Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Supreme Court rules the term sex refers to 'biological women'

1000 replies

everythingthelighttouches · 16/04/2025 10:10

Finally.

There is no “triumph” for me.

i am delighted though.
I feel relief that this reasonable request for clarity has been heard.

The judge also said “the law still gives trans people protection against discrimination.”

As it should do. No one ever argued otherwise.

Supreme Court rules the term sex refers to 'biological women'
OP posts:
Thread gallery
30
OKYay · 16/04/2025 22:32

...spaces for biological women.

OldCottageGreenhouse · 16/04/2025 22:33

mateysmum · 16/04/2025 22:22

I have just had to switch off ITV News at Ten and leave the room before I threw something at the TV. All the crap about how this is all terribly terribly complicated and where are all the poor delicate trans women going to feel safe now, the poor little flowers. Those nasty women with their sex based rights. Cue much wailing and renting of garments. The implicit suggestion being that as it's all so difficult it isn't yet resolved what with all those hurty feels.

Oh god. This is why I don’t watch news shows anymore. I just read the Sky News apps.

Pickleton1992 · 16/04/2025 22:34

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Danglinglights · 16/04/2025 22:35

Finally.

Inextremis · 16/04/2025 22:38

I'm just a little concerned that this has been very much a unilateral argument and conclusion. I wish someone would mention transmen. Oops, I just did.

Helleofabore · 16/04/2025 22:40

Inextremis · 16/04/2025 22:38

I'm just a little concerned that this has been very much a unilateral argument and conclusion. I wish someone would mention transmen. Oops, I just did.

Female people who have transgender identities have always been included in female sexed based provisions though.

Brefugee · 16/04/2025 22:42

She feels, in her words, that once society makes judgements like this, it’ll be the gay community that is targeted next.

why does she feel that? What is the connection between the L and the T?
For the record: if anyone comes for gay rights (or any human rights) i will be at the protests, i will be lobbying my MP etc etc. As we did before.

But i want some insight into this thinking, if your GF wouldn't mind letting us know? I simply don't see the connection between "no, men aren't women, never were and never will be" and, say, nullifying gay marriage.

spannasaurus · 16/04/2025 22:42

This judgement is great for transmen. It confirms that they are entitled to maternity and pregnancy legal protections which was in doubt if they were considered legally male re the Equality Act

UrinalCake · 16/04/2025 22:44

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Does she consume a lot of American content on the issue?

Brefugee · 16/04/2025 22:44

While i am baffled (and angered, tbh) by a transman with a GRC who gets pregnant - I am glad that they will receive the protections they are entitled to.

Trans men without GRC are covered by the legislation anyway, and always were. And that is what this ruling today confirmed. TBH if it is a win for women, it is particularly a win for trans men.

nocoolnamesleft · 16/04/2025 22:44

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

I'm sorry she feels that way. I am a biological realist, but thoroughly support lesbians. Ironically the misogynistic homophobia of the cotton ceiling was one of the things that firmed up my opinions, along with the transing of gay children.

Unsureabouteverything · 16/04/2025 22:45

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

I think it's almost the opposite to your partner's fears. I think the lowering support for LGBTQ taken as a whole is directly because of the unreasonable trans lobbying. No one wants to think of children being given puberty blockers or male rapists in women's prisons.

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 16/04/2025 22:46

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 16/04/2025 21:32

We are talking about the sex class that has collectively birthed every human who has ever lived. The ones who need pregnancy and maternity care. The ones who need legislation to protect us from being discriminated against because we are, or might become, pregnant. The only ones who are affected by attacks on abortion rights. The only ones who can become pregnant as a result of rape. The only ones who can die in childbirth. The only ones who go through the menopause. The ones who didn't have the right to vote in some people's living memory in parts of the European Union. The ones who suffer around 80% of all sexual assaults. The ones who are selectively aborted before birth in some cultures, and have their genitals multilated in others. The ones who aren't allowed to speak out loud or stand near windows in Afghanistan.

You don't think it might be even a teeny tiny bit useful to have a word for this group?

I think we need a word for female humans a lot more than we need a word for female sheep, but nobody questions the need for a word for female sheep.

Edited

This is so powerfully said, and absolutely nails it, thank you @MissScarletInTheBallroom

Sameoldsameoldsame · 16/04/2025 22:47

AnSolas · 16/04/2025 10:33

Imagine a UK judge has to rule that humans come in one of two sexual reproduction classifications.
Or that people elected by the community dont have a right to pass laws to force the community to pretend that humans can change sex.
🦧

Crazy isn't it, that this needs to be ruled on. How stupid society has become.

