Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU in thinking this could spread rapidly to other schools? Parents have to come into school to change NT DCs if they soil themselves.

1000 replies

CwmYoy · 20/12/2024 17:29

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/schools-tell-parents-if-your-34349942

It's been a long time coming but I can see it will spread now there are fewer TAs.

As long as SEN needs are taken into account I think it's a good idea.

Schools ask parents 'if your child has nappies you must come in and change them'

The new rule comes into force in schools across Blaenau Gwent next term for children in reception and nursery classes. Parents have spoken of their concern over the plans

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/schools-tell-parents-if-your-34349942

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
Waytooearlytogetup · 20/12/2024 20:01

oakleaffy · 20/12/2024 18:41

Exactly!
Clearly seriously disabled children have always needed personal care- but the others?
Definitely not.
It would have been considered shameful even amongst peers to have made a mess. ( Mainstream schools)
Who is paid to deal with things like this?

Care and Nursing homes / Hospitals are fully geared up with facilities,biohazard bags and sluice rooms.

Mainstream schools aren’t.

There are three types of children this impacts as far as I can see:

  1. SEN - there's a multitude of issues with why this will be problematic for parents already struggling to navigate an inadequate school system.
  2. NT children with a bladder or bowel condition.
  3. Children who's parents haven't pushed potty training and have effectively neglected their kids.

This policy lets down children in all three of those categories - because NONE of those issues are the child's fault.

One of my DC falls into category 2. She's very clever, very self aware and in top groups for all subjects in her class (reading 2 years ahead of her age), but according to a lot of the posters above shouldn't be entitled to an education because she sometimes has accidents and is being seen by a paediatric consultant for it.

To @oakleaffy and others who believe toileting accidents should be considered "shameful", let's hope incontinence never comes for you post childbirth or menopause or old age. But perhaps it's easier to sneer at some unknown children over the Internet than to have empathy for something you could well experience yourself at some point in the future.

ladygindiva · 20/12/2024 20:01

Seeing as it takes 3 years to diagnose autism this is awful.

ladygindiva · 20/12/2024 20:02

Waytooearlytogetup · 20/12/2024 20:01

There are three types of children this impacts as far as I can see:

  1. SEN - there's a multitude of issues with why this will be problematic for parents already struggling to navigate an inadequate school system.
  2. NT children with a bladder or bowel condition.
  3. Children who's parents haven't pushed potty training and have effectively neglected their kids.

This policy lets down children in all three of those categories - because NONE of those issues are the child's fault.

One of my DC falls into category 2. She's very clever, very self aware and in top groups for all subjects in her class (reading 2 years ahead of her age), but according to a lot of the posters above shouldn't be entitled to an education because she sometimes has accidents and is being seen by a paediatric consultant for it.

To @oakleaffy and others who believe toileting accidents should be considered "shameful", let's hope incontinence never comes for you post childbirth or menopause or old age. But perhaps it's easier to sneer at some unknown children over the Internet than to have empathy for something you could well experience yourself at some point in the future.

Great post 👍 I agree

nothinghasactuallychanged · 20/12/2024 20:02

Plus, one of the things I discovered from having an awful experience potty training DS is that MN is very unsympathetic and unpleasant to and about children with continence issues. I think the real world if you like tends to be kinder on this topic.

TheForestCalls · 20/12/2024 20:03

Waytooearlytogetup · 20/12/2024 20:01

There are three types of children this impacts as far as I can see:

  1. SEN - there's a multitude of issues with why this will be problematic for parents already struggling to navigate an inadequate school system.
  2. NT children with a bladder or bowel condition.
  3. Children who's parents haven't pushed potty training and have effectively neglected their kids.

This policy lets down children in all three of those categories - because NONE of those issues are the child's fault.

One of my DC falls into category 2. She's very clever, very self aware and in top groups for all subjects in her class (reading 2 years ahead of her age), but according to a lot of the posters above shouldn't be entitled to an education because she sometimes has accidents and is being seen by a paediatric consultant for it.

To @oakleaffy and others who believe toileting accidents should be considered "shameful", let's hope incontinence never comes for you post childbirth or menopause or old age. But perhaps it's easier to sneer at some unknown children over the Internet than to have empathy for something you could well experience yourself at some point in the future.

If incontinence comes for me, I'll be cleaning it up myself.

caringcarer · 20/12/2024 20:04

Teachers and TA's should not be changing shitty nappies under any circumstance. They have such a heavy load already. Parents should be made to come in every time nappies need changing. It is the parents responsibility to toilet train their DC.

TheForestCalls · 20/12/2024 20:04

nothinghasactuallychanged · 20/12/2024 20:02

Plus, one of the things I discovered from having an awful experience potty training DS is that MN is very unsympathetic and unpleasant to and about children with continence issues. I think the real world if you like tends to be kinder on this topic.

Continence issues (when medical or SEN) is different to just hasn't been taught though. I think people are pretty understanding about the former.

ARealitycheck · 20/12/2024 20:07

I imagine most people have sympathy for a child who has soiled himself. The reality though is there isn't the staffing or facilities for dealing with this in a school setting.

A child with a medical reason for soiling imo should have a care plan in place that doesn't divert the teacher from her job. Those without a medical reason other than the odd accident do need the parents to deal with it in some way.

everychildmatters · 20/12/2024 20:07

I suppose it's yet another thing adding to the severe teacher and support staff recruitment and retention crisis.
21 years in (primary teacher, SEN specialist) but left this week. The feeling of the weight finally being lifted is magical ✨️

ChristmasinBrighton · 20/12/2024 20:07

I’m quite surprised at this. My youngest started reception in 2004 in our village school, so 20 years ago. They would not accept any child in nappies, not even with SEN.

They said they didn’t have the resources. There was a girl at youngest playschool who was in nappies, but she didn’t start until Y1 when she was dry.

I think it’s fine to include those children if they will be properly cared for. But I suspect they might not be, which is so sad.

CaptainMyCaptain · 20/12/2024 20:08

MolkosTeenageAngst · 20/12/2024 18:36

As an EYFS teacher I don’t think this is reasonable at all. There will be lots of children with ALN/ SEN who don’t have a diagnosis or an IDP/ EHCP yet on starting school. In most cases if a child is not toilet trained by the time they start reception there will be some sort of additional/ medical need, even if it’s not known, or it will be a sign that they live in a dysfunctional or disadvantaged household where their needs haven’t been prioritised and parents have neglected to potty train them. This will only stand to make the experience of school, and the ability to attend school, more difficult for a set of already disadvantaged and vulnerable children.

It should also be added that in Wales children typically start school the term after they turn 3 and the article states this will apply to nursery aged children. Lots of typically developing children will not be fully reliably toilet trained on turning 3, again this is going to make school education less accessible for children who are at the later age to be toilet trained. It’s been shown that nursery attendance is beneficial for children but this will just widen the gap for those who aren’t reliably dry and don’t have parents who are willing or able to pick them up. For a child in an abusive or dysfunctional household who has an accident at school I can also imagine that there will be a negative attitude from parents having to go and pick them up and change them, maybe an increase in emotional or physical abuse towards the child and making the child feel shamed for something they cannot help. All this policy does is punish children.

I’m also not sure that this really reduces the need for staff, realistically if a child has had a soiling accident they would still need to be removed out of class, their parents would have to be called and somebody would have to wait with the child until the parents arrived. I don't see how this will be significantly easier for schools to manage than just having somebody take the 5 minutes needed to change the child in the first place. I teach many children with SEN who are not yet toilet trained and me and my TAs all know that changing a nappy as and when needed will be part of the job for that student, similarly some children aren’t reliably dry and cleaning up an accident and helping a child change clothes is expected. That’s EYFS! I’m surprised if there are early years teachers who don’t recognise that this is part of the job and would sooner see a child removed from class and from the learning environment in response to an accident.

Out of interest how long have you been an EYFS teacher? I started earlu 80s and it was rare for for a child to start nursery age 3 without being toilet trained barring the occasional accident. If they weren't toilet trained the place was deferred. By the time I retired in 2015 I had 3 in Reception who were in nappies.

What has changed?

caringcarer · 20/12/2024 20:10

oakleaffy · 20/12/2024 18:20

There should be special schools geared up for those unable to use the lavatory.
Why should teachers have to be personal carers ?( a very smelly job)

Years ago this wasn’t an issue.
Yes, the occasional wee in reception class, but poo was almost unheard of.

Toilet training seemed to be done much earlier on in a child’s life.

Maybe the comfier nappies make it easier to not be toilet trained?

That is exactly the issue. In a Terry nappy a DC felt wet and uncomfortable so they stopped wetting their nappy. Now in disposable nappies the DC don't feel wet or uncomfortable so carry on wetting their nappies. In the past most DC were dry and clean by 2 now many are 4 or 5 and still soiling nappies. In the past a child starting school in a nappy was unheard of now it seems almost common place. Put the kids back in Terry nappies for a few months at about 18-20 months and they would soon stop wetting the nappies and go on the potty or toilet with a toddler seat.

everychildmatters · 20/12/2024 20:10

@CaptainMyCaptain Respect for the teaching profession, mainly.

nothinghasactuallychanged · 20/12/2024 20:11

ChristmasinBrighton · 20/12/2024 20:07

I’m quite surprised at this. My youngest started reception in 2004 in our village school, so 20 years ago. They would not accept any child in nappies, not even with SEN.

They said they didn’t have the resources. There was a girl at youngest playschool who was in nappies, but she didn’t start until Y1 when she was dry.

I think it’s fine to include those children if they will be properly cared for. But I suspect they might not be, which is so sad.

I honestly don’t want to sound sarcastic but surprised the law has changed in twenty years?

Butterbean21 · 20/12/2024 20:12

I think that if you think of the practicalities, by the time the child is taken to reception and parent is called and by the time parent gets to school it's going to be at least 20 minutes said child is sitting soiled. I think that is pretty poor and dignity stripping.

In addition to this so many toileting issues are related to guilt and shame and a situation like this might cause a child to withhold stool holding it in the bowel longer making constipation worse and making the problem worse. Most advice around incontinence is to not discipline but to encourage independence around cleaning up. Most children age 5 could get their own trousers and pants off. Perhaps parent could be called to come in and meet them in the toilet at this stage rather than them sitting soiled.

I'm.thankful neither of mine have accidents but I know they are not rare in early years. I would rather be called in and help but I'm aware I have a lighter schedule than most.

Nothatgingerpirate · 20/12/2024 20:13

Notmanyleftnow · 20/12/2024 17:30

I worked on a school 20 years ago where this was the policy.

Yes.
Ought to be brought back.
Didn't know these people's job actually includes changing the children, didn't realise there are still children in nappies...wow.
Fortunately I never wanted to start a family, so what's the reason for this?
🤔

TTCJJB · 20/12/2024 20:13

YANBU, teachers are professionals and their time shouldn't be taken away from the other children in the group to change nappies. (Obviously this doesn't apply to children with additional needs).

I recently read that 20% of kids are starting school in nappies, it's sheer laziness from parents who think that it's a nurseries or schools job to teach their child absolutely everything.

KnittedCardi · 20/12/2024 20:14

The French schooling system is specifically aligned with toilet training. You can start Maternelle from 2 if trained, usually by 3, but if your kids aren't trained they can wait until 6.

Manxexile · 20/12/2024 20:14

x2boys · 20/12/2024 19:48

Err because the equality act makes it unlawful for schools to not allow children who are in nappies not to attend school ,so quite a lot I imagine.

I'm interested.

Where does it say that?

Equality Act 2010

Equality Act 2010

An Act to make provision to require Ministers of the Crown and others when making strategic decisions about the exercise of their functions to have regard to the desirability of reducing socio-economic inequalities; to reform and harmonise equality law...

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents

CaptainMyCaptain · 20/12/2024 20:15

pinkroses79 · 20/12/2024 18:46

I probably would not be able to leave work to do this.
When my eldest started school he was only allowed to stay until just before lunch time for at least a full term, possibly even longer, because he was a summer born baby and they literally weren't allowed to be at school all day. In theory, that would have meant some less mature children were only at school for 3 hours so less likely to have an accident.

That must have been a rule peculiar to your child's school. I used to have full time nursery children aged 3 or 4 in a school nursery class in the 80s.

x2boys · 20/12/2024 20:16

TheForestCalls · 20/12/2024 20:03

If incontinence comes for me, I'll be cleaning it up myself.

You might not have the capacity to understand you have been incontinent..

nothinghasactuallychanged · 20/12/2024 20:17

That’s a disgusting statement @TheForestCalls and should be deleted.

TheForestCalls · 20/12/2024 20:18

x2boys · 20/12/2024 20:16

You might not have the capacity to understand you have been incontinent..

Well, I would if it happened after childbirth or menopause. In much older age, maybe not, but that's still a while off and there will be workers in place who know that is part of the deal. Unlike teachers.

I had a child toilet trained at 2 (no credit to me, they did it themselves just like that). A few years later developed issues for medical reasons. So I know what it's like.

WhimsicalGubbins76 · 20/12/2024 20:19

Good!
Teachers absolutely should not be picking up the lazy parents slack.

If your child is NT with no physical disabilities, then there’s absolutely no reason why they would be in nappies during the day at school age!

Alltheyearround · 20/12/2024 20:24

x2boys · 20/12/2024 17:35

I think they will find according to the ERIC guidelines that leaving a child they know to be soiled and or wet can be considered to be neglect .

Was just about to say this. There is no obligation for parents to accept this. What if they are working and at a distance? Not everyone is twiddling their thumbs five minutes away from school.

While they are at school it is a school responsibility. ERIC have good guidance if anyone needs the right wording to reply/challenge, especially if you have a child with SEN or medical condition. Our son has continence issues, god we would have had to live at school to deal with every accident. The child can get a health care plan drawn up if needs be:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/supporting-pupils-at-school-with-medical-conditions--3

Supporting pupils with medical conditions at school

Statutory guidance about the support that pupils with medical conditions should receive at school.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/supporting-pupils-at-school-with-medical-conditions--3

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread