Is it just me

[Pippa246]

Or is this add a bit off? Thinking of contacting Tesco but maybe I’m bring OTT?

Yeah, little girls don't need to be sitting with their legs wide open like that, TBh it doesn't even help market the shorts because you have to zoom in to see they're shorts

Quite.

It's a combination of the the pose, facial expression, clothing style, and make up - If she was standing or sitting cross legged with a big goofy childlike grin it would be different.

Exactly this. There are people out there who will be misusing this picture.

Your instincts are correct. Of course it’s meant to be subtle to get across the line. Those who don’t think there’s anything wrong are naive

Disgusting that people would do this to make money

Better get off here and start prepping then eh?

Or you could just be rational.

is the top made from actual leopard fur?is the shorts vegan eco friendly sustainable? are "they"being feminised to adhere to societys "norms"..is it makae up or permanent tatoo style natural enhancements? is "they"on minimam wage?skipping school to pose?being exploited and smuggled in to studio for trafiking purposes?

Yes it's of
She's a child and they are trying to make her look sexy

YANBU, & it's not pearl clutching

The outfit is a bit adult and the kid seems to be wearing make-up, but I couldn't get worked up about it.

She looks like a child posing in Liz Hurley's clothes.
It's off.

I get what you mean. I'd prefer she was wearing black tights under the shirts. I don't have an issue with the outfit though, it's more the grown up outfit plus the pose.

No, that's not OK.

And I'd rather clutch my pearls until I'm blue in the face than be willfully ignorant.

Yep, that hasn't happened by accident. I think it's quite vile.

if you change the clothing to swimwear/underwear - is the pose still ok?

I'm always a bit bemused by this type of response. A quick search shows you've been posting on various threads covering weighty topics like church bells and towels in bins. So why are you tone policing this one?

image has been removed now off insta

Really?

Is no one allowed to be concerned about anything other than Putin potentially nuking the West? Seems a bit extreme.

Of all the pictures they could have used to advertise their kids clothing rage, it’s a bizarre choice. Looks like it was taken in a break between proper shots when the kid got tired/ bored and sat down on the floor.
Also, the lipstick gives it modern day Lolita vibes. So add the unusual pose, makeup and the fact that the clothes are smaller versions of adult women’s clothing (which is what seems to be in for that age range) and altogether yes, it’s off yes.

Of all the pictures they could have used to advertise their kids clothing rage, it’s a bizarre choice.

I agree. If she was dancing in this outfit with a group of other girls having fun it would be fine but she just looks vulnerable in that pose. I really don't like it.

U on glue, hun?

It's on their website - none of the other photos look like this

Oh, those two things are absolutely definitely related, aren’t they. We should definitely not do anything about anything while Putin is a threat. That makes absolute sense.

Oh, sorry, I just realised you were just trying to shame the OP right?

Oh, that old chestnut. 🙄

Yes, this. There’s a different demographic on here recently, though, I guess they’re probably buying this based on the ad.