Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Birthday present - single “supplement”?

129 replies

KewTitles · 10/04/2025 11:10

My cousin is turning 60 soon and is hosting a big family party. Unfortunately I can’t attend as I’m on holiday.

As I won’t be there, my mum asked if I’d like to contribute to a present along with her and my dad, my brother and SIL. The plan is to get Amazon vouchers rather than a physical present, so there’s no set amount involved. My mum asked if I was happy to give £20, which l said was fine. She then said, “That works out nicely, doesn’t it? £60 for a 60th birthday.”

I said she’d added up wrong - £20 each would be £100. She seemed confused and said, “No, it’s definitely £60 - £20 from you, £20 from me and your dad and £20 from your brother and SIL”. Basically she’s not treating us as five people for the purposes of the split, but three units; two couples and me. So I pay twice as much.

I said I didn’t think this was very fair. My mum said, “Well, of course you don’t have to give £20 - I just thought it made a nice number.” I said I understood the idea, but that wasn’t the point; the point was I as one person was expected to contribute the same amount as a couple.

AIBU? On one hand, as I’m perfectly happy to give £20 and would have definitely spent that or more on a physical present, maybe I shouldn’t worry about what anyone else is giving. But it’s the principle of the thing - the fact that I’m expected to give the same on my own as two adults (and it’s my own family expecting it!) Also if we’re giving £60 between five of us, TBH I think it looks a bit stingy; plus it looks like I only spent £12, when actually the rest of my immediate family spent less than that per person.

Am I entitled to be annoyed by this? And should I just say to my parents and brother that they can put together and I’ll get my cousin something myself?

OP posts:
autisticbookworm · 12/04/2025 11:31

You don’t have in-laws to buy for look at it as your brother pays for your family and your sil pays for hers.
my parents would pay double though because financially they are better off and technically a closer relative.

When it was my aunts 70th Dsis (single) and I (married 3 kids) contributed £25 each and dps gave £50 this was mums sister

fiveIsNewOne · 12/04/2025 11:32

YAB partially U

Because it isn’t relevant to my issue. No one has said to me “You should put more in because your brother and SIL will have to buy for BIL’s niece too” - and in any case, why should that affect me?

Not my problem

It isn't your "problem", but it is relevant for the situation. In a pair often each covers their side of the family, but both are always signed for social reasons.
Yes, it means that they get to sign twice many cards than you for the same money.

YWNBU to skip the joint present though.

Sounds you don't like the communication about the shared gift, so just opt out of it and solve your own? It doesn't matter who is right or wrong, what matters is that the setup doesn't work for anyone, it doesn't save time or work, so just skip it.

CallIpswichNow · 12/04/2025 11:38

BeaAndBen · 11/04/2025 16:55

You are being daft, @KewTitles . The people actually giving the gift are those related to the cousin - your brother, your mum and you.

The card will include your father and SIL because it can look a bit 'off' signing a card and leaving your father's name off, for example - it might look like a snub.

When I send gifts to my side of the family I sign it from both. DH does the same to his family. The only times I'd sign from me and not both are if we have both bought gifts and sign our own names, or if it's someone who doesn't know DH.

You aren't being penalised for being single. You are being expected to contribute equally as a relative of the birthday person.

This is exactly how everyone I know sees it. No issues

Shwish · 12/04/2025 11:38

FortyTwoDegrees · 12/04/2025 09:40

I don't necessarily agree with the OP re. gift giving - as others have pointed out, in a couple you are basically still buying for all your own relatives and your partner is still buying for all of theirs, so financially it's the same as if they were both single buying for your own relatives. (But a bit cheeky if they actually all know the person and it's meant to be a gift from them all.)

However, of course on a holiday each person should pay the same! It's not tight to want to pay the same as the other adults. What's tight is wanting to pay less than a single person just because you happen to be in a couple.

It's even worse if you look at the bigger picture and consider how much more expensive life is being single - your rent/mortgage and bills aren't halved compared to a couple! So a single person will, on average, already have a lot less spare money than each individual in a couple. (Yes, the single person could be millionaire, but equally so could someone in a couple - before anyone gives that straw man argument!)

I agree! We all paid the same amount per person and I was happy to do that. What I didn't think was reasonable was the single person complaining that they got the smallest room! Their room was effectively half the price of the others and with only 1 person presumably they didn't need as much space. I agree they shouldn't have paid more than anyone else though.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread