Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

NHS England to go is Keir being unreasonable?

479 replies

43percentburnt · 13/03/2025 11:25

I don’t work for the NHS but have friends who do (and are increasingly looking at leaving - in some cases to move abroad).

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cx29lrl826rt

Is the removal of NHS England a good thing? Or is this a Labour gimmick?

To include an Aibu for Keir -

Yes Keir - you are being unreasonable

Or

Good job Keir, please get rid of NHS England - you are NOT being unreasonable

Keir Starmer scraps NHS England to bring health service back under 'democratic control' - live updates

The PM says abolishing "the arms-length body" will reduce duplication and save money that can then be spent on frontline services.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cx29lrl826rt

OP posts:
BIossomtoes · 13/03/2025 12:00

It’s a very good thing. There’s a huge amount of duplication between NHS England and the DHSS. The real lunacy was its creation by Lansley’s 2012 health bill that created numerous layers of bureaucracy.

GottaWork · 13/03/2025 12:05

CatsChin · 13/03/2025 11:59

The problem can be that a lot of staff have been in their roles forever, ARE very well paid (average in an ICB is around 60k?! Prob the same in NHSE) and there is no way of getting rid of poor performers. So I have sympathy with Starmer because in some ways, burning the whole thing to the ground is probably the only way of starting again.

The way that poor NHS staff can stick around for decades is shocking. The unions are too powerful. It's one of the main issues that causes lack of agility and resentment among existing staff.

I had a great NHS team which merged with a shite one, and all the good staff left because the poor staff were just making the working day shit for everyone - and I couldn't get rid of them.

I absolutely agree. In our recent restructure, a huge number of very talented people were lost to voluntary redundancy. Consequently there are still people here who just get shifted from team to team as nobody really wants them. As a line manager I really struggle to get HR support for performance management.

TeenLifeMum · 13/03/2025 12:08

CatsChin · 13/03/2025 11:59

The problem can be that a lot of staff have been in their roles forever, ARE very well paid (average in an ICB is around 60k?! Prob the same in NHSE) and there is no way of getting rid of poor performers. So I have sympathy with Starmer because in some ways, burning the whole thing to the ground is probably the only way of starting again.

The way that poor NHS staff can stick around for decades is shocking. The unions are too powerful. It's one of the main issues that causes lack of agility and resentment among existing staff.

I had a great NHS team which merged with a shite one, and all the good staff left because the poor staff were just making the working day shit for everyone - and I couldn't get rid of them.

We’re ruthless in my trust. It takes 6 months and it’s an admin nightmare but we get rid of poor performers. It’s the coasting, just good enough ones that stick though, but that’s the same anywhere.

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 13/03/2025 12:09

@43percentburnt

I'm not sure whether it's a gimmick, or genuinely well intentioned.

All I know is that having seen it first hand, when you remove management, admin, and bureaucratic staff in the NHS, it doesn't simultaneously remove the demand for administration, management, and bureaucratic support. All that happens is that responsibility then falls upon the clinical staff who formerly had that support at hand, they end up spending more time doing things other than the clinical stuff, it's even more inefficient, leads to utter chaos, petty fiefdoms, and ultimately costs an extra arm and leg as opposed to when that sort of stuff is left to people specifically employed to deal with it.

BIossomtoes · 13/03/2025 12:11

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 13/03/2025 12:09

@43percentburnt

I'm not sure whether it's a gimmick, or genuinely well intentioned.

All I know is that having seen it first hand, when you remove management, admin, and bureaucratic staff in the NHS, it doesn't simultaneously remove the demand for administration, management, and bureaucratic support. All that happens is that responsibility then falls upon the clinical staff who formerly had that support at hand, they end up spending more time doing things other than the clinical stuff, it's even more inefficient, leads to utter chaos, petty fiefdoms, and ultimately costs an extra arm and leg as opposed to when that sort of stuff is left to people specifically employed to deal with it.

That won’t happen with the demise of NHSE, it doesn’t employ any front line staff. It’s the epitome of bureaucracy.

PandoraSox · 13/03/2025 12:13

BIossomtoes · 13/03/2025 12:11

That won’t happen with the demise of NHSE, it doesn’t employ any front line staff. It’s the epitome of bureaucracy.

Yep. NHSE's functions were previously carried out by DHSC.

Annoyeddd · 13/03/2025 12:16

Could do with more admin staff but at a lower level to help with tasks such as rotas leave sickness admin etc. - the secretaries of old. Not senior managers who seem to spend their days doing walkabouts.

43percentburnt · 13/03/2025 12:17

@JasmineTea11

Why is a task force different to a quango?
I presumed a task force researches an area and gives advice and info to the gov so falls under Quango as per the BBC article. Is this incorrect?

What do quangos do?
They can deliver public services, give advice or regulate behaviour. Quangos can range from tiny committees that meet a few times a year to organisations with multi-million pound budgets and thousands of staff. There are several different types:
Those with executive powers to actually do something. Examples include the Environment Agency, Regional Development Agencies, national galleries and museums, regulators such as Ofcom
Advisory bodies which give independent, expert advice to ministers on a range of matters - such as the Committee on Standards on Public Life, Boundary Commission
Watchdogs that set standards and regulate behaviour, such as bodies which look at prisons, immigration removal centres etc.

OP posts:
XDownwiththissortofthingX · 13/03/2025 12:17

BIossomtoes · 13/03/2025 12:11

That won’t happen with the demise of NHSE, it doesn’t employ any front line staff. It’s the epitome of bureaucracy.

Happy to hold my hand up and admit my NHS experience is not within the English NHS, so I'll defer to your superior knowledge, I just get a bit riled when I come across the frequent assertion that everyone and anyone in an admin or management role within the NHS is undoubtedly just an unnecessary waste of resources, in a "non-job", needs booted, and the money spent on beds/nurses. It's laughably naive.

zeibesaffron · 13/03/2025 12:18

I don’t know the detail of how this will work and what it actually means - but I work in the NHS and the conversations I have had in the last hour is that of overwhelming positivity at the move. Many are sick of the bureaucracy, the rules, the middle men (nhse) we have to appease to get anything done!

However Starmer will be judged on delivery so the detail is important as is his commitment this morning about this meaning more nurses etc…

BIossomtoes · 13/03/2025 12:22

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 13/03/2025 12:17

Happy to hold my hand up and admit my NHS experience is not within the English NHS, so I'll defer to your superior knowledge, I just get a bit riled when I come across the frequent assertion that everyone and anyone in an admin or management role within the NHS is undoubtedly just an unnecessary waste of resources, in a "non-job", needs booted, and the money spent on beds/nurses. It's laughably naive.

I worked in the NHS for over 20 years and I agree with you. Cutting the costs of organisations that deliver no front line care and micromanage those that do can only be a good thing.

43percentburnt · 13/03/2025 12:23

More nurses - but how?

I think it is appalling that we take nurses from abroad. We let another country train them and then poach them! It’s awful.

We need to focus on increasing places at university for Drs and Dentist courses in the U.K.

Maybe the savings could be used for training? With a commitment to work in the NHS on graduation for x number of years?

OP posts:
XDownwiththissortofthingX · 13/03/2025 12:26

43percentburnt · 13/03/2025 12:23

More nurses - but how?

I think it is appalling that we take nurses from abroad. We let another country train them and then poach them! It’s awful.

We need to focus on increasing places at university for Drs and Dentist courses in the U.K.

Maybe the savings could be used for training? With a commitment to work in the NHS on graduation for x number of years?

Edited

Where I am, there actually is no shortage of training places, it's a shortage of people willing to take them up, because the perception of the career that awaits has fallen so low that fewer and fewer people are interested.

It's not disinterest in the vocation, it's the horror stories of horrendous hours, horrendous salaries, staff being abused, attacked, etc etc

Almahart · 13/03/2025 12:26

It's good news. Lansleys reforms were a disaster for the NHS. There are a lot of duplicated functions across NHSE and DHSC. I feel terribly sorry for the huge number of people who will be losing their jobs though. I have worked with many people from both NHSE and DHSC over the years and they've all been very on the ball

SleepDeprivedButAlive · 13/03/2025 12:28

I can see no reason why a politicised NHS would be a bad idea.

BIossomtoes · 13/03/2025 12:30

SleepDeprivedButAlive · 13/03/2025 12:28

I can see no reason why a politicised NHS would be a bad idea.

It’s always been political.

WifeofBathtime · 13/03/2025 12:31

I don't think anyone really knows what this means yet.

If it means centralising purchasing power, for example, and saving money that way , all good.

It appears at the moment that the NHS is very fragmented with no joined-up thinking between all the trusts across England.

It does need some kind of central control instead of layers of management and waste.

How he will do this is unclear.

WifeofBathtime · 13/03/2025 12:32

43percentburnt · 13/03/2025 12:23

More nurses - but how?

I think it is appalling that we take nurses from abroad. We let another country train them and then poach them! It’s awful.

We need to focus on increasing places at university for Drs and Dentist courses in the U.K.

Maybe the savings could be used for training? With a commitment to work in the NHS on graduation for x number of years?

Edited

I think that's already happening but you do understand it takes 5 years to train?

43percentburnt · 13/03/2025 12:35

@XDownwiththissortofthingX

I thought some kids are struggling to get into uni doing medicine as not enough spaces.

This is from House of Commons library 2023 so I appreciate more spaces may have been made available in 2024.

‘Calls to raise the medical and dental student caps
Despite an increase in the number of medical schools and places across the UK since the early 2000s, the UK does not train enough doctors to have a sustainable supply without recruiting qualified doctors from abroad. Similarly, demand for dental services is not being met by the current NHS dental workforce.
This has led to calls from the House of Commons Health and Social Care Committee, as well as a number of healthcare sector bodies, for the UK to expand the number of doctors and dentists it trains.
The Labour party has said it would double the number of medical school places to 15,000 per year. This would include opening up to 15 new medical schools, expanding existing medical training centres, and delivering more clinical placements. It has said it would fund its proposal by abolishing the non-domiciled tax status, which allows some individuals to avoid paying UK income tax.’

https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-9735/

OP posts:
Fjgjam · 13/03/2025 12:35

WifeofBathtime · 13/03/2025 12:32

I think that's already happening but you do understand it takes 5 years to train?

But isn’t the problem new UK nurses and doctors can’t get jobs in the NHS? The whole system
is nuts.

ExcessiveNumberOfNinjas · 13/03/2025 12:41

Ablondiebutagoody · 13/03/2025 11:28

In my opinion its a good thing. I agree with Kier that there are way too many quangos, they cost too much and get in the way.

But, he has set up another 20 since the election.......so he's full of shit.

That just about sums him up, doesn't it? 😂

Feelingstrange2 · 13/03/2025 12:44

Surely taskforces are created with a time limiter engagement. To, presumably, work out what is going on and then enable improvement.

Even if KS knows areas have issues there's no way he would know everything to enable streamlining. I would expect a task force to tell him that?

lifeturnsonadime · 13/03/2025 12:44

The NHS will be on it's knees unless and until social care is properly addressed.

I'm afraid this is a headline grabber that fails to deal with the real issues that the NHS face.

I also don't trust Mr Starmer to do good for the people, he appears to have little regard to core labour values to be honest.

I didn't vote Labour the first time ever this election, I declined to vote.

In my opinion he is no better than the Tories and my fears which led me to fail to vote for him have played out.

Bleeky · 13/03/2025 12:45

43percentburnt · 13/03/2025 11:25

I don’t work for the NHS but have friends who do (and are increasingly looking at leaving - in some cases to move abroad).

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cx29lrl826rt

Is the removal of NHS England a good thing? Or is this a Labour gimmick?

To include an Aibu for Keir -

Yes Keir - you are being unreasonable

Or

Good job Keir, please get rid of NHS England - you are NOT being unreasonable

Give me a list of ALL the “arms length” bodies and I’ll chose the wasteful ones (the ones “friends of Labour” getting stupid salaries)

GottaWork · 13/03/2025 12:47

lifeturnsonadime · 13/03/2025 12:44

The NHS will be on it's knees unless and until social care is properly addressed.

I'm afraid this is a headline grabber that fails to deal with the real issues that the NHS face.

I also don't trust Mr Starmer to do good for the people, he appears to have little regard to core labour values to be honest.

I didn't vote Labour the first time ever this election, I declined to vote.

In my opinion he is no better than the Tories and my fears which led me to fail to vote for him have played out.

Absolutely - my Mum was in a hospital bed from November to the end of January waiting for a suitable care package - all of that time aside from 1 week when she had infection, she was medically fit for discharge.