talking about social housing not social care. They are two different things The electrician is coming to mine tomorrow to change my fuse box because H&S laws have changed. Hes not coming to help me on and off the commode
😂

comeandhaveteawithme · 27/04/2025 17:53

OurChristmasMiracle · 27/04/2025 10:27

1- charging extortionate rent- there would be rent caps dependent on size of property and facilities- ie garden would increase the cap

2- electric bikes/scooters/ adult bikes on pavements. Especially the electric ones which go quite fast.

3- not paying child support or avoiding declaring correct income.

One car or one vehicle?
What about owning one car, for family use, and a workvan?

billysboy · 27/04/2025 17:55

Men in Lycra with bicycles
Religion
Traffic lights for mending potholes or minor road repairs

comeandhaveteawithme · 27/04/2025 17:55

Damn, I replied to the wrong person and now I can't find the comment I meant to reply to! sorry @OurChristmasMiracle

comeandhaveteawithme · 27/04/2025 17:58

MonteStory · 27/04/2025 17:51

You’ve been prosecuted because your dog killed a sparrow? Or a wild rabbit?

No, of course you haven’t.

No... because my dog hasn't killed a sparrow? or a wild rabbit?
Dogs are not recognised as being responsible for killing 40 to 70 million birds each year?!

Sorry, what on earth is your point?