Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Killer claims to be ill

1000 replies

Galatine · 23/01/2025 12:09

According to the BBC Axel Rudakubana is shouting in court that he is ill.
AIBU to say I couldn’t give a shit!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
murasaki · 23/01/2025 16:11

30 years before he gets a parole hearing which he will most likely fail. He's not getting whole life due to his age at the time, which I believe he deliberately used, showing he's mentally competent enough to have researched and decided that. I don't believe that was a random choice. I hope for more, but we'll see.

murasaki · 23/01/2025 16:12

JohnTheRevelator · 23/01/2025 16:11

I can imagine that if he isn't given a life sentence that there will be 'civil unrest' again.

He will get a life sentence with a tariff. To be spent inside.

TinklySnail · 23/01/2025 16:13

When did convicts become so entitled to do what they want, even through the judiciary system?
They all seem to be refusing to face up to their fate. It’s a shame you can’t drag them out but officers hands are tied more than the criminals.

IHateBakedBeans · 23/01/2025 16:14

You should get time added automatically for refusal to attend sentencing.

Same as that fucking bitch who killed Arthur. Can't face your crimes, have another five years.

IVFmumoftwo · 23/01/2025 16:14

User8646382 · 23/01/2025 16:10

I think he targeted those little girls for the same reason the asylum seeker in Germany killed a 2 year old earlier this week - because it’s the most heinous crime imaginable. He apparently stabbed one of the children 122 times. I don’t think it had anything to do with violence towards women and girls. It was about committing an act so depraved that it would send a message about the depths to which he, and others like him, are willing to sink. Why else target children?

Apparently he was obsessed with ‘white genocide’:

Wasn't the child Moroccan from what I read?

122 times. WTF. Poor child.

IHateBakedBeans · 23/01/2025 16:15

TinklySnail · 23/01/2025 16:13

When did convicts become so entitled to do what they want, even through the judiciary system?
They all seem to be refusing to face up to their fate. It’s a shame you can’t drag them out but officers hands are tied more than the criminals.

I thought that and then I thought you couldn't control their behaviour if they were dragged to the dock.

TizerorFizz · 23/01/2025 16:15

@MaggieMistletoe For convicted people who are 17 when they commit the murder there are rules about sentencing. It’s completely unlikely he won’t be in a high security mental facility for many decades. The prisoner is given a tariff they must serve before parole can be considered. Even if it’s ever considered, it can be refused. We have a society that believes young people under the ago of 18 when they commit the crime have a different sentencing regime but this won’t be a lenient sentence and he will be segregated. We used to use the term “criminally insane” and this is likely to be the outcome but it is not called that.

WillimNot · 23/01/2025 16:16

I'm sitting here crying hearing what he did to those little girls. They were tiny. I just can't understand how no one put a stop to him from when he was 13.

Those poor, poor little girls. All of them there that day. Their poor parents.

Awwlookatmybabyspider · 23/01/2025 16:16

He's playing the Court like a fiddle. He’s going to to keep on feigning sickness and i do believe it’s feigned and The Courts are going to keep falling for it. Mind you I suppose by Law they have to give him the benefit of the doubt, incase he is being genuine. However can the Judge not sentence him in his absence.

murasaki · 23/01/2025 16:17

Interesting from the judge, maybe sexist needs to be added to the description of terrorism, that would cover sprees against women but also men, thinking Joanna Dennehy here.

The attack, he said, was “equivalent” of a terror attack, even though it did not legally fit the definition of terrorism because it did not have a political, religious, racial or ideological cause. Whether his motivation was terrorism “misses the point”.

ProfessionalPirate · 23/01/2025 16:17

PocketSand · 23/01/2025 15:56

The government has decided that tax payers will not fund early intervention at nursery and primary level and provide support to those who need it.

Unfortunately this means that a lot of teenagers (and their parents who have sought support for years) reach a crisis point. It is no longer the case that such crisis only affects the young person and their immediate family. It is spread out to the wider community with the young person not recognising they needed support but seeking revenge or attacking easy targets.

I suspect those vilifying the perpetrator are also opposed to paying enough tax to support preschool and primary school children who are also referred to as little shits.

Maybe as a cost/benefit it's worth it. Save taxes and only a few atrocities carried out by teens that needed much earlier support than they received. And then demonise them and call them monsters and the parents crap.

Meanwhile those of us that recognise that some children need support and professions need to be funded to provide it feel devastated for those who suffer 'collateral damage' due to failure and are left to mourn innocent victims.

Did you serious just refer to those poor little girls as ‘collateral damage’?

Wtf is wrong with you?

TheCrenchinglyMcQuaffenBrothers · 23/01/2025 16:18

JohnTheRevelator · 23/01/2025 16:11

I can imagine that if he isn't given a life sentence that there will be 'civil unrest' again.

He can't get a 'whole life tariff' but that doesn't mean that, when he eventually comes up for parole, they ever have to let him out.

Pippinsdiary · 23/01/2025 16:18

WillimNot · 23/01/2025 16:16

I'm sitting here crying hearing what he did to those little girls. They were tiny. I just can't understand how no one put a stop to him from when he was 13.

Those poor, poor little girls. All of them there that day. Their poor parents.

I’ve been the same today. Being a mum to 2 beautiful girls genuinely terrifies me knowing people like him are walking among us

Lampzade · 23/01/2025 16:19

He is evil personified

x2boys · 23/01/2025 16:20

JessiesJ99 · 23/01/2025 15:53

They would probably section him I guess. Then do it.

It's not as simple as that you can enforce ,psychiatric medication under a section but treatment for physical health can only be enforced aa a one off there maybe other ways around it I'm not sure.

TinklySnail · 23/01/2025 16:21

murasaki · 23/01/2025 16:17

Interesting from the judge, maybe sexist needs to be added to the description of terrorism, that would cover sprees against women but also men, thinking Joanna Dennehy here.

The attack, he said, was “equivalent” of a terror attack, even though it did not legally fit the definition of terrorism because it did not have a political, religious, racial or ideological cause. Whether his motivation was terrorism “misses the point”.

Dennehy is a psychopath through and through and she hated men.
Did he kill the kids purely because he hated little girls?
If so then he deserves a tuna lid

NotOneOfTheInCrowd · 23/01/2025 16:21

ElatedShark · 23/01/2025 15:05

The lack of empathy for a child who is obviously mentally disturbed is awful but alot of you were in threads feeling sorry for that baby killer Lucy Letby. Interesting.

I think he should get the same sentence as the guys that murdered James Bulger. With intense therapy.

It's a sad case but murders happen all the time, my focus is on all families who have lost their children

Nobody who commits this type of crime is mentally normal, so how about we stop bringing out the “mental illness” card.

He knew exactly what he was doing, and he’s actually expressed that he’s glad that the girls are dead.

I save my empathy for genuine victims, which he most definitely isn’t.

As for comparing him to the bulger killers, there is a vast difference between 10 and 17 year olds., so there is no comparison to make.

Oh, and I hope Lucy Letby rots in hell as well.

murasaki · 23/01/2025 16:22

Apparently the judge said a lack of remorse is not an aggravating factor in sentencing. Why on earth isn't it?

placemats · 23/01/2025 16:23

The victim impact statements are so distressing to read that one can barely imagine the horror of that day. For what it's worth I wish for them some form of hope in the future. For now the grief and trauma is still so horribly real.

Bellyfullofbiscuits · 23/01/2025 16:23

RandomButtons · 23/01/2025 13:13

You’re summing up why the extreme right has gained so much speed in America. What a stupid thing to wish for.

Why is it stupid thing? Genuinely?

IVFmumoftwo · 23/01/2025 16:24

@ElatedShark DFOD.

LadyDanburysHat · 23/01/2025 16:24

51 years! Quite right. This judge has done the best he can.

Thegoatliesdownonbroadway · 23/01/2025 16:25

Shame he can't serve 13 lots of 51 years, one after the other.

Jacopo · 23/01/2025 16:25

51 years for the murders. Excellent sentence.

Nottodaythankyou123 · 23/01/2025 16:25

Awwlookatmybabyspider · 23/01/2025 16:16

He's playing the Court like a fiddle. He’s going to to keep on feigning sickness and i do believe it’s feigned and The Courts are going to keep falling for it. Mind you I suppose by Law they have to give him the benefit of the doubt, incase he is being genuine. However can the Judge not sentence him in his absence.

The judge sent him out and continued, then sentenced in his absence.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.