A book I read (from the 80s) arguing against smacking notes that English has developed a remarkable vocabulary to cover hitting children: smacking, slapping, spanking, cuffing, clipping, clouting, walloping, slippering, six of the best, and many more; which speaks volumes about how deeply ingrained smacking children used to be in our culture. This book also notes that even then, many parents regarded it not just as a right, but their duty to hit their children.
I have a great relationship with my parents, but I think they got it very wrong on smacking. They used it to reinforce telling off, as presumably their parents did, and I feel very strongly indeed about a handful of times I was smacked, when it was for something I didn’t yet know was wrong. One example was a man in the street suddenly stopped walking, and I bumped into him. My mum carefully explained that he was blind, then smacked me. To this day I feel seething anger about that, and other such incidents. I was old enough to understand the explanation, and it ruined the day. I felt terrified of getting things wrong, in case I’d be smacked. This fear followed me into adulthood; I didn’t ask for help when I needed it, and I lied and covered things up when I made mistakes. This gave me problems as a young adult.
Another time, I lightly hit my brother when we disagreed about something; and I was interrogated, and very soundly smacked. I felt full of revenge for several days, and I almost wish I had had the teenage audacity to sulk in silence for the whole day to show how upset I really was (I was 9 at the time). But the question is: where did I get the idea of hitting being the result of a disagreement? Who taught me that? Even my dad admitted at the time that he had gone too far.
I don’t have children, but I sometimes imagine telling my parents sternly that they must not even think of smacking my children, or even joking about it, as they might have done.