Supreme Court rules the term sex refers to 'biological women'

[everythingthelighttouches]

Finally.

There is no “triumph” for me.

i am delighted though.
I feel relief that this reasonable request for clarity has been heard.

The judge also said “the law still gives trans people protection against discrimination.”

As it should do. No one ever argued otherwise.

Sorry haven't read the rest of thread. Invasive testing you describe is a swab of the inside of your cheek to asess your chromosones. Not massively invasive.

Years ago, if I noticed you in a toilet I would assume you were female as you were in the women's toilet. Now, I would would probably passume you were a male trans woman. How does that help you/ women in a similar position? You would be more accepted before all of this started!

So sad to see your femphobia.

This is a win for FEMALES of ALL colours and classes. And you know that, so stop lying!

Well they are just going to continue to get fucking bored, because us women will NEVER stop fighting for our rights. Interestingly though how these activists out themselves as the misogynists they truly are and that it was never about 'trans rights' to begin with. It was about stopping womens rights. His 'bored' comment proves this. It's a male bored that women fight for our rights. The femphobia and misogyny is confirmed by their own words. And he better fucking get used to being bored. Because he's going to be bored until the day he dies.

Trans are the ones who are mistreating females. Trans are the most privileged, most protected Sacred Caste there is. They VIOLENTLY hate females. You males need to get this through your heads: the days of you terrorising females are coming to an end. If you thought we feminists would ever give up fighting for our rights, you are fucking wrong. NEVER!

Woman is not an 'identity'. It is a SEX CLASS. Women are born, not worn. Take your Male Privilege elsewhere, maybe a Mens Rights Activist forum is more your speed, where you can whinge and complain about those 'uppity women taking away our rights to see our children in family court' or something. Us feminists are DONE with your hateful misogynistic bigotry.

"Fake feminism"

And with that, you've outed yourself as an MRA.

Spending money to get our FUCKING RIGHTS BACK is never a waste of money, MRA. Never. Get fucking used to it. We will NOT...STOP until every single male is out of female only spaces. Feminists will never stop.

Oh, we forgot. Us women are supposed to speak with a soft voice, never get angry and never swear. According to you MRAs.

An Advanced Search of slashlover shows they are a major Mens Rights Activist/trans activist. Their hatred of women is clear.

Bored of women fighting for their rights. Channel 4 news interview 2 x trans activists and one says 'bored'?

I see zero twwannnnsphobia. What I see is feminists defending womens rights. And femphobic people like yourself getting annoyed at us for doing so.

Transwomen are males. So not any kind of woman. Most (97% according to medical stats) transwomen retain their penis and testicles. Tell me; HOW is a male with a cock and balls any type of 'woman'? Please answer that. These are males, (in every way), of the oppressor sex class. They have no lived experience as females. How can a man have an idea of what it is to be a woman? This is males trying to identify into female sex class oppression.

Do you support Rachel Dolezal (google the name); a very pale (when not using very dark foundation and skin tan and afro wig) anglo white woman who 'identifies' as an African American and claims to be trans racial? If you agree it's wrong for a white person to culturally appropriate the oppression and struggle of black person, surely you can see how wrong it is for males to culturally appropriate the oppression and struggle of the female sex class?

No male has any part of womens discussions. Having a MALE in womens rights discussions is like adding a fox to the hen house. It harms women to have a male intruding in our spaces and discussions. No part of womens rights has anything to do with males, no matter how he 'identifies' in his head.

So you think that females shouldn't have a terminology or definition to exclude males?

Why do you think a male should be included in anything to do with females?

Definitions DON'T CHANGE. Biology DOESN'T CHANGE.

And removing women's ability to define ourselves as distinct from men is NOT 'progressive'. It is regressive.

Is there any chance you could signpost me to the male hockey player case please? I would really appreciate it. I have been keeping a look out, but haven’t come across anything. Thanks very much

Your 'understanding' of twwaannnnnnnsphobia is any woman defending her rights.

Be honest. That is what you really want to say.

Yes, it defines sex. Which is quite important when the Equality Act lists ‘sex’ as one of its protected characteristics.

It also lists ‘gender reassignment’ as one of its protected characteristics.

It doesn’t list ‘gender’ because, as you’ve just approached, ‘gender’ has essentially become a pseudonym for ‘personality’. And how can you create any kind of coherent system of legal or policy based rights around personality? You genuinely might as well build rights around favourite colour.