Pickleton1992 · 16/04/2025 22:51

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Sameoldsameoldsame · 16/04/2025 22:51

Helleofabore · 16/04/2025 22:00

@fourbedwinner

If you are genuinely interested in reading, can I suggest that you read the following books:

Trans by Helen Joyce
Material Girls by Kathleen Stock
Irreversible Damage by Abigail Shier

I also recommend the following video content:

Adult Human Female documentary (that had to be cancelled from screening mulitple times due to mostly intimidating male people with transgender identities blocking entry for women to watch the screening)

Behind the Looking Glass - a documentary with the real life voices of women who have been greatly harmed by their husbands who declared they were women.

If you want to see the evidence that no male person who has been through puberty loses their pubertal physical advantage, here is a thread with all the evidence that I have been able to pull together. Genuinely, no male person is a woman. And when women need single sex spaces, it is also because female people have greater likelihood of fighting off and escaping a female attacker, but when you consider that even a weak man has more strength than 90+% of all female people, the understanding should be falling into place.

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5142027-save-female-sports-evidence-thread?page=1

Yes, there is great harm to female people by treating any male as if they were female when they are male. Calling an individual male person a 'woman' has already been shown to cause collective harm to female people as well as individual harm.

The inclusion of one male person in a space, a sport, a job role specifying a female person, etc, causes harm typically to many more than one female person.

This is so important. Thank you 😊

AnSolas · 16/04/2025 22:51

LikeWhoUsesTypewritersAnyway · 16/04/2025 21:11

I also have to say, I don't think I have ever known of one single female to male transperson who demands to invade male private spaces, where they get naked/part naked, and may show intimate parts. Only male to female transgender people seem to demand to be in womens safe spaces.

Not all obviously, but if anyone transgender IS making unreasonable demands, it's ALWAYS male to female.

To be fair there was recent incident in the US where a woman was in the male spa area with a male friend and males customers objected to her being there to staff. So she and her male friend made a (usual bully style) video of the staff member trying to explain why staff ask her to move her female body to the female side

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5292291-imperial-spa-san-francisco-usa-incident-with-a-transman

Imperial Spa, San Francisco, USA - incident with a transman. | Mumsnet

A transman (biological female) was asked to move from the mens side to the female side due to not having a penis. I think this is a naked spa. The tra...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5292291-imperial-spa-san-francisco-usa-incident-with-a-transman

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 16/04/2025 22:51

nomas · 16/04/2025 21:57

Wow, you couldn’t even maintain the façade for a bit.

They never can, if there’s no immediate capitulation it’s straight in with the insults.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 16/04/2025 22:53

spicemaiden · 16/04/2025 21:42

Your mantra, for it to be honoured, would this require women to be protected from harm and discrimination that courts on the basis of their sex: so yes please, let’s live and indeed let live: let women live free from men in their prison cells, free from male patients on their single sex wards, free from men in the medical examination room, free from men in their rape crisis centres, free from men in their refuges, free from mein in their women only therapy groups, free from male competitors in their sports, and free from males in this changing rooms.

Let women live.

Perfectly put 👏

mordaunt · 16/04/2025 22:56

Such a relief for all.
i am women, hear me roar

Pussycat22 · 16/04/2025 22:56

Helleofabore · 16/04/2025 10:36

I now wonder what the impact will be on the two cases with the nurses? And the male dart player? And the new male hockey player case.

BIG compo payouts I hope!!

Darrellstclares · 16/04/2025 22:57

Eggtoastie · 16/04/2025 14:18

@Whatafustercluck maybe the TRA community should have been spending their energies campaigning for safe third spaces rather than devoting all energies into demanding admittance into women's spaces.

Absolutely this.

murasaki · 16/04/2025 23:01

Jo Swinson on Newsnight was such a shill then. Take the toxicity out of the debate. Who brought it, Jo? She clearly wants women to roll over.

Totallymessed · 16/04/2025 23:03

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Isn't it homophobia for a heterosexual man who identifies as a woman being able to say he's a lesbian, though? Doesn't she think that lesbians should have the right to single sex spaces?

Truthlikeness · 16/04/2025 23:04

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

The ruling actually helps protect gay and bi people. As the law was previously being interpreted, it was not possible to exclude men with a GRC from lesbian groups, for example. This will now allow same-sex attracted people the freedom to self-associate. As a bi woman, I am very grateful this has now been clarified.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.