Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

That picture of the Southport killer

1000 replies

User09678 · 20/01/2025 17:11

That has been circulating today.

Remember that sweet boy that was in all the reports at the time? The one who looked about nine?

Can anyone think of any other serious criminal who has pictures of them as a child out in the press?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
EasternStandard · 21/01/2025 12:42

BRL2 · 21/01/2025 12:37

Like I said @EasternStandard it’s just a guess. I just thought your statement of fact that because he entered a guilty plea of murder meant he didn’t cross the threshold for diminished responsibility needed qualifying.

Well you don't know, as a guess it's just more stuff people try to put forward without evidence.

In any case without that plea he still won't end up in the facility the pp wants for him

BRL2 · 21/01/2025 12:43

I said from the very start that was a guess @EasternStandard I don’t know how many times you need to me repeat it.

BRL2 · 21/01/2025 12:44

However @EasternStandard it isn’t a guess to say there are some circumstances where this sort of situation could occur. Counsel have to act on instructions.

EasternStandard · 21/01/2025 12:45

BRL2 · 21/01/2025 12:43

I said from the very start that was a guess @EasternStandard I don’t know how many times you need to me repeat it.

Why bother? It's not verifiable in any way and just adds to speculation and misinformation

kerstina · 21/01/2025 12:48

I hope if anything comes from the enquiry it is that people who show this level of violence in their life ( apparently the social workers requested police protection when they visited him) they should not be free to walk the streets but in secure hospitals/ places .or is there a better way? The deaths of these girls and the Nottingham killers victims would have been prevented.

Tittat50 · 21/01/2025 12:48

Inmydreams88 · 21/01/2025 12:39

Clearly that’s the only picture the press had of him at that time though?

Come on, you know the daily mail would have eaten up that crazed mugshot picture given half the chance. Likely not allowed to publish it at the time.

I don't think it's the most hideous picture I've seen of anyone I've got tbh. I've seen much more deranged scary looking mugshots of myself tbh.

Having gone through this thread and come to this point - all I can focus on is the fact there's a massive gap in the MHealth services for young people and the support for the parents dealing with it.

The service has been utterly destroyed over the last 15 or so years. Even redefining terrorism - maybe that might have helped. But where would he have gone if he was flagged - because I'll imagine where he lived there was no Tier 3 provision. Did he actually get assessed as Autistic. I'm going out there to say I'm sure he was from what I read but it's a nightmare for parents trying to get their kids assessed. Thread after thread on here about this problem. MHealth problems threads, no help anywhere.

This to me is the most important part of this whole saga and not many people are talking about it.

I'm no fan of Starmer but this problem was not caused by him.

I actually feel for this guy's parents. I wonder what they were dealing with.

BlueSilverCats · 21/01/2025 12:49
  • I'm not talking about a mugshot, just not a picture so misleading that it would make a volatile public believe it was deliberate.

Lucy Letbys pictures were out long before her trial, they didn't use one of her when she was 7 or 8 years younger www.chesterstandard.co.uk/news/16332233.home-searched-baby-murder-arrest-belongs-chester-childrens-nurse/*

There's a difference between an adult with plenty of pictures readily /publicly available and a child(in the eyes of the law) with so SM presence. Can you really not see the difference?

Clavinova · 21/01/2025 12:49

PandoraSox
Many people in the UK aren't interested in US politics, so hardly a good day to buru bad news.

The inauguration of Donald Trump and the beginning of his second term as US president leads many of the papers.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn57xelwxk1o

BRL2 · 21/01/2025 12:49

EasternStandard · 21/01/2025 12:45

Why bother? It's not verifiable in any way and just adds to speculation and misinformation

I felt I had to explain the misinformation you had stated. It may help other people to understand the issues.

EasternStandard · 21/01/2025 12:52

I felt I had to explain the misinformation you had stated. It may help other people to understand the issues.

By making a best guess as you did? Without any evidence whatsoever

You are just replacing some speculation with your own. So no it's not about helping with the issues.

crumblingschools · 21/01/2025 12:53

@Clavinova the news yesterday morning was all about the trial, once he had pleaded guilty. Obviously, if that hadn't happened it would just have been the formalities so nothing to report, so nothing hidden. Press conference this morning.

