Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Supreme Court rules the term sex refers to 'biological women'

1000 replies

everythingthelighttouches · 16/04/2025 10:10

Finally.

There is no “triumph” for me.

i am delighted though.
I feel relief that this reasonable request for clarity has been heard.

The judge also said “the law still gives trans people protection against discrimination.”

As it should do. No one ever argued otherwise.

Supreme Court rules the term sex refers to 'biological women'
OP posts:
Thread gallery
30
AccidentallyWesAnderson · 16/04/2025 18:51

AngeDough · 16/04/2025 18:46

Why is everyone so bothered. Just live and let live

Aye we’ll just do that Ange 😂

juldan · 16/04/2025 18:53

Lostcat · 16/04/2025 16:16

Well TRAs have delighted in women being less safe

transphobic generalisation.

i want trans people to be safe but not at the expense of women and girls

There is no need for anyone’s safety to be at the expense of anyone else’s. Again, transphobic statement.

Stonewall and other TRAs could have campaigned for third spaces and trans facilities but they didn’t

This judgement doesn’t mean that trans people should have “third spaces”. Trans people are still protected under the act, and their protected characteristic is gender reassignment . trans people should not have to live their lives, othered, siloed and outed.

@Lostcat

No, it does not force trans people to use third spaces. They can choose to use spaces which are correct for their biological sex.
It makes it clear however, that women’s spaces such as changing rooms, toilets are for biological women . It also makes it clear that lesbian women do not have to accept biological men into their spaces.__

HopeForTheBest · 16/04/2025 18:55

TheWisePlumDuck · 16/04/2025 18:39

I'm afraid we can look forward to confrontations and temper tantrums.

Though apparently we will all just shut up if they say it hormonal issues and show us their false birth certificates. So actually, they can just keep accessing women's spaces.

That level of ignorance is actually terrifying. It's just completely making up "facts".

Whatafustercluck · 16/04/2025 18:57

AnSolas · 16/04/2025 18:35

And you managed to remove your own post hiding your post history🙄

Charming and an A for effort👍

reframing to be a hero?
but sadly asking you questions to encourage you to explain why you posted what you posted about males and their safety is not an argument its a number of question.

AnSolas · Today 14:40

Whatafustercluck · Today 14:12
Common sense at last. And what a relief, just as I was convinced the UK was turning into some kind of Orwellian dystopia.

However, i can't help wondering what this actually means on a practical level. I wholeheartedly agree with the op that the law should protect against discrimination, both for women and trans people. I also agree that women were never seeking for trans people not to have protections.

But it doesn't really answer the very real concerns that trans people have about their own safety. If a trans person who commits a crime can no longer be kept in a women's facility (good), then where do they go, and be safe? If they can no longer be on women's wards in hospital (good), then where do they go, and be safe? If they can no longer be in women's refuges (good), then where is their safe space?

I don't really think the debate has gone away, because the ruling doesn't provide solutions for the trans community. So public services will still be faced with a continued standoff between women's rights and trans rights. The needs of the two protected characteristics are incompatible with one another, and the hard questions still need to be asked. My hope though is that at the very least it will lead to a much needed reasoned, balanced and open conversation, without all the name calling. For too long, this opportunity has been stifled - which helps neither women nor the trans community.
Edited

You only use people/trans/community to mean male in your post

Males who are sent to prison can be "safe" or as safe as the State can manage in a male prison. Females who claimed to be male were not placed in male units. Funny how there was an investigation launched when a woman was transported and once discovered held in segragation until transfered in a mens prison but dangerous males were routinely allowed into the female prisons

Why are you claiming that a male placed on a NHS male ward is unsafe?

Why do you think that there are no male DV refuges?

Why do you think that the lack of provision for males the responsibility of women not the State?

It's really not a conspiracy against you, no matter how hard you try to frame it as one. I've not 'hidden' or removed anything. I tried to focus on answering the questions you raised by bolding them, nothing more than that. Those following the thread can see all my posts and replies for full transparency, should they wish to. However I was replying to the questions you raised directly to me, as honestly as possible. But it seems you're still determined to pick a fight, so I'm going to strike it off as futile to continue. Quite a surreal experience to be honest. 'Reframing to be a hero'?! 😂 You're doing a good enough job of painting yourself as a pantomime villain without me needing to.

