Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

DH left me NOTHING in his will – devastated and fuming

516 replies

jackmd5 · 11/03/2025 13:32

I’m honestly reeling and don’t know what to do. DH of 15 years passed away unexpectedly a few months ago. It’s been a horrible time, and I’ve been dealing with everything – funeral, DC, paperwork, the lot – while also grieving.

I’ve just found out that he left NOTHING to me in his will. Not a penny. Everything has gone to his two DC from his first marriage, who are both adults and very comfortable financially. Our joint savings, the house (which is in his name, long story), even his personal possessions – all left to them. I get that he wanted to provide for them, but to leave me, his WIFE, completely out??! I am beyond hurt and also absolutely panicking because I have no idea where this leaves me financially.

He made the will before we were married, and I stupidly assumed he’d updated it. I trusted him. Never in a million years did I think he’d do this to me. I’ve raised our DC, supported him through thick and thin, and now I’m left with nothing??

I feel sick. I don’t even know where to start with legal stuff – does anyone know if I can challenge this? I can’t believe he’s done this. I thought we had a happy marriage. Just looking at his face in old photos makes me want to scream.

Has anyone been through anything similar? What did you do? I feel so betrayed.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
aCatCalledFawkes · 12/03/2025 08:26

sideeyes · 12/03/2025 08:16

Sure, if there is already provision for the child to receive when the wife dies, fine. But there isn’t and there won’t be unless the OP writes it. From what she has written - and of course this is in grief - it sounds like it’s about her and her kids mainly.

Well yes of course she is. She has two kids under the age of 18yrs who she is now bringing up on her own. Imagine being in that situation just after your husband has died and people now want you to sell your house which you have inherited from your husband because they don't think it's fair that you get to live in it.
She's not freeloading, she's been living in the house for 15yrs and her children have only known it as it there home. We don't even know if the other children have things like mortgages and good jobs that mean the money can be left to them after the op has died, however they are old enough to support themselves.
Being a single parent is tough and I cannot imagine having people suggesting you make yourself homeless after your husband dying.

thepariscrimefiles · 12/03/2025 08:26

myplace · 11/03/2025 17:25

For goodness sake. Children who are dependent and have lost their dad are entitled to more than children who are independent adults and enjoyed being provided for by their dad for their entire childhood.

After that there is the children’s mum to consider, who may also be a dependent.

When his assets are no longer needed for survival by his widow and young children, the adult dc can be considered.

Adult DCs have lost their dad, but they have other people in their lives to support them. OP has lost her husband and is supporting their dc.

Cut her some slack if she’s not on top of the paperwork.

OP there will be pensions that need informing- they can choose who to pay out to even if there is an expression of preference. I’ve left mine to my DC, but if we’d had a disaster and DH was on the breadline, they’d likely pay to him instead, if he needed it.

I’m sorry for your loss.

That's not how the Rule of Intestacy' work if there is definitely no will made by OP's DH after the marriage. Any joint savings and possessions will go to OP, plus the first £322,000. Anything above that amount will be split 50:50 between the surviving spouse (OP) and any biological/adopted children of the deceased. OP's children will receive the same amount as the children from the first marriage.

aCatCalledFawkes · 12/03/2025 08:29

thepariscrimefiles · 12/03/2025 08:26

That's not how the Rule of Intestacy' work if there is definitely no will made by OP's DH after the marriage. Any joint savings and possessions will go to OP, plus the first £322,000. Anything above that amount will be split 50:50 between the surviving spouse (OP) and any biological/adopted children of the deceased. OP's children will receive the same amount as the children from the first marriage.

No that's incorrect. They are under 18yrs so the OP can also claim child support from her husband estate. That's a thing you would cover off in a financial consent order should you ever get divorced or you should do to protect children under 18yrs.

LittleBigHead · 12/03/2025 08:35

user5213768943 · 11/03/2025 13:49

My understanding is also that a marriage overrides a previous Will.
My friend was on the other side of this - her dad married again quickly after her mother’s death. Then he died unexpectedly a few years later so all their mothers assets went to the new wife…

Yes this happens far too often. Children become disinherited and the second wife is rarely fair or generous.

VolcanoJapan · 12/03/2025 08:39

helpingDDfindaccomadation · 11/03/2025 13:33

If the will was made before you married it becomes nil and void and everything goes to you.

This.

If before marrying you the will is invalid now abd you'd get everything

Whatafustercluck · 12/03/2025 08:42

Wishingplenty · 11/03/2025 23:12

If a man or woman has children, it is only morally right that any assets are passed down to them. What is legal is entirely different, but children should not have to lose out because Mummy or Daddy has got a new "friend". Your husband actually sounds like a very moral man for thinking of his offspring which is so often not the case on here. I know it doesn't feel like it but he sounds pretty decent which is a rarity nowadays.

He hasn't thought about all his offspring though, has he? Younger dc require significant financial support. He has left his wife of 15 years, a newly single mother, without the financial means to support them. As well as a whole lot of stress and additional heartache as she attempts to ensure she and her dc are adequately provided for, whilst likely being called a money grabbing witch. He doesn't sound decent to me.

Seymour5 · 12/03/2025 09:02

VolcanoJapan · 12/03/2025 08:39

This.

If before marrying you the will is invalid now abd you'd get everything

Not necessarily, there are lots of knowledgeable posts explaining that it depends on the value of the estate.

BorgQueen · 12/03/2025 09:40

My god there are some ill informed and downright spiteful people on this thread.
OP has young children, she can will his adult kids a share of HER inheritance if she feels the need, otherwise they’ll have to make do with what they’re legally entitled to.
Applied for Letters yet OP ??

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 12/03/2025 10:06

Trolleysaregoodforemployment · 11/03/2025 23:32

Surely by the time they are 21 she will be working again.

I am not awful, I just believe in ring fencing. Where children have a relationship with a parent, it is children first.

Edited

Thankfully my DH doesn't feel that way otherwise I'd be homeless if he died.

Why should adult children, who presumably have their own homes and lives, come above the new partner and in OP's case younger children? DH's will leaves everything to me and vice versa. When the second one of us dies then his children will inherit anything left, split equally with my godchildren.

I suppose the main problem here is OP is a second wife and stepmum ans we all know how they are viewed by some on MN.

TENSsion · 12/03/2025 10:32

aCatCalledFawkes · 12/03/2025 08:13

The fact it was the family home is as irrelevant as his ex wife leaving her children her home. The major point is that it's that the husband chose to get married again which is a legal contract and his wife will benefit from this. Exactly the same as my exhusband who has made a conscious decision to leave everything to his wife which he is entitled to do, it's his money and he doesn't have to leave it to our daughter.

My children will inherit 50/50 from me including the funds that I got from the house which I got when I divorced my exhusband which only produced my daughter, I'm not leaving my son out or giving him less. Its my money,my house and I can leave it to who I want, I want them to have 50/50 when I'm dead.

Our daughter is well taken care of and will get a lot of help in different ways to buy her own house, when the time comes so will my son.

What are you even talking about? He clearly wanted his older children to inherit. That’s why he wrote his will that way.

Why should they get nothing just because he remarried?

GuevarasBeret · 12/03/2025 10:34

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 12/03/2025 10:06

Thankfully my DH doesn't feel that way otherwise I'd be homeless if he died.

Why should adult children, who presumably have their own homes and lives, come above the new partner and in OP's case younger children? DH's will leaves everything to me and vice versa. When the second one of us dies then his children will inherit anything left, split equally with my godchildren.

I suppose the main problem here is OP is a second wife and stepmum ans we all know how they are viewed by some on MN.

Edited

But why should you / your children get everything- potentially including things that came from their mother?

Will there ever be a time when the children from the first marriage have the same entitlement to the fathers estate as your children, or will they always come down the pecking order?

GuevarasBeret · 12/03/2025 10:35

I also have no idea why in today’s economy you would assume they own a home and aren’t renting?