And lets face it, most of the comments about the inauguration on SM are about Musk

BRL2 · 21/01/2025 12:53

EasternStandard · 21/01/2025 12:52

I felt I had to explain the misinformation you had stated. It may help other people to understand the issues.

By making a best guess as you did? Without any evidence whatsoever

You are just replacing some speculation with your own. So no it's not about helping with the issues.

Ok.

EasternStandard · 21/01/2025 12:54

And the fact that is known is he did not plead anything other than guilty

So pp diverging from that really are adding to misinformation

Clavinova · 21/01/2025 12:54

NoSoupForU · 21/01/2025 12:41

Day 1 is pre-trial. It isn't the same format as the rest of the trial. It's underpinning the formalities. Confirming the plea, swearing in the jury, giving an overview of the process etc. Had he not pled guilty, there would have been nothing to report.

The actual trial begins on day 2.

The judge told him: "Your trial will now take place on 20 January and you will be transferred from where you are now to a more convenient place for the purposes of attending this court."

https://news.sky.com/story/not-guilty-pleas-entered-for-southport-stabbings-suspect-axel-rudakubana-after-he-refuses-to-speak-13271371

bombastix · 21/01/2025 12:57

BRL2 · 21/01/2025 12:44

However @EasternStandard it isn’t a guess to say there are some circumstances where this sort of situation could occur. Counsel have to act on instructions.

Well we are going to find out I. Thursday as the sentencing submissions will include psychiatric reports. He doesn't have to be "insane" legally to have serious personality disorder. Even then, it means prison. A lot of murderers will have such disorders. All speculation, but the long preoccupation from 13 onwards is suggestive. Autism, not so much

EasternStandard · 21/01/2025 13:00

None of what is said at sentencing is evidence he requested a plea change as put forward by the pp

And it's still not anything bar prison. So no not the insane asylum as asked for by pp.

If people want facts then go for it, but not just sometimes.

crumblingschools · 21/01/2025 13:01

@Clavinova I know you are a fan of posting links to things (saw enough of them on the education threads during the pandemic) and actually ignoring the things that people are actually saying but can you answer would you be posting all these if this had happened whilst your beloved Tories were in charge?

The fact that the swearing in of jury would have taken place on 20th what exactly do you think was being hidden?

BRL2 · 21/01/2025 13:08

I am sitting on my hands now.

Clavinova · 21/01/2025 13:10

crumblingschools · 21/01/2025 13:01

@Clavinova I know you are a fan of posting links to things (saw enough of them on the education threads during the pandemic) and actually ignoring the things that people are actually saying but can you answer would you be posting all these if this had happened whilst your beloved Tories were in charge?

The fact that the swearing in of jury would have taken place on 20th what exactly do you think was being hidden?

actually ignoring the things that people are actually saying

I am mostly pointing out inaccuracies in what people are saying.

Perhaps you can answer the school question then - which Catholic school did Rudakubana attend? The other poster hasn't replied.

EasternStandard · 21/01/2025 13:15

Clavinova · 21/01/2025 12:49

PandoraSox
Many people in the UK aren't interested in US politics, so hardly a good day to buru bad news.

The inauguration of Donald Trump and the beginning of his second term as US president leads many of the papers.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn57xelwxk1o

I was wondering where the idea came from that it wasn't a top story

Goodo @BRL2

PeppyGreenFinch · 21/01/2025 13:18

BRL2 · 21/01/2025 12:23

I’m sorry but there is every reason for the lol when it comes to views like yours. Some of the brightest and the best solicitors and barristers are involved in this trial. They are people of the highest integrity. I dare you to say to their faces they are involved in a cover up over the slaughter of three children. Of course you wouldn’t dare. Much easier to type these things thoughtlessly and put them on social media.

Exactly. The claims of the civil service and courts being involved in a cover are so disrespectful to everyone’s integrity.

Iwanttoliveonamountain · 21/01/2025 13:18

I don’t understand what it is about that photo that’s caused this thread

PandoraSox · 21/01/2025 13:34

Iwanttoliveonamountain · 21/01/2025 13:18

I don’t understand what it is about that photo that’s caused this thread

That is because you are not a conspiracy theorist!

PandoraSox · 21/01/2025 13:36

Bye

PandoraSox · 21/01/2025 13:36

Thread

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread