Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

So, who is going to employ all these disabled people the government wants to wean of welfare

1000 replies

Jimisnotmyname · 18/03/2025 16:14

Really wondering. Not saying it is necessarily a bad thing to encourage those who can work, to work but as a carer for 2 disabled family members, I am hugely struggling to find another job as nobody is willing to give me any flexibility (which I need as a carer) and there are always candidates who do not need the same accomodations I do. I would imagine that many of those currently not in work because of disability or a health condition, will often need a similar level of flexibility. I just wonder who on the the government think will offer jobs galore on these circumstances??

OP posts:
Autisticunemployable · 18/03/2025 17:44

GreatAuntMaude · 18/03/2025 17:41

So did my dc, at the same age.
I believe my DC could work. Not enough to not need support from disability support services or benefits of one sort or another. But it's a bit depressing to decide that burnout at 21 means you still won't be able to work 25 or 30 years later, even part time, even in a specialist interest area, surely?

I tried again a couple of times and literally couldn’t function and had seizures. So I gave up and we decided that we would just rely on dh wages and tax credits and now his wages and UC.

Booboobagins · 18/03/2025 17:44

As I recall this was always going to be a supported scheme.

I hope there is adequate support to get people who can and want to work back into work and productive. Those who can but won't work will lose out cos no doubt their income will be cut and honestly that is appropriate. Real medics need to lead this decision making.

If people who can work did work we might not need so many economic immigrants.

Imagine a country with reduced benefits budget, more GDP and more income via taxation - how much better will services be for all of us?

I think it's the right move. A brave move. But it cannot be at a cost to those who really need help.

I esp like the fact that they are saying long term with no expectation of getting better will not be treated like those with shorter term health conditions too.

Maitri108 · 18/03/2025 17:45

1sttimeforeverything2 · 18/03/2025 17:42

I mean there have been lots of articles saying that job seekers allowance simply is not enough to live on so people are 'encouraged' to seek disability benefits (mental health e.g.) as the rates paid are higher. Once on those, there are no real conditions as with the job seekers allowance. That's what I meant, nothing about the 'medical evidence'.

It would clearly be better to ensure that those who find themselves suddenly out of work get a better rate and more support because, invariably, once you're on sickness benefits it is very hard, psychologically, to come back from that and enter the work place, so these people become forever inactive.

That's not correct. In order to claim disability benefits you need medical evidence, then you have an assessment. You are put in one of two groups, one is if you have a mild disability - you're put in a back to work group - and one where you have a severe disability and you don't have to look for work.

You are regularly assessed after that. You need medical evidence of your disability.

Quitelikeit · 18/03/2025 17:45

@Jimisnotmyname

how much flexibility do you want?

seems like you are saying you want to be able to work to your own timetable according to the needs of your family - which might be ok if you can commit to certain hours

also you are not obliged to be a carer - you can insist that your family members are assessed and a care package can be provided?

PatchouliOilandRoses · 18/03/2025 17:45

So you are 29 and haven't worked since 2015?
You are exactly the kind of person this country needs to get into work!
I am much older than you and if I decided at 19 that I was 'to overwhelmed' to get a job I would have been on the streets, benefits were not generous enough to give me a bean when I was 19. The expectation was that you would suck it up and get on with it...and we did!
After 10 years languishing as an unemployed person not pushing past any anxiety you have you will now be in a viscous circle, we need to avoid this cycle for as many young people as possible. If cutting benefits means more young people push themselves to work then I'm all for it.
Edited to say my phone is on the blink and lost my quote.

Whammyyammy · 18/03/2025 17:45

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

100% agree. In my organisation we have quite a few employees with various disabilities. The office has been adapted and provisions made for employees, Inc wfh, reasonable adjustments etc

SporadicMincePieMuncher · 18/03/2025 17:47

Hwi · 18/03/2025 17:28

About the jobs for those with mh issues who can't commit to 9 to 5 and work unsupervised. Maybe supervised flexible litter-picking - like going for a walk with with a responsible supervisor and the extra benefit of getting paid? Where my sister lives (West of Scotland, medium-sized town) they are drowning in litter. Along to motorway, around the burns, in the fields. Not a single unspoilt wild nature spot not covered in bottles, wrappers, cans, etc. And I have not even mentioned fly-tipping in the same places. I have never seen anything of the sort and I go to the Middle East and Africa. Nobody picks litter in those beautiful nature spots.

I work for a community organisation that has quite a few people with various disabilities, mental handicaps and physical, volunteering for us. They are taking a meaningful part in society and doing good for our community. Many charity shops are staffed by people who can't work, work (my poor turn of phrase). There are voluntary positions available for those who want and are able to contribute to society in some way.

Should they be compulsory for those who can but who choose not to? I'm not sure - this sort of thing is all good and well to debate in theory but the reality for individuals is complex. I'd MUCH prefer investment in services that actually help people to recover fully and well, where possible, and in creating a society that doesn't cause the mental health problems that ours does, currently.

ZigZagJigsaw · 18/03/2025 17:47

Maitri108 · 18/03/2025 17:37

I thought disabilities were protected by law under the Equality Act. Is that no longer correct?

The Equality Act does exist and it does cover disabilities. However, you are being extremely optimistic about what reasonable adjustments an employer is expected to put in place.

It’s a topic that is far too complex for mumsnet, to be honest.

Mademetoxic · 18/03/2025 17:47

Autisticunemployable · 18/03/2025 17:37

I can’t work , I worked at age 20-21 and suffered severe burnout and haven’t recovered plus some other conditions. I’m just glad my DH earns over the AET so I’m not ever hassled to work

So you have written your whole working life off aged 21? Wow.

BrandonFlowersEyesWithEyeliner · 18/03/2025 17:47

Autisticunemployable · 18/03/2025 17:41

I developed functional neurological disorder due to CPTSD and a huge amount of autoimmune conditions one after the other.

I'm sorry to sound offensive, but there's a lot of hyperbole "huge amount" of autoimmune conditions. What does that translate to exactly? You've either got an autoimmune condition or say 2 autoimmune conditions...?

I always feel a little sceptical when I hear "MASSIVE" panic attack. "HORRIFIC" agrophobia "HUGE" spider. It just doesn't help the cause. I've never heard anyone say "I've got anxiety" it always has to be prefixed with "horrendous/horrific/massive/severe" (coming from someone who is medicated successfully for good old fashioned 'anxiety')

minnienono · 18/03/2025 17:48

There is a wide spectrum of people who are currently claiming sickness benefits of some kind and we all know that some can (and do work, after all pip can be claimed in work).

the number of people claiming is riding at an astronomical rate, something needs to be done to ensure that young people are given the skills to manage their mental health (most of the rise is due to mental health) and get into the workplace. I know of two young people mid 20’s who have never worked due to mental health they say yet they are capable of socialising, going on holidays etc - the problem is real, they can’t cope with going to work so we need to teach them those coping mechanisms. I’m not claiming they don’t have issues!

Bepo77 · 18/03/2025 17:48

GreatAuntMaude · 18/03/2025 17:41

So did my dc, at the same age.
I believe my DC could work. Not enough to not need support from disability support services or benefits of one sort or another. But it's a bit depressing to decide that burnout at 21 means you still won't be able to work 25 or 30 years later, even part time, even in a specialist interest area, surely?

So did I. I was living at my parents house at the time. When my dad passed and my mum could no longer keep up the house I ended up on antidepressants and, crucially, renting on my own. Strangely, I became able to work again. I often wonder how “unlived” my life would have been if my parents/a partner had been able to house me forever.

BrandonFlowersEyesWithEyeliner · 18/03/2025 17:48

Mademetoxic · 18/03/2025 17:47

So you have written your whole working life off aged 21? Wow.

See there it is again "severe" . How is this being quantified?

KTheGrey · 18/03/2025 17:48

WeylandYutani · 18/03/2025 16:26

I am scared of this too. I have not worked for over 10 years and have no qualifications since I was 19 which is a really old GNVQ.
When I used to go to the job centre, I had to have someone go with me. They can't go with me to interviews and work.
When I get overwhelmed, I can't talk and I shut down. How will I get a job if I can't even pass an interviews?
All the talk of the changes to benefits has made me feel like I don't want to be here anymore.

Well nobody will make somebody employ you, so I should imagine you will have to do loads of interviews to show willing. This actually used to be exactly how unemployment pay worked - you had to evidence job searching. It was dull and pointless because if you are well qualified to be a front of house type and badly qualified to be a shelf stacker then the bigger number of shelf stacker jobs that you apply for are a bit pointless, but hey ho. After a bit you find something you don’t suck at and get a job doing that.

Puyyt · 18/03/2025 17:49

I've just found out I will be one of the people who no longer qualify.

I got 10 points for daily living and 10 points for mobility, so standard on both at my first assessment (no MR or tribunal) but all my daily living points are minimum 2 point awards.