Which, coincidentally, has a transwoman as head moderator there who deletes any feminist and gender critical content and words entries to make feminism look 'transphobic'. Fancy using wikipedia for a source for anything other than wiping your arse (if one could electronically). They may as well link to Pink News 'definition' of 'transphobia' for all the validity wikipedia the trans activist site has.

Transwomen are MALE. Men. No part of womens rights has anything to do with any male person. By definition, FEMinism excludes males.

You're really wondering how having FULLY INTACT MALES with their penis and nut sack in a female only space hurts traumatised rape survivors like me? It's not just about safety, but privacy and dignity away from the male gaze. But, here are some links/photos about these Autogynephilic transwomen (males) in female spaces: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10249633/Rape-victim-forced-quit-therapy-sessions-feels-threatened-6ft-trans-woman.html

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/oct/11/transgender-prisoner-who-sexually-assaulted-inmates-jailed-for-life

metro.co.uk/2019/03/16/transgender-woman-18-sexually-assaulted-girl-10-morrisons-toilet-8914577/amp/

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/seven-sex-attacks-in-womens-jails-by-transgender-convicts-cx9m8zqpg?fbclid=IwAR1JhugsOSdg58PzKpMAfvzqZVXxb7mRWs93qWqQyBA6vupiwnk1U_BJOOc

www.fox46.com/news/transgender-woman-convicted-of-sexually-assaulting-10-year-old-girl-in-bathroom/

www.scotsman.com/regions/edinburgh-fife-and-lothians/female-spaces-need-better-protection-after-trans-woman-sex-assault-girl-say-campaigners-140883?fbclid=IwAR2iMILdrlxCbawettem8KbyhpnRUfjpQIx8ZhPUiEeFGXCia1_soi-5JZI

www.foxnews.com/us/parents-speak-out-at-loudoun-county-school-board-meeting

fairplayforwomen.com/transgender-male-criminality-sex-offences/

transcrimeuk.com/

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10472547/Trans-rapist-25-groomed-13-year-old-girl-jailed-100-months.html

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10596441/Woman-83-parole-killing-two-arrested-charged-murder-sfa.html

www.scotsman.com/regions/edinburgh-fife-and-lothians/female-spaces-need-better-protection-after-trans-woman-sex-assault-girl-say-campaigners-140883

Is that enough for you?

Or what about this... how about the LA spa incident where a naked male-bodied person with a semi erection was walking about amongst women and children, in a woman's spa? Later emerged that they are on the sex offenders register. But that was how EASY it was for them to gain access to women's spaces.

Or what about the woman's beauty clinics where a male-bodied person demanded the person on duty wax around their penis and testicles? And then tried (unsuccessfully thankfully) to sue these clinics?

What about that? EVERYTHING we warned that would happen when fully intact males enter female spaces, and were told wouldn't happen, has happened. EVERYTHING.

I accident pressed that you are being unreasonable but actually totally agree with you.

How can you defend womens rights, if you CAN'T DEFINE women?!??

I’m backing those nurses 100%, really hope they win their cases.

Tell us you didn’t read the judgement or anything about it without telling us you didn’t read the judgment or anything about it

I adore your passion DoddlesMcDoddle, well said!

I certainly feel my 3 year old DD will be safer after yesterday, I am delighted!

I have always said I will be keeping a very close eye on her schools, and if I discover any nonsense about teenage males being allowed to change with her then I would be swiftly removing her and lodging complaints very highly if that were not stopped. This ruling will give parents much needed backing already facing these horrendous issues in our secondary schools.

Now let’s hope our nurses get a resounding victory too! They have been treated disgracefully.

The supreme court ruled that the terms “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act refer to a biological woman and biological sex. I agree that when it was published this is exactly what was meant by it. But haven't we progressed and evolved in the past 15 years?

There’s nothing progressive about eroding hard won rights to safety, dignity and protection. We’ve certainly not evolved physically to where a woman has a cock and balls, we’ve not evolved socially to where women aren’t at risk from men’s physical strength, we’ve not evolved psychologically to where men don’t subjugate women.

Funny how “evolve” invariably means women accommodating men, not men winding back their dangerous, misogynistic behaviours.

https://www.thehockeypaper.co.uk/articles/2025/04/14/transgender-trio-to-challenge-england-hockey-ban-in-landmark-legal-case-hopes

I did mix in some past or current cases up with this future one. I don’t know if it will go ahead.