Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be upset a brothel has opened next door to my child's school

315 replies

OneJadeEagle · 27/03/2025 09:52

Walking past school last week I noticed a shop next door that had been shut for ages has now turned into a 'massage' place. Curtains firmly shut, doorbell on, locked door, 'calling cards' left on the outside for people to pick up discreetly. Checked online and the gumtree ads and reviews from men leave no doubt the type of massages they are offering.

The school is a special needs school and some of the older children, whilst vulnerable with learning disabilities, do walk to school alone past the premises. The whole thing just really gives me the creeps, the idea of a bunch of creepy men being attracted to the road right by all these kids, possibly drugs etc.

Anyways I messaged the class WhatsApp to try and co-ordinate complaints to the council and the general vibe was I was overreacting. We are in a big city, there's always going to be something going on in the vicinity. Why put some ladies out of work when they're trying to earn an honest living and as long as they aren't parading into school what's the drama.

I don't know, AIBU?

OP posts:
Cerealkiller9000 · 28/03/2025 10:35

GlomOfNit · 27/03/2025 17:59

CerealKiller, you appear to be somewhat hard of thinking. I said very clearly that this isn't a matter of quantifiable 'proof' because it's a matter of definition. There is an agreed definition of 'consent' in the context of sexual matters. And I think most reasonable people would agree that part of that is that 'consent' cannot be purchased. If you HAVE to pay for sex, this is something that would not otherwise happen. Lots and lots of posters have spelled this out to you, so why do you appear to find it so hard to understand? I honestly do hope you're just a troll, and not someone who has anything to do with children in RL.

So no, it's not a matter of proof. You're using this same phrase again and again like you think you're some sort of Jeremy Paxman-like God of Debate. It makes you look extremely foolish - quite aside from the whole issue of how you seem bent on normalising men paying women for sex.

Ahh. So you have no evidence to back up your outlandish claims then?

Cerealkiller9000 · 28/03/2025 10:36

GlomOfNit · 27/03/2025 17:59

CerealKiller, you appear to be somewhat hard of thinking. I said very clearly that this isn't a matter of quantifiable 'proof' because it's a matter of definition. There is an agreed definition of 'consent' in the context of sexual matters. And I think most reasonable people would agree that part of that is that 'consent' cannot be purchased. If you HAVE to pay for sex, this is something that would not otherwise happen. Lots and lots of posters have spelled this out to you, so why do you appear to find it so hard to understand? I honestly do hope you're just a troll, and not someone who has anything to do with children in RL.

So no, it's not a matter of proof. You're using this same phrase again and again like you think you're some sort of Jeremy Paxman-like God of Debate. It makes you look extremely foolish - quite aside from the whole issue of how you seem bent on normalising men paying women for sex.

Do you know any sex workers?

JHound · 28/03/2025 10:50

Cerealkiller9000 · 28/03/2025 10:36

Do you know any sex workers?

I am convinced they do not. I am not pro-sex work per se but do have a very close friend and acquaintances who are currently / former FSSW who would reject people insisting to them that they are rape victims who just don’t realise that yet.

I also have an old friend who, while not a sex worker directly, had “benefactors” and was very clear she would not think of having sex with a man who was not financing her life (this was when she was criticising me for thinking differently.)

I just don’t get why some people here think they should he the sole arbiters of the “correct” contexts in which people may have sex.

Augarden · 28/03/2025 11:19

What kind of man wants to have sex with a woman who does not want to have sex with him? Not someone I'd want anywhere near kids.

Ddakji · 28/03/2025 11:28

I wish in these discussions people would realise the difference between individual and societal. Just because some individuals have chosen to blind themselves to the realities of prostitution (abuse, rape, exploitation, trafficking, to mention a few - there are plenty more) doesn’t mean those realities don’t exist and doesn’t mean the wider negatives for women and for don’t exist.

It’s not about someone’s happy hooker pal.

Same issues when trying to discuss surrogacy.

SeaSwim5 · 28/03/2025 12:00

Ddakji · 28/03/2025 11:28

I wish in these discussions people would realise the difference between individual and societal. Just because some individuals have chosen to blind themselves to the realities of prostitution (abuse, rape, exploitation, trafficking, to mention a few - there are plenty more) doesn’t mean those realities don’t exist and doesn’t mean the wider negatives for women and for don’t exist.

It’s not about someone’s happy hooker pal.

Same issues when trying to discuss surrogacy.

There are potential harms associated with many activities in life. That doesn’t mean we should prevent people from choosing to do them.

Arran2024 · 28/03/2025 12:31

SeaSwim5 · 27/03/2025 22:30

I have spoken to a woman who has worked as an ‘upmarket’ escort. She loved the role as she made a fortune and had complete flexibility.

Why should it be for the state or other women to dictate what women can and can’t do out of moralistic paternalism?

She is part of the same industry that involves trafficking, exploitation, unsafe practices, sexual disease. Like the entire drugs trade is joined up, so is the sex industry. You can't just pick out the 1% as being fine.

Arran2024 · 28/03/2025 12:34

SeaSwim5 · 28/03/2025 12:00

There are potential harms associated with many activities in life. That doesn’t mean we should prevent people from choosing to do them.

Really? Society does make all sorts of rules which people have to follow. Wearing seat belts, not speeding, not smoking in public places, not carrying guns in the UK, not jay-walking in the US, not selling body parts, not soliciting for sex on the streets.......in fact selling sex is legal in the UK but brothels are not.

Cerealkiller9000 · 28/03/2025 13:11

JHound · 28/03/2025 10:50

I am convinced they do not. I am not pro-sex work per se but do have a very close friend and acquaintances who are currently / former FSSW who would reject people insisting to them that they are rape victims who just don’t realise that yet.

I also have an old friend who, while not a sex worker directly, had “benefactors” and was very clear she would not think of having sex with a man who was not financing her life (this was when she was criticising me for thinking differently.)

I just don’t get why some people here think they should he the sole arbiters of the “correct” contexts in which people may have sex.

agree.

life doesn’t work like that. You cannot just assume you know how everyone feels or how everyone behaves. That’s is not how to do

thats like saying everyone hates the colour red…..ridiculous claims!

I fully back safer working conditions for sex workers

i fully back that some people like their jobs and I know one of them myself.

not everyone hates the colour red but of course they can’t back up their outlandish claims.

Cerealkiller9000 · 28/03/2025 13:13

JHound · 28/03/2025 10:50

I am convinced they do not. I am not pro-sex work per se but do have a very close friend and acquaintances who are currently / former FSSW who would reject people insisting to them that they are rape victims who just don’t realise that yet.

I also have an old friend who, while not a sex worker directly, had “benefactors” and was very clear she would not think of having sex with a man who was not financing her life (this was when she was criticising me for thinking differently.)

I just don’t get why some people here think they should he the sole arbiters of the “correct” contexts in which people may have sex.

Now I am not saying everyone likes it and everyone is safe and everyone is consenting. No no no. I am not saying it is ok and right I am saying that the assumptions they are making are massively incorrect

im am trying to open their closed minds to the fact that some people choose it.

Cerealkiller9000 · 28/03/2025 13:14

SeaSwim5 · 28/03/2025 12:00

There are potential harms associated with many activities in life. That doesn’t mean we should prevent people from choosing to do them.

Agreed and we don’t tell them what they feel and what they think. We allow them their own opinions and their own views

we do not control how they react or feel or think. Or tell others how they feel react or think.

Cerealkiller9000 · 28/03/2025 13:15

Arran2024 · 28/03/2025 12:34

Really? Society does make all sorts of rules which people have to follow. Wearing seat belts, not speeding, not smoking in public places, not carrying guns in the UK, not jay-walking in the US, not selling body parts, not soliciting for sex on the streets.......in fact selling sex is legal in the UK but brothels are not.

I misread your post.

excuse me

FaithFables · 28/03/2025 13:33

SeaSwim5 · 27/03/2025 22:02

No, because all of those things are inherently harmful and dangerous.

Sex between consenting adults is not harmful or dangerous.

And how do you know it's between consenting adults? Why shouldn't we be able to sell body parts if we can sell our bodies for sex? What's the difference?

TY78910 · 28/03/2025 13:43

Well putting all the ethical discussions of brothels aside, I’ve never seen a pub or an off license directly next door to a school (sure down the road but never next door) and I am guessing this has to do with some sort of planning permission and what is appropriate and what isn’t. I don’t see why an adult only premises would be appropriate right next to a children’s one.

Jc2001 · 28/03/2025 14:00

LBFseBrom · 27/03/2025 11:03

I cannot see how the brothel, if indeed it is one, will impact on the children at the school next door. Presumably it is staffed by consenting adults and the clients are the same, they will go in, come out and go home, won't even look at the school.

Honestly, what do you think will happen? Be sensible please.

So you wouldn't mind living next door to a brothel then?

Licky · 28/03/2025 14:12

FaithFables · 28/03/2025 13:33

And how do you know it's between consenting adults? Why shouldn't we be able to sell body parts if we can sell our bodies for sex? What's the difference?

Perhaps because you're not actually selling your body but a service. In this regard it's no different than any other service that has to be done with the body, eg acting or massaging.

There's no comparison with selling an actual body part.

FaithFables · 28/03/2025 14:22

Licky · 28/03/2025 14:12

Perhaps because you're not actually selling your body but a service. In this regard it's no different than any other service that has to be done with the body, eg acting or massaging.

There's no comparison with selling an actual body part.

Are you or have you ever been a sex worker?

Licky · 28/03/2025 14:34

FaithFables · 28/03/2025 14:22

Are you or have you ever been a sex worker?

Edited

Not relevant. I don't owe you my story.

FaithFables · 28/03/2025 14:36

Licky · 28/03/2025 14:34

Not relevant. I don't owe you my story.

I'm not asking for your story, (nor do I care tbh). I want to know how you could possibly know what it feels like to be a sex worker. Do all sex workers see it as "not selling their body, but a service"?

Licky · 28/03/2025 14:43

FaithFables · 28/03/2025 14:36

I'm not asking for your story, (nor do I care tbh). I want to know how you could possibly know what it feels like to be a sex worker. Do all sex workers see it as "not selling their body, but a service"?

What 'it feels like' is irrelevant. The simple fact is they're not selling their actual bodies but a service.

SeaSwim5 · 28/03/2025 14:45

Arran2024 · 28/03/2025 12:34

Really? Society does make all sorts of rules which people have to follow. Wearing seat belts, not speeding, not smoking in public places, not carrying guns in the UK, not jay-walking in the US, not selling body parts, not soliciting for sex on the streets.......in fact selling sex is legal in the UK but brothels are not.

That is why sex work should be legal but tightly regulated, in the same way as other potentially harmful activities.

Obesity is harmful to society- it causes millions of deaths and serious health issues and costs the NHS billions. That doesn’t mean the state should be telling people they can’t eat chocolate cake, but there are rules on ingredients and marketing.

FaithFables · 28/03/2025 14:46

Licky · 28/03/2025 14:43

What 'it feels like' is irrelevant. The simple fact is they're not selling their actual bodies but a service.

So getting a dick shoved inside you by an old fat perv is exactly the same working in Tesco's is it?

Licky · 28/03/2025 15:59

FaithFables · 28/03/2025 14:46

So getting a dick shoved inside you by an old fat perv is exactly the same working in Tesco's is it?

I'm pretty sure that's not what I said. It seems comprehension is a lost skill.

FaithFables · 28/03/2025 16:04

Licky · 28/03/2025 15:59

I'm pretty sure that's not what I said. It seems comprehension is a lost skill.

They're both "providing a service" according to you. That one can put your life in danger seems to have passed you by.

Ddakji · 28/03/2025 16:23

Licky · 28/03/2025 15:59

I'm pretty sure that's not what I said. It seems comprehension is a lost skill.

It’s exactly what you mean when you rebrand prostitution as sex work.