Right, but what’s the point of the policy if it doesn’t make any money?
Yet again as on all of these threads, posters say it won’t make any difference, and then they say, well it’s a good thing anyway if more kids shift to state.
How is it a good thing if the education funding available per pupil actually goes down, plus lots of schools go bust making local people who work in them redundant? How is that a win for anyone? More stretched state schools and a bit more unnecessary unemployment? Doesn’t sound like a result to me?
The only rationale for the VAT policy is that it will make money. That’s what the govt has sold it on. If it doesn’t make any money, the state system gets even more stretched but the remaining students in the private sector get an even bigger advantage, isn’t that just a massive own goal? How could it be anything but? It only works if private school pupils don’t switch!
The pleasant fantasy that a lot of sharp-elbowed former private school parents will change the local state school for the better is just that, a stupid fantasy. a) Are the existing state parents just too useless to advocate for their DC? That’s a silly idea to start with! And b) even if this idea worked, all these new parents will just be advocating for their DC over yours. Now their DC appear in your kids’ schools and get all the music lessons, and the enrichment trips, and the best roles in plays and the head girl posts and the top grades, instead of your kids 🤣