Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Reform and abortion

650 replies

Craftymam · 06/12/2024 10:41

Just a public service announcement as I missed this last week and find it quite shocking that coverage was so low.

Nigel Farage has said he wants to ‘open a new discussion’ on abortion rights.

Considering everything that’s gone on in America, the rise in popularity of reform and this alleged 100 Million donation from Elon musk; I felt I had to bring this to everyone’s attention.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
NotOneOfTheInCrowd · 07/12/2024 15:27

anothercupplease · 07/12/2024 14:56

The varying disabilities also include needing to wear glasses which is also included in that statistic. So we shouldn’t save the preemies because they may need glasses? Or may be deaf?

Yes there are some serious complications but they only account for around 24%

But I’d love to engage in a thread about children born with disabilities and if their lives are worth it - especially Down Syndrome children so if you want to start a separate thread about it I’ll happily join you over there

I think you’ll find the term is “children with Down’s syndrome”. HTH

ToWhitToWhoo · 07/12/2024 15:42

RingoJuice · 07/12/2024 06:43

And not because radical Islam has been responsible for 3000+ American deaths seen live on television?

Honestly after that we’d be justified not letting any Muslim migrants inside our borders at all.

Even Muslim migrants who are fleeing to escape radical Islamists? A high proportion of the victims of Muslim extremists are themselves Muslims,

ToWhitToWhoo · 07/12/2024 15:51

On American right-wing evangelicals, the extremely influential (now late) Reverend Jerry Falwell said after 9-11 on his television program “The 700 Club” that “I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People for the American Way—all of them who have tried to secularize America—I point the finger in their face and say, ‘You helped this happen.'” I.e. that God was punishing America for support of secularism, women's rights and gay rights by not protecting them from terrorism.

There is a significant proportion of religious right-wingers in America who hold these views. Fewer in the UK, but they exist.

Tangerinenets · 07/12/2024 15:53

Gogogo12345 · 07/12/2024 12:44

This comes with it's own problems though. Hospitals intervention even when it's not wanted.its that that stopped my DD having any chance of seeing her baby alive. Instead she had to have babys heart stopped before the Induction

I’m sorry for your loss. I’m not sure I’d want them to intervene so early either . I’d be really worried about long term health problems and learning disabilities.

SunQueen24 · 07/12/2024 15:59

Freddie999 · 07/12/2024 13:05

My post was in reply to someone suggesting that late abortion is painful and therefore to be avoided at all cost regardless of the wishes of the mother and her bodily autonomy, and NICU care somehow is not. Both things can be true and both routes, late abortion or no expenses spared treatment of extreme premies can both be right, dependent on the mother and her circumstances. But advances in one field (NICU) should never be at the expense of women and their bodily autonomy.

Extreme premies are not my area of specialism, but that doesn't mean we didn't try for a really long time, and as such I am entitled to the feelings and fears I experienced at the time. I've resuscitated much older kids and young adults with poor neurological outcomes, and I can assure you the guilt I feel for "saving" those lives is real, and something I will not apologise for or resign from my profession over.

I have a family member who has experienced similar - in that they’ve resuscitated someone they later felt should have been allowed to pass owing to the brain damage and quality of life, plus the impact on the family in now having to care for them and the prospect of their future. I know the issues is you don’t really know what the longterm prognosis is until it’s too late and when you’re dealing with someone in resus you haven’t got time to balance up the pros and cons.

You’ve got to be very naive not to realise sometimes death is kinder than life.

30percent · 07/12/2024 16:02

HardenYourHeart · 06/12/2024 12:23

You think a woman should be able to terminate a healthy pregnancy at term?

Yes.

There are almost no jurisdictions in the world where that is legal.

So what? That's piss poor argument for any discussion

That's wild though. Full-time as in 40 weeks? How's it any different from killing a new born?

Julia34 · 07/12/2024 16:05

KeyWorker · 07/12/2024 06:39

This is so incredibly naive I don’t know where to start.

What is naive? If someone teen daughter wake up, goes school and back home from school and stay home she got 0% chance to get pregnant as I not think she will had sex at school. But I see on my own eyes kids young as 8 and 10 roaming outside without parents and lots teenagers even in the evening hours so no suprise there are unwanted teen pregnancies

pointythings · 07/12/2024 16:11

Julia34 · 07/12/2024 16:05

What is naive? If someone teen daughter wake up, goes school and back home from school and stay home she got 0% chance to get pregnant as I not think she will had sex at school. But I see on my own eyes kids young as 8 and 10 roaming outside without parents and lots teenagers even in the evening hours so no suprise there are unwanted teen pregnancies

So your solution is to lock young people up until they're 18? I can't even...

Julia34 · 07/12/2024 16:15

pointythings · 07/12/2024 16:11

So your solution is to lock young people up until they're 18? I can't even...

Not lock and not until 18 but to let go outside very young kids alone is just stupid. My daughter is 11 and she not going out alone apart to school. To many tragedies occurs in UK I rather wait but longer to give her more freedom to roaming out in big city after school especially when in winter time is dark outside so fast

pointythings · 07/12/2024 16:18

Julia34 · 07/12/2024 16:15

Not lock and not until 18 but to let go outside very young kids alone is just stupid. My daughter is 11 and she not going out alone apart to school. To many tragedies occurs in UK I rather wait but longer to give her more freedom to roaming out in big city after school especially when in winter time is dark outside so fast

My kids were walking to school and back independently from age 9. They were allowed to spend time with friends and walk there and back. They were allowed to travel to our nearby time by bus and back from about 12 - 13. Amazingly they didn't get pregnant and nothing happened - because I educated them about sex, risk and everything else. Keeping your kids wrapped in cotton wool and ignorant doesn't equip them for adulthood.

I note you completely ignored the points I made earlier about the relationship between early and comprehensive sex education and low rates of unwanted pregnancy and abortion. I wonder why you don't want to accept facts.

FOJN · 07/12/2024 16:20

anothercupplease · 07/12/2024 14:56

The varying disabilities also include needing to wear glasses which is also included in that statistic. So we shouldn’t save the preemies because they may need glasses? Or may be deaf?

Yes there are some serious complications but they only account for around 24%

But I’d love to engage in a thread about children born with disabilities and if their lives are worth it - especially Down Syndrome children so if you want to start a separate thread about it I’ll happily join you over there

From the article:

In one study of 241 children born before 26 weeks' gestation the following was found (9):

22% had severe disability (e.g. cerebral palsy and not walking, low cognitive scores, blindness, profound deafness)
24% had moderate disability (e.g. cerebral palsy and walking, IQ/cognitive scores in the special needs range, lesser degree of visual or hearing impairment)
34% had mild disability (defined as low IQ/cognitive score, squint, requiring glasses)
20% had no problems

Note that these are figures for babies born before 26 weeks, we do not know how many of those were born before 24 weeks. If you are so familiar with prenatal ultrasounds then surely you know there is a huge difference between a 23 and 26 week foetus.

The value of the lives of children born with disabilities is not part of this conversation but you have emotively dragged them into it.

We are discussing the relationship between viability and abortion laws.

Julia34 · 07/12/2024 16:23

pointythings · 07/12/2024 16:18

My kids were walking to school and back independently from age 9. They were allowed to spend time with friends and walk there and back. They were allowed to travel to our nearby time by bus and back from about 12 - 13. Amazingly they didn't get pregnant and nothing happened - because I educated them about sex, risk and everything else. Keeping your kids wrapped in cotton wool and ignorant doesn't equip them for adulthood.

I note you completely ignored the points I made earlier about the relationship between early and comprehensive sex education and low rates of unwanted pregnancy and abortion. I wonder why you don't want to accept facts.