I think A LOT of people genuinely unable to work will be in same position as me as the assesors give you the lowest points possible (if they award anything at all) so lots of people will only have 2 points spread across the board.

I'm not exaggerating when I say Im terrified. Ive just had a breakdown with DH and ended up hitting myself repeatedly in the face and now i have a swollen cheek. I'm not proud of that but I can't cope with changes and this is monumental. I feel like throwing myself in front of a train.

Im in the LWRCA group on UC and apparently thats being scrapped too.

I'm just fucking terrified that I'm going to lose every ounce of stability i have.

I have so much going on right now and this just feels like its going to tip me over the edge.

doodahdayy · 18/03/2025 17:49

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Careful, you’ll be accused of ableism

Autisticunemployable · 18/03/2025 17:49

BrandonFlowersEyesWithEyeliner · 18/03/2025 17:47

I'm sorry to sound offensive, but there's a lot of hyperbole "huge amount" of autoimmune conditions. What does that translate to exactly? You've either got an autoimmune condition or say 2 autoimmune conditions...?

I always feel a little sceptical when I hear "MASSIVE" panic attack. "HORRIFIC" agrophobia "HUGE" spider. It just doesn't help the cause. I've never heard anyone say "I've got anxiety" it always has to be prefixed with "horrendous/horrific/massive/severe" (coming from someone who is medicated successfully for good old fashioned 'anxiety')

Within the space of 4.5 years (age 23 onwards) I developed coeliac disease and then crohns, hashimotos thyroiditis and type 1 diabetes
edited to add I also have endometriosis and adenomyosis but I don’t know if they are classed as autoimmune

MewithME · 18/03/2025 17:51

By the way, zero cases of PIP fraud in 2024 according to government figures.

Autisticunemployable · 18/03/2025 17:51

BrandonFlowersEyesWithEyeliner · 18/03/2025 17:48

See there it is again "severe" . How is this being quantified?

I was sectioned that’s how I quantify it as severe

ilovesooty · 18/03/2025 17:51

Hwi · 18/03/2025 17:21

Loads of non-verbal jobs - your spelling is wonderful, your sentences are properly constructed. A part-time librarian in a local library?

Oh yes. Local libraries are overflowing with paid job opportunities... 🙄

PartyPopper57 · 18/03/2025 17:52

There’s loads of WFH jobs. You only have to read all the threads on here with people whinging about them and the angry comments in the Daily Mail to know that it’s true 🙄 😂

Joking aside, I work for the Civil Service and work from home. Due to a reasonable adjustment (health related) I only have to attend the office twice a month. They’re very flexible and pretty much all of the other teams are like that too. I’m sure you could find something.

KTheGrey · 18/03/2025 17:52

Autisticunemployable · 18/03/2025 17:44

I tried again a couple of times and literally couldn’t function and had seizures. So I gave up and we decided that we would just rely on dh wages and tax credits and now his wages and UC.

Gosh what sort of work were you doing? Sounds like a horrendous experience. I don’t think most work is that awful.

CantStopMoving · 18/03/2025 17:53

Yalta · 18/03/2025 17:34

The thing with something like Pip is that you can work full time and claim it as well as it is to pay for your treatment/meds or what ever you need to help with your disability rather than a payment for not going to work

I think people don’t understand that part

Someone without a disability earning £2000 per month is able to use their £2000 per month salary to do what ever they like where as someone with a disability doing the same job and on the same salary has to set aside eg £200 per month to pay for things that make working possible. Not just stuff on prescriptions but counselling or coaching and equipment as well as other vitamins and minerals etc
Pip was supposed to level the playing field

But is that morally right though? If you work full time and are able to earn a salary of £100k or more for example should you claim any benefits? I appreciate it is unfair that some people have a disability and others don’t and I understand the rationale for PIP but I can’t help but think it should be means tested.

Soubriquet · 18/03/2025 17:53

ZigZagJigsaw · 18/03/2025 17:47

The Equality Act does exist and it does cover disabilities. However, you are being extremely optimistic about what reasonable adjustments an employer is expected to put in place.

It’s a topic that is far too complex for mumsnet, to be honest.

Plus at the end of the day, if there are 5 candidates for the job, and you have a choice between the disabled person who requires adjustments, or the healthy abled body person….what do you think the employer will go for?

Autisticunemployable · 18/03/2025 17:53

Mademetoxic · 18/03/2025 17:47

So you have written your whole working life off aged 21? Wow.

Yes and I’m 45 now. I don’t claim anything for myself we just get by on DH wages

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread