Trans protest- sharing for balance

[Tandora]

There’s a thread sharing some really awful images from the protest, so I wanted to share some positive ones for the sake of some perspective/ balance.
A lot of people are really understandably incredibly angry and overwhelmed by the events of the last few days. But most people who support trans rights absolutely don’t condone fighting oppression and injustice with misogyny.

I wanted to reply to you earlier on your post where you mentioned how we had gone from an occasional workaround to massive overreach and just wanted to mention that the 'workaround' also wasn't consented to by women but was actually a decision made by doctors of their own accord without consultation with women. I add that not as a criticism to you but just as general info - there's a real sense of 'this is how it's always been and women didn't mind' in some quarters when in actual fact women had it imposed on us. This was also the case in some LGBT spaces.

But you're right about the current overreach - sorry I couldn't find your original post to respond to it directly.

So a woman is what?

What, every person at the protest?

I am scientist. What you have explained has not scientific basis. You are just twisting the facts to suit your own narrative.

If anything the reinforcement of male supremacy through trans privilege is more aligned with fascism.

No, the judgement does not say this
Yes agree as per my pp.

It merely enforces that in law, it's biological sex that is key

No it doesn’t say or do this. It says in the EA the word “woman” means biological woman and “sex” means “biological sex”. It’s about interpreting language in the statute, that’s it.

I’m going to ask again, why would one group of men who identify as the opposite sex have a different rate of sexual offending than another group of men who don’t? Please show your working. Thanks in advance.

My fundamental no go is to walk alongside anyone who displays a banner that is deeply misogynistic and promotes capital punishment by hanging and witch burning. It's all a bit Badenoch and Reform UK.

You have your parties mixed up. Calling for hanging, decapitation and raping people who refuse to follow their belief system is the purview of the SNP, Greens and many in Labour.

Let's simplify it then.

The number of male sex offenders housed in women's prisons should be zero.

Is it currently zero, or more than zero?

Do you think none of the women who are GC have read or understood any science? You must know that the bulk of it says the there are only 2 sex classes in mammals?
Someone here is radicalised. It’s not people who are GC.

You have to wonder what has gone wrong in OP's life to be blindly defending something she is actually so ill-informed about. It's all very odd.

So why are they protesting against the SC ruling.

Thats what the protest is for.

What devastation has been caused?

Most of us have bothered to read it, which is different from presenting a thesis on it. You haven't done the basics and are here trying to dictate to women what it means.

Apartheid? Are you fucking serious?

yes . Did you just say that apartheid wasn’t enforced by authorities and the law? Baffled.

In fairness, until I read Tandora's definition of fascism, I had a completely mistaken idea of what went on in Europe between 1939 and 1945🙄

For clarity: thank you Sarahconnor1, I completely agree with your comment.

Yes if they’re protesting the single sex clarification of the EA2010.

Every single one of them wanting men to have access to women’s single sex spaces is a predator. I’ll happily die on this hill.

Is it apartheid to have separate toilets for men and women?

Wouldn't that mean that most of the world is currently living under apartheid?

This is complete nonsense. It’s 88 pages which you haven’t read. What do you think it actually talks about?

All the men (regardless of their identity) yes. They are predating on women’s spaces, sports, and language.

Interesting. So no significant difference between the male mind and the female mind?

So what is the difference between a man and a woman?

Some of them might just be idiots who haven't read or understood the judgment and never met a bandwagon they didn't like.

If you have read the full 88 page judgement then good for you. I’ve read parts of it, plus analysis/ commentary. If you believe my interpretations are wrong then you are very free to say so and explain why based on having read the full 88 pages,

But how many genders are there?

How do you know what it does or doesn't say? You just admitted you haven't read it.

I'm sure I'm not the only one with a theory