Pices · 16/04/2025 19:03

The part that winds me up the most is the accusations that’s this is the government swinging right…the Supreme Court has fuck all to do with the Labour government for a start. And calling a woman a woman is not a right wing move!

juldan · 16/04/2025 19:06

mumsthewordi · 16/04/2025 16:41

The ruling reinforces a framework that often benefits cisgender, middle-class, white women - the group most historically to be heard in feminist spaces and institutions. Meanwhile, it has a risk of side-lining the lived experiences of those already navigating layers of exclusion based on race, class and gender identity

intersectionality issues always get lost in these of legal binaries

@mumsthewordi
There is not such a thing as a cis woman. It’s a WOMAN. There are also trans women of course, nobody is denying that.

WhatterySquash · 16/04/2025 19:06

Coolasfeck · 16/04/2025 18:51

Rubbish - working-class/non-white women are still women. There are no layers of women. Sex is not a spectrum. It’s binary. Stop trying to make trans a subset of women.

Exactly. One thing that is central to the concept of biological sex, and by extension feminism, is that ALL women are female - all women, from everywhere in the world, every ethnicity, class, disability, religion, all women. I have more in common physiologically, genetically and in terms of "lived experience" of my own body, with every women on the planet than I do with any male.

It is not the gotcha these idiots think it is to make out that white, middle-class or western women are some kind of standard/platonic version of "woman" and other women are secondary or a subset that can be compared to trans-identifying males. It's mindbogglingly western-centric and racist.

It's funny how black or brown women are never given as the standard with white women being some kind of subset comparable to TW. Even though white women are actually the minority.

SpideyVerse · 16/04/2025 19:06

Nameychangington · 16/04/2025 14:18

Transwomen I think you mean, not transpeople?

Transwomen go to the prison/ hospital ward /refuge for their sex, which is male. Just like the disabled, young, gay, old, weak and small men who also might feel or be unsafe in male spaces. Women aren't human shields for non macho blokes and our spaces aren't for men who for some reason aren't seen as manly enough for the men's provision.

@Nameychangington 's point really hits the nail on the head.
"Transwomen go to the prison/ hospital ward /refuge for their sex, which is male. Just like the disabled, young, gay, old, weak and small men who also might feel or be unsafe in male spaces. Women aren't human shields for non macho blokes and our spaces aren't for men who for some reason aren't seen as manly enough for the men's provision."

It can't be too hard to grasp that:

  • Progress does NOT mean eroding+denying protections rightly afforded to another group (biological women) fought long and hard for.
  • Progress DOES mean separately finding ways of additionally protecting ALL TYPES of vulnerable males from dangerous/aggressive/intimidating males, too (and nurturing a society that no longer emboldens the the toxic behaviour/attitudes of the latter).
viques · 16/04/2025 19:08

TheWisePlumDuck · 16/04/2025 18:39

I'm afraid we can look forward to confrontations and temper tantrums.

Though apparently we will all just shut up if they say it hormonal issues and show us their false birth certificates. So actually, they can just keep accessing women's spaces.

Oh dear, when you are up against people who believes that taking hormones over a number of years actually changes the genetic chromosomes in your cells then there is still a steep hill to climb.

Walking boots on!

WildBluebells · 16/04/2025 19:12

Thanks sense and goodness for that

viques · 16/04/2025 19:14

Helleofabore · 16/04/2025 18:19

Likely. It will take some work to get some organisations to provide single sex provisions for women . Maybe not though.

They mostly managed it pretty well in the past, before they got scared of the shouty people.

YourLoyalPlumOP · 16/04/2025 19:14

DoddlesMcDoddle · 16/04/2025 10:29

This is so FUCKING FANTASTIC! So now Fife NHS are fucked. This is great news. Transwomen are not women and never were and never will be. Women are Adult Human Females. And transwomen not to be in female spaces. I think we'll be headed for third spaces/categories/definitions; male, female, and gender neutral. Which is WHAT WE ASKED FOR, FOR YEARS but trans rejected it. Too bad for them now, hah!

#Up the women!
#Womens Rights Are Human Rights!
#Feminist REVOLUTION!!!

What happened in Fife?

slashlover · 16/04/2025 19:17

AgnesNaismith · 16/04/2025 10:35

Does this mean we can call ourselves women now…and not female people? I would like that.

Nobody ever stopped you calling yourself a woman.

juldan · 16/04/2025 19:20

Lostcat · 16/04/2025 16:32

If trans people don't want to use mixed-sex 'third spaces' they are free to use the spaces of their biological sex

No they really cannot.

@Lostcat
Are you saying that trans women cannot share space with other biological males but women should be forced to share their space with biological males who identify as women????

JandamiHash · 16/04/2025 19:22

AngeDough · 16/04/2025 18:46

Why is everyone so bothered. Just live and let live

Did you not read above about the woman who was raped by a trans woman in a hospital ward with a penis and was gaslighted by the NHS and police to say it didn’t happen because there were “no men on the ward”? Thats why it matters

andtheworldrollson · 16/04/2025 19:22

I think the short fife answer is that a nurse was suspended because she was uncomfortable with the transwomen doctor in the changing room. Now in tribunal.

Greyskybluesky · 16/04/2025 19:22

slashlover · 16/04/2025 19:17

Nobody ever stopped you calling yourself a woman.

Nobody stopped it, but one hell of a lot of people tried to redefine the term to make it include something else than adult human females.

Language matters. As we have seen today.

JandamiHash · 16/04/2025 19:24

slashlover · 16/04/2025 19:17

Nobody ever stopped you calling yourself a woman.

Hahaha. Sure

Waitwhat23 · 16/04/2025 19:25

YourLoyalPlumOP · 16/04/2025 19:14

What happened in Fife?

In a nutshell, a male doctor using female changing rooms. A nurse asked him to stop. He went running (literally) to the NHS bosses and they suspended the nurse for transphobia and some (quite transparently made up) nonsense about concerns for patient safety. The nurse (Sandie Peggie) took them to an Employment Tribunal and NHS Fife and Upton (the doctor) made themselves look utter lying fools, grandstanding and withholding documents they'd been asked to provide. They most recently had a foot stamping tantrum about the ET being subject to open justice and citizen journalism.

Still ongoing but today's judgement will undoubtedly impact it.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy700zpgvr3o.amp

https://www.thecourier.co.uk/fp/politics/5223082/nhs-fife-sandie-peggie-tribunal-supreme-court-ruling/

There's also a mega thread on here (currently 24 threads long) but I can't link for some reason.

Dr Beth Upton is shown wearing a brown fur-lined jacket while leaving the tribunal office in Dundee.

Health board call to restrict access to nurse trans row tribunal - BBC News

NHS Fife has requested only media be allowed to watch the livestream of the case brought by nurse Sandie Peggie.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy700zpgvr3o.amp

WeMeetInFairIthilien · 16/04/2025 19:26

I am very much looking forward to the next set of NASWUT (second largest teaching union) Women's lectures. Given that this year and many previously, they were exclusively for women and those who identify as women.

viques · 16/04/2025 19:26

slashlover · 16/04/2025 19:17

Nobody ever stopped you calling yourself a woman.

Dance Dancing Dinosaur GIF by Dino Dana

Except the people who called us menstruators, or ciswomen, or rights hoarding dinosaurs.

slashlover · 16/04/2025 19:26

JandamiHash · 16/04/2025 19:24

Hahaha. Sure

Who stopped you referring to yourself as a woman?

slashlover · 16/04/2025 19:27

Greyskybluesky · 16/04/2025 19:22

Nobody stopped it, but one hell of a lot of people tried to redefine the term to make it include something else than adult human females.

Language matters. As we have seen today.

So nobody stopped her? Glad we agree.

JustANobody · 16/04/2025 19:29

Let's not forget everything they put us through.

I want to see loooots of lawsuits.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.