TENSsion · 12/03/2025 10:37

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 12/03/2025 10:06

Thankfully my DH doesn't feel that way otherwise I'd be homeless if he died.

Why should adult children, who presumably have their own homes and lives, come above the new partner and in OP's case younger children? DH's will leaves everything to me and vice versa. When the second one of us dies then his children will inherit anything left, split equally with my godchildren.

I suppose the main problem here is OP is a second wife and stepmum ans we all know how they are viewed by some on MN.

Edited

Because if you outlive your husband, it would be perfectly possible that you don’t include them in your will and your god children inherit everything THEIR DAD intended to leave THEM.

I really think there should be legal obligations regarding making iron clad wills on people remarrying when they have existing children. The current laws are not sufficient

Cosyblankets · 12/03/2025 10:38

GuevarasBeret · 12/03/2025 10:34

But why should you / your children get everything- potentially including things that came from their mother?

Will there ever be a time when the children from the first marriage have the same entitlement to the fathers estate as your children, or will they always come down the pecking order?

But if all children were from same mother would it not be the norm for the children to inherit property etc after the second parent dies? When my mum died it all went to my dad. When he died it all came to us.

sideeyes · 12/03/2025 10:39

TENSsion · 12/03/2025 10:37

Because if you outlive your husband, it would be perfectly possible that you don’t include them in your will and your god children inherit everything THEIR DAD intended to leave THEM.

I really think there should be legal obligations regarding making iron clad wills on people remarrying when they have existing children. The current laws are not sufficient

Hard agree

Cosyblankets · 12/03/2025 10:40

TENSsion · 12/03/2025 10:37

Because if you outlive your husband, it would be perfectly possible that you don’t include them in your will and your god children inherit everything THEIR DAD intended to leave THEM.

I really think there should be legal obligations regarding making iron clad wills on people remarrying when they have existing children. The current laws are not sufficient

This could easily have been sorted out when he married again by writing a new will.

If you want something to happen after your death you make it clear when you're alive.

TENSsion · 12/03/2025 10:41

Cosyblankets · 12/03/2025 10:40

This could easily have been sorted out when he married again by writing a new will.

If you want something to happen after your death you make it clear when you're alive.

I’m pretty sure I stated that I think there should be legal obligations on people to do this rather than guidance.

GuevarasBeret · 12/03/2025 10:42

Cosyblankets · 12/03/2025 10:38

But if all children were from same mother would it not be the norm for the children to inherit property etc after the second parent dies? When my mum died it all went to my dad. When he died it all came to us.

True, except she is proposing that only her children get the house when she passes on, and that the children from the first marriage get Zero from their fathers estate - which may also include their mothers estate.

Whycanineverthinkofone · 12/03/2025 10:50

Cosyblankets · 12/03/2025 10:38

But if all children were from same mother would it not be the norm for the children to inherit property etc after the second parent dies? When my mum died it all went to my dad. When he died it all came to us.

It depends. My dad died when I was young, everything went to my mum. There was a lot of money.

mum’s never worked so 30 years later she’s in her 80’s and there’s none left 🤷‍♀️ she’s lived a good life with plenty of luxuries and holidays. The million pound house has been sold, the money gone.

when she dies I may get a few thousand, that’s it.

dh’s parents left all their money to his sister. He got nothing.

my brother remarried. His first wife got everything in the divorce, he walked away with a rucksack after she had an affair. He and his second wife started from scratch, with her providing deposits etc, and facilitating him supporting his kids. Why should she have to give everything to his kids?

nobody is guaranteed money from parents. They can leave their money to whoever the want.

if wives are to be disinherited in favour of kids then that should apply to all marriages.

You can’t guarantee a first wife won’t remarry and leave the house to her new husband either. If she doesn’t make a will that is what happens.

why are we only applying this rule to second wives? Anyone with kids can disinherit them.

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 12/03/2025 10:53

sideeyes · 12/03/2025 10:39

Hard agree

We have nothing from their mother so that's will never be an issue (why on earth would we want anything of hers?). We don't have children together, hence me mentioning my godchildren - they are included as it's unfair that his children get everything.

In our case we have a one bedroom flat and selling it to release the money to any of the children would effectively leave the surviving partner homeless as there wouldn't be enough money to buy another home.

I have no intention of leaving his kids out of my will, I wouldn't dream of doing that but I don't think it's unreasonable to want to keep my home while I'm still alive!

Cosyblankets · 12/03/2025 10:54

Whycanineverthinkofone · 12/03/2025 10:50

It depends. My dad died when I was young, everything went to my mum. There was a lot of money.

mum’s never worked so 30 years later she’s in her 80’s and there’s none left 🤷‍♀️ she’s lived a good life with plenty of luxuries and holidays. The million pound house has been sold, the money gone.

when she dies I may get a few thousand, that’s it.

dh’s parents left all their money to his sister. He got nothing.

my brother remarried. His first wife got everything in the divorce, he walked away with a rucksack after she had an affair. He and his second wife started from scratch, with her providing deposits etc, and facilitating him supporting his kids. Why should she have to give everything to his kids?

nobody is guaranteed money from parents. They can leave their money to whoever the want.

if wives are to be disinherited in favour of kids then that should apply to all marriages.

You can’t guarantee a first wife won’t remarry and leave the house to her new husband either. If she doesn’t make a will that is what happens.

why are we only applying this rule to second wives? Anyone with kids can disinherit them.

I didn't mean it was a guarantee i just meant that if kids are to inherit it's more likely after the second parent dies.
In the case of divorce and remarriage it would be more usual for a new will and them to be named and I'm a case similar to the OP a lifetime interest in the house is usually set up.

aCatCalledFawkes · 12/03/2025 10:56

TENSsion · 12/03/2025 10:32

What are you even talking about? He clearly wanted his older children to inherit. That’s why he wrote his will that way.

Why should they get nothing just because he remarried?

Most people write a new will while they get divorced, so that there ex doesn’t inherit from them so yes at the time he probably did write it for that reason and being newly single. I wrote one as soon as I got divorced.

Since then he remarried so presumably he either didn’t know the law (unlikely given he got divorced and wrote a will) or didn’t think he had too due to remarrying.

Are you actually divorced? Have you actually been through this with a solicitor?

TENSsion · 12/03/2025 10:59

aCatCalledFawkes · 12/03/2025 10:56

Most people write a new will while they get divorced, so that there ex doesn’t inherit from them so yes at the time he probably did write it for that reason and being newly single. I wrote one as soon as I got divorced.

Since then he remarried so presumably he either didn’t know the law (unlikely given he got divorced and wrote a will) or didn’t think he had too due to remarrying.

Are you actually divorced? Have you actually been through this with a solicitor?

“Since then he remarried so presumably he either didn’t know the law (unlikely given he got divorced and wrote a will)”

This is a really ridiculous statement when you have the evidence of this thread to see how few people understand the full complexities of second marriages, exiting children, wills and inheritance.

Cosyblankets · 12/03/2025 11:00

GuevarasBeret · 12/03/2025 10:42

True, except she is proposing that only her children get the house when she passes on, and that the children from the first marriage get Zero from their fathers estate - which may also include their mothers estate.

I've just re read all her posts and i don't actually think that's what she's proposed. She's just finding out what the law says. She's in shock and she's looking at her own children but i can't see anything anywhere that actually says that she'd leave them without a penny

aCatCalledFawkes · 12/03/2025 11:02

TENSsion · 12/03/2025 10:59

“Since then he remarried so presumably he either didn’t know the law (unlikely given he got divorced and wrote a will)”

This is a really ridiculous statement when you have the evidence of this thread to see how few people understand the full complexities of second marriages, exiting children, wills and inheritance.

Right. From the person who is arguing that his will should stand up even though he’s got remarried again and didn’t write a new will 🙄