Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Am I a far right extremist?

1000 replies

Isitme245 · 25/01/2025 11:30

I had a conversation with my best friend of 25 years the other day and she called me a far right extremist and how my views are scary, dangerous and 'nazi coded'
I was really shocked as I didn't think any of what I said was bad. I'm not a particularly avid supporter of any political party and very much keep opinions to myself. She's very supportive of labour and anti trump and always has been. Usually when she asks me my opinions I just don't want to get into it but I did the other night and now I feel bad.

Here's the breakdown:

  • she sent me an article and told me that Nigel Farage is going to ban abortion eventually if he wins an election. I read the article and pointed out he only suggested lowering the abortion cut off date to 22 weeks (not 24 as it is now). I told her it wasn't the end of the world and it's reasonable if you read his reasons. I also made the point that men shouldn't really be getting involved in abortion law but that what he said wasn't the end of the world.
  • she asked me about immigration and I said that it's great but that we should be prioritising skilled immigrants and have stronger immigration laws. She also asked about asylum seekers and hotels and I said that we should have stronger laws about monitoring people and collecting documentation when people arrive.
  • she sent me and asked about Elon Musk's Nazi salute and I said I didn't interpret it that way
  • I said that immigrants who rape or murder should be deported.

To me this feels really reasonable and not over the top but she really attacked me for it? Now I feel really awkward and uncomfortable talking to her. Is this far right??

OP posts:
Thread gallery
22
username299 · 26/01/2025 13:36

1dayatatime · 26/01/2025 13:23

@username299

"He specifically killed anyone with socialist views. He purged the party of left wing views.

I've heard this a lot recently; people calling the left wing fascists, denying far right has any meaning and saying that Nazis are socialist. It's amazing what people believe."

I think we are getting to the key point where you have misunderstood or lack historical knowledge or subconsciously interpret history to fit today's beliefs.

Hitler specifically targeted anyone or any group that were not part of his Nazi Party. He even targeted those groups that were aligned with his views but posed a potential political threat to the dominance of the Nazi Party.

A good example for you to read is a purge called the "Night of the Long Knives" where Hitler ordered the removal of the potential political threat of the SA.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NightofftheLonggKnives

If you read my posts, which you have quoted, you'll see I've already mentioned the the Night of the Long Knives. In fact Hitler killed Otto Strasser who was the head of the left wing of the party.

What you're attempting to argue is that Hitler was a socialist and killed anyone left wing, including the left wing of his party because he didn't want the competition. He wanted to be the only left wing person in his government.

OneAmberFinch · 26/01/2025 13:37

Lostcat · 26/01/2025 11:39

In which case I agree. The circumstances in which women between 22-24 weeks pregnant are having abortions would fulfil these other conditions. However, relying on these other exceptions it takes the decision out of the hands of the woman concerned and places it in the hands of “authorities”- which also makes access to abortion in those cases more challenging/ puts doctors and women at risk on criminal prosecution if they make a wrong judgement . This is fundamentally patriarchal and therefore still abhorrent in my view.

As a woman I think there should be some legal protections for post-viability babies. I'm comfortable with the current legislation which doesn't restrict medically urgent cases but does mean you can't just decide on a whim to have an abortion past that limit. As I understand it this doesn't really happen in practice, aside from isolated cases which get a lot of press and where the majority of the population are comfortable with prosecution.

I think there is a bigger threat to these protections (life of mother/child in late term) if we import American-style "abortion is an unqualified right, shout your abortion!!" politics. The vast majority of public support for abortion is actually in first trimester, with grey area re: how far into the second to go to. The public is also okay with a sober acceptance that sometimes due to very sad circumstances, it's not possible to continue a late-term pregnancy. I don't think that there is a need to loosen our abortion laws further and make it fully elective to term - if anything, a public debate would likely result in a lower term limit for elective abortions (perhaps to somewhere between 14-18 weeks) due to backlash and the public realising that medical exceptions would still be possible to term.

1dayatatime · 26/01/2025 13:53

@username299

"What you're attempting to argue is that Hitler was a socialist and killed anyone left wing, including the left wing of his party because he didn't want the competition. He wanted to be the only left wing person in his government."