That good for you I don't know any child get pregnant young as 9, but the risk incrase with age. And every child is diffrent. To many tragedies in UK happen like stabbings, road accidents, kidnapping etc not only is about unwanted pregnancy. The fact your kids are safe is matter of luck

pointythings · 07/12/2024 16:31

The fact your kids are safe is matter of luck

Luck always plays a part. But it is also a matter of education, of managing risk, of gradually increasing independence - and that includes talking frankly about sex. Still not addressing the link between good sex education and low rates of unwanted pregnancy and abortion then?

Julia34 · 07/12/2024 16:39

pointythings · 07/12/2024 16:31

The fact your kids are safe is matter of luck

Luck always plays a part. But it is also a matter of education, of managing risk, of gradually increasing independence - and that includes talking frankly about sex. Still not addressing the link between good sex education and low rates of unwanted pregnancy and abortion then?

I understand but if there is a immediate danger the kids may panic and not think straigh to get help. I sure many kids who dies from stabbing etc was told how to behave outside yet when bad things happen unspected is hard for kids to think and act logic. I rather keep my daughter home for longer instead of rely on her logic while she can be on extreme danger

pointythings · 07/12/2024 16:43

Still not addressing the link between good sex education and low rates of unwanted pregnancy and abortion then?

Still no response? You parent your way by all means, but your opposition to goos sex education started young flies in the face of the evidence.

Julia34 · 07/12/2024 16:52

pointythings · 07/12/2024 16:43

Still not addressing the link between good sex education and low rates of unwanted pregnancy and abortion then?

Still no response? You parent your way by all means, but your opposition to goos sex education started young flies in the face of the evidence.

About sex education because this time girls as young as 8 can have period then ok teach them about ministrations,then teach about body development etc but NOT teach kids about sex until.they are 13 at least, because even if girls can have periods fast in age they are still kids and I can't imagine girls have sex at this young age,because this will be simply crime even if was with the girl constent . So apart from teaching on menstruation and body development I not see any sense to educate kids under the age of 13 about sex. When the kids reach age 13 then it can be slow introduced the education about sex like contraception etc. But I can't imagine young girls and boys age 10 learn about sex let them be kids.

BIossomtoes · 07/12/2024 16:54

If you wait until they’re 13 their mates will have told them all kinds of shit. It’s far too late.

Julia34 · 07/12/2024 16:56

BIossomtoes · 07/12/2024 16:54

If you wait until they’re 13 their mates will have told them all kinds of shit. It’s far too late.

I said if teen girls not roaming outside in dark after school and not have boyfriends when they are under 13 , this won't be happen

Freddie999 · 07/12/2024 17:05

Julia34 · 07/12/2024 16:56

I said if teen girls not roaming outside in dark after school and not have boyfriends when they are under 13 , this won't be happen

Is it just teen girls that you intend to lock up at home or teen boys as well? It takes two you know!

There are countries with this sort of restrictive sexist policy in place, one of those countries has just this week stopped the training of midwives (I bet even with your narrow world view you can work out which country).

I'd rather educate my daughter and balance the risk of predatory males against the benefit of her freedom to grow and become independent, than imprison her for her childhood and then suddenly have her walk out into a big scary world at 18.

pointythings · 07/12/2024 17:06

Julia34 · 07/12/2024 16:52

About sex education because this time girls as young as 8 can have period then ok teach them about ministrations,then teach about body development etc but NOT teach kids about sex until.they are 13 at least, because even if girls can have periods fast in age they are still kids and I can't imagine girls have sex at this young age,because this will be simply crime even if was with the girl constent . So apart from teaching on menstruation and body development I not see any sense to educate kids under the age of 13 about sex. When the kids reach age 13 then it can be slow introduced the education about sex like contraception etc. But I can't imagine young girls and boys age 10 learn about sex let them be kids.

Thank you - so you're happy to ignore all the evidence that says educating young people makes them less likely to have sex young, less likely to get pregnant young and less likely to have an abortion. You'd rather keep them ignorant and at higher risk of all of the above.

At age 10, they absolutely do need to know the essentials about how babies are made, because some of them will be physically able to have one if they don't have the knowledge and the power to say no.

BoydTheApe · 07/12/2024 17:09

Julia34 · 07/12/2024 16:56

I said if teen girls not roaming outside in dark after school and not have boyfriends when they are under 13 , this won't be happen

I really feel for your daughter. I've met women and girls who were locked and and kept from the outside world by their restrictive misogynistic parents and they end up completely unprepared for adulthood.

catndogslife · 07/12/2024 17:10

Dotjones · 06/12/2024 10:47

Well there probably should be a discussion on abortion, like how it should be easier to access and should be available at any point during pregnancy up to the birth. The laws we have at the moment are over fifty years old, they need updating. The 24 week limit is way too early and it shouldn't need the consent of two doctors, if the mother wants one that should be the end of the discussion.

As a mother of a premmie born at 27 weeks and therefore having witnessed babies in NICU at 24 weeks, I find the suggestion of more late abortions abhorrent.
There is a case to lower the limit to 22 weeks given that survival rates below 24 weeks have improved significantly in recent years.
I don't however think that anything else in the current UK system needs to be changed.

SerendipityJane · 07/12/2024 17:11

Thank you - so you're happy to ignore all the evidence that says educating young people makes them less likely to have sex young, less likely to get pregnant young and less likely to have an abortion. You'd rather keep them ignorant and at higher risk of all of the above.

I am sure there is evidence that shows the exact contrary.

Or there would be if "they" hadn't hidden it or censored it.

Julia34 · 07/12/2024 17:14

Freddie999 · 07/12/2024 17:05

Is it just teen girls that you intend to lock up at home or teen boys as well? It takes two you know!

There are countries with this sort of restrictive sexist policy in place, one of those countries has just this week stopped the training of midwives (I bet even with your narrow world view you can work out which country).

I'd rather educate my daughter and balance the risk of predatory males against the benefit of her freedom to grow and become independent, than imprison her for her childhood and then suddenly have her walk out into a big scary world at 18.

Yes is take two I know that and yes boys young should not roaming outside too they both kids girls and boys under age 13 especially... ok is your choice but my daughter who is 11 not feel imprisoned because she can't go out after school in dark roaming through city. She have contact with her friends at school and they are sometimes coming to house and she had contact with them every day. To you is look like prison but not for my daughter. She is 11 I not teach her about sex because I think is too early I want her childhood still be going on, but I do teach her about body development and menustration as she at age her body is changing.

anothercupplease · 07/12/2024 17:22

FOJN · 07/12/2024 16:20

From the article:

In one study of 241 children born before 26 weeks' gestation the following was found (9):

22% had severe disability (e.g. cerebral palsy and not walking, low cognitive scores, blindness, profound deafness)
24% had moderate disability (e.g. cerebral palsy and walking, IQ/cognitive scores in the special needs range, lesser degree of visual or hearing impairment)
34% had mild disability (defined as low IQ/cognitive score, squint, requiring glasses)
20% had no problems

Note that these are figures for babies born before 26 weeks, we do not know how many of those were born before 24 weeks. If you are so familiar with prenatal ultrasounds then surely you know there is a huge difference between a 23 and 26 week foetus.

The value of the lives of children born with disabilities is not part of this conversation but you have emotively dragged them into it.

We are discussing the relationship between viability and abortion laws.

Of course I do - but they are still able to fight for a chance of survival with advancements we have made.

You will also note from that link that it’s impossible to tell the outcome before an attempt has been made.

The value of the lives of children born with disabilities is not part of this conversation but you have emotively dragged them into it

if you’d bothered to read the thread you would see I was responding to a post where the poster implied it was it was better to let them pass away rather than help them.

We are discussing the relationship between viability and abortion laws

Actually it was about Farage saying he wanted to discuss late term abortions.

I think there is a discussion to be had in which it needs to be lowered - unless there are severe abnormalities or the mothers life is at risk