Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to not understand MNers against neurodiversity

484 replies

UkiUki · 12/12/2024 13:30

Inspired by another thread on here today but it’s an ongoing trend.

I’ve noticed that most, if not all of the time, when a poster suggests that a behaviour may be caused by ND, other posters jump on them and seem enraged that ‘everything is explained away with neurodiversity these days’.

There has been a lot of progress in understanding these conditions which has naturally contributed to an increase in people getting diagnosed. It is especially increasing in females as, per most medical issues, the parameters for diagnoses were created around male behaviour.

As someone currently in the latter part of the long and stressful diagnosis process, my motivation to suggest ND when I recognise certain traits in situations described is that my heart goes out to those who could flourish with a little extra understanding of how their brains work, especially children. I believe I would be a different person now if I’d had the support I needed growing up, instead of just believing I was lazy, clumsy and weird.

I feel a lot of irritation and sometimes outright anger from some posters, and the suggestion that people are using ND as an excuse somehow.

Aibu to not understand where this annoyance comes from?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
x2boys · 18/12/2024 14:37

IKEAJesus · 18/12/2024 14:31

Got it, so you only care about the rights of a very specific presentation and are happy for everyone else to be excluded,

That's not what the poster was saying she was saying the person whose disabilities mean the make loud involuntary noises Haa the right not to be excluded as it's discrimination

I have a severely autistic non verbal teen who makes loud involuntarily noises it's highly unlikely i would take him to event like this anyway but he does have the right to attend
As do you ,it's not a simple solution

QuickDenimDeer · 18/12/2024 14:38

A lot of people simply don’t believe neurodivergence is a thing. They should come to my house for a weekend…

Jellycatspyjamas · 18/12/2024 15:51

Also a designated quiet zone wouldn't necessarily stop someone who makes involuntary noise attending as again they can't help the noise as it's part of their disability so couldn't be excluded on those grounds.

But you wouldn’t seat someone who makes involuntary noise in the quiet zone, your seat the person who can’t cope with involuntary noise in the quiet zone.

Perzival · 18/12/2024 16:11

Jellycatspyjamas · 18/12/2024 15:51

Also a designated quiet zone wouldn't necessarily stop someone who makes involuntary noise attending as again they can't help the noise as it's part of their disability so couldn't be excluded on those grounds.

But you wouldn’t seat someone who makes involuntary noise in the quiet zone, your seat the person who can’t cope with involuntary noise in the quiet zone.

But not allowing them to sit there if they choose to or if their carer chooses to is direct discrimination because of their disability. You've made the decision that they can't access that area and must sit elsewhere because of their disability. They have the same rights to be there as anyone else. If they choose that is another question.

x2boys · 18/12/2024 16:19

Jellycatspyjamas · 18/12/2024 15:51

Also a designated quiet zone wouldn't necessarily stop someone who makes involuntary noise attending as again they can't help the noise as it's part of their disability so couldn't be excluded on those grounds.

But you wouldn’t seat someone who makes involuntary noise in the quiet zone, your seat the person who can’t cope with involuntary noise in the quiet zone.

You would seat them where best suits them aa I said it's highly unlikely i would take my son anyway ,but if I did although he's the noisiest person I know ironically he can't cope with other people,s involuntary noise 🤷‍♀️

ChristmasGrump5 · 18/12/2024 16:26

Vinvertebrate · 18/12/2024 13:10

Oh look another “autism whisperer” who seems unable to comprehend that their/their DC’s neurodivergence is not exactly the same as someone else’s.

My type of ND = a fabulous genetic quirk <preens>

Other people’s ND = likely the result of poor parenting, more effort required, no boundaries, etc.

Autistic presentation is variable. In some cases it presents as poor impulse control, disruptiveness, lashing out, etc - all indicators of needs not being met. All examples of “bad behaviour” too, but it is wrong to assume the autistic person is consciously not choosing the path of sanctimonious righteousness.

I think we need to update the “if you’ve met one autistic person…” phrase to “if you ARE one autistic person”. Being ND does not make you some kind of savant who speaks for everyone on the spectrum. Lots of these “badly behaved” kids are struggling, and need acceptance, adjustments and understanding as much as the “more deserving/less autistic” folk.

Alternatively, I’d give you an hour alone with my PDA DS, which you might find quite illuminating.

This, in spades!

Acrossthemountains · 18/12/2024 16:36

IKEAJesus · 18/12/2024 14:31

Got it, so you only care about the rights of a very specific presentation and are happy for everyone else to be excluded,

For your point to make any sense, it would have to be the case that the only noise you have a problem with is that which is made involuntarily by disabled people.

Id be embarrassed to admit that if it was me.

I struggle hugely with people's noises, involuntarily or otherwise. Id be less affected by an involuntary noise from a disabled person than i would be by someone's sweet packet rustling, or someone coughing or sniffing, because the disabled person can't help it. Shall i regard all other people who are making noises, eating, drinking, sniffing, laughing as preventing me from attending?

Perzival · 18/12/2024 16:37

I've been discussing it with a friend who deals with discrimation law and she said the venue would need to show that it meets a proportionate means to a legitimate aim but how they'd do this is another matter as many people with autism don't like noise but those same people may make noise or stim or use repetitive language so it would be hard for the venue to not allow access to those people and so venues would be unlikely to persue it as it would leave them open to claims of discrimination.

Also it is different to say relaxed performances or performances with sign language etc as these performances don't exclude but include.

I also wouldn't likely take my ds to a quiet area if there was one but I will always back his right to be treated the same as everyone else and if he wanted to sit there I'd support him in that. Like X2boys has said my ds also doesn't like noise but he is extremely good at making it at times.

ridl14 · 24/12/2024 10:09

Perzival · 18/12/2024 09:54

With this being an anonymous forum, I hope people reply freely to my next question and not angrily or with malice.

How do you feel about severe kids/ teens/adults who aren't violent but behave in unusual ways when out and about not in relaxed situations eg vocalising or making other noises, flapping, pacing, repeating scripts etc? Maybe in a restaurant, a shop etc

I wouldn't know how to feel other than neutral, they have every right to be there and I wish their companions / caregivers well

New posts on this thread. Refresh page