What I am putting forward is that the Nazi Party shared more common ideology with socialism than it ever did with right wing free market capitalism.

For example:
• farmers should be given their land
• pensions should improve
• public industries such as electricity and water should be owned by the state

He didn't just kill left wing people he also killed right wing people. He even killed members of the church.

More importantly he killed these individuals and groups simply because they represented a political threat to him (from left, right or religion or whatever) and his Nazi Party.

AnnaFrith · 26/01/2025 14:03

TicklishReader · 25/01/2025 19:07

How did you feel when Trump bragged about being responsible for Roe v. Wade being overturned?

Women are dying in the US because of this decision. How many women have died because of identification laws?

I don't think these issues are linked.
It is possible to have a different opinion to Trump on the right of women to access safe abortions, and also be delighted at his strong stance on the trans issue.
How do you feel about the fact that women prisoners in the US will no longer be locked up with dangerous men, some of whom convicted rapists and murderers?

Junaluma · 26/01/2025 14:09

I don’t see what you said as remotely far right. I agree with what you’re saying. Probably centrist/centre right.

TooBigForMyBoots · 26/01/2025 14:11

Betchyaby · 26/01/2025 10:42

Do you realise the Nazis were left wing socialists? It always cracks me up when someone refers to ring wing people as Nazis or fascists.

Edited

No they weren't.🙈

username299 · 26/01/2025 14:14

1dayatatime · 26/01/2025 13:53

@username299

"What you're attempting to argue is that Hitler was a socialist and killed anyone left wing, including the left wing of his party because he didn't want the competition. He wanted to be the only left wing person in his government."

What I am putting forward is that the Nazi Party shared more common ideology with socialism than it ever did with right wing free market capitalism.

For example:
• farmers should be given their land
• pensions should improve
• public industries such as electricity and water should be owned by the state

He didn't just kill left wing people he also killed right wing people. He even killed members of the church.

More importantly he killed these individuals and groups simply because they represented a political threat to him (from left, right or religion or whatever) and his Nazi Party.

You don't understand the basic tenants of either far right or far left ideology. The NSP originally started out as a socialist party but when Hitler came to power was fascist.

Hitler then purged both the party and society of socialists, communists and trade unionists.

I understand that you think he was just making sure he had no competition but he wasn't left wing.

The foundation of Nazi ideology is Hitler's belief in German racial superiority and the dangers of Communism. He believed in the subordination of the individual to the state which is diametrically opposed to Communism.

Banyon · 26/01/2025 14:27

Isitme245 · 26/01/2025 12:27

@username299 you clearly didn't read my post properly because I never said husband. Have a look back at it. I said that my friend has told a mutual friend of ours about my views and she now thinks that my views are dangerous towards her and her family.
The mutual friend is half Pakistani and her DAD is a paediatrician who moved to this country to work.
My views on immigration do not affect her or her dad as she was born here and he is a skilled immigrant, which implies that the first friend has skewed what I've said to make it sound a lot worse.

Don’t assume immigrants support open boarders and uncontrolled immigration … many absolutely don’t. It’s often their jobs, housing & communities that are mostly directly negatively impacted.

Grammarnut · 26/01/2025 14:37

BoredZelda · 26/01/2025 00:11

The reason for reducing the limit on abortions is that we can now be fairly sure a 24-week feotus will survive and be healthy, which was not the case up until recently. It seems reasonable to lower the limit in the light of this fact, unless there is good reason for a later abortion e.g. catastrophic abnormality e.g. anencephaly. At the moment, as you say, very few women go past 24 weeks for an abortion and it is because of death of the child, conditions where life is insupportable, or where the mother's life is in severe danger. Such decisions would not be affected by lowering the limit to 22 weeks, because many of them occur now after 24 weeks.

Conflating abortion and viability is a dangerous thing to do.

For a start your numbers are wrong. The earliest baby to survive was 21 weeks and 1 day. I personally know a number of 23 weekers who have gone on to thrive with no issues.

The survival rate at birth for babies born before 24 weeks is 50%. But about half of those babies die within 6 weeks. 40% of those who survive go on to have lifelong / life limiting disabilities. A further 30% will have a less severe disability, but still will require long term care.

At 24 weeks, the survival rate rises, but is still only 65%. 20% of those do not make it home. Again, 50% of those who do go home, go on to have a life long disability, 20% of whom will be severely affected.

When people talk about "viable" they don't really know what they mean. Surviving birth is only a tiny part of the picture.

The reason we have to be careful about lowering the point at which a person can choose an abortion is down to pre-natal scanning and foetal development. It isn't until 20 weeks that many foetal abnormalities can be detected. If a scan is slightly delayed (which isn't unusual) you will put women in the position of having to make a very difficult decision in a very short space of time.

The system as it is, is working well. 0.1% of abortions are at 24 weeks. 1% happen after 20 weeks. 95% happen before 12 weeks. If we allow a political party to use abortion as a wedge issue, for political gain, we're all losing.

But if there is a severe abnormality then the time limit on abortion no longer operates, does it (because it doesn't now). Abortion because of severe abnormality would be allowed - we are not talking cleft palettes and club foots here, btw, but severe, life-limiting conditions where a child will have no viable life or will die within hours or days in pain and distress.

Grammarnut · 26/01/2025 14:58

Isitme245 · 26/01/2025 02:12

Thank you, this is a reassuring post. I did just that today and reached out to her looking to clear the air. She told me she'd told a mutual friend of ours (that we're meant to be meeting tomorrow) about our conversation and apparently the friend is upset because my views endanger her and her family. The mutual friend is half Pakistani on her dad's side, was born in the UK and her dad is a paediatrician.
Original friend told me she's incredibly worried that I am being radicalised and is going to support me in getting through this so I don't 'lose people.'
I feel really weird and like I've been made out as some sort of extremist... I'm also wondering how on earth she may have twisted my words to make our mutual friend think that I have views dangerous to her and her dad. Feeling really uncomfortable

I am not surprised you feel uncomfortable. Your beliefs are mainstream. Most countries, for example, have strict immigration laws, favouring immigrants with skills the country needs. Deporting non-citizen criminals such as murderers is felt by many to be something that ought to be done (though it does undermine the possibility of rehabilitation, perhaps).
I can't comment on Musk since I have not see his hand/arm gestures - but all such gestures are open to interpretation and 'not seeing it as a Nazi salute' does not make you right wing, it just means you have a different interpretation of a scenario.
Your friend who is part Pakistani is also barking up the wrong tree. She was born here, so is not an immigrant, and her father has a skill the UK wants even if he was not born here. Your ideas are no threat to her family whatsoever - nor to anyone like her (for example, my DC who are dual-heritage and whose father was not born in the UK).

Your friend owes you an apology. She also might like to consider how her views fit into maintaining a stable society, too. But if you lose her as a friend it will be little loss, for she obviously considers you to be a person in need of help and unable to make up their own mind on issues - this is what I see as her thinking you are being 'radicalised'. She has infantilized you, in effect.

Grammarnut · 26/01/2025 15:01

username299 · 26/01/2025 14:14

You don't understand the basic tenants of either far right or far left ideology. The NSP originally started out as a socialist party but when Hitler came to power was fascist.

Hitler then purged both the party and society of socialists, communists and trade unionists.

I understand that you think he was just making sure he had no competition but he wasn't left wing.

The foundation of Nazi ideology is Hitler's belief in German racial superiority and the dangers of Communism. He believed in the subordination of the individual to the state which is diametrically opposed to Communism.

I'm not at all sure that subbordinating the individual to the state is antithetical to communism where the few are subbordinated to the needs of the many.

Locutus2000 · 26/01/2025 15:01

I'm on Mumsnet being gaslit about how the fucking Nazis were left wing.

Fuck 2025.

Greywhippet · 26/01/2025 15:03

OneAmberFinch · 26/01/2025 13:37

As a woman I think there should be some legal protections for post-viability babies. I'm comfortable with the current legislation which doesn't restrict medically urgent cases but does mean you can't just decide on a whim to have an abortion past that limit. As I understand it this doesn't really happen in practice, aside from isolated cases which get a lot of press and where the majority of the population are comfortable with prosecution.

I think there is a bigger threat to these protections (life of mother/child in late term) if we import American-style "abortion is an unqualified right, shout your abortion!!" politics. The vast majority of public support for abortion is actually in first trimester, with grey area re: how far into the second to go to. The public is also okay with a sober acceptance that sometimes due to very sad circumstances, it's not possible to continue a late-term pregnancy. I don't think that there is a need to loosen our abortion laws further and make it fully elective to term - if anything, a public debate would likely result in a lower term limit for elective abortions (perhaps to somewhere between 14-18 weeks) due to backlash and the public realising that medical exceptions would still be possible to term.

I think whether or when a woman has an abortion is none of anyone’s business and that no one has the right to opine about it

Grammarnut · 26/01/2025 15:04

Banyon · 26/01/2025 14:27

Don’t assume immigrants support open boarders and uncontrolled immigration … many absolutely don’t. It’s often their jobs, housing & communities that are mostly directly negatively impacted.

About one-third of immigrants voted to leave the EU on grounds of open borders and also immigration rules that put their families at a disadvantage compared to (white European) immigrant from the rest of the EU. So you are right. Immigrants generally want controlled immigration, too, because, as you say, their communities are the ones that suffer from excess immigration.

1dayatatime · 26/01/2025 15:09

Locutus2000 · 26/01/2025 15:01

I'm on Mumsnet being gaslit about how the fucking Nazis were left wing.

Fuck 2025.

I don't see as gas lighting but more of an opportunity to improve both your history knowledge and interpretation of history.

PandoraSox · 26/01/2025 15:16

1dayatatime · 26/01/2025 15:09

I don't see as gas lighting but more of an opportunity to improve both your history knowledge and interpretation of history.

"Hitler allied himself with leaders of German conservative and nationalist movements, and in January 1933 German President Paul von Hindenburg appointed him chancellor. Hitler’s Third Reich had been born, and it was entirely fascist in character.

Within two months Hitler achieved full dictatorial power through the Enabling Act.

In April 1933 communists, socialists, democrats, and Jews were purged from the German civil service, and trade unions were outlawed the following month.

That July Hitler banned all political parties other than his own, and prominent members of the German Communist Party and the Social Democratic Party were arrested and imprisoned in concentration camps.

Lest there be any remaining questions about the political character of the Nazi revolution, Hitler ordered the murder of Gregor Strasser, an act that was carried out on June 30, 1934, during the Night of the Long Knives. Any remaining traces of socialist thought in the Nazi Party had been extinguished"

https://www.britannica.com/story/were-the-nazis-socialists

Were the Nazis Socialists? | Britannica

What’s the difference between National Socialists and every other kind of socialist?

https://www.britannica.com/story/were-the-nazis-socialists

LittleMG · 26/01/2025 15:18

Isitme245 · 25/01/2025 11:35

Not at all, I know everyone's different. I just want to know if this is considered far right. My understanding of far-right is people who are openly racist, want completely closed borders, abortion bans etc

I worry that although you may not be far right, you are a dangerous group because you will support far right people who sanitise things just enough for people like you to vote for it. And then before you know it Musk is doing a Nazi salute and you think that’s fine. You’re not far right but you are a dangerous.

TooBigForMyBoots · 26/01/2025 15:19

Locutus2000 · 26/01/2025 15:01

I'm on Mumsnet being gaslit about how the fucking Nazis were left wing.

Fuck 2025.

It's not gaslighting. It's straight up Lying and disinformation. I doubt the timing of this shit is a coincidence.🤨

ArtTheClown · 26/01/2025 15:20

You’re not far right but you are a dangerous.

And you don't see the inherent danger of labelling individuals as "dangerous" for having some fairly non-remarkable views?

PandoraSox · 26/01/2025 15:21

TooBigForMyBoots · 26/01/2025 15:19

It's not gaslighting. It's straight up Lying and disinformation. I doubt the timing of this shit is a coincidence.🤨

Edited

Yep. Rewriting history in the most abhorrent way.

We'll have the Holocaust deniers sliming on to MN next. If they haven't already.

Lostcat · 26/01/2025 15:29

OneAmberFinch · 26/01/2025 13:37

As a woman I think there should be some legal protections for post-viability babies. I'm comfortable with the current legislation which doesn't restrict medically urgent cases but does mean you can't just decide on a whim to have an abortion past that limit. As I understand it this doesn't really happen in practice, aside from isolated cases which get a lot of press and where the majority of the population are comfortable with prosecution.

I think there is a bigger threat to these protections (life of mother/child in late term) if we import American-style "abortion is an unqualified right, shout your abortion!!" politics. The vast majority of public support for abortion is actually in first trimester, with grey area re: how far into the second to go to. The public is also okay with a sober acceptance that sometimes due to very sad circumstances, it's not possible to continue a late-term pregnancy. I don't think that there is a need to loosen our abortion laws further and make it fully elective to term - if anything, a public debate would likely result in a lower term limit for elective abortions (perhaps to somewhere between 14-18 weeks) due to backlash and the public realising that medical exceptions would still be possible to term.

I don't disagree with you at all on your second paragraph. I think this is very wise.

But we certainly don't want the likes of Farage reducing the 24 week limit..

username299 · 26/01/2025 15:31

Grammarnut · 26/01/2025 15:01

I'm not at all sure that subbordinating the individual to the state is antithetical to communism where the few are subbordinated to the needs of the many.

Nazism has a hierarchy and a deep rooted belief in the strong ruling the weak. Communism is based on the liberation of the proletariat or the working class; it's a classless society without capitalism or privatisation.

Greywhippet · 26/01/2025 15:33

ArtTheClown · 26/01/2025 15:20

You’re not far right but you are a dangerous.

And you don't see the inherent danger of labelling individuals as "dangerous" for having some fairly non-remarkable views?

well the views are dangerous to immigrants, dangerous for race relations, dangerous for women and it’s certainly dangerous that anyone thinks a nazi salute is no biggie

thepariscrimefiles · 26/01/2025 15:34

Greywhippet · 26/01/2025 15:03

I think whether or when a woman has an abortion is none of anyone’s business and that no one has the right to opine about it

When people say that they are against abortion, I would say that's fine, don't have one then but don't stop other women from accessing one.

ElatedShark · 26/01/2025 15:39

Isitme245 · 25/01/2025 11:30

I had a conversation with my best friend of 25 years the other day and she called me a far right extremist and how my views are scary, dangerous and 'nazi coded'
I was really shocked as I didn't think any of what I said was bad. I'm not a particularly avid supporter of any political party and very much keep opinions to myself. She's very supportive of labour and anti trump and always has been. Usually when she asks me my opinions I just don't want to get into it but I did the other night and now I feel bad.

Here's the breakdown:

  • she sent me an article and told me that Nigel Farage is going to ban abortion eventually if he wins an election. I read the article and pointed out he only suggested lowering the abortion cut off date to 22 weeks (not 24 as it is now). I told her it wasn't the end of the world and it's reasonable if you read his reasons. I also made the point that men shouldn't really be getting involved in abortion law but that what he said wasn't the end of the world.
  • she asked me about immigration and I said that it's great but that we should be prioritising skilled immigrants and have stronger immigration laws. She also asked about asylum seekers and hotels and I said that we should have stronger laws about monitoring people and collecting documentation when people arrive.
  • she sent me and asked about Elon Musk's Nazi salute and I said I didn't interpret it that way
  • I said that immigrants who rape or murder should be deported.

To me this feels really reasonable and not over the top but she really attacked me for it? Now I feel really awkward and uncomfortable talking to her. Is this far right??

Bait post. We all know that's probably not only what you said or likely how you worded it either.
And who cares if you hold far right views their are many of your ilk about now.

I've said the stuff you typed and not been called far right which is why I think you said more than that with coded language.

I am all for foreign criminals being sent back to their country of origin and am very vocal in trying to get Spain to ship English criminals back (we have alot of them being a drain on the countries resources)

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.