Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Is 45 too old to have a baby

767 replies

Catontoof · 09/02/2025 12:22

is this fair on a child?
I am seriously considering this as I feel like
therr has been a huge hole in my life.

OP posts:
TallulaSpeakEaay · 09/02/2025 16:09

You'll get so many mixed opinions on this but only you know you and how you would manage this. As long as you're fit and healthy, have a wide network of support especially in case anything ever happened to you if you'd be doing this alone then only you can decide this, not a bunch of strangers on the Internet. Write a list of pros and cons. Research medical conditions that may occur in mother's and children over the age of 40 and then decide. You're not an old lady and having a teenagers in your 50s wouldn't be the end of the world. I know parents that age and foster carers and they all manage and are happy. It's your life, you decide and good luck

Unpaidviewer · 09/02/2025 16:10

StScholastica · 09/02/2025 16:00

Oooh ouch.
I actually know several people who have teenagers and are in their 60s. All of them are brilliant parents and the kids are flourishing.
Getting sick of the ageism on this site.

Can't be true. Everyone on here knows that as soon as you hit 60 you're decrepit and need to either go in a nursing home or be euthanized. Unless you provide childcare that is.

SockFluffInTheBath · 09/02/2025 16:10

Catontoof · 09/02/2025 14:58

To be clear I am not saying I am going to get pregnant for my child. I am saying that there are things from this DC coukd and would benefit from!

Like what? Learning how to be your village when they should be out clubbing with their mates? If you do this it’s your baby, not your existing DC’s baby, they’re not your partner in this.

PyongyangKipperbang · 09/02/2025 16:12

Catontoof · 09/02/2025 15:02

Didn't that depend on the parent though? And the child
I certainly wouldn't expect my child to spend their best years caring for me

My parents didnt expect me to care for them but that is exactly what has ended up happening.

No one expects that, no one wants to be "that" parent but aging changes people both physically and emotionally and what seemed anathema during their 40's is treated as perfectly acceptable in their 70's. Little favours, nipping to the shop for example, gradually become bigger and bigger favours almost without anyone realising and then before you know it, you are a full time carer. As I am.

Liveandletlive18 · 09/02/2025 16:15

I have a close relative produced last baby of a family of 4 at 47. No issues no problems. It's all about the individuals concerned & nothing to do with age.

LadyPenelope72 · 09/02/2025 16:17

Yes, I personally think anything over 40 is too old. My parents were both 40 when they had me back in the 70’s. Dad died at 64 and mum’s health was terrible 50+. When I had my children in my early 30’s she was like an elderly woman and someone else I had to take care of. Best age is late 20’s to mid 30’s for me.

Notjustabrunette · 09/02/2025 16:22

I’m 45, already have 2 kids and wouldn’t want a baby. I feel like I’ve just got my life back on track now the kids are not so dependent on me.
having said that my friend has recently had a surprise 3rd child at the age of 44. She seems happy.

crumblingschools · 09/02/2025 16:22

@Catontoof what would your current DC benefit from a sibling. Only children can have great lives, they don’t need a sibling

CurlyhairedAssassin · 09/02/2025 16:24

Hwi · 09/02/2025 15:38

Nothing will give you so much joy as a baby! My great-grandmother had her seventh baby (two died in infancy) in abject poverty in Germany, at 52. No social help, no washing machines, no disposable nappies, no maternity leave, no women's rights. Just saying.

Highly unlikely. It's much more likely that it was an older daughter's illegitimate child passed off as her own becaue in those days it was just too shameful.

rainbowunicorn · 09/02/2025 16:24

NorthernGirl1981 · 09/02/2025 14:58

Yes it is.

It isn’t fair to the child. At a time when they should be flying the nest, exploring the world, going on adventures etc they will probably not feel free to do any of it as their parents are creeping towards their 70s.

My mum is only 66 but she still depends on me a lot now for all sorts of things and I feel this heavy weight of responsibility on my shoulders. I’m 42 years old and I find that kind of pressure hard to live with, never mind if I was 20!

My parents are a decade older than your mum and don't rely on me for anything. They were both working until a couple of years ago. They still volunteer several days a week. They travel abroad a few times a year. Look after my niece and nephew a couple of times a week and go hillwalking regulary. Dad swims most mornings and mums does yoga, pilates and line dancing.
Its not a given that you turn 60 and become reliant on others overnight which is just as well really as retirement age is closer to 70 than 60 now. Most people your mums age are still at work at least part time.

JennyWren87 · 09/02/2025 16:24

Yes

crumblingschools · 09/02/2025 16:25

@hwi did the other siblings do most of the childcare?

Praying4Peace · 09/02/2025 16:25

HollyBollyBooBoo · 09/02/2025 12:27

Is it fair on you? I'm healthy, active and fit and couldn't cope with a baby and the following decade of raising a child that's for sure.

This and babies aren't supposed to be filling a huge void in people's lives
Not fair on babies either!

Umbilicat · 09/02/2025 16:27

I agree with those who say you don’t know how you actually will behave as an older person – let’s say someone of 70 - compared to how you think you will behave around your children. Also, unless I’ve missed it, you haven’t said if you have parents of your own because they are going to become increasingly demanding. You may think it’s not going to happen, I used to think that because my parents seemed so well, but things can go downhill very rapidly.

NeshButUpNorth · 09/02/2025 16:28

Sorry, I haven't read all the posts, here's my thoughts:

  1. You would he lucky to get pregnant straightaway, so your question is really "Is 46-50 too old to have a baby"
  2. As people say, think about when they are 21 you could be 66-71
  3. If you die before they are 18, what's to stop them ending up in a children's home - have you got someone ready to adopt them?
BluebellsRinging · 09/02/2025 16:32

ARainyNightInSoho · 09/02/2025 15:56

I wouldn’t like to say whether 45 is too old to have a baby but I would like to say that I am utterly mystified the number of people who say they are exhausted in their 40s and would be far too tired to parent a teenager in their 60s. Why? I am 63 and could cope fine with a teenager. I was certainly fitter and more energetic in my 50s than I had ever been. Not just me but everyone else I know. There are perhaps lots of reasons not to have a child after your mid 40s but none of them to do with being physically incapable. Honestly, if you feel exhausted in your 40s and 50s start eating and properly!

What age did you have children out of interest? Woman are exhausted in their 40s/50s because of peri/menopause, I assume you’re one of those who sailed through it? Most don’t and OP needs to take that into consideration.

Custardcreamsbetterwithtea · 09/02/2025 16:34

PyongyangKipperbang · 09/02/2025 16:12

My parents didnt expect me to care for them but that is exactly what has ended up happening.

No one expects that, no one wants to be "that" parent but aging changes people both physically and emotionally and what seemed anathema during their 40's is treated as perfectly acceptable in their 70's. Little favours, nipping to the shop for example, gradually become bigger and bigger favours almost without anyone realising and then before you know it, you are a full time carer. As I am.

Exactly this. There is also a higher risk you'll get less time with you child/more importantly child less time with their parent . It isn't easy for dcs to lose parents younger either, or potentially have more caring to do from a younger age. My friend lost her Mum, Mum was 76, friend was 30. Her Mum was healthy, fit and nobody saw it coming. The truth is everybody will die, and it can happen at any age, but it is fact that there is a higher chance it'll happen when you're older, meaning your dcs will likely have longer to live without you. I say this as somebody who has lost a parent in my 30s; it hurts like hell.

rainbowunicorn · 09/02/2025 16:34

HardenYourHeart · 09/02/2025 15:15

All anecdotal.

I was a child to older parents and own my experiences are totally different. I don't want that for any child, because it was horrible.

That's what I am on about.

Just pointing out that your experience isn't everyone's. I stand by whatbi said earlier, being in and out of hospital in your 50s is quite unusual and not the most likely scenario.

Oakiedoakie · 09/02/2025 16:35

I know two people close to me who had babies at 45, no problems at all and both really pleased they did. One child is now an adult, the other a teen. They did have older children too, so maybe that was a help? But I don't think 45 is too old.

CurlyhairedAssassin · 09/02/2025 16:39

NorthernGirl1981 · 09/02/2025 15:57

It’s the opposite with me.

My mum decided to move closer to me, probably for the same reasons you gave, and it’s just made it worse. Now that she’s closer she expects me to be even more “on hand” than I was before, and experts to see me a lot more because there is no reason not to anymore, i.e the issue of distance no longer exists.

This feeling of being “needed” and being responsible for my mother’s well-being just weighs heavy on me sometimes, and I imagine it would be so much worse if I was only 20 and having to navigate this kind of scenario.

Has she not created other social connections for herself rather than relying on you?

Roselilly36 · 09/02/2025 16:41

Personally I would say too old.

Charlize43 · 09/02/2025 16:46

An ex colleague had a child at 46 through IVF (shortly after her marriage broke down because her husband, who was older, was looking forward to retirement and not being a dad) and I heard through another friend that in her mid-late fifties she has onset dementia, so what should be her daughter's fun teenage years have been consumed by looking after her mum and ferrying her back and forth to hospital. I wouldn't wish that on anyone.

Maybe it would be better to foster a child instead? Or get a cat?

YikesItsLate · 09/02/2025 16:53

44 and youngest child is a delight, top set at school ( seniors) really popular with their peers.

Good luck, we are married, so have each other and other younger siblings, but certainly keeps you young

PyongyangKipperbang · 09/02/2025 16:58

Might be worth exploring why you have this "hole" inside you.

How long have you felt like this? What triggered it?

I ask because I wonder if its the little talked about Perimeno "Last Chance Saloon" broodiness that affect a lot (a LOT) of women. Its as if your body is screaming "Do it now while you still can!!" before menopause proper starts. I went through it, every woman my age that I know well enough to ask went through it. It does pass.

Ihatelittlefriendsusan · 09/02/2025 17:03

Biologically probably not.

Ethically is a whole other matter.

How fit and healthy are you? Do you have a good support network around you? If the child decides on uni, how will you help support them in your retirement?

I am 45, I have an 11 year old but there is absolutely no way I would want to be going through sleepless nights, nappies, terrible 2's etc again. I barely have the energy to play tennis with her now, I cannot imagine trying to help her practice if I was 56.

Swipe left for the next trending thread